Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1549
subdivisions; 326B.435, subdivision 2; 326B.438; 326B.46, subdivisions 1a, 1b, 2, 3; 326B.47, subdivisions 1, 3; 326B.49, subdivision 1; 326B.56, subdivision 1; 326B.58; 326B.82, subdivisions 2, 3, 7, 9; 326B.821, subdivisions 1, 5, 5a, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23; 326B.865; 326B.89, subdivisions 6, 8; 327.32, subdivisions 1a, 1b, 1e; 327.33, subdivisions 1, 2; 341.321; Laws 2009, chapter 78, article 1, section 18; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 326B; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 326B.82, subdivisions 4, 6; 326B.821, subdivision 3.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"ARTICLE 1
JOBS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND HOUSING APPROPRIATIONS
Section 1. JOBS,
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND HOUSING APPROPRIATIONS. |
The amounts shown in this section
summarize direct appropriations, by fund, made in this article.
|
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
$80,090,000
|
|
$77,758,000
|
|
$157,848,000
|
Workforce Development |
|
14,151,000
|
|
14,151,000
|
|
28,302,000
|
Remediation |
|
700,000
|
|
700,000
|
|
1,400,000
|
Workers' Compensation |
|
22,574,000
|
|
22,574,000
|
|
45,148,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$117,515,000 |
|
$115,183,000 |
|
$232,698,000 |
Sec. 2. JOBS,
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND HOUSING.
|
The sums shown in the columns marked
"Appropriations" are appropriated to the agencies and for the
purposes specified in this article. The appropriations
are from the general fund, or another named fund, and are available for the
fiscal years indicated for each purpose.
The figures "2012" and "2013" used in this article
mean that the appropriations listed under them are available for the fiscal
year ending June 30, 2012, or June 30, 2013, respectively. "The first year" is fiscal year
2012. "The second year" is
fiscal year 2013. "The
biennium" is fiscal years 2012 and 2013.
|
|
|
APPROPRIATIONS |
|
|
|
|
Available for the Year |
|
|
|
|
Ending June 30 |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
2013 |
Sec. 3. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT |
|
|
|
Subdivision 1. Total
Appropriation |
|
$53,044,000 |
|
$50,819,000 |
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
|
||
|
2012
|
2013
|
|
|
|
General |
38,850,000
|
36,625,000
|
Remediation |
700,000
|
700,000
|
Workforce Development |
13,494,000
|
13,494,000
|
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1550
The amounts that may be spent for each purpose are
specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Business and Community Development |
9,166,000 |
|
6,941,000 |
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
|
||
General |
8,186,000 |
5,961,000 |
Remediation |
700,000 |
700,000 |
Workforce Development |
280,000 |
280,000 |
(a) $700,000 the first year and $700,000 the second year
are from the remediation fund for contaminated site cleanup and development grants
under Minnesota Statutes, section 116J.554.
This appropriation is available until expended.
(b) $970,000 the first year and $970,000 the second year
are from the general fund for contaminated site cleanup and development grants
under Minnesota Statutes, section 116J.554.
(c) $1,086,000 the first year and $1,086,000 the second
year are from the general fund for the Minnesota Trade Office.
(d) $150,000 each year is from the general fund for a grant
to WomenVenture for women's business development programs and for programs that
encourage and assist women to enter nontraditional careers in the trades;
manual and technical occupations; science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics-related occupations; and green jobs. This appropriation may be matched dollar for
dollar with any resources available from the federal government for these
purposes with priority given to initiatives that have a goal of increasing by
at least ten percent the number of women in occupations where women currently
comprise less than 25 percent of the workforce.
(e) $75,000 each year is from the general fund and $40,000
each year is from the workforce development fund for a grant to the
Metropolitan Economic Development Association for continuing minority business development
programs in the metropolitan area. This
appropriation must be used for the sole purpose of providing free or reduced
fee business consulting services to minority entrepreneurs and contractors.
(f)(1) $425,000 the first year is a onetime appropriation
from the general fund for a grant to BioBusiness Alliance of Minnesota for
bioscience business development programs to promote and position the state as a
global leader in bioscience business activities. These funds may be used to create, recruit,
retain, and expand biobusiness activity in Minnesota; implement the destination
2025 statewide plan; update a statewide assessment of the bioscience industry
and the competitive position of Minnesota-
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1551
based bioscience businesses relative to other states and
other nations; and develop and implement business and scenario-planning models
to create, recruit, retain, and expand biobusiness activity in Minnesota.
(2) The BioBusiness Alliance must report each year by
February 15 to the committees of the house of representatives and the senate
having jurisdiction over bioscience industry activity in Minnesota on the use
of funds; the number of bioscience businesses and jobs created, recruited,
retained, or expanded in the state since the last reporting period; the
competitive position of the biobusiness industry; and utilization rates and
results of the business and scenario-planning models and outcomes resulting
from utilization of the business and scenario-planning models.
(g) $50,000 the first year is from the general fund for a
grant to the Minnesota Inventors Congress, of which at least $5,000 must be
used for youth inventors. This is a
onetime appropriation.
(h)(1) $90,000 each year is from the workforce development
fund for a grant under Minnesota Statutes, section 116J.421, to the Rural
Policy and Development Center at St. Peter, Minnesota. The grant shall be used for research and
policy analysis on emerging economic and social issues in rural Minnesota, to
serve as a policy resource center for rural Minnesota communities, to encourage
collaboration across higher education institutions, to provide
interdisciplinary team approaches to research and problem-solving in rural
communities, and to administer overall operations of the center.
(2) The grant shall be provided upon the condition that
each state-appropriated dollar be matched with a nonstate dollar. Acceptable matching funds are nonstate
contributions that the center has received and have not been used to match
previous state grants. Any funds not
spent the first year are available the second year.
(i)(1) $150,000 each year is appropriated from the
workforce development fund for grants of $50,000 to eligible organizations each
year to assist in the development of entrepreneurs and small businesses. Each state grant dollar must be matched with
$1 of nonstate funds. Any balance in the
first year does not cancel but is available in the second year.
(2) Three grants must be awarded to continue or to develop
a program. One grant must be awarded to
the Riverbend Center for Entrepreneurial Facilitation in Blue Earth County, and
two to other organizations serving Faribault and Martin Counties. Grant recipients must report to the
commissioner by February 1 of each year that the organization receives a grant
with the number of customers served; the number of businesses started,
stabilized, or expanded; the number of jobs created and retained; and business
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1552
success rates. The
commissioner must report to the house of representatives and senate committees
with jurisdiction over economic development finance on the effectiveness of
these programs for assisting in the development of entrepreneurs and small
businesses.
(j) $1,000,000 the first year is from the
general fund for the Minnesota Investment Fund under Minnesota Statutes,
section 116J.8731. The appropriation is
available until spent. This is a onetime
appropriation and is not added to the agency's base.
(k) $750,000 the first year is from the
general fund for the redevelopment account under Minnesota Statutes, section 116J.571.
This is a onetime appropriation and is available until spent.
Subd. 3. Workforce
Development |
|
43,020,000
|
|
43,020,000
|
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
|
||
General |
29,806,000
|
29,806,000
|
Workforce Development |
13,214,000
|
13,214,000
|
(a) $3,728,000 each year is from the
general fund for the Minnesota job skills partnership program under Minnesota
Statutes, sections 116L.01 to 116L.17.
If the appropriation for either year is insufficient, the appropriation
for the other year is available. This
appropriation is available until spent.
(b) $10,800,000 each year is from the
general fund for the state's vocational rehabilitation program under Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 268A.
(c) $5,928,000 each year is from the
general fund for the state services for the blind activities.
(d) $2,150,000 each year is from the
general fund for grants to centers for independent living under Minnesota
Statutes, section 268A.11.
(e) $315,000 each year is from the general
fund and $105,000 each year is from the workforce development fund for a grant
under Minnesota Statutes, section 116J.8747, to Twin Cities RISE! to provide training to hard-to-train
individuals. Funds unexpended in the
first year are available for expenditure in the second year.
(f) $100,000 each year is from the general
fund for a grant to Northern Connections in Perham to implement and operate a
workforce program that provides one-stop supportive services to individuals as
they transition into the workforce.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1553
(g) $5,091,000 each year is from the
general fund and $6,527,000 each year is from the workforce development fund for
extended employment services for persons with severe disabilities or related
conditions under Minnesota Statutes, section 268A.15. Of the general fund appropriation, $125,000
each year is to supplement funds paid for wage incentives for the community support
fund established in Minnesota Rules, part 3300.2045.
(h) $1,479,000 each year is from the
general fund for grants to programs that provide employment support services to
persons with mental illness under Minnesota Statutes, sections 268A.13 and 268A.14. Grants may be used for special projects for
young people with mental illness transitioning from school to work and people
with serious mental illness receiving services through a mental health court or
civil commitment court. Special projects
must demonstrate interagency collaboration.
(i) $135,000 each year is from the general
fund and $163,000 each year is from the workforce development fund for a grant
under Minnesota Statutes, section 268A.03, to Rise, Inc. for the Minnesota Employment Center for
People Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.
Money not expended the first year is available the second year.
(j) $80,000 each year is from the general
fund and $160,000 each year is from the workforce development fund for a grant
to Lifetrack Resources for its immigrant and refugee collaborative program,
including those related to job-seeking skills and workplace orientation,
intensive job development, functional work English, and on-site job
coaching. This appropriation may also be
used in Rochester.
(k) $1,100,000 each year is from the
workforce development fund for the Opportunities Industrialization Center
programs. The OIC state council must not
be colocated with the Department of Employment and Economic Development.
(l) $2,450,000 the first year is a onetime
appropriation from the workforce development fund for the Minnesota youth
program under Minnesota Statutes, sections 116L.56 and 116L.561.
(m) $630,000 the first year is a onetime
appropriation from the workforce development fund for grants for the
Minneapolis summer youth employment program.
The commissioner shall establish criteria for awarding the grant.
Of this appropriation, 25 percent is for a
grant to the Minneapolis learn-to-earn summer youth employment program.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1554
(n) $750,000 the first year is a onetime
appropriation from the workforce development fund for a grant to the Minnesota
Alliance of Boys and Girls Clubs to administer a statewide project of youth
jobs skills development. This project,
which may have career guidance components, including health and life skills, is
to encourage, train, and assist youth in job-seeking skills, workplace
orientation, and job-site knowledge through coaching. This grant requires a 25 percent match from
nonstate resources. The Alliance may
work collaboratively with the Minneapolis Park Board for summer youth
employment programming.
(o) $391,000 the first year is a onetime
appropriation from the workforce development fund for grants to fund summer
youth employment in St. Paul. The
commissioner shall establish criteria for awarding the grant.
(p) $700,000 the first year is a onetime
appropriation from the workforce development fund for the youthbuild program
under Minnesota Statutes, sections 116L.361 to 116L.366.
(q) $238,000 the first year is a onetime
appropriation from the workforce development fund for grants to provide interpreters
for a regional transition program that specializes in providing culturally
appropriate transition services leading to employment for deaf,
hard-of-hearing, and deafblind students.
(r) $5,159,000 the second year is from the
workforce development fund for the youth workforce development competitive
grant pilot program. The commissioner
shall develop and implement a competitive grant program to provide workforce
training services to youth in Minnesota.
Of this amount, up to five percent is for administering and monitoring
this program. The commissioner shall
report by October 15, 2011, to the standing committees of the senate and house
of representatives having jurisdiction over workforce development issues on
program parameters and criteria developed for the competitive grants under this
paragraph. This appropriation is added
to the agency's base.
Subd. 4. State-Funded
Administration |
|
858,000 |
|
858,000 |
Sec. 4. HOUSING
FINANCE AGENCY |
|
|
|
|
Subdivision
1. Total Appropriation |
|
$36,251,000 |
|
$36,251,000 |
The amounts that may be spent for each
purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
This appropriation is for transfer to the
housing development fund for the programs specified. Except as otherwise indicated, this transfer
is part of the agency's permanent budget base.
Journal
of the House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1555 Subd. 2. Challenge
Program |
|
7,059,000 |
|
7,059,000 |
For the economic development and housing challenge program
under Minnesota Statutes, section 462A.33.
Of this amount, $1,208,000 each year shall be made available during the
first eight months of the fiscal year exclusively for housing projects for
American Indians. Any funds not
committed to housing projects for American Indians in the first eight months of
the fiscal year shall be available for any eligible activity under Minnesota
Statutes, section 462A.33.
Subd. 3. Housing
Trust Fund |
|
8,305,000 |
|
8,305,000 |
For deposit in the housing trust fund account, for the
purposes provided under Minnesota Statutes, section 462A.201.
Subd. 4. Rental
Assistance for Mentally Ill |
|
2,638,000 |
|
2,638,000 |
For the rental housing assistance program for persons with
a mental illness or families with an adult member with a mental illness under
Minnesota Statutes, section 462A.2097.
Subd. 5. Family
Homeless Prevention |
|
7,465,000 |
|
7,465,000 |
For the family homeless prevention and assistance programs
under Minnesota Statutes, section 462A.204.
Subd. 6. Home
Ownership Assistance Fund |
|
797,000 |
|
797,000 |
For the home ownership assistance program under Minnesota Statutes,
section 462A.21, subdivision 8. The
annual interest rate on loans provided under Minnesota Statutes, section
462A.21, subdivision 8, must equal two percent.
Subd. 7. Affordable
Rental Investment Fund |
|
6,813,000 |
|
6,813,000 |
(a) For the affordable rental investment fund program under
Minnesota Statutes, section 462A.21, subdivision 8b. The appropriation is to finance the
acquisition, rehabilitation, and debt restructuring of federally assisted
rental property and for making equity take-out loans under Minnesota Statutes,
section 462A.05, subdivision 39.
(b) The owner of federally assisted rental property must
agree to participate in the applicable federally assisted housing program and
to extend any existing low-income affordability restrictions on the housing for
the maximum term permitted. The owner
must also enter into an agreement that gives local units of government, housing
and redevelopment authorities, and nonprofit housing organizations the right of
first refusal if the rental property is offered for sale. Priority must be given among comparable
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1556
federally assisted rental properties to properties with the
longest remaining term under an agreement for federal assistance. Priority must also be given among comparable
rental housing developments to developments that are or will be owned by local
government units, a housing and redevelopment authority, or a nonprofit housing
organization.
(c) The appropriation also may be used to
finance the acquisition, rehabilitation, and debt restructuring of existing
supportive housing properties. For
purposes of this subdivision, "supportive housing" means affordable
rental housing with links to services necessary for individuals, youth, and
families with children to maintain housing stability.
Subd. 8. Housing
Rehabilitation |
|
2,449,000
|
|
2,449,000
|
For the housing rehabilitation program
under Minnesota Statutes, section 462A.05, subdivision 14, for rental housing
developments.
Subd. 9. Homeownership Education, Counseling, and Training |
600,000
|
|
600,000
|
For the
homeownership education, counseling, and training program under Minnesota
Statutes, section 462A.209.
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 462A.209, subdivision 7,
paragraph (b), more than one-half of the funds awarded for foreclosure
prevention and assistance activities may be used for mortgage or financial
counseling services.
Subd. 10. Capacity-Building
Grants |
|
125,000
|
|
125,000
|
For nonprofit capacity-building grants
under Minnesota Statutes, section 462A.21, subdivision 3b.
Sec. 5. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY |
|
|
|
Subdivision 1. Total
Appropriation |
|
$22,328,000 |
|
$22,328,000 |
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
|
||
|
2012
|
2013
|
|
|
|
General |
800,000
|
800,000
|
Workers' Compensation |
20,871,000
|
20,871,000
|
Workforce Development |
657,000
|
657,000
|
The amounts that may be spent for each
purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Workers'
Compensation |
|
14,832,000
|
|
14,832,000
|
This appropriation is from the workers'
compensation fund.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1557
$200,000 each year is for grants to the Vinland Center for
rehabilitation services. Grants shall be
distributed as the department refers injured workers to the Vinland Center for
rehabilitation services.
Subd. 3. Labor
Standards and Apprenticeship |
|
1,457,000 |
|
1,457,000 |
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
|
||
General |
800,000 |
800,000 |
Workforce Development |
657,000 |
657,000 |
$657,000 each year is appropriated from the workforce development
fund for the apprenticeship program under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 178.
Subd. 4. General
Support |
|
6,039,000 |
|
6,039,000 |
This appropriation is from the workers' compensation fund.
Sec. 6. BUREAU
OF MEDIATION SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
Subdivision 1. Total
Appropriation |
|
$1,525,000 |
|
$1,525,000 |
The amounts that may be spent for each purpose are
specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Mediation
Services |
|
1,471,000 |
|
1,471,000 |
Subd. 3. Labor
Management Cooperation Grants |
|
54,000 |
|
54,000 |
$54,000 each year is for grants to area labor management
committees. Grants may be awarded for a
12-month period beginning July 1 each year.
Any unencumbered balance remaining at the end of the first year does not
cancel but is available for the second year.
Sec. 7. WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT OF APPEALS
|
$1,703,000 |
|
$1,703,000 |
This appropriation is from the workers' compensation fund.
Sec. 8. BOARD
OF ACCOUNTANCY |
|
$480,000 |
|
$480,000 |
Sec. 9. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING,
LAND SURVEYING, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GEOSCIENCE, AND INTERIOR DESIGN |
$774,000 |
|
$774,000 |
Sec. 10. BOARD OF COSMETOLOGIST EXAMINERS |
$1,046,000 |
|
$1,046,000 |
Sec. 11. BOARD
OF BARBER EXAMINERS |
|
$257,000 |
|
$257,000 |
Journal of the House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1558 Sec. 12. MINNESOTA
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AUTHORITY |
$107,000 |
|
$0 |
This is a onetime appropriation.
Sec. 13. TRANSFERS
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to June 30, 2012, the commissioner of
iron range resources shall transfer $60,000,000 from the Douglas J. Johnson
Economic Protection Trust to the general fund.
This is a onetime transfer.
The unexpended balance, estimated to be $1,575,000,
of funds collected for unemployment insurance state administration under
Minnesota Statutes, section 268.18, subdivision 2, is transferred to the
general fund.
ARTICLE 2
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116J.035, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7. Monitoring
pass-through grant recipients. The
commissioner shall monitor the activities and outcomes of programs and services
funded by legislative appropriations and administered by the department on a
pass-through basis. Unless amounts are
otherwise appropriated for administrative costs, the commissioner may retain up
to five percent of the amount appropriated to the department for grants to
pass-through entities. Amounts retained
are deposited to a special revenue account and are appropriated to the
commissioner for costs incurred in administering and monitoring the
pass-through grants.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116J.8737, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given.
(b) "Qualified small business" means a business that has been certified by the commissioner under subdivision 2.
(c) "Qualified investor" means an investor who has been certified by the commissioner under subdivision 3.
(d) "Qualified fund" means a pooled angel investment network fund that has been certified by the commissioner under subdivision 4.
(e) "Qualified investment" means a cash investment in a qualified small business of a minimum of:
(1) $10,000 in a calendar year by a qualified investor; or
(2) $30,000 in a calendar year by a qualified fund.
A qualified investment must be made in exchange for common stock, a partnership or membership interest, preferred stock, debt with mandatory conversion to equity, or an equivalent ownership interest as determined by the commissioner.
(f) "Family" means a family member within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code, section 267(c)(4).
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1559
(g) "Pass-through entity" means a corporation that for the applicable taxable year is treated as an S corporation or a general partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, trust, or limited liability company and which for the applicable taxable year is not taxed as a corporation under chapter 290.
(h) "Intern" means a student
of an accredited institution of higher education, or a former student who has
graduated in the past six months from an accredited institution of higher
education, who is employed by a qualified small business in a nonpermanent
position for a duration of nine months or less that provides training and
experience in the primary business activity of the business.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective retroactively from January 1, 2011.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116J.8737, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Certification of qualified small businesses. (a) Businesses may apply to the commissioner for certification as a qualified small business for a calendar year. The application must be in the form and be made under the procedures specified by the commissioner, accompanied by an application fee of $150. Application fees are deposited in the small business investment tax credit administration account in the special revenue fund. The application for certification for 2010 must be made available on the department's Web site by August 1, 2010. Applications for subsequent years' certification must be made available on the department's Web site by November 1 of the preceding year.
(b) Within 30 days of receiving an application for certification under this subdivision, the commissioner must either certify the business as satisfying the conditions required of a qualified small business, request additional information from the business, or reject the application for certification. If the commissioner requests additional information from the business, the commissioner must either certify the business or reject the application within 30 days of receiving the additional information. If the commissioner neither certifies the business nor rejects the application within 30 days of receiving the original application or within 30 days of receiving the additional information requested, whichever is later, then the application is deemed rejected, and the commissioner must refund the $150 application fee. A business that applies for certification and is rejected may reapply.
(c) To receive certification, a business must satisfy all of the following conditions:
(1) the business has its headquarters in Minnesota;
(2) at least 51 percent of the business's employees are employed in Minnesota, and 51 percent of the business's total payroll is paid or incurred in the state;
(3) the business is engaged in, or is committed to engage in, innovation in Minnesota in one of the following as its primary business activity:
(i) using proprietary technology to add value to a product, process, or service in a qualified high-technology field;
(ii) researching or developing a proprietary product, process, or service in a qualified high-technology field; or
(iii) researching, developing, or producing a new proprietary technology for use in the fields of agriculture, tourism, forestry, mining, manufacturing, or transportation;
(4) other than the activities specifically listed in clause (3), the business is not engaged in real estate development, insurance, banking, lending, lobbying, political consulting, information technology consulting, wholesale or retail trade, leisure, hospitality, transportation, construction, ethanol production from corn, or professional services provided by attorneys, accountants, business consultants, physicians, or health care consultants;
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1560
(5) the business has fewer than 25 employees;
(6) the business must pay its employees annual wages of at least 175 percent of the federal poverty guideline for the year for a family of four and must pay its interns annual wages of at least 175 percent of the federal minimum wage used for federally covered employers, except that this requirement must be reduced proportionately for employees and interns who work less than full-time, and does not apply to an executive, officer, or member of the board of the business, or to any employee who owns, controls, or holds power to vote more than 20 percent of the outstanding securities of the business;
(7) the business has not been in operation for more than ten years;
(8) the business has not previously received private equity
investments of more than $2,000,000 $4,000,000; and
(9) the business is not an entity disqualified under section 80A.50, paragraph (b), clause (3).
(d) In applying the limit under paragraph (c), clause (5), the employees in all members of the unitary business, as defined in section 290.17, subdivision 4, must be included.
(e) In order for a qualified investment in a business to be eligible for tax credits, the business must have applied for and received certification for the calendar year in which the investment was made prior to the date on which the qualified investment was made.
(f) The commissioner must maintain a list of businesses certified under this subdivision for the calendar year and make the list accessible to the public on the department's Web site.
(g) For purposes of this subdivision, the following terms have the meanings given:
(1) "qualified high-technology field" includes aerospace, agricultural processing, renewable energy, energy efficiency and conservation, environmental engineering, food technology, cellulosic ethanol, information technology, materials science technology, nanotechnology, telecommunications, biotechnology, medical device products, pharmaceuticals, diagnostics, biologicals, chemistry, veterinary science, and similar fields; and
(2) "proprietary technology" means the technical innovations that are unique and legally owned or licensed by a business and includes, without limitation, those innovations that are patented, patent pending, a subject of trade secrets, or copyrighted.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective
retroactively from January 1, 2011.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116J.8737, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Certification of qualified funds. (a) A pass-through entity may apply to the commissioner for certification as a qualified fund for a calendar year. The application must be in the form and be made under the procedures specified by the commissioner, accompanied by an application fee of $1,000. Application fees are deposited in the small business investment tax credit administration account in the special revenue fund. The application for certification for 2010 of qualified funds must be made available on the department's Web site by August 1, 2010. Applications for subsequent years' certification must be made available by November 1 of the preceding year.
(b) Within 30 days of receiving an application for certification under this subdivision, the commissioner must either certify the fund as satisfying the conditions required of a qualified fund, request additional information from the fund, or reject the application for certification. If the commissioner requests additional information from the
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1561
fund, the commissioner must either certify the fund or reject the application within 30 days of receiving the additional information. If the commissioner neither certifies the fund nor rejects the application within 30 days of receiving the original application or within 30 days of receiving the additional information requested, whichever is later, then the application is deemed rejected, and the commissioner must refund the $1,000 application fee. A fund that applies for certification and is rejected may reapply.
(c) To receive certification, a fund must:
(1) invest or intend to invest in qualified small businesses;
(2) be organized as a pass-through entity; and
(3) have at least three separate
investors, all of whom at least three whose investment is made in the
certified business and who seek a tax credit allocation satisfy the
conditions in subdivision 3, paragraph (c).
(d) Investments in the fund may consist of equity investments or notes that pay interest or other fixed amounts, or any combination of both.
(e) In order for a qualified investment in a qualified small business to be eligible for tax credits, a qualified fund that makes the investment must have applied for and received certification for the calendar year prior to making the qualified investment.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective retroactively from January 1, 2011.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116L.3625, is amended to read:
116L.3625
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.
The commissioner may use up to five
percent of the biennial appropriation for Youthbuild from the general fund
to pay costs incurred by the department in administering Youthbuild during the
biennium.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116L.62, is amended to read:
116L.62
DISTRIBUTION AND USE OF STATE MONEY.
The commissioner shall distribute the money appropriated for:
(a) comprehensive job training and related services or job opportunities programs for economically disadvantaged, unemployed, and underemployed individuals, including persons of limited English speaking ability, through opportunities industrialization centers; and
(b) the establishment and operation in Minnesota of these centers.
The commissioner may use up to five
percent of the appropriation for opportunities industrialization center programs
to pay costs incurred by the department in administering the programs.
Comprehensive job training and related services include: recruitment, counseling, remediation, motivational prejob training, vocational training, job development, job placement, and other appropriate services enabling individuals to secure and retain employment at their maximum capacity.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1562
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 154.06, is amended to read:
154.06 WHO MAY
RECEIVE CERTIFICATES OF REGISTRATION AS A REGISTERED APPRENTICE.
Subdivision 1. Qualifications; duration or registration. (a) A person is qualified to receive a certificate of registration as a registered apprentice:
(1) who has completed at least ten grades of an approved school;
(2) who has graduated from a barber school approved by the board; and
(3) who has passed an examination conducted by the board to determine fitness to practice as a registered apprentice.
(b) An applicant for a certificate of registration to practice as an apprentice who fails to pass the examination conducted by the board is required to complete a further course of study of at least 500 hours, of not more than eight hours in any one working day, in a barber school approved by the board.
(c) A certificate of registration of an apprentice shall be valid for four years from the date the certificate of registration is issued by the board and shall not be renewed. During the four-year period the certificate of registration shall remain in full force and effect only if the apprentice complies with all the provisions of sections 154.001, 154.002, 154.003, 154.01 to 154.161, 154.19 to 154.21, and 154.24 to 154.26, including the payment of an annual fee, and the rules of the board.
Subd. 2. Limited extension of registration. (a) If a registered apprentice, during the term in which the certificate of registration is in effect, enters full-time active duty in the armed forces of the United States of America, the expiration date of the certificate of registration shall be extended by a period of time equal to the period or periods of active duty.
(b) The expiration date of a certificate issued to a
person while incarcerated shall be extended once so that it expires four years
from the date of first release from a correctional facility after the person
becomes a registered apprentice. This
paragraph applies when a person graduates from a barber school approved by the
board and is issued a certificate of registration while incarcerated by the
Department of Corrections or the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 154.065, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Qualifications. A person is qualified to receive a certificate of registration as an instructor of barbering who:
(1) is a graduate from an approved high school, or its equivalent, as determined by examination by the Department of Education;
(2) has qualified for a teacher's or instructor's
vocational certificate; successfully completed instructor barber
training from a board-approved program of not less than 40 clock hours, or
completed a college or university program resulting in a technical or
vocational education certificate or its equivalent, issued by an accredited
college or university and approved by the board;
(3) is currently a registered barber in this state and has at least three years experience as a registered barber in this state, or its equivalent as determined by the board; and
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1563
(4) has passed an examination conducted by the board to determine fitness to instruct in barbering.
A certificate of registration under this section is
provisional until a teacher's or instructor's vocational certificate has been
issued by the Department of Education. A
provisional certificate of registration is valid for 30 days and is not
renewable.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 154.08, is amended to read:
154.08 APPLICATION;
FEE.
Each applicant for an examination shall:
(1) make application to the Board of Barber Examiners on blank forms prepared and furnished by it, the application to contain proof under the applicant's oath of the particular qualifications and identity of the applicant;
(2) furnish to the board two five-inch x three-inch
signed photographs of the applicant, one to accompany the application and one
to be returned to the applicant, to be presented to the board when the
applicant appears for examination; present a government-issued picture
identification as proof of identity when the applicant appears for examination;
and
(3) pay to the board the required fee.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 154.11, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Examination of nonresidents. A person who meets all of the
requirements for barber registration in sections 154.001, 154.002, 154.003,
154.01 to 154.161, 154.19 to 154.21, and 154.24 to 154.26 and either has a
license, certificate of registration, or an equivalent as a practicing barber
or instructor of barbering from another state or country which in the
discretion of the board has substantially the same requirements for registering
barbers and instructors of barbering as required by sections 154.001, 154.002,
154.003, 154.01 to 154.161, 154.19 to 154.21, and 154.24 to 154.26 or can prove
by sworn affidavits practice as a barber or instructor of barbering in another
state or country for at least five years immediately prior to making
application in this state, shall, upon payment of the required fee, be issued a
certificate of registration without examination, provided that the other
state or country grants the same privileges to holders of Minnesota
certificates of registration.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 154.12, is amended to read:
154.12 EXAMINATION
OF NONRESIDENT APPRENTICES.
A person who meets all of the requirements for registration
as a barber in sections 154.001, 154.002, 154.003, 154.01 to 154.161, 154.19 to
154.21, and 154.24 to 154.26 and who has a license, a certificate of
registration, or its equivalent as an apprentice in a state or country which in
the discretion of the board has substantially the same requirements for
registration as an apprentice as is provided by sections 154.001, 154.002,
154.003, 154.01 to 154.161, 154.19 to 154.21, and 154.24 to 154.26, shall, upon
payment of the required fee, be issued a certificate of registration without
examination, provided that the other state or country grants the same
privileges to holders of Minnesota certificates of registration.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 268.18, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Overpayment because of fraud. (a) Any applicant who receives unemployment benefits by knowingly misrepresenting, misstating, or failing to disclose any material fact, or who makes a false statement or representation without a good faith belief as to the correctness of the statement or representation, has committed
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1564
fraud. After the discovery of facts indicating fraud, the commissioner must make a determination that the applicant obtained unemployment benefits by fraud and that the applicant must promptly repay the unemployment benefits to the trust fund. In addition, the commissioner must assess a penalty equal to 40 percent of the amount fraudulently obtained. This penalty is in addition to penalties under section 268.182.
(b) Unless the applicant files an appeal within 20 calendar days after the sending of the determination of overpayment by fraud to the applicant by mail or electronic transmission, the determination is final. Proceedings on the appeal are conducted in accordance with section 268.105.
(c) If the applicant fails to repay the unemployment
benefits, penalty, and interest assessed, the total due may be collected by the
methods allowed under state and federal law.
A determination of overpayment by fraud must state the methods of
collection the commissioner may use to recover the overpayment. Money received in repayment of fraudulently
obtained unemployment benefits, penalties, and interest is first applied to the
unemployment benefits overpaid, then to the penalty amount due, then to any
interest due. 62.5 percent of the
Payments made toward the penalty are credited to the contingent account and
37.5 percent credited to the administration account.
(d) If an applicant has been overpaid unemployment benefits under the law of another state because of fraud and that state certifies that the applicant is liable to repay the unemployment benefits and requests the commissioner to recover the overpayment, the commissioner may offset from future unemployment benefits otherwise payable the amount of overpayment.
(e) Unemployment benefits paid for weeks more than four years before the date of a determination of overpayment by fraud issued under this subdivision are not considered overpaid unemployment benefits.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 268.18, subdivision 2b, is amended to read:
Subd. 2b. Interest. (a) On any unemployment benefits fraudulently obtained, and any penalty amounts assessed under subdivision 2, the commissioner must assess interest at the rate of 1-1/2 percent per month on any amount that remains unpaid beginning 30 calendar days after the date of the determination of overpayment by fraud. A determination of overpayment by fraud must state that interest will be assessed.
(b) If the determination did not state that interest will be assessed, interest is assessed beginning 30 calendar days after notification, by mail or electronic transmission, to the applicant that interest is now assessed.
(c) Interest payments under this section are credited to the administration
contingent account.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 268.199, is amended to read:
268.199 CONTINGENT
ACCOUNT.
(a) There is created in the state treasury a special account,
to be known as the contingent account, that does not lapse nor revert to any
other fund or account. This account
consists of all money collected under this chapter that is required to be
placed in this account and any interest earned on the account. All money in this account is appropriated
and available for administration of the Minnesota unemployment insurance
program unless otherwise appropriated by session law.
(b) All money in this account must be deposited, administered, and disbursed in the same manner and under the same conditions and requirements as is provided by law for the other special accounts in the state treasury.
(c) Beginning in fiscal year 2012 and each fiscal year
thereafter, all money in the account shall be transferred to the general fund
before the closing of the fiscal year.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1565
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 298.17, is amended to read:
298.17 OCCUPATION
TAXES TO BE APPORTIONED.
All occupation taxes paid by persons, copartnerships,
companies, joint stock companies, corporations, and associations, however or
for whatever purpose organized, engaged in the business of mining or producing
iron ore or other ores, when collected shall be apportioned and distributed in
accordance with the Constitution of the state of Minnesota, article X, section
3, in the manner following: 90 percent
shall be deposited in the state treasury and credited to the general fund of
which four-ninths shall be used for the support of elementary and secondary
schools; and ten percent of the proceeds of the tax imposed by this section
shall be deposited in the state treasury and credited to the general fund for
the general support of the university. Of
the moneys apportioned to the general fund by this section there is annually
appropriated and credited to the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board
account in the special revenue fund an amount equal to that which would have
been generated by a 1.5 cent tax imposed by section 298.24 on each taxable ton
produced in the preceding calendar year, to be expended for the purposes of
section 298.22. The money appropriated
pursuant to this section shall be used (1) to provide environmental development
grants to local governments located within any county in region 3 as defined in
governor's executive order number 60, issued on June 12, 1970, which does not
contain a municipality qualifying pursuant to section 273.134, paragraph (b),
or (2) to provide economic development loans or grants to businesses located
within any such county, provided that the county board or an advisory group
appointed by the county board to provide recommendations on economic
development shall make recommendations to the Iron Range Resources and
Rehabilitation Board regarding the loans.
Payment to the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board account
shall be made by May 15 annually.
Of the money allocated to Koochiching County, one-third
must be paid to the Koochiching County Economic Development Commission.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 341.321, is amended to read:
341.321 FEE
SCHEDULE.
(a) The fee schedule for professional licenses issued by the commission is as follows:
(1) referees, $25 $45 for each initial license
and each renewal;
(2) promoters, $400 for each initial license and each renewal;
(3) judges and knockdown judges, $25 $45 for
each initial license and each renewal;
(4) trainers, $25 $45 for each initial license
and each renewal;
(5) ring announcers, $25 $45 for each initial
license and each renewal;
(6) seconds, $25 $45 for each initial license
and each renewal;
(7) timekeepers, $25 $45 for each initial
license and each renewal;
(8) combatants, $25 $45 for each initial
license and each renewal;
(9) managers, $25 $45 for each initial license
and each renewal; and
(10) ringside physicians, $25 $45 for each initial
license and each renewal.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1566
In addition to the license fee and the late filing penalty
fee in section 341.32, subdivision 2, if applicable, an individual who applies
for a combatant professional license on the same day the
combative sporting event is held shall pay a late fee of $100 plus
the original license fee of $45 at the time the application is submitted.
(b) The fee schedule for amateur licenses issued by the commission is as follows:
(1) referees, $10 $45 for each
initial license and each renewal;
(2) promoters, $100 $400 for
each initial license and each renewal;
(3) judges and knockdown judges, $10 $45
for each initial license and each renewal;
(4) trainers, $10 $45 for each
initial license and each renewal;
(5) ring announcers, $10 $45
for each initial license and each renewal;
(6) seconds, $10 $45 for each
initial license and each renewal;
(7) timekeepers, $10 $45 for
each initial license and each renewal;
(8) combatant, $10 $25 for
each initial license and each renewal;
(9) managers, $10 $45 for each
initial license and each renewal; and
(10) ringside physicians, $10 $45
for each initial license and each renewal.
(c) The commission shall establish a contest
fee for each combative sport contest.
The professional combative sport contest fee is $1,500 per event
or not more than four percent of the gross ticket sales, whichever is
greater, as determined by the commission when the combative sport contest
is scheduled, except that the amateur combative sport contest fee shall be $150
$500 or not more than four percent of the gross ticket sales, whichever is
greater. The commission shall
consider the size and type of venue when establishing a contest fee. The commission may establish the maximum
number of complimentary tickets allowed for each event by rule. An A professional or amateur
combative sport contest fee is nonrefundable.
(d) All fees and penalties collected by the commission must be deposited in the commission account in the special revenue fund.
Sec. 17. Laws 2009, chapter 78, article 1, section 18, is amended to read:
Sec. 18. COMBATIVE
SPORTS COMMISSION |
|
$80,000 |
|
$80,000 |
This is a onetime appropriation. The Combative Sports Commission expires on
July 1, 2011, unless the commissioner of finance determines that the
commission's projected expenditures for the fiscal biennium ending June 30,
2013, will not exceed the commission's projected revenues for the fiscal
biennium ending June 30, 2013, from fees and penalties authorized in Minnesota
Statutes 2008, chapter 341.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1567
ARTICLE 3
LABOR AND INDUSTRY
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 181.723, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Application. To obtain an independent contractor exemption certificate, the individual must submit, in the manner prescribed by the commissioner, a complete application and the certificate fee required under subdivision 14.
(a) A complete application must include all of the following information:
(1) the individual's full name;
(2) the individual's residence address and telephone number;
(3) the individual's business name, address, and telephone number;
(4) the services for which the individual is seeking an independent contractor exemption certificate;
(5) the individual's Social Security number;
(6) the individual's or the individual's business federal employer identification number, if a number has been issued to the individual or the individual's business;
(7) any information or documentation that the commissioner requires by rule that will assist the department in determining whether to grant or deny the individual's application; and
(8) the individual's sworn statement that the individual meets all of the following conditions:
(i) maintains a separate business with the individual's own office, equipment, materials, and other facilities;
(ii) holds or has applied for a federal employer identification number or has filed business or self-employment income tax returns with the federal Internal Revenue Service if the person has performed services in the previous year for which the individual is seeking the independent contractor exemption certificate;
(iii) operates under contracts to perform specific services for specific amounts of money and under which the individual controls the means of performing the services;
(iv) incurs the main expenses related to the service that the individual performs under contract;
(v) is responsible for the satisfactory completion of services that the individual contracts to perform and is liable for a failure to complete the service;
(vi) receives compensation for service performed under a contract on a commission or per-job or competitive bid basis and not on any other basis;
(vii) may realize a profit or suffer a loss under contracts to perform service;
(viii) has continuing or recurring business liabilities or obligations; and
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1568
(ix) the success or failure of the individual's business depends on the relationship of business receipts to expenditures.
(b) Individuals who are applying for or renewing
a residential building contractor or residential remodeler license under
sections 326B.197, 326B.802, 326B.805, 326B.81, 326B.815, 326B.821 to 326B.86,
326B.87 to 326B.885, and 327B.041, and any rules promulgated pursuant thereto,
may simultaneously apply for or renew an independent contractor exemption
certificate. The commissioner shall
create an application form that allows for the simultaneous application for
both a residential building contractor or residential remodeler license and an
independent contractor exemption certificate.
If individuals simultaneously apply for or renew a residential building
contractor or residential remodeler license and an independent contractor
exemption certificate using the form created by the commissioner, individuals
shall only be required to provide, in addition to the information required by
section 326B.83 and rules promulgated pursuant thereto, the sworn statement
required by paragraph (a), clause (8), and any additional information required
by this subdivision that is not also required by section 326B.83 and any rules
promulgated thereto. When individuals
submit a simultaneous application on the form created by the commissioner for
both a residential building contractor or residential remodeler license and an
independent contractor exemption certificate, the application fee shall be
$150. An independent contractor
exemption certificate that is in effect before March 1, 2009, shall remain in
effect until March 1, 2013, unless revoked by the commissioner or canceled by
the individual.
(c) Within 30 days of receiving a complete application and the certificate fee, the commissioner must either grant or deny the application. The commissioner may deny an application for an independent contractor exemption certificate if the individual has not submitted a complete application and certificate fee or if the individual does not meet all of the conditions for holding the independent contractor exemption certificate. The commissioner may revoke an independent contractor exemption certificate if the commissioner determines that the individual no longer meets all of the conditions for holding the independent contractor exemption certificate, commits any of the actions set out in subdivision 7, or fails to cooperate with a department investigation into the continued validity of the individual's certificate. Once issued, an independent contractor exemption certificate remains in effect for four years unless:
(1) revoked by the commissioner; or
(2) canceled by the individual.
(d) If the department denies an individual's
original or renewal application for an independent contractor exemption
certificate or revokes an independent contractor exemption certificate, the
commissioner shall issue to the individual an order denying or revoking the
certificate. The commissioner may issue
an administrative penalty order to an individual or person who commits any of
the actions set out in subdivision 7. The
commissioner may file and enforce the unpaid portion of a penalty as a judgment
in district court without further notice or additional proceedings.
(e) An individual or person to whom the commissioner issues an order under paragraph (d) shall have 30 days after service of the order to request a hearing. The request for hearing must be in writing and must be served on or faxed to the commissioner at the address or facsimile number specified in the order by the 30th day after service of the order. If the individual does not request a hearing or if the individual's request for a hearing is not served on or faxed to the commissioner by the 30th day after service of the order, the order shall become a final order of the commissioner and will not be subject to review by any court or agency. The date on which a request for hearing is served by mail shall be the postmark date on the envelope in which the request for hearing is mailed. If the individual serves or faxes a timely request for hearing, the hearing shall be a contested case hearing and shall be held in accordance with chapter 14.
Journal of the House
- 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1569
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 182.6553, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Enforcement. This section shall be enforced by the
commissioner under section sections 182.66 and 182.661. A violation of this section is subject to the
penalties provided under section 182.666.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.04, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Deposits. Unless otherwise specifically designated
by law: (1) all money collected under sections
144.122, paragraph (f); 181.723; 326B.092 to 326B.096; 326B.101 to
326B.194; 326B.197; 326B.32 to 326B.399; 326B.43 to 326B.49; 326B.52 to
326B.59; 326B.802 to 326B.885; 326B.90 to 326B.998; 327.31 to 327.36; and
327B.01 to 327B.12, except penalties, is credited to the construction code
fund; (2) all fees collected under section 45.23 sections 326B.098 to
326B.099 in connection with continuing education for residential
contractors, residential remodelers, and residential roofers any
license, registration, or certificate issued pursuant to this chapter are
credited to the construction code fund; and (3) all penalties assessed under
the sections set forth in clauses (1) and (2) and all penalties assessed under
sections 144.99 to 144.993 in connection with any violation of sections 326B.43
to 326B.49 or 326B.52 to 326B.59 or the rules adopted under those sections are
credited to the assigned risk safety account established by section 79.253.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.091, is amended to read:
326B.091
DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1. Applicability. For purposes of sections 326B.091 to 326B.098
326B.099, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given
them.
Subd. 2. Applicant. "Applicant" means a person who
has submitted to the department an application for a an initial or
renewal license.
Subd. 3. License. "License" means any registration, certification, or other form of approval authorized by this chapter 326B and chapter 327B to be issued by the commissioner or department as a condition of doing business or conducting a trade, profession, or occupation in Minnesota. License includes specifically but not exclusively an authorization issued by the commissioner or department: to perform electrical work, plumbing or water conditioning work, high pressure piping work, or residential building work of a residential contractor, residential remodeler, or residential roofer; to install manufactured housing; to serve as a building official; or to operate a boiler or boat.
Subd. 4. Licensee. "Licensee" means the person named on the license as the person authorized to do business or conduct the trade, profession, or occupation in Minnesota.
Subd. 5. Notification date. "Notification date" means the date of the written notification from the department to an applicant that the applicant is qualified to take the examination required for licensure.
Subd. 5b. Qualifying
individual. "Qualifying
individual" means the individual responsible for obtaining continuing
education on behalf of a residential building contractor, residential
remodeler, or residential roofer licensed pursuant to sections 326B.801 to
326B.885.
Subd. 6. Renewal deadline. "Renewal deadline," when used with respect to a license, means 30 days before the date that the license expires.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1570
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.098, is amended to read:
326B.098 CONTINUING
EDUCATION.
Subdivision 1. Applicability Department seminars. This section applies to seminars offered by
the department for the purpose of allowing enabling licensees to
meet continuing education requirements for license renewal.
Subd. 2. Rescheduling. An individual who is registered with the department to attend a seminar may reschedule one time only, to attend the same seminar on a date within one year after the date of the seminar the individual was registered to attend.
Subd. 3. Fees nonrefundable. All seminar fees paid to the department are nonrefundable except for any overpayment of fees or if the department cancels the seminar.
Sec. 6. [326B.0981] CONTINUING EDUCATION;
NONDEPARTMENT SEMINARS.
This section applies to seminars that are offered by an
entity other than the department for the purpose of enabling licensees to meet
continuing education requirements for license renewal.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.13, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Effective date of rules. A rule to adopt or amend the State
Building Code is effective 180 days after the filing of the rule with the
secretary of state under section 14.16 or 14.26 publication of the
rule's notice of adoption in the State Register. The rule may provide for a later effective
date. The rule may provide for an
earlier effective date if the commissioner or board proposing the rule finds
that an earlier effective date is necessary to protect public health and safety
after considering, among other things, the need for time for training of
individuals to comply with and enforce the rule.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.148, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Computation. To defray the costs of administering sections 326B.101 to 326B.194, a surcharge is imposed on all permits issued by municipalities in connection with the construction of or addition or alteration to buildings and equipment or appurtenances after June 30, 1971. The commissioner may use any surplus in surcharge receipts to award grants for code research and development and education.
If the fee for the permit issued is fixed in amount the
surcharge is equivalent to one-half mill (.0005) of the fee or 50 cents, except
that effective July 1, 2010, until June 30, 2011 2013, the permit
surcharge is equivalent to one-half mill (.0005) of the fee or $5, whichever amount
is greater. For all other permits, the
surcharge is as follows:
(1) if the valuation of the structure, addition, or alteration is $1,000,000 or less, the surcharge is equivalent to one-half mill (.0005) of the valuation of the structure, addition, or alteration;
(2) if the valuation is greater than $1,000,000, the surcharge is $500 plus two-fifths mill (.0004) of the value between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000;
(3) if the valuation is greater than $2,000,000, the surcharge is $900 plus three-tenths mill (.0003) of the value between $2,000,000 and $3,000,000;
(4) if the valuation is greater than $3,000,000, the surcharge is $1,200 plus one-fifth mill (.0002) of the value between $3,000,000 and $4,000,000;
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1571
(5) if the valuation is greater than $4,000,000, the surcharge is $1,400 plus one-tenth mill (.0001) of the value between $4,000,000 and $5,000,000; and
(6) if the valuation exceeds $5,000,000, the surcharge is $1,500 plus one-twentieth mill (.00005) of the value that exceeds $5,000,000.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.42, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1b. Backflow
prevention rebuilder. A
"backflow prevention rebuilder" is an individual who is qualified by
training prescribed by the Plumbing Board and possesses a master or journeyman
plumber's license to engage in the testing, maintenance, and rebuilding of
reduced pressure zone type backflow prevention assemblies as regulated by the
plumbing code.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.42, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1c. Backflow prevention tester. A "backflow prevention tester" is an individual who is qualified by training prescribed by the Plumbing Board to engage in the testing of reduced pressure zone type backflow prevention assemblies as regulated by the plumbing code.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.42, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Plumbing
contractor. "Plumbing
contractor" means a licensed contractor whose responsible licensed
plumber individual is a licensed master plumber.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.42, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Responsible
licensed plumber individual.
A contractor's "responsible licensed plumber individual"
means the licensed master plumber or licensed restricted master plumber designated
in writing by the contractor in the contractor's license application, or in
another manner acceptable to the commissioner, as the individual responsible
for the contractor's compliance with sections 326B.41 to 326B.49, all rules
adopted under these sections and sections 326B.50 to 326B.59, and all orders
issued under section 326B.082.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.42, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Restricted
plumbing contractor. "Restricted
plumbing contractor" means a licensed contractor whose responsible licensed
plumber individual is a licensed restricted master plumber.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.435, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Powers; duties; administrative support. (a) The board shall have the power to:
(1) elect its chair, vice-chair, and secretary;
(2) adopt bylaws that specify the duties of its officers, the meeting dates of the board, and containing such other provisions as may be useful and necessary for the efficient conduct of the business of the board;
(3) adopt the plumbing code that must be followed in this state and any plumbing code amendments thereto. The plumbing code shall include the minimum standards described in sections 326B.43, subdivision 1, and 326B.52, subdivision 1. The board shall adopt the plumbing code and any amendments thereto pursuant to chapter 14 and as provided in subdivision 6, paragraphs (b), (c), and (d);
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1572
(4) review requests for final interpretations and issue final interpretations as provided in section 326B.127, subdivision 5;
(5) adopt rules that regulate the licensure, certification, or registration of plumbing contractors, journeymen, unlicensed individuals, master plumbers, restricted master plumbers, restricted journeymen, restricted plumbing contractors, backflow prevention rebuilders and testers, water conditioning contractors, and water conditioning installers, and other persons engaged in the design, installation, and alteration of plumbing systems or engaged in or working at the business of water conditioning installation or service, or engaged in or working at the business of medical gas system installation, maintenance, or repair, except for those individuals licensed under section 326.02, subdivisions 2 and 3. The board shall adopt these rules pursuant to chapter 14 and as provided in subdivision 6, paragraphs (e) and (f);
(6) adopt rules that regulate continuing education for individuals licensed as master plumbers, journeyman plumbers, restricted master plumbers, restricted journeyman plumbers, water conditioning contractors, and water conditioning installers, and for individuals certified under sections 326B.437 and 326B.438. The board shall adopt these rules pursuant to chapter 14 and as provided in subdivision 6, paragraphs (e) and (f);
(7) refer complaints or other communications to the commissioner, whether oral or written, as provided in subdivision 8, that allege or imply a violation of a statute, rule, or order that the commissioner has the authority to enforce pertaining to code compliance, licensure, or an offering to perform or performance of unlicensed plumbing services;
(8) approve per diem and expenses deemed necessary for its members as provided in subdivision 3;
(9) approve license reciprocity agreements;
(10) select from its members individuals to serve on any other state advisory council, board, or committee; and
(11) recommend the fees for licenses, registrations, and certifications.
Except for the powers granted to the Plumbing Board, the Board of Electricity, and the Board of High Pressure Piping Systems, the commissioner of labor and industry shall administer and enforce the provisions of this chapter and any rules promulgated pursuant thereto.
(b) The board shall comply with section 15.0597, subdivisions 2 and 4.
(c) The commissioner shall coordinate the board's rulemaking and recommendations with the recommendations and rulemaking conducted by the other boards created pursuant to this chapter. The commissioner shall provide staff support to the board. The support includes professional, legal, technical, and clerical staff necessary to perform rulemaking and other duties assigned to the board. The commissioner of labor and industry shall supply necessary office space and supplies to assist the board in its duties.
Sec. 15. [326B.437]
REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTION REBUILDERS AND TESTERS.
(a) No person shall perform or offer to perform the installation, maintenance, repair, replacement, or rebuilding of reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assemblies unless the person obtains a plumbing contractor's license. An individual shall not engage in the testing, maintenance, repair, or rebuilding of reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assemblies, as regulated by the Plumbing Code, unless the individual is certified by the commissioner as a backflow prevention rebuilder.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1573
(b) An individual shall not engage in testing of a reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assembly, as regulated by the Plumbing Code, unless the individual possesses a backflow prevention rebuilder certificate or is certified by the commissioner as a backflow prevention tester.
(c) Certificates are issued for an initial period of two years and must be renewed every two years thereafter for as long as the certificate holder installs, maintains, repairs, rebuilds, or tests reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assemblies. For purposes of calculating fees under section 326B.092, an initial or renewed backflow prevention rebuilder or tester certificate shall be considered an entry level license.
(d) The Plumbing Board shall adopt expedited rules under section 14.389 that are related to the certification of backflow prevention rebuilders and backflow prevention testers. Section 326B.13, subdivision 8, does not apply to these rules. Notwithstanding the 18-month limitation under section 14.125, this authority expires on December 31, 2014.
(e) The department shall recognize
certification programs that are a minimum of 16 contact hours and include the
passage of an examination. The
examination must consist of a practical and a written component. This paragraph expires when the Plumbing
Board adopts rules under paragraph (d).
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.438, is amended to read:
326B.438
MEDICAL GAS SYSTEMS.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the terms defined in this subdivision have the meanings given them.
(b) "Medical gas" means medical gas as defined under the National Fire Protection Association NFPA 99C Standard on Gas and Vacuum Systems.
(c) "Medical gas system" means a level 1, 2, or 3 piped medical gas and vacuum system as defined under the National Fire Protection Association NFPA 99C Standard on Gas and Vacuum Systems.
Subd. 2. License
and certification required. A
No person shall perform or offer to perform the installation,
maintenance, or repair of medical gas systems unless the person obtains a
contractor's license. An individual
shall not engage in the installation, maintenance, or repair of a medical gas
system unless the person individual possesses a current Minnesota
master or journeyman plumber's license and is certified by the commissioner
under rules adopted by the Minnesota Plumbing Board. The certification must be renewed annually
biennially for as long as the certificate holder engages in the
installation, maintenance, or repair of medical gas and vacuum
systems. If a medical gas and vacuum
system certificate is not renewed within 12 months after its expiration the
medical gas and vacuum certificate is permanently forfeited.
Subd. 3. Exemptions. (a) A person An individual
who on August 1, 2010, holds a valid certificate authorized by the American
Society of Sanitary Engineering (ASSE) in accordance with standards recommended
by the National Fire Protection Association under NFPA 99C is exempt from the
requirements of subdivision 2. This
exemption applies only if the person individual maintains a valid
certification authorized by the ASSE.
(b) A person An individual who
on August 1, 2010, possesses a current Minnesota master or journeyman plumber's
license and a valid certificate authorized by the ASSE in accordance with
standards recommended by the National Fire Protection Association under NFPA
99C is exempt from the requirements of subdivision 2 and may install, maintain,
and repair a medical gas system. This
exemption applies only if a person an individual maintains a
valid Minnesota master or journeyman plumber's license and valid certification
authorized by the ASSE.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1574
Subd. 4. Fees.
The fee for a medical gas certificate For the purpose
of calculating fees under section 326B.092, an initial or renewed medical gas
certificate issued by the commissioner according to subdivision 2 is $30
per year shall be considered a journeyman level license.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.46, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Exemptions from licensing. (a) An individual without a contractor license may do plumbing work on the individual's residence in accordance with subdivision 1, paragraph (a).
(b) An individual who is an employee working on the
maintenance and repair of plumbing equipment, apparatus, or facilities owned or
leased by the individual's employer and which is within the limits of property
owned or leased, and operated or maintained by the individual's employer, shall
not be required to maintain a contractor license as long as the employer has on
file with the commissioner a current certificate of responsible person. The certificate must be signed by the
responsible individual. The
responsible individual must be a master plumber or, in an area of the state
that is not a city or town with a population of more than 5,000 according to
the last federal census, a restricted master plumber,. The certificate must be signed by the
responsible individual and must state that the person signing the
certificate is responsible for ensuring that the maintenance and repair work
performed by the employer's employees comply complies with
sections 326B.41 to 326B.49, all rules adopted under those sections and
sections 326B.50 to 326B.59, and all orders issued under section 326B.082. The employer must pay a filing fee to file a
certificate of responsible person individual with the
commissioner. The certificate shall
expire two years from the date of filing.
In order to maintain a current certificate of responsible person individual,
the employer must resubmit a certificate of responsible person individual,
with a filing fee, no later than two years from the date of the previous
submittal. The filing of the certificate
of responsible person individual does not exempt any employee of
the employer from the requirements of this chapter regarding individual
licensing as a plumber or registration as a plumber's apprentice.
(c) If a contractor employs a licensed plumber, the licensed plumber does not need a separate contractor license to perform plumbing work on behalf of the employer within the scope of the licensed plumber's license.
(d) A person may perform and offer to perform building
sewer or water service installation without a contractor's license if the
person is in compliance with the bond and insurance requirements of subdivision
2.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.46, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Employment of master plumber or restricted
master plumber. (a) Each contractor
must designate a responsible licensed plumber, who shall be responsible for the
performance of all plumbing work in accordance with sections 326B.41 to
326B.49, all rules adopted under these sections and sections 326B.50 to
326B.59, and all orders issued under section 326B.082. A plumbing contractor's responsible licensed
plumber individual must be a master plumber. A restricted plumbing contractor's
responsible licensed plumber individual must be a master plumber
or a restricted master plumber. A
plumbing contractor license authorizes the contractor to offer to perform and,
through licensed and registered individuals, to perform plumbing work in all
areas of the state. A restricted
plumbing contractor license authorizes the contractor to offer to perform and,
through licensed and registered individuals, to perform plumbing work in all
areas of the state except in cities and towns with a population of more than
5,000 according to the last federal census.
(b) If the contractor is an individual or sole
proprietorship, the responsible licensed plumber individual must
be the individual, proprietor, or managing employee. If the contractor is a partnership, the
responsible licensed plumber individual must be a general partner
or managing employee. If the contractor
is a limited liability company, the responsible licensed plumber individual
must be a chief manager or managing employee.
If the contractor is a corporation, the responsible licensed plumber
individual must be an officer or managing employee. If the responsible licensed plumber individual
is a managing employee, the responsible licensed plumber individual
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1575
must be actively engaged in performing plumbing work on
behalf of the contractor, and cannot be employed in any capacity as a plumber
for any other contractor. An individual
may be the responsible licensed plumber individual for only one
contractor.
(c) All applications and renewals for contractor licenses shall include a verified statement that the applicant or licensee has complied with this subdivision.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.46, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Bond;
insurance. As a condition of
licensing, each contractor (a) The bond and insurance requirements of
paragraphs (b) and (c) apply to each person who performs or offers to perform plumbing
work within the state, including any person who offers to perform or performs
sewer or water service installation without a contractor's license. If the person performs or offers to perform
any plumbing work other than sewer or water service installation, then the
person must meet the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) as a condition of
holding a contractor's license.
(b) Each person who performs or offers to perform plumbing work within the state shall give and maintain bond to the state in the amount of at least $25,000 for (1) all plumbing work entered into within the state or (2) all plumbing work and subsurface sewage treatment work entered into within the state. If the bond is for both plumbing work and subsurface sewage treatment work, the bond must comply with the requirements of this section and section 115.56, subdivision 2, paragraph (e). The bond shall be for the benefit of persons injured or suffering financial loss by reason of failure to comply with the requirements of the State Plumbing Code and, if the bond is for both plumbing work and subsurface sewage treatment work, financial loss by reason of failure to comply with the requirements of sections 115.55 and 115.56. The bond shall be filed with the commissioner and shall be written by a corporate surety licensed to do business in the state.
In addition, as a condition of licensing,
each contractor (c) Each person who performs or offers to perform
plumbing work within the state shall have and maintain in effect public
liability insurance, including products liability insurance with limits of at
least $50,000 per person and $100,000 per occurrence and property damage
insurance with limits of at least $10,000.
The insurance shall be written by an insurer licensed to do business in
the state of Minnesota and.
Each licensed master plumber person who performs or offers to
perform plumbing work within the state shall maintain on file with the
commissioner a certificate evidencing the insurance. In the event of a policy cancellation, the
insurer shall send written notice to the commissioner at the same time that a
cancellation request is received from or a notice is sent to the insured.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.46, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Bond
and insurance exemption. If a master
plumber or restricted master plumber person who is in compliance
with the bond and insurance requirements of subdivision 2, employs a licensed
plumber, the or an individual who has completed pipe-laying training
as prescribed by the commissioner, that employee plumber shall not
be required to meet the bond and insurance requirements of subdivision 2. An individual who is an employee working on the
maintenance and repair of plumbing equipment, apparatus, or facilities owned or
leased by the individual's employer and which is within the limits of property
owned or leased, and operated or maintained by the individual's employer, shall
not be required to meet the bond and insurance requirements of subdivision 2.
Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.47, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Registration; supervision; records. (a) All unlicensed individuals, other than plumber's apprentices and individuals who have completed pipe-laying training as prescribed by the commissioner, must be registered under subdivision 3.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1576
(b) A plumber's apprentice or registered unlicensed individual is authorized to assist in the installation of plumbing only while under the direct supervision of a master, restricted master, journeyman, or restricted journeyman plumber. The master, restricted master, journeyman, or restricted journeyman plumber is responsible for ensuring that all plumbing work performed by the plumber's apprentice or registered unlicensed individual complies with the plumbing code. The supervising master, restricted master, journeyman, or restricted journeyman must be licensed and must be employed by the same employer as the plumber's apprentice or registered unlicensed individual. Licensed individuals shall not permit plumber's apprentices or registered unlicensed individuals to perform plumbing work except under the direct supervision of an individual actually licensed to perform such work. Plumber's apprentices and registered unlicensed individuals shall not supervise the performance of plumbing work or make assignments of plumbing work to unlicensed individuals.
(c) Contractors employing plumber's apprentices or registered unlicensed individuals to perform plumbing work shall maintain records establishing compliance with this subdivision that shall identify all plumber's apprentices and registered unlicensed individuals performing plumbing work, and shall permit the department to examine and copy all such records.
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.47, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Registration, rules, applications, renewals, and fees. An unlicensed individual may register by completing and submitting to the commissioner an application form provided by the commissioner, with all fees required by section 326B.092. A completed application form must state the date the individual began training, the individual's age, schooling, previous experience, and employer, and other information required by the commissioner. The Plumbing Board may prescribe rules, not inconsistent with this section, for the registration of unlicensed individuals. Applications for initial registration may be submitted at any time. Registration must be renewed annually and shall be for the period from July 1 of each year to June 30 of the following year.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.49, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Application, examination, and license fees. (a) Applications for master and journeyman plumber's licenses shall be made to the commissioner, with all fees required by section 326B.092. Unless the applicant is entitled to a renewal, the applicant shall be licensed by the commissioner only after passing a satisfactory examination developed and administered by the commissioner, based upon rules adopted by the Plumbing Board, showing fitness.
(b) All initial journeyman plumber's licenses shall be effective for more than one calendar year and shall expire on December 31 of the year after the year in which the application is made. All master plumber's licenses shall expire on December 31 of each even-numbered year after issuance or renewal. The commissioner shall in a manner determined by the commissioner, without the need for any rulemaking under chapter 14, phase in the renewal of master and journeyman plumber's licenses from one year to two years. By June 30, 2011, all renewed master and journeyman plumber's licenses shall be two-year licenses.
(c) Applications for contractor licenses shall be made to the commissioner, with all fees required by section 326B.092. All contractor licenses shall expire on December 31 of each odd-numbered year after issuance or renewal.
(d) For purposes of calculating license fees and renewal license fees required under section 326B.092:
(1) the following licenses shall be considered business licenses: plumbing contractor and restricted plumbing contractor;
(2) the following licenses shall be considered master licenses: master plumber and restricted master plumber;
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1577
(3) the following licenses shall be considered journeyman licenses: journeyman plumber and restricted journeyman plumber; and
(4) the registration of a plumber's apprentice under section 326B.47, subdivision 3, shall be considered an entry level license.
(e) For each filing of a certificate of
responsible person individual by an employer, the fee is $100.
(f) The commissioner shall charge each
person giving bond under section 326B.46, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), a
biennial bond filing fee of $100, unless the person is a licensed contractor.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.56, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Bonds. (a) As a condition of licensing, each
water conditioning contractor shall give and maintain a bond to the state as
described in paragraph (b). No applicant
for a water conditioning contractor or installer license who maintains
the bond under paragraph (b) shall be otherwise required to meet the bond
requirements of any political subdivision.
(b) Each bond given to the state under this subdivision shall be in the total sum of $3,000 conditioned upon the faithful and lawful performance of all water conditioning installation or servicing done within the state. The bond shall be for the benefit of persons suffering injuries or damages due to the work. The bond shall be filed with the commissioner and shall be written by a corporate surety licensed to do business in this state. The bond must remain in effect at all times while the application is pending and while the license is in effect.
Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.58, is amended to read:
326B.58
FEES; RENEWAL.
(a) Each initial water conditioning master and water conditioning journeyman license shall be effective for more than one calendar year and shall expire on December 31 of the year after the year in which the application is made.
(b) The commissioner shall in a manner
determined by the commissioner, without the need for any rulemaking under
chapter 14, phase in the renewal of water conditioning master and journeyman
licenses from one year to two years. By
June 30, 2011, all renewed water conditioning contractor and installer
licenses shall be two-year licenses. The
Plumbing Board may by rule prescribe for the expiration and renewal of
licenses.
(c) All water conditioning contractor licenses shall expire on December 31 of the year after issuance or renewal.
(d) For purposes of calculating license fees and renewal fees required under section 326B.092:
(1) a water conditioning journeyman license shall be considered a journeyman license;
(2) a water conditioning master license shall be considered a master license; and
(3) a water conditioning contractor license shall be considered a business license.
Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.82, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2.
Appropriate and related
knowledge. "Appropriate and
related knowledge" means facts, information, or principles that are
clearly relevant to the licensee in performing licensee's
responsibilities under a license issued by the commissioner. These facts, information, or principles must
convey substantive and procedural knowledge as it relates to postlicensing
issues and must be relevant to the technical aspects of a particular area of
continuing education regulated industry.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1578
Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.82, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Classroom hour. "Classroom hour" means a
50-minute hour 50 minutes of educational content.
Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.82, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Medical hardship. "Medical hardship" includes
means a documented physical disability or medical condition.
Sec. 29. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.82, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Regulated
industries industry. "Regulated
industries industry" means residential contracting,
residential remodeling, or residential roofing. Each of these is a regulated industry any
business, trade, profession, or occupation that requires a license issued under
this chapter or chapter 327B as a condition of doing business in Minnesota.
Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Purpose.
The purpose of this section is to establish standards for
residential building contractor continuing education. The standards must include requirements
for continuing education in the implementation of energy codes or energy
conservation measures applicable to residential buildings.
Sec. 31. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Content.
(a) Continuing education consists of approved courses that impart
appropriate and related knowledge in the residential construction industry
regulated industries pursuant to sections 326B.802 to 326B.885 this
chapter and other relevant applicable federal and state laws,
rules, and regulations. Courses may
include relevant materials that are included in licensing exams subject to the
limitations imposed in subdivision 11.
The burden of demonstrating that courses impart appropriate and related
knowledge is upon the person seeking approval or credit.
(b) Except as required for Internet continuing education,
course examinations will not be required for continuing education courses unless
they are required by the sponsor.
(c) Textbooks are not required to be used for continuing
education courses. If textbooks are
not used as part of the course, the sponsor must provide students with a
syllabus containing, at a minimum, the course title, the times and dates
of the course offering, the name, address, and telephone number of the
course sponsor and, the name and affiliation of the instructor,
and a detailed outline of the subject materials to be covered. Any written or printed material given to
students must be of readable quality and contain accurate and current
information.
(d) Upon completion of an approved course, licensees shall
earn one hour of continuing education credit for each classroom hour
approved by the commissioner. One
credit hour of continuing education is equivalent to 50 minutes of educational
content. Each continuing education
course must be attended in its entirety in order to receive credit for the
number of approved hours. Courses may be
approved for full or partial credit, and for more than one regulated industry.
(e) Continuing education credit in an approved course
shall be awarded to presenting instructors on the basis of one credit for each
hour of preparation for the duration of the initial presentation. Continuing education credit may not be
earned if the licensee has previously obtained credit for the same course as a
licensee or as an instructor within the three years immediately prior credits
for completion of an approved course may only be used once for renewal of a
specific license.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1579
(e) (f) Courses will be approved using the
following guidelines:
(1) course content must demonstrate significant
intellectual or practical content and deal with matters directly related to the
practice of residential construction in the regulated industry,
workforce safety, or the business of running a residential construction
company in the regulated industry.
Courses may also address the professional responsibility or ethical
obligations of residential contractors to homeowners and suppliers a
licensee related to work in the regulated industry;
(2) the following courses may be automatically
approved if they are specifically designed for the residential construction
regulated industry and are in compliance with paragraph (f) (g):
(i) courses approved by the Minnesota Board of Continuing Legal Education; or
(ii) courses approved by the International Code Council,
National Association of Home Building, or other nationally recognized
professional organization of the residential construction regulated
industry; and
(3) courses must be presented and attended in a suitable classroom or construction setting, except for Internet education courses which must meet the requirements of subdivision 5a. Courses presented via video recording, simultaneous broadcast, or teleconference may be approved provided the sponsor is available at all times during the presentation, except for Internet education courses which must meet the requirements of subdivision 5a.
(f) (g) The following courses will not be
approved for credit:
(1) courses designed solely to prepare students for a license examination;
(2) courses in mechanical office skills, including typing,
speed reading, or other machines or equipment.
Computer courses are allowed, if appropriate and related to the residential
construction regulated industry;
(3) courses in sales promotion, including meetings held in conjunction with the general business of the licensee;
(4) courses in motivation, salesmanship, psychology, or personal time management;
(5) courses that are primarily intended to impart knowledge of specific products of specific companies, if the use of the product or products relates to the sales promotion or marketing of one or more of the products discussed; or
(6) courses where any of the educational content of the
course is the State Building Code that include code provisions that have
not been adopted into the State Building Code unless the course materials
clarify whether or not that the code provisions have been
officially adopted into a future version of the State Building Code and the
effective date of enforcement, if applicable.
Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 5a, is amended to read:
Subd. 5a. Internet continuing education. (a) Minnesota state colleges and
universities that are accredited to provide Internet education by the Higher
Learning Commission are exempt from the requirements of this subdivision.
(b) The design and delivery of an Internet continuing education course must be approved by the International Distance Education Certification Center (IDECC) before the course is submitted for the commissioner's approval. The IDECC approval must accompany the course submitted.
(b) (c) An Internet continuing education
course must:
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1580
(1) specify the minimum computer system requirements;
(2) provide encryption that ensures that all personal information, including the student's name, address, and credit card number, cannot be read as it passes across the Internet;
(3) include technology to guarantee seat time;
(4) include a high level of interactivity;
(5) include graphics that reinforce the content;
(6)
include the ability for the student to contact an instructor or course sponsor
within a reasonable amount of time;
(7) include the ability for the student to get technical support within a reasonable amount of time;
(8) include a statement that the student's information will not be sold or distributed to any third party without prior written consent of the student. Taking the course does not constitute consent;
(9) be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, excluding minimal downtime for updating and administration, except that this provision does not apply to live courses taught by an actual instructor and delivered over the Internet;
(10) provide viewing access to the online course at all times to the commissioner, excluding minimal downtime for updating and administration;
(11) include a process to authenticate the student's identity;
(12) inform the student and the commissioner how long after its purchase a course will be accessible;
(13) inform the student that license education credit will not be awarded for taking the course after it loses its status as an approved course;
(14) provide clear instructions on how to navigate through the course;
(15) provide automatic bookmarking at any point in the course;
(16) provide questions after each unit or chapter that must be answered before the student can proceed to the next unit or chapter;
(17) include a reinforcement response when a quiz question is answered correctly;
(18) include a response when a quiz question is answered incorrectly;
(19) include a final examination in which the student must correctly answer 70 percent of the questions;
(20) allow the student to go back and review any unit at any time, except during the final examination;
(21) provide a course evaluation at the end of the course. At a minimum, the evaluation must ask the student to report any difficulties caused by the online education delivery method;
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1581
(22) provide a completion certificate when the course and exam have been completed and the provider has verified the completion. Electronic certificates are sufficient and shall include the name of the provider, date and location of the course, educational program identification that was provided by the department, hours of instruction or continuing education hours, and licensee's or attendee's name and license, certification, or registration number or the last four digits of the licensee's or attendee's Social Security number; and
(23) allow the commissioner the ability to electronically review the class to determine if credit can be approved.
(c) (d) The final
examination must be either an encrypted online examination or a paper
examination that is monitored by a proctor who certifies that the student took
the examination.
Sec. 33. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Course approval. (a) Courses must be approved by the commissioner in advance and will be approved on the basis of the applicant's compliance with the provisions of this section relating to continuing education in the regulated industries. The commissioner shall make the final determination as to the approval and assignment of credit hours for courses. Courses must be at least one hour in length.
Licensees requesting credit for continuing education courses that have not been previously approved by the commissioner shall, on a form prescribed by the commissioner, submit an application for approval of continuing education credit accompanied by a nonrefundable fee of $20 for each course to be reviewed. To be approved, courses must be in compliance with the provisions of this section governing the types of courses that will and will not be approved.
Approval will not be granted for time spent on meals or other unrelated activities. Breaks may not be accumulated in order to dismiss the class early. Classes shall not be offered by a provider to any one student for longer than eight hours in one day, excluding meal breaks.
(b) Application for course approval must be submitted on a form approved by the commissioner at least 30 days before the course offering.
(c) Approval must be granted for a subsequent offering of identical continuing education courses without requiring a new application if a notice of the subsequent offering is filed with the commissioner at least 30 days in advance of the date the course is to be held. The commissioner shall deny future offerings of courses if they are found not to be in compliance with the laws relating to course approval.
Sec. 34. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Courses
open to all. All course offerings
must be open to any interested individuals.
Access may be restricted by the sponsor based on class size only. Courses must shall not be
approved if attendance is restricted to any particular group of people, except
for company-sponsored courses allowed by applicable law.
Sec. 35. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Course
sponsor. (a) Each course of study
shall have at least one sponsor, approved by the commissioner, who is
responsible for supervising the program and ensuring compliance with all
relevant law. Sponsors may engage an
additional approved sponsor in order to assist the sponsor or to act as a
substitute for the sponsor in the event of an emergency or illness.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1582
(b) Sponsors must submit an application
and sworn statement stating they agree to abide by the requirements of this
section and any other applicable statute or rule pertaining to residential
construction continuing education in the regulated industry.
(c) A sponsor may also be an instructor.
(d) Failure to comply with requirements
paragraph (b) may result in loss of sponsor approval for up to two years
in accordance with section 326B.082.
Sec. 36. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Responsibilities. A sponsor is responsible for:
(1) ensuring compliance with all laws and rules relating to continuing educational offerings governed by the commissioner;
(2) ensuring that students are provided with
current and accurate information relating to the laws and rules governing their
licensed activity the regulated industry;
(3) supervising and evaluating courses and instructors. Supervision includes ensuring that all areas of the curriculum are addressed without redundancy and that continuity is present throughout the entire course;
(4) ensuring that instructors are qualified to teach the course offering;
(5) furnishing the commissioner, upon
request, with copies of course and instructor evaluations and. Evaluations must be completed by students at
the time the course is offered;
(6) furnishing the commissioner, upon
request, with copies of the qualifications of instructors. Evaluations must be completed by students at
the time the course is offered and by sponsors within five days after the
course offering;
(6) (7) investigating complaints
related to course offerings or instructors.
A copy of the written complaint must be sent to the commissioner within
ten days of receipt of the complaint and a copy of the complaint resolution
must be sent not more than ten days after resolution is reached;
(7) (8) maintaining accurate
records relating to course offerings, instructors, tests taken by students if
required, and student attendance for a period of three years from the date on
which the course was completed. These
records must be made available to the commissioner upon request. In the event the sponsor ceases operations
before termination of the sponsor application, the sponsor must provide to the
commissioner digital copies of all course and attendance records of courses
held for the previous three years;
(8) (9) attending workshops or
instructional programs as reasonably required by the commissioner;
(9) (10) providing course
completion certificates within ten days of, but not before, completion of the
entire course. A sponsor may require
payment of the course tuition as a condition of receiving the course completion
certificate. Course completion
certificates must be completed in their entirety. Course completion certificates must and
shall contain the following:
(i) the statement: "If you have any comments about this
course offering, please mail them to the Minnesota Department of Labor and
Industry.";
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1583
(ii) the current address of the
department must be included. A
sponsor may require payment of the course tuition as a condition for
receiving the course completion certificate, name of the provider, date
and location of the course, educational program identification provided by the
department, and hours of instruction or continuing education hours; and
(iii) the licensee's or attendee's name and license, certificate, or registration number or the last four digits of the licensee's or attendee's Social Security number; and
(10) (11) notifying the
commissioner in writing within ten days of any change in the information in an
application for approval on file with the commissioner.
Sec. 37. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Instructors. (a) Each continuing education course shall have an instructor who is qualified by education, training, or experience to ensure competent instruction. Failure to have only qualified instructors teach at an approved course offering will result in loss of course approval. Sponsors are responsible to ensure that an instructor is qualified to teach the course offering.
(b) Qualified continuing education instructors must have one of the following qualifications:
(1) four years' practical experience in the subject area being taught;
(2) a college or graduate degree in the subject area being taught;
(3) direct experience in the development of
laws, rules, or regulations related to the residential construction regulated
industry; or
(4)
demonstrated expertise in the subject area being taught. Instructors providing instruction related
to electricity, plumbing, or high pressure piping systems must
comply with all applicable continuing education rules adopted by the Board of
Electricity, the Plumbing Board, or the Board of High Pressure Piping Systems.
(c) Approved Qualified continuing
education instructors are responsible for:
(1) compliance with all laws and rules relating to continuing education;
(2) providing students with current and accurate information;
(3) maintaining an atmosphere conducive to learning in the classroom;
(4) verifying attendance of students, and certifying course completion;
(5) providing assistance to students and responding to questions relating to course materials; and
(6) attending the workshops or instructional programs that are required by the commissioner.
Sec. 38. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. Prohibited practices for sponsors and instructors. (a) In connection with an approved continuing education course, sponsors and instructors shall not:
(1) recommend or, promote,
or disparage the specific services, products, processes,
procedures, or practices of a particular business person in the
regulated industry;
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1584
(2) encourage or recruit individuals students
to engage the services of, or become associated with, a particular business;
(3) use materials for the sole purpose of promoting a particular business;
(4) require students to participate in other programs or services offered by an instructor or sponsor;
(5) attempt, either directly or indirectly, to discover questions or answers on an examination for a license;
(6) disseminate to any other person specific questions, problems, or information known or believed to be included in licensing examinations;
(7) misrepresent any information submitted to the commissioner;
(8) fail to reasonably cover, or ensure coverage of, all points, issues, and concepts contained in the course outline approved by the commissioner during the approved instruction; or
(9) issue inaccurate course completion certificates.
(b) Sponsors shall notify the commissioner
within ten days of a felony or gross misdemeanor conviction or of disciplinary
action taken against an occupational or professional license held by the
sponsor or an instructor teaching an approved course. The notification conviction or
disciplinary action shall be grounds for the commissioner to withdraw the
approval of the sponsor and to disallow the use of the sponsor or instructor.
Sec. 39. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 12, is amended to read:
Subd. 12. Fees
Course tuition. Fees Tuition
for an approved course of study and related materials must be clearly
identified to students. In the event
that a course is canceled for any reason, all fees tuition must
be returned within 15 days from the date of cancellation. In the event that a course is postponed for
any reason, students shall be given the choice of attending the course at a
later date or having their fees tuition refunded in full within
15 days from the date of postponement.
If a student is unable to attend a course or cancels the registration in
a course, sponsor policies regarding refunds shall govern.
Sec. 40. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 15, is amended to read:
Subd. 15. Advertising courses. (a) Paragraphs (b) to (g) govern the advertising of continuing education courses.
(b) Advertising must be truthful and not deceptive or misleading. Courses may not be advertised as approved for continuing education credit unless approval has been granted in writing by the commissioner.
(c) Once a course is approved, all advertisement, pamphlet, circular, or other similar materials pertaining to an approved course circulated or distributed in this state, must prominently display the following statement:
"This course has been approved by the
Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for ....... (approved number of
hours) hours for residential contractor ....... (regulated industry)
continuing education."
(d) Advertising of approved courses must be clearly distinguishable from the advertisement of other nonapproved courses and services.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1585
(e) Continuing education courses may not be
advertised before approval unless the course is described in any advertising as
"approval pending." The
sponsor must verbally notify licensees students before
commencement of the course if the course has been denied credit, has not been
approved for credit, or has only been approved for partial credit by the
commissioner.
(f) The number of hours for which a course has been approved must be prominently displayed on an advertisement for the course. If the course offering is longer than the number of hours of credit to be given, it must be clear that credit is not earned for the entire course.
(g) The course approval number must not be included in any advertisement.
Sec. 41. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 16, is amended to read:
Subd. 16. Notice to students. At the beginning of each approved offering, the following notice must be handed out in printed form or must be read to students:
"This educational offering is recognized
by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry as satisfying ....... (insert number of hours approved) hours of
credit toward residential contractor (insert regulated industry)
continuing education requirements."
Sec. 42. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 18, is amended to read:
Subd. 18. Falsification
of reports or certificates. A
licensee, its qualified person qualifying individual, or an
applicant found to have falsified an education report or certificate to
the commissioner shall be considered to have violated the laws relating to the regulated
industry for which the person has a license and shall be subject to censure,
limitation, condition, suspension, or revocation of the license or denial of the
application for licensure the enforcement provisions of section 326B.082.
The commissioner reserves the right to audit a licensee's continuing education records.
Sec. 43. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 19, is amended to read:
Subd. 19. Waivers
and extensions. If a licensee
provides documentation to the commissioner that the licensee or its qualifying
person is unable, and will continue to be unable, to attend actual classroom course
work because of a physical disability, medical condition, or similar reason,
attendance at continuing education courses shall be waived for a period not to
exceed one year. The commissioner shall
require that the licensee or its qualifying person satisfactorily complete a
self-study program to include reading a sufficient number of textbooks, or
listening to a sufficient number of tapes, related to the residential
building contractor industry, as would be necessary for the licensee to satisfy
continuing educational credit hour needs.
The commissioner shall award the licensee credit hours for a self-study
program by determining how many credit hours would be granted to a classroom
course involving the same material and giving the licensee the same number of
credit hours under this section. The
licensee may apply each year for a new waiver upon the same terms and
conditions as were necessary to secure the original waiver, and must
demonstrate that in subsequent years, the licensee was unable to complete
actual classroom course work. The
commissioner may request documentation of the condition upon which the request
for waiver is based as is necessary to satisfy the commissioner of the
existence of the condition and that the condition does preclude attendance at
continuing education courses.
Upon written proof demonstrating a medical
hardship, the commissioner shall extend, for up to 90 days, the time period
during which the continuing education must be successfully completed. Loss of income from either attendance at
courses or cancellation of a license is not a bona fide financial hardship. Requests for extensions must be submitted to
the commissioner in writing no later than 60 days before the education is due
and must include an explanation with verification of the hardship, plus
verification of enrollment at an approved course of study on or before the
extension period expires.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1586
Sec. 44. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 20, is amended to read:
Subd. 20. Reporting
requirements. Required
Continuing education credits must be reported by the sponsor in a
manner prescribed by the commissioner.
Licensees are responsible for maintaining copies of course completion
certificates.
Sec. 45. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 22, is amended to read:
Subd. 22. Continuing
education approval. Continuing
education courses must be approved in advance by the commissioner of labor and
industry. "Sponsor" means
any person or entity offering approved education.
Sec. 46. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.821, subdivision 23, is amended to read:
Subd. 23. Continuing education fees. The following fees shall be paid to the commissioner:
(1) initial course approval, $20 for each
hour or fraction of one hour of continuing education course approval
sought. Initial course approval expires
on the last day of the 24th 36th month after the course is
approved;
(2) renewal of course approval, $20 per
course. Renewal of course approval expires
on the last day of the 24th month after the course is renewed;
(3) (2) initial sponsor
approval, $100. Initial sponsor approval
expires on the last day of the 24th month after the sponsor is approved; and
(4) (3) renewal of sponsor
approval, $20 $100.
Renewal of sponsor approval expires on the last day of the 24th month
after the sponsor is renewed.
Sec. 47. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.865, is amended to read:
326B.865
SIGN CONTRACTOR; BOND.
(a) A sign contractor may post a compliance bond with the commissioner, conditioned that the sign contractor shall faithfully perform duties and comply with laws, ordinances, rules, and contracts entered into for the installation of signs. The bond must be renewed biennially and maintained for so long as determined by the commissioner. The aggregate liability of the surety on the bond to any and all persons, regardless of the number of claims made against the bond, may not exceed the annual amount of the bond. The bond may be canceled as to future liability by the surety upon 30 days' written notice mailed to the commissioner by United States mail.
(b) The amount of the bond shall be $8,000. The bond may be drawn upon only by a local unit of government that requires sign contractors to post a compliance bond. The bond is in lieu of any compliance bond required by a local unit of government.
(c) For purposes of this section, "sign" means a device, structure, fixture, or placard using graphics, symbols, or written copy that is erected on the premises of an establishment including the name of the establishment or identifying the merchandise, services, activities, or entertainment available on the premises.
(d) Each person giving bond under this section shall pay a biennial bond filing fee of $100 to the commissioner of labor and industry.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2012.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1587
Sec. 48. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.89, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Verified application. To be eligible for compensation from the fund, an owner or lessee shall serve on the commissioner a verified application for compensation on a form approved by the commissioner. The application shall verify the following information:
(1) the specific grounds upon which the owner or lessee seeks to recover from the fund:
(2) that the owner or the lessee has obtained a final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction against a licensee licensed under section 326B.83;
(3) that the final judgment was obtained against the licensee on the grounds of fraudulent, deceptive, or dishonest practices, conversion of funds, or failure of performance that arose directly out of a contract directly between the licensee and the homeowner or lessee that was entered into prior to the cause of action and that occurred when the licensee was licensed and performing any of the special skills enumerated under section 326B.802, subdivision 15;
(4) the amount of the owner's or the lessee's actual and direct out-of-pocket loss on the owner's residential real estate, on residential real estate leased by the lessee, or on new residential real estate that has never been occupied or that was occupied by the licensee for less than one year prior to purchase by the owner;
(5) that the residential real estate is located in Minnesota;
(6) that the owner or the lessee is not the spouse of the licensee or the personal representative of the licensee;
(7) the amount of the final judgment, any amount paid in satisfaction of the final judgment, and the amount owing on the final judgment as of the date of the verified application;
(8) that the owner or lessee has diligently pursued remedies against all the judgment debtors and all other persons liable to the judgment debtor in the contract for which the owner or lessee seeks recovery from the fund; and
(9) that the verified application is being served within two years after the judgment became final.
The verified application must include documents evidencing the amount of the owner's or the lessee's actual and direct out-of-pocket loss. The owner's and the lessee's actual and direct out-of-pocket loss shall not include any attorney fees, litigation costs or fees, interest on the loss, and interest on the final judgment obtained as a result of the loss or any costs not directly related to the value difference between what was contracted for and what was provided. Any amount paid in satisfaction of the final judgment shall be applied to the owner's or lessee's actual and direct out-of-pocket loss. An owner or lessee may serve a verified application regardless of whether the final judgment has been discharged by a bankruptcy court. A judgment issued by a court is final if all proceedings on the judgment have either been pursued and concluded or been forgone, including all reviews and appeals. For purposes of this section, owners who are joint tenants or tenants in common are deemed to be a single owner. For purposes of this section, owners and lessees eligible for payment of compensation from the fund shall not include government agencies, political subdivisions, financial institutions, and any other entity that purchases, guarantees, or insures a loan secured by real estate.
Sec. 49. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.89, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Administrative hearing. If an owner or a lessee timely serves a request for hearing under subdivision 7, the commissioner shall request that an administrative law judge be assigned and that a hearing be conducted under the contested case provisions of chapter 14 within 45 days after the commissioner received the request for hearing, unless the parties agree to a later date. The commissioner must notify the owner or lessee of the time and place of
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1588
the hearing at least 15 days before the hearing. Upon petition of the commissioner, the administrative law judge shall continue the hearing up to 60 days and upon a showing of good cause may continue the hearing for such additional period as the administrative law judge deems appropriate.
At the hearing the owner or the lessee shall have the burden of proving by substantial evidence under subdivision 6, clauses (1) to (8). Whenever an applicant's judgment is by default, stipulation, or consent, or whenever the action against the licensee was defended by a trustee in bankruptcy, the applicant shall have the burden of proving the cause of action for fraudulent, deceptive, or dishonest practices, conversion of funds, or failure of performance. Otherwise, the judgment shall create a rebuttable presumption of the fraudulent, deceptive, or dishonest practices, conversion of funds, or failure of performance. This presumption affects the burden of producing evidence.
The administrative law judge shall issue findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and order. If the
administrative law judge finds that compensation should be paid to the owner or
the lessee, the administrative law judge shall order the commissioner to make
payment from the fund of the amount it finds to be payable pursuant to the
provisions of and in accordance with the limitations contained in this
section. The order of the administrative
law judge shall constitute the final decision of the agency in the contested
case. The commissioner or the owner
or lessee may seek judicial review of the administrative law judge's
findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order shall be in accordance
with sections 14.63 to 14.69.
Sec. 50. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 327.32, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Requirement; used manufactured homes. No person shall sell or offer for sale in this state any used manufactured home manufactured after June 14, 1976, or install for occupancy any used manufactured home manufactured after June 14, 1976, unless the used manufactured home complies with the Notice of Compliance Form as provided in this subdivision. If manufactured after June 14, 1976, the home must bear a label as required by the secretary. The Notice of Compliance Form shall be signed by the seller and purchaser indicating which party is responsible for either making or paying for any necessary corrections prior to the sale and transferring ownership of the manufactured home.
The Notice of Compliance Form shall be substantially in the following form:
"Notice of Compliance Form as required in Minnesota Statutes, section 327.32, subdivision 1
This notice must be completed and signed by the purchaser(s) and the seller(s) of the used manufactured home described in the purchase agreement and on the bottom of this notice before the parties transfer ownership of a used manufactured home constructed after June 14, 1976.
Electric
ranges and clothes dryers must have required four-conductor cords and
plugs. For the purpose of complying
with the requirements of section 327B.06, a licensed retailer or limited
retailer shall retain at least one copy of the form required under this
subdivision.
Complies .......... |
Correction required .......... |
Initialed by Responsible Party: Buyer .......... |
Seller .......... |
Solid fuel-burning fireplaces or stoves must be listed for use in manufactured homes, Code of Federal Regulations, title 24, section 3280.709 (g), and installed correctly in accordance with their listing or standards (i.e., chimney, doors, hearth, combustion, or intake, etc., Code of Federal Regulations, title 24, section 3280.709 (g)).
Complies .......... |
Correction required .......... |
Initialed by Responsible Party: Buyer .......... |
Seller .......... |
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1589
Gas water heaters and furnaces must be listed for manufactured home use, Code of Federal Regulations, title 24, section 3280.709 (a) and (d)(1) and (2), and installed correctly, in accordance with their listing or standards.
Complies .......... |
Correction required .......... |
Initialed by Responsible Party: Buyer .......... |
Seller .......... |
Smoke alarms are required to be installed and operational in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations, title 24, section 3280.208.
Complies .......... |
Correction required .......... |
Initialed by Responsible Party: Buyer .......... |
Seller .......... |
Carbon monoxide alarms or CO detectors that are approved and operational are required to be installed within ten feet of each room lawfully used for sleeping purposes.
Complies .......... |
Correction required .......... |
Initialed by Responsible Party: Buyer .......... |
Seller .......... |
Egress windows are required in every bedroom with at least one operable window with a net clear opening of 20 inches wide and 24 inches high, five square feet in area, with the bottom of windows opening no more than 36 inches above the floor. Locks, latches, operating handles, tabs, or other operational devices shall not be located more than 54 inches above the finished floor.
Complies .......... |
Correction required .......... |
Initialed by Responsible Party: Buyer .......... |
Seller .......... |
The
furnace compartment of the home is required to have interior finish with a
flame spread rating not exceeding 25 feet, as specified in the 1976 United
States Department of Housing and Urban Development Code governing manufactured
housing construction.
Complies .......... |
Correction required .......... |
Initialed by Responsible Party: Buyer .......... |
Seller .......... |
The water heater enclosure in this home is required to have interior finish with a flame spread rating not exceeding 25 feet, as specified in the 1976 United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Code governing manufactured housing construction.
Complies .......... |
Correction required .......... |
Initialed by Responsible Party: Buyer .......... |
Seller .......... |
The home complies with the snowload and heat zone requirements for the state of Minnesota as indicated by the data plate.
Complies .......... |
Correction required .......... |
Initialed by Responsible Party: Buyer .......... |
Seller .......... |
The parties to this agreement have initialed all required sections and agree by their signature to complete any necessary corrections prior to the sale or transfer of ownership of the home described below as listed in the purchase agreement. The state of Minnesota or a local building official has the authority to inspect the home in the manner described in Minnesota Statutes, section 327.33, prior to or after the sale to ensure compliance was properly executed as provided under the Manufactured Home Building Code.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 51. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 327.32, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Alternative
design plan. An alternative
frost-free design slab for a new or used manufactured home that is
submitted to the local building official, third-party inspector, or the
department, stamped by a licensed professional engineer or architect, and is
as being in compliance with either the federal installation standards in
effect at the date of manufacture, the manufacturer's installation manual,
or the Minnesota State Building Code, when applicable, shall be issued a permit
by the department within ten days of being received by the approving
authority.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 52. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 327.32, subdivision 1e, is amended to read:
Subd. 1e. Reinstallation
requirements for single-section used manufactured homes. (a) All single-section used
manufactured homes reinstalled less than 24 months from the date of
installation by the first purchaser must be reinstalled in compliance with
subdivision 1c. All single-section
used manufactured homes reinstalled more than 24 months from the date of
installation by the first purchaser may be reinstalled without a
frost-protected foundation if the home is reinstalled in compliance with
Minnesota Rules, chapter 1350, for above frost-line installations and the
notice requirement of subdivision 1f is complied with by the seller and the
purchaser of the single-section used manufactured home.
(b) The installer shall affix an
installation seal issued by the department to the outside of the home as
required by the Minnesota State Building Code.
The certificate of installation issued by the installer of record shall
clearly state that the home has been reinstalled with an above frost-line
foundation. Fees for inspection of a
reinstallation and for issuance of reinstallation seals shall follow the
requirements of sections 326B.802 to 326B.885.
Fees for review of plans, specifications, and on-site inspections shall
be those as specified in section 326B.153, subdivision 1, paragraph (c). Whenever an installation certificate for an
above frost-line installation is issued to a single-section used
manufactured home being listed for sale, the purchase agreement must disclose
that the home is installed on a nonfrost-protected foundation and recommend
that the purchaser have the home inspected to determine the effects of frost on
the home.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1591
Sec. 53. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 327.32, subdivision 1f, is amended to read:
Subd. 1f. Notice
requirement. The seller of the single-section
used manufactured home being reinstalled under subdivision 1e shall provide the
following notice to the purchaser and secure signatures of all parties to the
purchase agreement on or before signing a purchase agreement prior to
submitting an application for an installation certificate. Whenever a current owner of a manufactured
home reinstalls the manufactured home under subdivision 1e, the current owner
is not required to comply with the notice requirement under this
subdivision. The notice shall be in at
least 14-point font, except the heading, "WHICH MAY VOID WARRANTY,"
must be in capital letters, in 20-point font.
The notice must be printed on a separate sheet of paper in a color
different than the paper on which the purchase agreement is printed. The notice becomes a part of the purchase
agreement and shall be substantially in the following form:
"Notice
of Reinstalling of a Single-Section Used Manufactured Home Above
Frost-Line;
WHICH MAY VOID WARRANTY
It is recommended that the single-section used
manufactured home being reinstalled follow the instructions in the
manufacturer's installation manual. By
signing this notice, the purchaser(s) are acknowledging they have elected to
use footings placed above the local frost line in accordance with the Minnesota
State Building Code.
The seller has explained the differences between the manufacturer's installation instructions and the installation system selected by the purchaser(s) with respect to possible effects of frost on the manufactured home.
The purchaser(s) acknowledge by signing this notice that there is no manufacturer's original warranty remaining on the home and recognize that any other extended or ancillary warranty could be adversely affected if any applicable warranty stipulates that the home be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation manual to remain effective.
After the reinstallation of the manufactured home, it is highly recommended that the purchaser(s) have a licensed manufactured home installer recheck the home's installation for any releveling needs or anchoring system adjustments each freeze-thaw cycle.
The purchaser(s) of the used manufactured home described below that is being reinstalled acknowledge they have read this notice and have been advised to contact the manufacturer of the home and/or the Department of Labor and Industry if they desire additional information before signing this notice. It is the intent of this notice to inform the purchaser(s) that the purchaser(s) elected not to use a frost-protected foundation system for the reinstallation of the manufactured home as originally required by the home's installation manual.
Plain language notice.
I understand that because this home will be installed with footings placed above the local frost line, this home may be subject to adverse effects from frost heave that may damage this home. Purchaser(s) initials: .......
I understand that the installation of this home with footings placed above the local frost line could affect my ability to obtain a mortgage or mortgage insurance on this home. Purchaser(s) initials: .......
I understand that the installation of this home with footings placed above the local frost line could void my warranty on the home if any warranty is still in place on this home. Purchaser(s) initials: .......
Name of licensed installer and license number or homeowner responsible for the installation of the home as described above.
Installer name:......................................................................................................... |
License number:......................................................................................................" |
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 54. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 327.32, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Enforcement. All jurisdictions enforcing the State Building
Code, in accordance with sections 326B.101 to 326B.151, shall undertake or
provide for the administration and enforcement of the manufactured home
installation rules promulgated by the commissioner. Municipalities which have adopted the
State Building Code may provide installation inspection and plan review
services in noncode areas of the state.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 55. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 327.33, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Fees.
The commissioner shall by rule establish reasonable fees for seals,
installation seals and inspections which are sufficient to cover all costs
incurred in the administration of sections 327.31 to 327.35. The commissioner shall also establish by rule
a monitoring inspection fee in an amount that will comply with the secretary's
fee distribution program. This
monitoring inspection fee shall be an amount paid by the manufacturer for each
manufactured home produced in Minnesota.
The monitoring inspection fee shall be paid by the manufacturer to the
secretary. The rules of the fee distribution
program require the secretary to distribute the fees collected from all manufactured
home manufacturers among states approved and conditionally approved based on
the number of new manufactured homes whose first location after leaving the
manufacturer is on the premises of a distributor, dealer or purchaser in that
state. Fees for inspections in areas
that have not adopted the State Building Code must be equal to the fees for
inspections in code areas of the state.
Third party vendors may charge their usual and normal charge for
inspections.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 56. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 327C.095, subdivision 12, is amended to read:
Subd. 12. Payment to the Minnesota manufactured home relocation trust fund. (a) If a manufactured home owner is required to move due to the conversion of all or a portion of a manufactured home park to another use, the closure of a park, or cessation of use of the land as a manufactured home park, the manufactured park owner shall, upon the change in use, pay to the commissioner of management and budget for deposit in the Minnesota manufactured home relocation trust fund under section 462A.35, the lesser amount of the actual costs of moving or purchasing the manufactured home approved by the neutral third party and paid by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency under subdivision 13, paragraph (a) or (e), or $3,250 for each single section manufactured home, and $6,000 for each multisection manufactured home, for which a manufactured home owner has made application for payment of relocation costs under subdivision 13, paragraph (c). The manufactured home park owner shall make payments required under this section to the Minnesota manufactured home relocation trust fund within 60 days of receipt of invoice from the neutral third party.
Journal of the House
- 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1593
(b) A manufactured home park owner is not required to make the payment prescribed under paragraph (a), nor is a manufactured home owner entitled to compensation under subdivision 13, paragraph (a) or (e), if:
(1) the manufactured home park owner relocates the manufactured home owner to another space in the manufactured home park or to another manufactured home park at the park owner's expense;
(2) the manufactured home owner is vacating the premises and has informed the manufactured home park owner or manager of this prior to the mailing date of the closure statement under subdivision 1;
(3) a manufactured home owner has abandoned the manufactured home, or the manufactured home owner is not current on the monthly lot rental, personal property taxes;
(4) the manufactured home owner has a pending eviction action for nonpayment of lot rental amount under section 327C.09, which was filed against the manufactured home owner prior to the mailing date of the closure statement under subdivision 1, and the writ of recovery has been ordered by the district court;
(5) the conversion of all or a portion of a manufactured home park to another use, the closure of a park, or cessation of use of the land as a manufactured home park is the result of a taking or exercise of the power of eminent domain by a governmental entity or public utility; or
(6) the owner of the manufactured home is not a resident of the manufactured home park, as defined in section 327C.01, subdivision 9, or the owner of the manufactured home is a resident, but came to reside in the manufactured home park after the mailing date of the closure statement under subdivision 1.
(c) If the unencumbered fund balance in
the manufactured home relocation trust fund is less than $1,000,000 as of June
30 of each year, the commissioner of management and budget shall annually
assess each manufactured home park owner by
mail the total amount of $12 for each licensed lot in their park, payable on or
before September 15 of each that year. The commissioner of management and budget
shall deposit the any payments in the Minnesota manufactured home
relocation trust fund. On or before July
15 of each year, the commissioner of management and budget shall prepare and
distribute to park owners a letter explaining whether funds are being
collected for that year, information about the collection, an invoice for
all licensed lots, and a sample form for the park owners to collect information
on which park residents have been accounted for. If assessed under this paragraph, the
park owner may recoup the cost of the $12 assessment as a lump sum or as a
monthly fee of no more than $1 collected from park residents together with
monthly lot rent as provided in section 327C.03, subdivision 6. Park owners may adjust payment for lots in
their park that are vacant or otherwise not eligible for contribution to the
trust fund under section 327C.095, subdivision 12, paragraph (b), and deduct
from the assessment accordingly.
(d) This subdivision and subdivision 13, paragraph (c), clause (5), are enforceable by the neutral third party, on behalf of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, or by action in a court of appropriate jurisdiction. The court may award a prevailing party reasonable attorney fees, court costs, and disbursements.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 57. REVISOR'S
INSTRUCTION.
The revisor of statutes shall renumber
each section of Minnesota Statutes listed in column A with the number listed in
column B. The revisor shall also make
necessary cross-reference changes consistent with the renumbering.
Sec. 58. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 326B.82, subdivisions
4 and 6; and 326B.821, subdivision 3, are repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2012."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to economic development; modifying certain economic development, fees, and licensing provisions; modifying certain occupational continuing education requirements; clarifying and modifying regulation of medical gas system and manufactured home provisions; requiring reports; appropriating money for jobs, economic development, and housing purposes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 116J.035, by adding a subdivision; 116J.8737, subdivisions 1, 2, 4; 116L.3625; 116L.62; 154.06; 154.065, subdivision 2; 154.08; 154.11, subdivision 1; 154.12; 181.723, subdivision 5; 182.6553, subdivision 6; 268.18, subdivisions 2, 2b; 268.199; 298.17; 326B.04, subdivision 2; 326B.091; 326B.098; 326B.13, subdivision 8; 326B.148, subdivision 1; 326B.42, subdivisions 8, 9, 10, by adding subdivisions; 326B.435, subdivision 2; 326B.438; 326B.46, subdivisions 1a, 1b, 2, 3; 326B.47, subdivisions 1, 3; 326B.49, subdivision 1; 326B.56, subdivision 1; 326B.58; 326B.82, subdivisions 2, 3, 7, 9; 326B.821, subdivisions 1, 5, 5a, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23; 326B.865; 326B.89, subdivisions 6, 8; 327.32, subdivisions 1a, 1b, 1e, 1f, 7; 327.33, subdivision 2; 327C.095, subdivision 12; 341.321; Laws 2009, chapter 78, article 1, section 18; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 326B; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 326B.82, subdivisions 4, 6; 326B.821, subdivision 3."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Taxes.
The report was
adopted.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1595
Holberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:
S. F. No. 1016, A bill for an act relating to state government; appropriating money for agriculture, the Board of Animal Health, and the Agricultural Utilization Research Institute; modifying certain fees; modifying certain restrictions on farm disposal; clarifying the authority of certain entities; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 17.135; 18B.03, subdivision 1; 18C.005, by adding a subdivision; 18C.111, by adding a subdivision; 18C.131; 18C.425, by adding a subdivision; 18D.201, subdivision 5, by adding a subdivision; 18E.03, subdivision 4; 27.041, by adding a subdivision; 38.01; 373.01, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 115A.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. SUMMARY OF APPROPRIATIONS.
|
The
amounts shown in this section summarize direct appropriations, by fund, made in
this act.
|
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
$42,287,000
|
|
$34,314,000
|
|
$76,601,000
|
Agricultural |
|
$800,000
|
|
$800,000
|
|
$1,600,000
|
Remediation |
|
$388,000
|
|
$388,000
|
|
$776,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$43,475,000 |
|
$35,502,000 |
|
$78,977,000 |
Sec. 2. AGRICULTURE
APPROPRIATIONS. |
The sums shown in the columns marked
"Appropriations" are appropriated to the agencies and for the
purposes specified in this act. The appropriations
are from the general fund, or another named fund, and are available for the
fiscal years indicated for each purpose.
The figures "2012" and "2013" used in this act mean
that the appropriations listed under them are available for the fiscal year
ending June 30, 2012, or June 30, 2013, respectively. "The first year" is fiscal year
2012. "The second year" is
fiscal year 2013. "The
biennium" is fiscal years 2012 and 2013.
|
|
|
APPROPRIATIONS |
|
|
|
|
Available for the Year |
|
|
|
|
Ending June 30 |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
2013 |
Sec. 3. DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE |
|
|
|
|
Subdivision
1. Total Appropriation |
|
$35,851,000 |
|
$27,878,000 |
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
|
||
|
2012
|
2013
|
|
|
|
General |
34,663,000
|
26,690,000
|
Remediation |
388,000
|
388,000
|
Agricultural |
800,000
|
800,000
|
The amounts that may be spent for each
purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
Journal
of the House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1596 Subd. 2. Protection
Services |
|
12,193,000 |
|
12,193,000 |
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
|
||
General |
11,805,000 |
11,805,000 |
Remediation |
388,000 |
388,000 |
$388,000 the first year and $388,000 the second year are from
the remediation fund for administrative funding for the voluntary cleanup
program.
$75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for
compensation for destroyed or crippled animals under Minnesota Statutes, section 3.737. If the amount in the first year is
insufficient, the amount in the second year is available in the first
year.
$75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for
compensation for crop damage under Minnesota Statutes, section 3.7371. If the amount in the first year is
insufficient, the amount in the second year is available in the first year.
If the commissioner determines that claims made under
Minnesota Statutes, section 3.737 or 3.7371, are unusually high, amounts
appropriated for either program may be transferred to the appropriation for the
other program.
$245,000 the first year and $245,000 the second year are
for an increase in retail food handler inspections. This is a onetime appropriation. No later than February 1, 2013, the
commissioner shall report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the
legislative committees with jurisdiction over agriculture finance regarding the
commissioner's progress in addressing the department's perceived shortfall of
necessary inspections.
Subd. 3. Agricultural
Marketing and Development |
|
3,632,000 |
|
3,632,000 |
$186,000 the first year and $186,000 the second year are
for transfer to the Minnesota grown account and may be used as grants for
Minnesota grown promotion under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.102. Grants may be made for one year. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section
16A.28, the appropriations encumbered under contract on or before June 30,
2013, for Minnesota grown grants in this paragraph are available until June 30,
2015. $50,000 of the appropriation in
each year is for efforts to promote Minnesota grown products in retail food
establishments including but not limited to restaurants, grocery stores, and
convenience stores.
Up to $100,000 each year may be used for grants to farmers
for demonstration projects involving sustainable agriculture as authorized in
Minnesota Statutes, section 17.116. Of
the amount
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1597
for grants, up to $20,000 may be used for dissemination of
information about the demonstration projects.
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 16A.28, the appropriations
encumbered under contract on or before June 30, 2013, for sustainable
agriculture grants in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2015.
$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are to
provide training and technical assistance to county and town officials relating
to livestock siting issues and local zoning and land use planning, including
maintenance of the checklist template clarifying the federal, state, and local
government requirements for consideration of an animal agriculture
modernization or expansion project. For
the training and technical assistance program, the commissioner shall continue
to seek guidance, advice, and support of livestock producer organizations, general
agricultural organizations, local government associations, academic
institutions, other government agencies, and others with expertise in land use
and agriculture.
$10,000 the first year and $10,000 the second year are for
annual cost-share payments to resident farmers or persons who sell, process, or
package agricultural products in this state for the costs of organic
certification. Annual cost-share
payments per farmer must be two-thirds of the cost of the certification or
$350, whichever is less. In any year
that a resident farmer or person who sells, processes, or packages agricultural
products in this state receives a federal organic certification cost-share
payment, that resident farmer or person is not eligible for state cost-share
payments. A certified farmer is eligible
to receive annual certification cost-share payments for up to five years. The commissioner may allocate any excess
appropriation in either fiscal year for organic market and program development
including organic producer education efforts, assistance for persons
transitioning from conventional to organic agriculture, or sustainable
agriculture demonstration grants authorized under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.116, and pertaining to organic research
or demonstration. Any unencumbered
balance does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the
second year.
$100,000 each year is for a licensed education professional
for the Agriculture in the Classroom program to develop and disseminate
curriculum, provide teacher training opportunities, and work with schools to
enhance agricultural literacy by incorporating agriculture into classroom
curriculum.
Subd. 4. Bioenergy
and Value-Added Agriculture |
|
13,353,000 |
|
5,280,000 |
$13,353,000 the first year is for final ethanol producer deficiency
payments under Minnesota Statutes, section 41A.09. If the appropriation in either year exceeds
the total amount for which all
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1598
producers are eligible, the balance in the appropriation is
available for the agricultural growth, research, and innovation program under
Minnesota Statutes, section 41A.12. The
funding base for this program in fiscal year 2014 and fiscal year 2015 is
$10,291,000 per year.
Subd. 5. Administration
and Financial Assistance |
|
6,673,000
|
|
6,773,000
|
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
|
||
General |
5,873,000
|
5,973,000
|
Agricultural |
800,000
|
800,000
|
$634,000 the first year and $634,000 the second
year are for continuation of the dairy development and profitability
enhancement and dairy business planning grant programs established under Laws 1997, chapter 216, section 7, subdivision 2,
and Laws 2001, First Special Session chapter 2, section 9, subdivision 2. The commissioner may allocate the available
sums among permissible activities, including efforts to improve the quality of
milk produced in the state in the proportions that the commissioner deems most
beneficial to Minnesota's dairy farmers.
The commissioner must submit a detailed accomplishment report and a work
plan detailing future plans for, and anticipated accomplishments from,
expenditures under this program to the chairs and ranking minority members of
the legislative committees with jurisdiction over agricultural policy and
finance on or before the start of each fiscal year. If significant changes are made to the plans
in the course of the year, the commissioner must notify the chairs and ranking
minority members.
$47,000 the first year and $47,000 the
second year are for the Northern Crops Institute. These appropriations may be spent to purchase
equipment.
$18,000 the first year and $18,000 the
second year are for a grant to the Minnesota Livestock Breeders Association.
$235,000 the first year and $235,000 the
second year are for grants to the Minnesota Agricultural Education and
Leadership Council for programs of the
council under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 41D.
$474,000 the first year and $474,000 the
second year are for payments to county and district agricultural societies and associations under Minnesota Statutes, section
38.02, subdivision 1. Aid
payments to county and district agricultural societies and associations shall
be disbursed no later than July 15 of each year. These payments are the amount of aid from the
state for an annual fair held in the previous calendar year.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1599
$1,000 the first year and $1,000 the second year are for
grants to the Minnesota State Poultry Association.
$108,000 the first year and $108,000 the second year are
for annual grants to the Minnesota Turf Seed Council for basic and applied
research on: (1) the improved production
of forage and turf seed related to new and improved varieties; and (2) native
plants, including plant breeding, nutrient management, pest management, disease
management, yield, and viability. The
grant recipient may subcontract with a qualified third party for some or all of
the basic or applied research. The grant
recipient must actively participate in the Agricultural Utilization Research
Institute's Renewable Energy Roundtable.
$500,000 the first year and $500,000 the second year are
for grants to Second Harvest Heartland on behalf of Minnesota's six Second
Harvest food banks for the purchase of milk for distribution to Minnesota's
food shelves and other charitable organizations that are eligible to receive
food from the food banks. Milk purchased
under the grants must be acquired from Minnesota milk processors and based on
low-cost bids. The milk must be
allocated to each Second Harvest food bank serving Minnesota according to the
formula used in the distribution of United States Department of Agriculture
commodities under The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP). Second Harvest
Heartland must submit quarterly reports to the commissioner on forms
prescribed by the commissioner. The
reports must include, but are not limited to, information on the expenditure of
funds, the amount of milk purchased, and the organizations to which the milk
was distributed. Second Harvest
Heartland may enter into contracts or agreements with food banks for shared
funding or reimbursement of the direct purchase of milk. Each food bank receiving money from this
appropriation may use up to two percent of the grant for administrative
expenses.
$94,000 the first year and $94,000 the second year are for
transfer to the Board of Trustees of the Minnesota State Colleges and
Universities for statewide mental health counseling support to farm families
and business operators through farm business management programs at Central
Lakes College and Ridgewater College.
$17,000 the first year and $17,000 the second year are for
grants to the Minnesota Horticultural Society.
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 18C.131,
$800,000 the first year and $800,000 the second year are from the fertilizer
account in the agricultural fund for grants for fertilizer research as awarded
by the Minnesota Agricultural Fertilizer Research and Education Council under
Minnesota Statutes, section 18C.71. The
amount appropriated in either fiscal year must not exceed 57
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1600
percent of the inspection fee revenue collected under Minnesota
Statutes, section 18C.425, subdivision 6, during the previous fiscal year. No later than February 1, 2013, the
commissioner shall report to the legislative committees with jurisdiction over
agriculture finance. The report must
include the progress and outcome of funded projects as well as the sentiment of
the council concerning the need for additional research funds.
$100,000 the second year is for a grant to
the Center for Rural Policy and Development in St. Peter.
The commissioner may allocate operating
reductions in this subdivision to program operations throughout the agency.
Sec. 4. BOARD
OF ANIMAL HEALTH |
|
$4,841,000 |
|
$4,841,000 |
Sec. 5. AGRICULTURAL
UTILIZATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE |
$2,783,000 |
|
$2,783,000 |
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 18C.005, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1b. Ammonia
and anhydrous ammonia. "Ammonia"
and "anhydrous ammonia" are used interchangeably and mean a compound
formed by the chemical combinations of the elements nitrogen and hydrogen in
the molar proportion of one part nitrogen to three parts hydrogen. This relationship is shown by the chemical
formula, NH3. On a weight
basis, the ratio is 14 parts nitrogen to three parts hydrogen or approximately
82 percent nitrogen to 18 percent hydrogen.
Ammonia may exist in either a gaseous or a liquid state. Ammonia or anhydrous ammonia does not include
aqua ammonia or ammonium hydroxide, which are solutions of ammonia in water and
are sometimes called ammonia.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 18C.111, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4. Certification
of regulatory compliance. (a)
The commissioner may, under rules adopted under section 18C.121, subdivision 1,
certify a person to offer or perform a regulatory compliance inspection of any
person or site that stores, handles, or distributes ammonia or anhydrous
ammonia fertilizer.
(b) Pursuant to those rules, a person
certified under paragraph (a) may issue a certification of compliance to an
inspected person or site if the certified person documents in writing full
compliance with the provisions of this chapter and rules adopted under this
chapter.
(c) A person or site issued a
certification of compliance must provide a copy of the certification to the
commissioner immediately upon request or within 90 days following
certification.
(d) Certifications of compliance are
valid for a period of three years. The
commissioner may determine a different time period in the interest of public
safety or for other reasonable cause.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 18D.201, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7. Compliance
and inspection frequency. (a)
The commissioner may implement policies and procedures that provide for a
decrease in the frequency of regulatory inspection for a person or site issued
a certification of compliance pursuant to section 18C.111, subdivision 4.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1601
(b) The commissioner must consider the
compliance history, enforcement record, and other public safety or
environmental risk factors in determining the eligibility of a person or site
for the reduced frequency of inspection described in paragraph (a). If the commissioner determines that a person
or site is ineligible, the commissioner must notify the person or site of that
ineligibility and the reasons for that determination.
(c) The compliance findings of the
commissioner's inspection of a person or site that stores, handles, or
distributes ammonia and anhydrous ammonia fertilizer may be used as a basis for
decreased frequency of regulatory inspection, as described in paragraphs (a)
and (b).
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 18E.03, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Fee. (a) The response and reimbursement fee consists of the surcharges and any adjustments made by the commissioner in this subdivision and shall be collected by the commissioner. The amount of the response and reimbursement fee shall be determined and imposed annually by the commissioner as required to satisfy the requirements in subdivision 3. The commissioner shall adjust the amount of the surcharges imposed in proportion to the amount of the surcharges listed in this subdivision. License application categories under paragraph (d) must be charged in proportion to the amount of surcharges imposed up to a maximum of 50 percent of the license fees set under chapters 18B and 18C.
(b) The commissioner shall impose a surcharge on pesticides registered under chapter 18B to be collected as a surcharge on the gross sales under section 18B.26, subdivision 3, that is equal to 0.1 percent of sales of the pesticide in the state and sales of pesticides for use in the state during the previous calendar year, except the surcharge may not be imposed on pesticides that are sanitizers or disinfectants as determined by the commissioner. No surcharge is required if the surcharge amount based on percent of annual gross sales of a nonagricultural pesticide is less than $10. Sales of pesticides in the state for use outside of the state are exempt from the surcharge in this paragraph if the registrant, agricultural pesticide dealer, or pesticide dealer properly documents the sale location and the distributors.
(c) The commissioner shall impose a ten cents per ton surcharge on the inspection fee under section 18C.425, subdivision 6, for fertilizers, soil amendments, and plant amendments.
(d) The commissioner shall impose a surcharge on the license application of persons licensed under chapters 18B and 18C consisting of:
(1) a $75 surcharge for each site where pesticides are stored or distributed, to be imposed as a surcharge on pesticide dealer application fees under section 18B.31, subdivision 5, and the agricultural pesticide dealer application fee under section 18B.316, subdivision 10;
(2) a $75 surcharge for each site where a fertilizer, plant amendment, or soil amendment is distributed, to be imposed on persons licensed under sections 18C.415 and 18C.425;
(3) a $50 surcharge to be imposed on a structural pest control applicator license application under section 18B.32, subdivision 6, for business license applications only;
(4) a $20 surcharge to be imposed on commercial applicator license application fees under section 18B.33, subdivision 7; and
(5) a $20 surcharge to be imposed on noncommercial applicator license application fees under section 18B.34, subdivision 5, except a surcharge may not be imposed on a noncommercial applicator that is a state agency, political subdivision of the state, the federal government, or an agency of the federal government.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1602
(e) A $1,000 fee shall be imposed on each site where pesticides are stored and sold for use outside of the state unless:
(1) the distributor properly documents that it has less than $2,000,000 per year in wholesale value of pesticides stored and transferred through the site; or
(2) the registrant pays the surcharge under paragraph (b) and the registration fee under section 18B.26, subdivision 3, for all of the pesticides stored at the site and sold for use outside of the state.
(f) Paragraphs (c) to (e) apply to sales, licenses issued, applications received for licenses, and inspection fees imposed on or after July 1, 1990.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 27.041, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3. Account;
appropriation. A wholesale
produce dealers account is created in the agricultural fund. All fees, charges, and penalties collected
under sections 27.01 to 27.069 and 27.11 to 27.19, including interest
attributable to that money, shall be deposited in the wholesale produce dealers
account. Money in the account is
appropriated to the commissioner for the purposes of sections 27.01 to 27.069
and 27.11 to 27.19.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 38.01, is amended to read:
38.01
COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES; FORMATION, POWERS.
(a) An agricultural society or association may be incorporated by citizens of any county, or two or more counties jointly, but only one agricultural society shall be organized in any county. An agricultural society may sue and be sued in its corporate name; may adopt bylaws, rules, and regulations, alter and amend the same; may purchase and hold, lease and control any real or personal property deemed to promote the objects of the society, and may rent, lease, sell, exchange, and convey the same. Any income from the rental or lease of the property may be used for any or all of the following purposes: (1) Acquisition of additional real property; (2) Construction of additional buildings; or (3) Maintenance and care of the society's property. This section shall not be construed to preclude the continuance of any agricultural society now existing or the granting of aid to the society.
(b) An agricultural society shall have jurisdiction and control of the grounds upon which its fairs are held and of the streets and adjacent grounds during the fair, so far as may be necessary for fair purposes, and are exempt from local zoning ordinances throughout the year as provided in section 38.16.
(c) The society may contract with the sheriff, local municipality, or security guard as defined in section 626.88 to provide the society with police service. A person providing police service pursuant to a contract is not, by reason of the contract, classified as an employee of the agricultural society for any purpose other than the discharge of powers and duties under the contract.
(d) Any person who shall willfully violate any rule or regulation made by agricultural societies during the days of a fair shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The provisions of this section supersede all special laws on the same subject.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 41A.12, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Oversight. The commissioner, in consultation with
the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and
senate committees with jurisdiction over agriculture finance, must allocate
available funds among eligible uses as specified by the legislature,
develop competitive eligibility criteria, and award funds on a needs basis.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1603
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 373.01, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Public corporation; listed powers. (a) Each county is a body politic and corporate and may:
(1) Sue and be sued.
(2)
Acquire and hold real and personal property for the use of the county, and
lands sold for taxes as provided by law.
(3) Purchase and hold for the benefit of the county real estate sold by virtue of judicial proceedings, to which the county is a party.
(4) Sell, lease, and convey real or personal estate owned by the county, and give contracts or options to sell, lease, or convey it, and make orders respecting it as deemed conducive to the interests of the county's inhabitants.
(5) Make all contracts and do all other acts in relation to the property and concerns of the county necessary to the exercise of its corporate powers.
(b) No sale, lease, or conveyance of real estate owned by the county, except the lease of a residence acquired for the furtherance of an approved capital improvement project, nor any contract or option for it, shall be valid, without first advertising for bids or proposals in the official newspaper of the county for three consecutive weeks and once in a newspaper of general circulation in the area where the property is located. The notice shall state the time and place of considering the proposals, contain a legal description of any real estate, and a brief description of any personal property. Leases that do not exceed $15,000 for any one year may be negotiated and are not subject to the competitive bid procedures of this section. All proposals estimated to exceed $15,000 in any one year shall be considered at the time set for the bid opening, and the one most favorable to the county accepted, but the county board may, in the interest of the county, reject any or all proposals.
(c) Sales of personal property the value of which is estimated to be $15,000 or more shall be made only after advertising for bids or proposals in the county's official newspaper, on the county's Web site, or in a recognized industry trade journal. At the same time it posts on its Web site or publishes in a trade journal, the county must publish in the official newspaper, either as part of the minutes of a regular meeting of the county board or in a separate notice, a summary of all requests for bids or proposals that the county advertises on its Web site or in a trade journal. After publication in the official newspaper, on the Web site, or in a trade journal, bids or proposals may be solicited and accepted by the electronic selling process authorized in section 471.345, subdivision 17. Sales of personal property the value of which is estimated to be less than $15,000 may be made either on competitive bids or in the open market, in the discretion of the county board. "Web site" means a specific, addressable location provided on a server connected to the Internet and hosting World Wide Web pages and other files that are generally accessible on the Internet all or most of a day.
(d) Notwithstanding anything in this
section to the contrary herein, the county may, exchange
parcels of real property of substantially similar or equal value without
advertising for bids, subject to clause (1) or (2).
(1) When acquiring real property for
county highway right-of-way, exchange parcels of real property of
substantially similar or equal value without advertising for bids. the
estimated values for these parcels shall be determined by the county assessor.
(2) When acquiring real property for any
other purpose, the estimated values for these parcels must be determined by the
county assessor or a private Minnesota licensed real estate appraiser. The private appraised value of the parcels
must be substantially equal to the county assessor's estimated market value of
similar land, as adjusted by the sales ratio determined by the commissioner of
revenue. Before giving final approval to
the exchange of land, the county board shall hold a public hearing on the
exchange. At least two weeks before the
hearing, the county auditor shall post a hearing notice in the auditor's office
and the official newspaper of the county that contains a description of the
lands affected.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1604
(e) If real estate or personal property remains unsold after advertising for and consideration of bids or proposals the county may employ a broker to sell the property. The broker may sell the property for not less than 90 percent of its appraised market value as determined by the county. The broker's fee shall be set by agreement with the county but may not exceed ten percent of the sale price and must be paid from the proceeds of the sale.
(f) A county or its agent may rent a county-owned residence acquired for the furtherance of an approved capital improvement project subject to the conditions set by the county board and not subject to the conditions for lease otherwise provided by paragraph (a), clause (4), and paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), and (g).
(g) In no case shall lands be disposed of without there being reserved to the county all iron ore and other valuable minerals in and upon the lands, with right to explore for, mine and remove the iron ore and other valuable minerals, nor shall the minerals and mineral rights be disposed of, either before or after disposition of the surface rights, otherwise than by mining lease, in similar general form to that provided by section 93.20 for mining leases affecting state lands. The lease shall be for a term not exceeding 50 years, and be issued on a royalty basis, the royalty to be not less than 25 cents per ton of 2,240 pounds, and fix a minimum amount of royalty payable during each year, whether mineral is removed or not. Prospecting options for mining leases may be granted for periods not exceeding one year. The options shall require, among other things, periodical showings to the county board of the results of exploration work done.
(h) Notwithstanding anything in this subdivision to the contrary, the county may, when selling real property owned in fee simple that cannot be improved because of noncompliance with local ordinances regarding minimum area, shape, frontage, or access, proceed to sell the nonconforming parcel without advertising for bid. At the county's discretion, the real property may be restricted to sale to adjoining landowners or may be sold to any other interested party. The property shall be sold to the highest bidder, but in no case shall the property be sold for less than 90 percent of its fair market value as determined by the county assessor. All owners of land adjoining the land to be sold shall be given a written notice at least 30 days before the sale. This paragraph shall be liberally construed to encourage the sale of nonconforming real property and promote its return to the tax roles.
Sec. 14. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2010, section
41A.09, subdivisions 1a, 2a, 3a, 4, and 10, are repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective June 30, 2012."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to agriculture; appropriating money for agriculture, the Board of Animal Health, and the Agricultural Utilization Research Institute; changing certain agriculture-related provisions, requirements, and programs; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 18C.005, by adding a subdivision; 18C.111, by adding a subdivision; 18D.201, by adding a subdivision; 18E.03, subdivision 4; 27.041, by adding a subdivision; 38.01; 41A.12, subdivision 3; 373.01, subdivision 1; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 41A.09, subdivisions 1a, 2a, 3a, 4, 10."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The
report was adopted.
Journal of the House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 -
Top of Page 1605
SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. Nos. 191 and 1016
were read for the second time.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The
following House Files were introduced:
Abeler; Huntley; Gottwalt; Murphy, E.; Kiffmeyer; Hosch; Hayden
and Liebling introduced:
H. F. No. 1320, A bill for an act relating to human
services; establishing a sex offender civil commitment petition screening panel
for purposes of determining whether the civil commitment of certain sex
offenders is appropriate; requiring county payment of certain expenses;
providing for the identification and development of alternative treatment
facilities; providing for reduction in custody petitions for patients in
alternative programs or assisted living units; requiring implementation of the
statewide judicial panel for commitment proceedings regarding sexual
psychopathic personalities and sexually dangerous persons; providing for
consideration of alternatives to commitment or alternative treatment programs
in certain cases; including provisions governing a stay of commitment; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 244.05, subdivision 7; 246B.10; 253B.095,
subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 253B.185, subdivisions 1, 4, 8, by adding a subdivision;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 246B; 253B.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Health and Human Services Reform.
Woodard introduced:
H. F. No. 1321, A bill for an act relating to education;
further clarifying charter school provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010,
section 124D.10.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Education Reform.
Hoppe, Holberg and Zellers introduced:
H. F. No. 1322, A bill for an act relating to traffic regulations;
amending requirements for travel in left-hand lanes; modifying driver's manual;
making technical changes; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes
2010, sections 169.18, subdivisions 7, 10, by adding a subdivision; 171.13, by
adding a subdivision; 357.021, subdivision 6.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Transportation Policy and Finance.
Hoppe introduced:
H. F. No. 1323, A bill for an act relating to insurance; providing
for the establishment of an online motor vehicle insurance verification system; appropriating money; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2010, section 169.09, subdivision 13; proposing coding for new
law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 169.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Transportation Policy and Finance.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1606
Crawford introduced:
H. F. No. 1324, A bill for an act relating to capital
investment; appropriating money for publicly owned infrastructure in Braham;
authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Jobs and Economic Development Finance.
Melin, Anzelc and Rukavina introduced:
H. F. No. 1325, A bill for an act relating to capital
investment; appropriating money for a grant to the city of Floodwood for
business development public infrastructure; authorizing the sale and issuance
of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Jobs and Economic Development Finance.
Atkins and Hoppe introduced:
H. F. No. 1326, A bill for an act relating to alcohol; allowing
a bed and breakfast to serve Minnesota beer; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010,
section 340A.4011, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Commerce and Regulatory Reform.
Anderson, B.; Dettmer; Leidiger; Kriesel; Lesch; Gunther;
Anzelc and Gruenhagen introduced:
H. F. No. 1327, A bill for an act relating to veterans;
changing the small business set-aside program for veteran-owned small
businesses; authorizing county set-aside programs for veteran-owned small
businesses; changing reporting requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010,
section 161.321, subdivisions 2, 5, 8, by adding subdivisions; proposing coding
for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 375.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Veterans Services Division.
Kahn; Liebling; Hayden; Murphy, E., and Norton introduced:
H. F. No. 1328, A bill for an act relating to health;
strengthening state laws protecting the health of tanning salon customers;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 325H.01, subdivision 7; 325H.05;
325H.06; 325H.08; 325H.09.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Commerce and Regulatory Reform.
Kahn; Liebling; Hayden; Murphy, E., and Norton introduced:
H. F. No. 1329, A bill for an act relating to health;
regulating tanning facilities and their use; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 325H; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections
325H.01; 325H.02; 325H.03; 325H.04; 325H.05; 325H.06; 325H.07; 325H.08;
325H.09; 325H.10.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Health and Human Services Reform.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1607
Kahn; Dill; Hilty; Hansen; Murphy, M.; Huntley; Knuth and
Davids introduced:
H. F. No. 1330, A bill for an act relating to natural
resources; requiring notification of hunters on research bears; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 97B.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Policy and Finance.
Benson, M., and Downey introduced:
H. F. No. 1331, A bill for an act relating to state
government; requiring certain state agencies to enter into contracts to provide
consulting services for improvements to certain state-operated systems and
services.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Government Operations and Elections.
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Holberg requested
immediate consideration of H. F. No. 1010.
H. F. No. 1010 was reported
to the House.
McNamara moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 39, delete section 17
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
McNamara, Kriesel, Lohmer and Kieffer moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 5, after line 14, insert:
"$128,000 the first year is from the environmental fund for transfer to the Department of Health to complete the environmental health tracking and biomonitoring analysis related to perfluorochemicals and disseminate the results."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1608
McNamara moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 43, delete section 22
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the McNamara
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 106 yeas and 22 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Eken
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Daudt
Davids
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Garofalo
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Hancock
Kelly
Leidiger
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Quam
Scott
Shimanski
Swedzinski
Wardlow
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Torkelson and McNamara moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 51, line 25, delete "State Recreation" and insert "Scientific and Natural"
Page 51, line 32, delete "state recreation" and insert "scientific and natural"
Page 51, line 34, delete "85.013" and insert "86A.05, subdivision 5"
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1609
Page 52, line 28, delete "State" and insert "Scientific and Natural"
Page 52, line 29, delete "Recreation"
Page 53, line 1, delete "state" and insert "scientific and natural"
Page 53, line 2, delete "recreation"
Page 53, line 3, delete "85.013" and insert "86A.05, subdivision 5"
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Drazkowski moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 50, line 10, delete "$1,500,000" and insert "$1,783,000" and delete "$1,500,000" and insert "$1,783,000"
Page 50, line 14, after the period, insert "Of this amount,
$283,000 the first year and $283,000 the second year are for deposit into the
environment and natural resources trust fund land management account within the
special revenue fund to be used to pay for future restoration and enhancement
of lands purchased in fee with money from the trust fund and held by the state
and to make the payments required under Minnesota Statutes, sections 97A.061,
subdivision 1, and 477A.12, for lands purchased in fee with money from the
trust fund."
Page 51, line 27, delete "$820,000" and insert "$912,000" and delete "$820,000" and insert "$912,000"
Page 52, line 1, after the period, insert "Of this amount,
$92,000 the first year and $92,000 the second year are for deposit into the
environment and natural resources trust fund land management account within the
special revenue fund to be used to pay for future restoration and enhancement
of lands purchased in fee with money from the trust fund and held by the state
and to make the payments required under Minnesota Statutes, sections 97A.061,
subdivision 1, and 477A.12, for lands purchased in fee with money from the
trust fund."
Page 52, line 13, delete "$1,000,000" and insert "$1,187,000" and delete "$1,000,000" and insert "$1,187,000"
Page 52, line 23, after the period, insert "Of this amount,
$187,000 the first year and $187,000 the second year are for deposit into the
environment and natural resources trust fund land management account within the
special revenue fund to be used to pay for future restoration and enhancement
of lands purchased in fee with money from the trust fund and held by the state
and to make the payments required under Minnesota Statutes, sections 97A.061,
subdivision 1, and 477A.12 for lands purchased in fee with money from the trust
fund." and after "$10,000" insert "of the
total amount appropriated"
Page 52, line 30, delete "$1,000,000" and insert "$1,187,000" and delete "$1,000,000" and insert "$1,187,000"
Page 53, line 9, after the period, insert "Of this amount,
$187,000 the first year and $187,000 the second year are for deposit into the environment
and natural resources trust fund land management account within the special
revenue fund to be used to pay for future
Journal of the House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page
1610
restoration and enhancement of lands purchased in fee with money from
the trust fund and held by the state and to make the payments required under
Minnesota Statutes, sections 97A.061, subdivision 1, and 477A.12, for lands
purchased in fee with money from the trust fund."
Page 53, line 10, after "$54,000" insert "of the total amount appropriated"
Page 53, line 32, delete "$1,737,000" and insert "$1,765,000" and delete "$1,738,000" and insert "$1,765,000"
Page 54, line 25, after the period, insert "Of the total
appropriation, $28,000 the first year and $28,000 the second year are for
deposit into the environment and natural resources trust fund land management
account within the special revenue fund to be used to pay for future
restoration and enhancement of lands purchased in fee with money from the trust
fund and held by the state and to make the payments required under Minnesota
Statutes, sections 97A.061, subdivision 1, and 477A.12 for lands purchased in
fee with money from the trust fund."
Page 55, line 22, delete "$1,737,000" and insert "$1,765,000" and delete "$1,738,000" and insert "$1,766,000"
Page 56, line 13, after the period, insert "Of the total
appropriation, $28,000 the first year and $28,000 the second year are for
deposit into the environment and natural resources trust fund land management
account within the special revenue fund to be used to pay for future
restoration and enhancement of lands purchased in fee with money from the trust
fund and held by the state and to make the payments required under Minnesota
Statutes, sections 97A.061, subdivision 1, and 477A.12 for lands purchased in
fee with money from the trust fund."
Page 65, delete lines 32 to 33
Page 66, delete lines 1 to 12
Adjust amounts accordingly
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Hackbarth moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended.
Thissen
requested a division of the Hackbarth amendment to H. F. No. 1010, the second
engrossment, as amended.
The first portion of the Hackbarth amendment to H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, reads as follows:
Page 13, after line 11, insert:
"The commissioner shall not close any state park or state recreation area between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2013, that is funded with money appropriated in this article."
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1611
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the first portion of the Hackbarth
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 128 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion prevailed and the first portion of the Hackbarth amendment was adopted.
Hackbarth
withdrew the second portion of his amendment to H. F. No. 1010, the second
engrossment, as amended.
Wagenius moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 63, after line 6, insert:
"(c) Emerald Ash Borer Landscape Management Impacts
$267,000 the first year and $67,000 the second year are from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to research impacts of insecticides used for managing emerald ash borers on other insects and birds. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2014, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered."
Page 65, delete lines 23 to 31
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 2
The question was taken on the Wagenius
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 54 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
McNamara, Dill, Rukavina and Anzelc moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 10, after line 33, insert:
"After the commissioner approves a sustainable resources management plan, any division of the Department of Natural Resources seeking interaction with the Division of Forestry on projects to implement the plan must reimburse the Division of Forestry for time spent responding to questions, concerns, or challenges to the projects."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Hilty moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 43, after line 20, insert:
"Sec. 23. SALE
OF STATE NURSERIES; MORATORIUM.
The commissioner of natural resources
shall not sell the state forest nurseries at the Baudora State Nursery or the
General Andrews State Nursery until the commissioner determines that it is in
the best interest of the state.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1613
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Hilty
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 61 yeas and 68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Crawford
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Brynaert moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 64, line 1, before "Youth" insert "(a)"
Page 64, after line 11, insert:
"(b) Minnesota Junior Master Naturalist Program
$267,000 the first year and $98,000 the second year are from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to expand the junior naturalist after-school programs. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2014, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered."
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1614
Page 64, line 15, delete the second "$100,000" and insert "$99,000"
Page 65, line 1, delete the second "$600,000" and insert "$597,000"
Page 65, line 7, delete "$3,804,000" and insert "$3,777,000"
Page 65, delete lines 23 to 31
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Brynaert amendment
and the roll was called. There were 54
yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Gauthier moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 60, after line 23, insert:
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1615
"(a) Lake
Superior Water Quality Monitoring
$267,000 the first year and $233,000 the second year are from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Large Lakes Observatory for research of Lake Superior waters to assess ecosystem health and water quality in response to environmental stresses. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2014, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered."
Page 64, line 15, delete the second "$100,000" and insert "$96,000"
Page 65, line 1, delete the second "$600,000" and insert "$574,000"
Page 65, line 7, delete "$3,804,000" and insert "$3,601,000"
Page 65, delete lines 23 to 31
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Gauthier
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 55 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Morrow
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Poppe
Quam
Runbeck
Journal of the House -
33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1616
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker called Lanning to the Chair.
Persell moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended.
Dill
requested a division of the Persell amendment to H. F. No. 1010, the second
engrossment, as amended.
The first portion of the Persell amendment to H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, reads as follows:
Page 41, delete section 20
Renumber the sections in sequence and
correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the first portion of the Persell amendment and the
roll was called. There were
46 yeas and 83 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Peterson, S.
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Journal of the House -
33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1617
Mack
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Morrow
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion did not prevail and the first
portion of the Persell amendment
was not adopted.
The second portion of the Persell amendment to H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, reads as follows:
Page
43, delete section 21
Renumber the sections in sequence and
correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the second portion of
the Persell amendment and the roll was called.
There were 57 yeas
and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lesch
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion did not prevail and the second
portion of the Persell amendment
was not adopted.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1618
Knuth moved to amend H. F. No. 1010, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 40, delete section 18
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Knuth
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 113 yeas and 16 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Bills
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Eken
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Benson, M.
Buesgens
Crawford
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Kiffmeyer
Leidiger
Lohmer
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Swedzinski
Wardlow
Westrom
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 1010, A bill for an act relating to state government; appropriating money for environment, natural resources, commerce, and energy; creating accounts; modifying disposition of certain receipts; modifying responsibilities and authorities; creating an advisory committee; modifying Petroleum Tank Release Cleanup Act; modifying cooperative electric association petition provisions; repealing definitions and requirements; requiring rulemaking on wild rice standards; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 85.052, subdivision 4; 89.21; 97A.055, by adding a subdivision; 97A.071, subdivision 2; 97A.075; 103G.271, subdivision 6; 103G.301, subdivision 2; 103G.615, subdivision 2; 115A.1314; 115A.1320, subdivision 1; 115C.09, subdivision 3c; 115C.13;
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1619
116P.04, by adding a subdivision; 116P.05, subdivision 2; 216B.026, subdivision 1; 290.431; 290.432; 357.021, subdivision 7; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 16E; 84; 89; 97A; 103G; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 84.02, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; 84.027, subdivision 11; 116P.09, subdivision 4; 116P.14.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 72 yeas and 57 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
Dill was excused between the hours of 3:45
p.m. and 6:20 p.m.
There being no objection, the order of
business reverted to Messages from the Senate.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The
following message was received from the Senate:
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1620
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
Senate File, herewith transmitted:
S. F. No. 958.
Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF
SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 958, A bill for an act relating to public safety; acquiring an easement for the correctional facility in Faribault; appropriating money for the courts, public defenders, public safety, corrections, certain other criminal justice agencies, boards, and commissions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 297I.06, subdivision 3.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Holberg requested
immediate consideration of H. F. No. 1101.
H. F. No. 1101 was reported
to the House.
Banaian moved to amend H. F. No. 1101, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 16, after line 13, insert:
"Sec. 12. [145.4221]
STATE FUNDS; PROHIBITED USE FOR HUMAN CLONING.
Subdivision 1. Prohibited
use of state funds. No state
funds or federal funds the state receives for state programs may be used to
either support human cloning or to pay for any expenses incidental to human
cloning. For purposes of this section,
"cloning" means generating a genetically identical copy of an
organism at any stage of development by combining an enucleated egg and the
nucleus of a somatic cell to make an embryo.
Subd. 2. Scientific
research. Nothing in this
section shall affect areas of scientific research not specifically addressed by
this section, including research in the use of nuclear transfer or other
cloning techniques to produce molecules, DNA, cells other than human embryos,
tissues, organs, plants, or animals other than humans. In addition, notwithstanding section 145.422,
nothing in this section shall affect the scientific field of stem cell
research, unless explicitly prohibited.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1621
POINT OF
ORDER
Kahn raised a point of order pursuant to
rule 3.21 that the Banaian amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore
Lanning ruled the point of order not well taken and the Banaian amendment in
order.
Kahn appealed the decision of Speaker pro
tempore Lanning.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The vote was taken on the question
"Shall the decision of Speaker pro tempore Lanning stand as the judgment
of the House?" and the roll was called.
There were 79 yeas and 48 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Peppin
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Falk
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
So it was the judgment of the House that
the decision of Speaker pro tempore Lanning should stand.
Thissen offered an amendment to the
Banaian amendment to H. F. No. 1101, the first engrossment.
POINT OF
ORDER
Peppin raised a point of order pursuant to
section 402, paragraph 5, of "Mason's Manual of Legislative
Procedure," that the Thissen amendment to the Banaian amendment was not in
order. Speaker pro tempore Lanning ruled the point of order well taken and the
Thissen amendment to the Banaian amendment out of order.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1622
Thissen appealed the decision of Speaker
pro tempore Lanning.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The vote was taken on the question "Shall
the decision of Speaker pro tempore Lanning stand as the judgment of the
House?" and the roll was called.
There were 80 yeas and 49 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Falk
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Lesch
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
So it was the judgment of the House that
the decision of Speaker pro tempore Lanning should stand.
FISCAL
CALENDAR ANNOUNCEMENT
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Holberg announced
her intention to place S. F. No. 1016 on the Fiscal Calendar for
Wednesday, March 30, 2011.
The
Speaker resumed the Chair.
Journal of the House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 -
Top of Page 1623
FISCAL CALENDAR, Continued
Norton moved to amend the Banaian amendment to H. F. No. 1101, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, line 3, after "HUMAN" insert "REPRODUCTIVE"
Page 1, line 6, after "human" insert "reproductive"
Page 1, line 7, after "human" insert "reproductive" and delete ""cloning"" and insert ""human reproductive cloning""
Page 1, delete lines 8 and 9 and insert "the creation of a human fetus that is substantially genetically identical to a previously born human being"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The
question was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was
called. There were 50 yeas and 79
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Falk
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kieffer
Knuth
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1624
The question recurred on the Banaian
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 81 yeas and 48 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Falk
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Hosch was excused between the hours of
5:40 p.m. and 8:30 p.m.
Pelowski moved to amend H. F. No. 1101, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 12, after line 25, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 15A.081, subdivision 7c, is amended to read:
Subd. 7c. Minnesota
State Colleges and Universities chancellor.
The Board of Trustees of the Minnesota State Colleges and
Universities shall establish a salary range for the position of chancellor of
the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.
The board shall submit the proposed salary range to the Legislative
Coordinating Commission for approval, modification, or rejection in the manner
provided in section 3.855. The board
shall establish the a salary for the chancellor within the
approved salary range that does not exceed the governor's salary.
In deciding whether to approve a salary increase, the board shall consider the performance of the chancellor in areas including educational leadership, student success, system management, human resources, and affirmative action.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment for contracts entered into on or after that date."
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1625
Page 13, after line 20, insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 136F.40, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Contracts. (a) The board may enter into a contract with
the chancellor, a vice-chancellor, or a president, containing terms and
conditions of employment. The terms of
the contract must be authorized under a plan approved under section 43A.18,
subdivision 3a. The salary
established for a contract under this section must not exceed the governor's
salary.
(b) Notwithstanding section 43A.17, subdivision 11, or other law to the contrary, a contract under this section may provide a liquidated salary amount or other compensation if a contract is terminated by the board prior to its expiration.
(c) Notwithstanding section 356.24 or other law to the contrary, a contract under this section may contain a deferred compensation plan made in conformance with section 457(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
(d) Notwithstanding any provision of
the plan approved under section 43A.18, subdivision 3a, a contract under this
section must not authorize or otherwise provide for a bonus payment.
(e) To promote transparency and accountability,
the board must provide timely, complete, and easily accessible information on
its website on the compensation of persons with contracts under this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment for contracts entered into on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Pelowski
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 89 yeas and 38 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Benson, J.
Bills
Buesgens
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hayden
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lillie
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Moran
Morrow
Murphy, E.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1626
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, D.
Banaian
Beard
Benson, M.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Doepke
Downey
Eken
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilty
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kelly
Knuth
Koenen
LeMieur
Lesch
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Mazorol
Melin
Mullery
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Norton
Paymar
Petersen, B.
Rukavina
Simon
Wagenius
Winkler
The motion
prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Pelowski moved to amend H. F. No. 1101, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 17, after line 8, insert:
"Sec. 14. REPORT ON TRANSFORMING HIGHER EDUCATION.
The Board of Trustees of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities shall do a comprehensive evaluation of the structure of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities and report to the legislature with recommendations for improvements to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of delivering postsecondary education through public two-year colleges and state universities. The study must evaluate the organization of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, and must consider and evaluate the following organizational alternatives:
(1) the alignment of the two-year and four-year
institutions into separate administrative systems;
(2) establishment of regional education districts;
(3) formation of multi-campus institutions;
(4) district or subdistrict accreditation of
institutions;
(5) regional delivery of shared services and programs;
and
(6) elimination of duplicate services and programs.
The
study must identify potential structural and operational efficiencies and must
recommend methods to refocus administration at the campus level and reduce or
eliminate duplicative administration through central services. The costs and benefits of each alternative in
the study must be evaluated and reported with the study findings and
recommendations by January 30, 2012, to the committees of the legislature with
responsibility for higher education finance.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion
prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1627
Drazkowski moved to amend H. F. No. 1101, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 8, line 6, delete "$466,700,000" in both places and insert "$466,450,000" in both places
Page 9, after line 19, insert:
"The Board of Regents is requested to reduce the salary of the president by $250,000 for fiscal year 2012 and $250,000 for fiscal year 2013 to reflect the reduction in the appropriations for Operations and Maintenance in these fiscal years."
Correct the totals accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anzelc
Barrett
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davnie
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Hancock
Hayden
Hortman
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lohmer
Marquart
McDonald
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Murray
Nelson
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Shimanski
Slocum
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Wardlow
Woodard
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Beard
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Davids
Dean
Doepke
Downey
Eken
Garofalo
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Lanning
Lesch
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Mazorol
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Petersen, B.
Rukavina
Runbeck
Schomacker
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Westrom
Winkler
Spk. Zellers
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1628
Gunther was excused between the hours of
6:00 p.m. and 6:45 p.m.
H. F. No. 1101, as amended, was read for the third time.
CALL OF
THE HOUSE
On the motion of Hilstrom and on the
demand of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered. The following members answered to their
names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Dean moved that further proceedings of the
roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in
the absentees. The motion prevailed and
it was so ordered.
H. F. No. 1101, A bill for an act relating to higher education; amending postsecondary education provisions; requiring reports; changing Minnesota college savings plan matching grants; making technical changes; modifying definitions; setting requirements for credit transfer; providing stable undergraduate tuition rates; modifying achieve scholarship program; modifying contract and salary provisions; prohibiting use of certain public funds to support human cloning; requiring a study of graduate education in for-profit sector; repealing certain provisions related to equipment and apparel; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 15A.081, subdivision 7c; 135A.51, subdivision 2; 136A.121, subdivision 6; 136F.40, subdivision 2; 136G.01; 136G.03, subdivisions 1, 18, 27; 136G.05, subdivisions 1, 6, 8; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 136F; 137; 145; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 135A.26; 136G.11, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; 181.986; Laws 2009, chapter 95, article 2, section 39.
The bill, as amended, was placed upon its
final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 69 yeas and 60 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Journal of the House -
33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1629
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Banaian
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kiel
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
CALL OF
THE HOUSE LIFTED
Holberg moved that the call of the House
be lifted. The motion prevailed and it
was so ordered.
Dean moved that the House recess subject
to the call of the Chair. The motion
prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to
order by the Speaker.
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Holberg requested
immediate consideration of H. F. No. 934.
H. F. No. 934 was reported
to the House.
Tillberry, Dittrich and Peterson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 42, delete section 14
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1630
Page 54, delete subdivision 20
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the
Tillberry et al amendment and the roll was called. There were 58 yeas and 70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
CALL OF THE HOUSE
On the motion of Thissen and on the demand
of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Journal of the House -
33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1631
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Dean moved that further proceedings of the
roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in the
absentees. The motion prevailed and it
was so ordered.
Winkler moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 42, lines 11 and 16, delete "located in a city of the first class"
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
CALL OF
THE HOUSE LIFTED
Dean moved that the call of the House be
lifted. The motion prevailed and it was
so ordered.
CALL OF
THE HOUSE
On the motion of Thissen and on the demand
of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Journal of the House -
33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1632
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Dean moved that further proceedings of the
roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in
the absentees. The motion prevailed and
it was so ordered.
Pursuant to rule 1.50, Dean moved that the
House be allowed to continue in session after12:00 midnight.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Dean motion
and the roll was called. There were 75
yeas and 55 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
The
motion prevailed.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1633
Falk moved to amend the Winkler amendment to H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, after line 1, insert:
"Page 42, line 10, after "(a)" insert "If a majority of the voters of a school's school district vote to adopt this subdivision,""
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to
the amendment and the roll was called.
Dean moved that those not voting be
excused from voting. The motion
prevailed.
There were 59 yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1634
The question recurred on the Winkler
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 55 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Buesgens
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Downey
Erickson
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilty
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Slawik
Slocum
Tillberry
Wardlow
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Carlson
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Drazkowski
Eken
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greene
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Benson, J., and Slocum were excused for
the remainder of today's session.
Buesgens moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 9, line 3, delete "$5,174" and insert "$5,155"
Page 20, line 8, delete "5,695,383,000" and insert "5,679,713,000"
Page 20, line 9, delete "5,862,929,000" and insert "5,856,215,000"
Page 20, line 10, delete "$4,016,844,000" and insert "$4,001,174,000"
Page 20, line 12, delete "$1,717,378,000" and insert "$1,710,662,000"
Page 82, line 5, delete "5,000,000" and insert "3,000,000"
Page 82, line 6, delete "5,000,000" and insert "4,000,000"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1635
The question was taken on the Buesgens
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 16 yeas and 112 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Barrett
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Drazkowski
Franson
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hancock
Kiffmeyer
Leidiger
Lohmer
Quam
Shimanski
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Beard
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Murphy, E., and Mariani moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment.
Woodard requested a division of the Murphy, E., and Mariani amendment to H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment.
Woodard further requested that
the second portion of the divided Murphy, E., and Mariani amendment be voted on
first.
The second portion of the Murphy, E., and Mariani amendment to H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, reads as follows:
Page 49, after line 1, insert:
"Sec. 24. ENROLLMENT
OPTIONS FOR STUDENTS OF LOW-PERFORMING SCHOOLS; REPORT.
The commissioner of education must submit to the education policy and finance committees of the legislature by February 1, 2014, a report on the enrollment options for students at low-performing public schools under section 14. The report, at a minimum, must:
Journal of the House
- 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1636
(1) examine the demographics of the
students participating in the program; and
(2) detail the academic performance of students participating in the program, including their performance on reading and mathematics tests under Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 120B.30, and compare the academic performance of students of similar demographics in public schools with these students."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the second
portion of the Murphy, E., and Mariani amendment and the roll was called. There were 128 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion prevailed and the second portion of the Murphy, E., and Mariani
amendment was adopted.
CALL OF
THE HOUSE LIFTED
Holberg moved that the call of the House
be lifted. The motion prevailed and it
was so ordered.
The first portion of the Murphy, E., and Mariani amendment to H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as amended, reads as follows:
Page 43, line 35, before the period, insert "; EXPIRATION"
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1637
Page 43, line 36, delete "later" and insert "expires at the end of the 2014-2015 school year"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the first
portion of the Murphy, E., and Mariani amendment and the roll was called. There were 57 yeas and 69 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion did not prevail and the first portion of the Murphy, E., and Mariani amendment
was not adopted.
Huntley was excused for the remainder of
today's session.
Buesgens moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Pages 74 to 80, delete sections 1 to 6
Page 81, delete subdivision 8
Page 82, line 4, delete "under Minnesota Statutes, section 119C.04"
Page 82, line 7, delete lines 7 to 12 and insert:
"(a) All children whose parents or
legal guardians meet the eligibility requirements of paragraph (b) established
by the commissioner are eligible to receive early childhood education
scholarships under this section.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1638
(b) A parent or legal guardian is eligible for an early childhood education scholarship if the parent or legal guardian:
(1) has a child three or four years of
age on September 1, beginning in calendar year 2011; and
(2)(i) has income equal to or less than 47 percent of the state median income in the current calendar year; or
(ii) can document their child's identification through another public funding eligibility process, including the Free and Reduced Price Lunch Program, National School Lunch Act, United States Code, title 42, section 1751, part 210; Head Start under federal Improving Head Start for School Readiness Act of 2007; Minnesota family investment program under chapter 256J; and child care assistance programs under chapter 119B."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Buesgens
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 66 yeas and 60 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Greene
Hansen
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McFarlane
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1639
Moran moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 54, line 26, delete the semicolon and insert a comma
Page 54, delete line 27
Page 54, line 28, delete everything before "are"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Moran
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 126 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Davnie and Slocum moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 43, after line 36, insert:
"Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 124D.10, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Authorizer. (a) For purposes of this section, the terms defined in this subdivision have the meanings given them.
"Application" to receive approval as an authorizer means the proposal an eligible authorizer submits to the commissioner under paragraph (c) before that authorizer is able to submit any affidavit to charter to a school.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1640
"Application" under subdivision 4 means the charter school business plan a school developer submits to an authorizer for approval to establish a charter school that documents the school developer's mission statement, school purposes, program design, financial plan, governance and management structure, and background and experience, plus any other information the authorizer requests. The application also shall include a "statement of assurances" of legal compliance prescribed by the commissioner.
"Affidavit" means a written statement the authorizer submits to the commissioner for approval to establish a charter school under subdivision 4 attesting to its review and approval process before chartering a school.
"Affidavit" means the form an authorizer submits to the commissioner that is a precondition to a charter school organizing an affiliated nonprofit building corporation under subdivision 17a.
(b) The following organizations may authorize one or more charter schools:
(1) a school board; intermediate school district school board; education district organized under sections 123A.15 to 123A.19;
(2) a charitable organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, excluding a nonpublic sectarian or religious institution, any person other than a natural person that directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the nonpublic sectarian or religious institution, and any other charitable organization under this clause that in the federal IRS Form 1023, Part IV, describes activities indicating a religious purpose, that:
(i) is a member of the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits or the Minnesota Council on Foundations;
(ii) is registered with the attorney general's office;
(iii) reports an end-of-year fund balance of at least $2,000,000; and
(iv) is incorporated in the state of Minnesota;
(3) a Minnesota private college, notwithstanding clause (2), that grants two- or four-year degrees and is registered with the Minnesota Office of Higher Education under chapter 136A; community college, state university, or technical college governed by the Board of Trustees of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities; or the University of Minnesota; or
(4) a nonprofit corporation subject to chapter 317A, described in section 317A.905, and exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, may authorize one or more charter schools if the charter school has operated for at least three years under a different authorizer and if the nonprofit corporation has existed for at least 25 years.
(5) no more than three single-purpose authorizers that are charitable, nonsectarian organizations formed under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and incorporated in the state of Minnesota whose sole purpose is to charter schools. Eligible organizations interested in being approved as an authorizer under this paragraph must submit a proposal to the commissioner that includes the provisions of paragraph (c) and a five-year financial plan. Such authorizers shall consider and approve applications using the criteria provided in subdivision 4 and shall not limit the applications it solicits, considers, or approves to any single curriculum, learning program, or method.
(c) An eligible authorizer under this subdivision must apply to the commissioner for approval as an authorizer before submitting any affidavit to the commissioner to charter a school. The application for approval as a charter school authorizer must demonstrate the applicant's ability to implement the procedures and satisfy the criteria for
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1641
chartering a school under this section. The commissioner must approve or disapprove an application within 60 business days of the application deadline. If the commissioner disapproves the application, the commissioner must notify the applicant of the deficiencies and the applicant then has 20 business days to address the deficiencies to the commissioner's satisfaction. Failing to address the deficiencies to the commissioner's satisfaction makes an applicant ineligible to be an authorizer. The commissioner, in establishing criteria for approval, must consider the applicant's:
(1) capacity and infrastructure;
(2) application criteria and process;
(3) contracting process;
(4) ongoing oversight and evaluation processes; and
(5) renewal criteria and processes.
(d) The affidavit to be submitted to and evaluated by the commissioner must include at least the following:
(1) how chartering schools is a way for the organization to carry out its mission;
(2) a description of the capacity of the organization to serve as an authorizer, including the personnel who will perform the authorizing duties, their qualifications, the amount of time they will be assigned to this responsibility, and the financial resources allocated by the organization to this responsibility;
(3) a description of the application and review process the authorizer will use to make decisions regarding the granting of charters, which will include at least the following:
(i) how the statutory purposes defined in subdivision 1 are addressed;
(ii) the mission, goals, program model, and student performance expectations;
(iii) an evaluation plan
for the school that includes criteria for evaluating educational,
organizational, and fiscal plans;
(iv) the school's governance plan;
(v) the financial management plan; and
(vi) the administration and operations plan;
(4) a description of the type of contract it will arrange with the schools it charters that meets the provisions of subdivision 6 and defines the rights and responsibilities of the charter school for governing its educational program, controlling its funds, and making school management decisions;
(5) the process to be used for providing ongoing oversight of the school consistent with the contract expectations specified in clause (4) that assures that the schools chartered are complying with both the provisions of applicable law and rules, and with the contract;
(6) the process for making decisions regarding the renewal or termination of the school's charter based on evidence that demonstrates the academic, organizational, and financial competency of the school, including its success in increasing student achievement and meeting the goals of the charter school agreement; and
Journal of the House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page
1642
(7) an
assurance specifying that the organization is committed to serving as an
authorizer for the full five-year term.
A disapproved applicant under this paragraph may resubmit an application during a future application period.
(e) The authorizer must participate in department-approved training.
(f) An authorizer that chartered a school
before August 1, 2009, must apply by June 30, 2011 2012, to the
commissioner for approval, under paragraph (c), to continue as an authorizer
under this section. For purposes of this
paragraph, an authorizer that fails to submit a timely application is
ineligible to charter a school.
(g) The commissioner shall review an authorizer's performance every five years in a manner and form determined by the commissioner and may review an authorizer's performance more frequently at the commissioner's own initiative or at the request of a charter school operator, charter school board member, or other interested party. The commissioner, after completing the review, shall transmit a report with findings to the authorizer. If, consistent with this section, the commissioner finds that an authorizer has not fulfilled the requirements of this section, the commissioner may subject the authorizer to corrective action, which may include terminating the contract with the charter school board of directors of a school it chartered. The commissioner must notify the authorizer in writing of any findings that may subject the authorizer to corrective action and the authorizer then has 15 business days to request an informal hearing before the commissioner takes corrective action.
(h) The commissioner may at any time take corrective action against an authorizer, including terminating an authorizer's ability to charter a school for:
(1) failing to demonstrate the criteria under paragraph (c) under which the commissioner approved the authorizer;
(2) violating a term of the chartering contract between the authorizer and the charter school board of directors; or
(3) unsatisfactory performance as an approved authorizer.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Davnie and Slocum
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 126 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Journal of the House -
33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1643
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Davnie and Slocum moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 22, line 24, delete "123B.05;"
Page 33, delete section 6
Page 35, delete section 7
Page 41, after line 4, insert:
"Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 123B.05, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2.
Contract deadline date; state aid
penalty. Notwithstanding any law to
the contrary, a public employer and the exclusive representative of the
teachers must both sign a collective bargaining agreement on or before January
15 of an even-numbered October 15 of an odd-numbered calendar
year. If a collective bargaining
agreement is not signed by that date, state aid paid to the public employer for
that fiscal year must be reduced.
However, state aid must not be reduced if:
(1) a public employer and the exclusive
representative of the teachers have submitted all unresolved contract items to
interest arbitration according to section 179A.16 before December 31 October
1 of an odd-numbered even-numbered year and filed required
final positions on all unresolved items with the commissioner of mediation
services before January 15 October 15 of an even-numbered odd-numbered
year; and
(2) the arbitration panel has issued its decision within 60 days after the date the final positions were filed.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective for revenue for fiscal year 2012 and later.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 123B.05, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. State
aid reductions returned to general fund redistributed to other school
districts. Reductions from aid
to districts and public employers other than districts must be returned to
the general fund redistributed on a per pupil unit basis to all other
school districts who have settled their contracts and are not subject to a
penalty under this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for revenue for fiscal year 2012 and later."
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1644
Page 45, delete sections 16 and 17
Page 46, delete sections 18 and 19
Page 54, delete lines 24 and 25
Page 54, line 26, delete "(b)"
Page 54, line 29, delete everything after "DATE."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Davnie and
Slocum amendment and the roll was called.
There were 58 yeas and 66 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davids
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Kath moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 31, delete section 5
Page 48, delete sections 21 and 22
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1645
Page 54, delete subdivision 19
Renumber the subdivisions in sequence
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Kath
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 67 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Norton and Benson, J., moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 77, delete section 4
Page 79, after line 27, insert:
"Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 124D.135, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1646
Subdivision 1. Revenue. The revenue for early childhood family
education programs for a school district equals $112 for fiscal year 2007
and $120 $127 for fiscal year 2008 2012 and later,
times the greater of:
(1) 150; or
(2) the number of people under five years of age residing in the district on October 1 of the previous school year.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for revenue for fiscal years 2012 and later."
Page 80, delete section 6
Page 80, line 31, delete "10,095,000" and insert "11,845,000"
Page 80, line 32, delete "10,095,000" and insert "12,595,000"
Page 80, line 33, delete "$7,067,000" and insert "$8,817,000"
Page 81, line 1, delete "$3,028,000" and insert "$3,778,000" and delete "$7,067,000" and insert "$8,817,000"
Page 81, line 4, delete "22,466,000" and insert "24,216,000"
Page 81, line 5, delete "23,015,000" and insert "25,515,000"
Page 81, line 6, delete "$15,924,000" and insert "$17,674,000"
Page 81, line 7, delete "$6,824,000" and insert "$7,574,000" and delete "$16,191,000" and insert "$17,941,000"
Page 82, delete subdivision 9
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Norton and Benson,
J., amendment and the roll
was called. There were 56 yeas and 69
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McFarlane
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1647
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Brynaert, Mariani, Greiling, Kath, Morrow and Davnie moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 42, line 2, delete "122A.73" and insert "123B.147, subdivision 3, paragraph (b)"
Page 42, after line 7, insert:
"Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 123B.147, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Duties; evaluation. (a) The principal shall provide
administrative, supervisory, and instructional leadership services, under the
supervision of the superintendent of schools of the district and in
accordance with according to the policies, rules, and regulations of
the school board of education, for the planning, management,
operation, and evaluation of the education program of the building or buildings
to which the principal is assigned.
(b) To enhance a principal's leadership skills and support and improve teaching practices, school performance, and student achievement, a district must develop and implement a performance-based system for annually evaluating school principals assigned to supervise a school building within the district. The evaluation must be designed to improve teaching and learning by supporting the principal in shaping the school's professional environment and developing teacher quality, performance, and effectiveness. The annual evaluation must:
(1) support and improve a principal's instructional
leadership, organizational management, and professional development, and strengthen
the principal's capacity in the areas of instruction, supervision, evaluation,
and teacher development;
(2) include formative and summative evaluations;
(3) be consistent with a principal's job description, a
district's long-term plans and goals, and the principal's own professional
multiyear growth plans and goals, all of which must support the principal's
leadership behaviors and practices, rigorous curriculum, school performance,
and high-quality instruction;
(4) include on-the-job observations and previous
evaluations;
(5) allow surveys to help identify a principal's
effectiveness, leadership skills and processes, and strengths and weaknesses in
exercising leadership in pursuit of school success;
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1648
(6) use longitudinal data on student
academic growth as an evaluation component and incorporate district achievement
goals and targets; and
(7) be linked to professional
development that emphasizes improved teaching and learning, curriculum and
instruction, student learning, and a collaborative professional culture.
The provisions of this paragraph are
intended to provide districts with sufficient flexibility to accommodate
district needs and goals related to developing, supporting, and evaluating
principals.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for the 2013-2014 school year and later."
Page 47, line 23, delete "122A.73" and insert "123B.147, subdivision 3, paragraph (b)"
Pages 85 to 107, delete sections 1 to 24, and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 122A.40, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Probationary period. (a) The first three consecutive years of a teacher's first teaching experience in Minnesota in a single district is deemed to be a probationary period of employment, and after completion thereof, the probationary period in each district in which the teacher is thereafter employed shall be one year. The school board must adopt a plan for written evaluation of teachers during the probationary period that is consistent with subdivision 8. Evaluation must occur at least three times each year at appropriate intervals for a teacher performing services on 120 or more school days, at least two times each year for a teacher performing services on 60 to 119 school days, and at least one time each year for a teacher performing services on fewer than 60 school days. Days devoted to parent-teacher conferences, teachers' workshops, and other staff development opportunities and days on which a teacher is absent from school must not be included in determining the number of school days on which a teacher performs services. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), during the probationary period any annual contract with any teacher may or may not be renewed as the school board shall see fit. However, the board must give any such teacher whose contract it declines to renew for the following school year written notice to that effect before July 1. If the teacher requests reasons for any nonrenewal of a teaching contract, the board must give the teacher its reason in writing, including a statement that appropriate supervision was furnished describing the nature and the extent of such supervision furnished the teacher during the employment by the board, within ten days after receiving such request. The school board may, after a hearing held upon due notice, discharge a teacher during the probationary period for cause, effective immediately, under section 122A.44.
(b) A board must discharge a probationary teacher, effective immediately, upon receipt of notice under section 122A.20, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), that the teacher's license has been revoked due to a conviction for child abuse or sexual abuse.
(c) A probationary teacher whose first three years of consecutive employment are interrupted for active military service and who promptly resumes teaching consistent with federal reemployment timelines for uniformed service personnel under United States Code, title 38, section 4312(e), is considered to have a consecutive teaching experience for purposes of paragraph (a).
(d) A probationary teacher must complete at least 60 days of teaching service each year during the probationary period. Days devoted to parent-teacher conferences, teachers' workshops, and other staff development opportunities and days on which a teacher is absent from school do not count as days of teaching service under this paragraph.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment and applies to all collective
bargaining agreements ratified after that date.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1649
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 122A.40, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Mentoring for probationary teachers. A school board and an exclusive representative of the teachers in the district must develop a probationary teacher peer review process through joint agreement that is consistent with subdivision 8. The process may include having trained observers serve as mentors or coaches or having teachers participate in professional learning communities.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment and applies to all collective bargaining
agreements ratified after that date.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 122A.40, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Development,
evaluation, and peer coaching for continuing contract teachers. (a) To improve student learning and
success, a school board and an exclusive representative of the teachers in
the district shall, consistent with paragraph (b), may develop a
an annual teacher evaluation and peer review process for probationary
and continuing contract teachers through joint agreement. If a school board and the exclusive
representative of the teachers in the district do not agree to an annual
teacher evaluation and peer review process, then the school board and the
exclusive representative of the teachers must implement the plan for evaluation
and review developed under paragraph (c) that is consistent with this
subdivision. The process may must
include having trained observers serve as peer coaches or having teachers
participate in professional learning communities, consistent with paragraph
(b).
(b) To develop, improve, and support qualified teachers and effective teaching practices and improve student learning and success, the annual evaluation process for teachers must:
(1) for probationary teachers, provide
for all evaluations required under subdivision 5;
(2) establish a three-year professional
evaluation cycle for each teacher that includes an individual growth and
development plan, a peer review process, the opportunity to participate in a
professional learning community under paragraph (a), and at least one summative
evaluation performed by a qualified and trained school administrator;
(3) be based on professional teaching
standards established in rule;
(4) coordinate staff development
activities under sections 122A.60 and 122A.61 with this evaluation process and
teachers' evaluation outcomes;
(5) provide time during the school day
and school year for peer coaching and teacher collaboration;
(6) include mentoring and induction
programs;
(7) include an option for teachers to
develop and present a portfolio demonstrating evidence of reflection and
professional growth, consistent with section 122A.18, subdivision 4, paragraph
(b), and include teachers' own performance assessment based on student work
samples and examples of teachers' work, which may include video among other
activities for the summative evaluation;
(8) use longitudinal data on student
academic growth, student attendance, student engagement and connection, other outcome
measures under section 120B.35, and other measures of student learning
explicitly aligned with the elements of curriculum for which teachers are
responsible;
(9) require qualified and trained
administrators to perform summative evaluations;
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1650
(10) give teachers not meeting professional teaching
standards under clause (3) or other professional criteria sufficient support to improve through a teacher
improvement process that includes established goals and timelines; and
(11) provide for a teacher not making adequate progress
in the teacher improvement process under clause (10) to be issued discipline
that may include being issued a last chance warning, terminated, discharged,
not renewed, or otherwise subjected to discipline that school administrators
deem appropriate; transferred to a different position; or granted a leave of
absence to address issues of teacher effectiveness.
(c) The department, in consultation with an equal number
of teacher and administrator representatives appointed by their respective
organizations, representing the Board of Teaching, the Minnesota Association of
School Administrators, the Minnesota School Boards Association, the Minnesota
Elementary and Secondary Principals Associations, Education Minnesota, and
representatives of the Minnesota Assessment Group and Minnesota postsecondary
institutions with research expertise in teacher evaluation, must create and
publish a teacher evaluation process that complies with the requirements in paragraph
(b) and applies to all teachers under sections 122A.40 and 122A.41 for whom no
agreement exists under paragraph (a) for an annual teacher evaluation and peer
review process. The teacher evaluation
process created under this subdivision does not create additional due process
rights for probationary teachers under subdivision 5.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment and applies to all collective bargaining agreements
ratified after that date.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 122A.41, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Probationary period; discharge or
demotion. (a) All teachers in the
public schools in cities of the first class during the first three years of
consecutive employment shall be deemed to be in a probationary period of
employment during which period any annual contract with any teacher may, or may
not, be renewed as the school board, after consulting with the peer review
committee charged with evaluating the probationary teachers under subdivision
3, shall see fit. The school site
management team or the school board if there is no school site management team,
shall adopt a plan for a written evaluation of teachers during the probationary
period according to subdivision subdivisions 3 and 5. Evaluation by the peer review committee
charged with evaluating probationary teachers under subdivision 3 shall occur
at least three times each year at appropriate intervals for a teacher
performing services on 120 or more school days, at least two times each year
for a teacher performing services on 60 to 119 school days, and at least one
time each year for a teacher performing services on fewer than 60 school
days. Days devoted to parent-teacher conferences,
teachers' workshops, and other staff development opportunities and days on
which a teacher is absent from school shall not be included in determining the
number of school days on which a teacher performs services. The school board may, during such
probationary period, discharge or demote a teacher for any of the causes as
specified in this code. A written
statement of the cause of such discharge or demotion shall be given to the
teacher by the school board at least 30 days before such removal or demotion
shall become effective, and the teacher so notified shall have no right of
appeal therefrom.
(b) A probationary teacher whose first three years of consecutive employment are interrupted for active military service and who promptly resumes teaching consistent with federal reemployment timelines for uniformed service personnel under United States Code, title 38, section 4312(e), is considered to have a consecutive teaching experience for purposes of paragraph (a).
(c) A probationary teacher must complete at least 60 days of teaching service each year during the probationary period. Days devoted to parent-teacher conferences, teachers' workshops, and other staff development opportunities and days on which a teacher is absent from school do not count as days of teaching service under this paragraph.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment and applies to all collective bargaining agreements
ratified after that date.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1651
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 122A.41, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Mentoring for probationary teachers. A board and an exclusive representative of the teachers in the district must develop a probationary teacher peer review process through joint agreement that is consistent with subdivision 5. The process may include having trained observers serve as mentors or coaches or having teachers participate in professional learning communities.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment and applies to all collective bargaining agreements
ratified after that date.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 122A.41, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Development, evaluation, and peer
coaching for continuing contract teachers.
(a) To improve student learning and success, a school board
and an exclusive representative of the teachers in the district must,
consistent with paragraph (b), may develop a an annual teacher
evaluation peer review process for probationary and nonprobationary
teachers through joint agreement. If
a school board and the exclusive representative of the teachers in the district
do not agree to an annual teacher evaluation and peer review process, then the
school board and the exclusive representative of the teachers must implement
the plan for evaluation and review developed under paragraph (c) that is
consistent with this subdivision.
The process may must include having trained observers
serve as peer coaches or having teachers participate in professional learning
communities, consistent with paragraph (b).
(b) To develop, improve, and support qualified teachers and effective teaching practices and improve student learning and success, the annual evaluation process for teachers must:
(1) for probationary teachers, provide for all
evaluations required under subdivision 2;
(2) establish a three-year professional evaluation cycle
for each teacher that includes an individual growth and development plan, a
peer review process, the opportunity to participate in a professional learning
community under paragraph (a), and at least one summative evaluation performed
by a qualified and trained administrator;
(3) be based on professional teaching standards
established in rule;
(4) coordinate staff development activities under
sections 122A.60 and 122A.61 with this evaluation process and teachers'
evaluation outcomes;
(5) provide time during the school day and school year
for peer coaching and teacher collaboration;
(6) include mentoring and induction programs;
(7) include an option for teachers to develop and
present a portfolio demonstrating evidence of reflection and professional growth,
consistent with section 122A.18, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), and include
teachers' own performance assessment based on student work samples and examples
of teachers' work, which may include video among other activities for the
summative evaluation;
(8) use longitudinal data on student academic growth,
student attendance, student engagement and connection, and other outcome
measures under section 120B.35 as evaluation components;
(9) require qualified and trained administrators to
perform summative evaluations;
(10) give teachers not meeting professional teaching
standards under clause (3) or other professional criteria sufficient support to
improve through an established teacher improvement process; and
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1652
(11) provide for a teacher not making adequate
progress in the teacher improvement process under clause (10) to be transferred
to a different position, granted a leave of absence to address issues of
teacher effectiveness, issued discipline that may include being issued a last
chance warning, terminated, discharged, not renewed, or otherwise subjected to
discipline that school administrators deem appropriate;
(c) The department, in consultation with
an equal number of teacher and administrator representatives appointed by their
respective organizations, representing the Board of Teaching, the Minnesota
Association of School Administrators, the Minnesota School Boards Association,
the Minnesota Elementary and Secondary Principals Associations, Education Minnesota, representatives of the Minnesota
Assessment Group and Minnesota postsecondary institutions with research
expertise in teacher evaluation, and other education stakeholders, must create
and publish a teacher evaluation process that complies with the requirements in
paragraph (b) and applies to all teachers under sections 122A.40 and 122A.41
for whom no agreement exists under paragraph (a) for an annual teacher
evaluation and peer review process. The
teacher evaluation process created under this subdivision does not create
additional due process rights for probationary teachers under subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment and applies to all collective bargaining agreements ratified after that date."
Pages 109 to 110, delete sections 27 to 29
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
CALL OF
THE HOUSE
On the motion of Hilstrom and on the demand
of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Dean moved that further proceedings of the
roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in
the absentees. The motion prevailed and
it was so ordered.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1653
The question recurred on the Brynaert et
al amendment and the roll was called.
There were 59 yeas and 68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davids
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Thissen
Tillberry
Urdahl
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
CALL OF THE HOUSE LIFTED
Hilstrom moved that the call of the House
be lifted. The motion prevailed and it
was so ordered.
Mariani moved to amend H. F. No. 934, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 27, delete section 4 and insert:
"Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 120B.30, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1b. High
school assessments. (a)
Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the commissioner shall establish
a system of high school assessments for students entering grade 8 in the
2011-2012 school year and later that provides information on the college and
career readiness of Minnesota students and fulfills federal accountability
requirements, consistent with this subdivision and related rules. For purposes of this subdivision,
"college and career readiness" means the knowledge and skills that a
high school graduate needs to undertake either credit-bearing coursework at a
two-year or four-year college or university or career-track employment that
pays a living wage, provides employment benefits, and offers clear pathways for
advancement through further education and training.
Journal of the House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page
1654
(b) The commissioner shall establish and administer a high school reading and writing exam at the end of grade 10. The reading and writing exam must conform with the following:
(1) align with the most recently revised academic
content standards under section 120B.023, subdivision 2;
(2) produce independent scores for each content area;
(3) include both multiple-choice and open-ended items on
the reading portion of the exam to assess skills defined in the state's
academic content standards;
(4) be designed for computer administration and scoring
so that, beginning the second year a computerized test is administered and as soon
as practicable during the first year a computerized test is administered, the
exam results of students who take computerized tests are available to the
school or district within three full school days after the exam is
administered, among other design characteristics;
(5) allow for remediation and frequent computer retests
of the reading and writing portions of the exam;
(6) use achievement level descriptors in reading and
writing that define a student's readiness for college or a career;
(7) require all general education students, as a
condition of graduating, to achieve passing scores in reading and writing
established through a professionally recognized methodology, consistent with
this paragraph;
(8) require general education students to participate in
a locally developed remediation plan if they do not achieve a passing score
after two retest opportunities;
(9) provide a state-level student appeals process that
accommodates alternative measures to demonstrate students' college and career
readiness and is available only to those limited number of students in the
second semester of their senior year who are unable to demonstrate reading or
writing proficiency on the assessment but can demonstrate equivalent levels of
knowledge and skill based on the alternative measures; and
(10) allow an eligible student to meet this exam requirement through an alternative method:
(i) for high school students who transfer into Minnesota
from another state where the high school reading and writing course and graduation
requirements are of equal or greater rigor, meet that state's federal
accountability exams requirements in reading or writing, as applicable;
(ii) allow a student who has an active individualized
education program to achieve a passing status at an individual level as
prescribed by the commissioner;
(iii) waive the required exam for a high school student
who is an English language learner under section 124D.59 and who has been
enrolled for four or fewer school years in a school in which English is the
primary language of instruction; or
(iv) other alternative methods recommended by the
Assessment Advisory Committee, if subsequently specifically authorized by law
to allow other alternative methods.
All general education students must receive a passing
score in both reading and writing to graduate, consistent with paragraph
(e). A score below "passing"
means that there is a high likelihood that the student does not have the
reading and writing skills needed to succeed in postsecondary education or the
workplace. The commissioner must
establish the passing score based on the recommendations of both kindergarten
through grade 12 and postsecondary
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1655
educators with relevant language arts expertise and employers
and other community leaders who understand the knowledge and skills that
individuals need for work and citizenship, and an established statistical
relationship between two consecutive years of students' exam results and other
indicators of college and career readiness that the commissioner develops in
consultation with the Assessment Advisory Committee under section 120B.365.
(c) The commissioner shall establish statewide end-of-course exams in subjects equivalent to high school algebra and biology. These exams must conform with the following:
(1) align with the most recently
revised academic content standards under section 120B.023, subdivision 2;
(2) include both multiple-choice and
open-ended items that assess the appropriate algebra and biology knowledge and
skills contained in the state's academic content standards;
(3) be designed for computer
administration and scoring so that, beginning the second year a computerized
test is administered and as soon as practicable during the first year a
computerized test is administered, the exam results of students who take
computerized tests are available to the school or district within three full
school days after the exam is administered, among other design characteristics;
(4) be administered at regular
intervals that align with the most common high school schedules in Minnesota;
(5) generate achievement levels
established through a professionally recognized methodology;
(6) use achievement level descriptors
that define a student's college and career readiness;
(7) comprise 25 percent of the
student's overall course grade in the corresponding course, except a school
that is identified as highly misaligned under clause (11) for two consecutive
school years or more shall make the exam results a component of and equivalent
to 50 percent of the student's overall course grade in algebra or biology, as
applicable;
(8) require a student who does not pass
a high school algebra or biology course to (i) retake the course or complete a
district-authorized credit recovery class, (ii) opt, at the student's election,
to retake the end-of-course assessment within a regularly scheduled
administration window, and (iii) have the student select the exam score on the
initial test or the retest to count as the equivalent of 25 percent of the
student's overall course grade, or the equivalent of 50 percent if the school
has been identified as highly misaligned for two consecutive school years or
more, consistent with clause (7);
(9) allow an eligible student to meet this requirement through an alternative method that demonstrates the student's college and career readiness:
(i) for high school students who
transfer into Minnesota from another state where the algebra or biology course
content, as applicable, is of equal or greater rigor, pass that state's high
school course and graduation requirements in algebra or biology, as applicable;
(ii) allow a student who has an active
individualized education program to achieve a passing status at an individual
level as prescribed by the commissioner;
(iii) waive the required exam for a
high school student who is an English language learner under section 124D.59
and who has been enrolled for four or fewer years in a school in which English
is the primary language of instruction; or
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1656
(iv) other alternative methods recommended
by the Assessment Advisory Committee, if subsequently specifically authorized
by law to allow other alternative methods;
(10) use three consecutive school years
of research and analysis through the 2015-2016 school year, as prescribed by
the commissioner, to calculate and report an alignment index that compares
students' final grades in these courses with their end-of-course exam scores;
(11) subsequent to calculating and
reporting the alignment index under clause (10), require schools that are
highly misaligned for two or more consecutive school years to transmit written
notice of the misalignment to all parents of students enrolled in the school,
as prescribed by the commissioner; and
(12) when schools are highly misaligned
for two or more consecutive years under clause (11), use school district funds
under section 122A.60, subdivision 1a, paragraph (a), to correct the
misalignment.
A highly misaligned school that must
count a student's algebra or biology exam score, as applicable, as the equivalent
of 50 percent of the student's overall course grade under clause (7) or (8) may
again count a student's exam score as the equivalent of 25 percent of the
student's overall course grade when the school is not identified as highly
misaligned in two subsequent consecutive school years.
(d) The requirements of this subdivision
apply to students in public schools, including charter schools, who enter grade
8 in the 2011-2012 school year or later.
The commissioner may establish a transition period where students who
enter grade 8 in the 2011-2012 or 2012-2013 school year graduate either under
the graduation-required assessment for diploma requirements under section
120B.30, subdivision 1, or through a staggered implementation of this
subdivision. During the transition
period, the proficiency of any federal or state-required interim passing score
in reading or writing must be comparable in rigor to the passing scores
currently required for reading and writing under the graduation-required
assessment for diploma. The commissioner
may seek authority from the legislature to adjust the timeline under this
paragraph if circumstances such as changes in federal law governing educational
accountability and assessment warrant such an adjustment.
(e) To fully implement this subdivision and enable school districts to provide intervention and support to struggling students and improve instruction for all students, the commissioner must provide districts with:
(i) benchmark assessments that are
aligned with the high school reading and writing assessment and algebra and
biology end-of-course exams; and
(ii) an item bank available to teachers
for creating formative assessments to help students prepare for the high school
reading and writing assessment and algebra and biology end-of-course
exams. The benchmark assessments must be
available to districts for at least two full school years before students are
required to achieve a passing score on the reading and writing exam to graduate
from high school.
(f) The commissioner shall expand the
membership and purpose of the Assessment Advisory Committee established under
section 120B.365 to include assessment experts and practitioners from both
secondary and postsecondary education systems and other appropriate stakeholders
to monitor the implementation of and student outcomes based on the
end-of-course exams and policies and the state support available to districts,
including small or rural districts, under this subdivision. This committee shall report annually by
February 15 to the commissioner and the legislature on the implementation of
and student outcomes based on the exams and policies under this
subdivision. Notwithstanding section
15.059, subdivision 3, committee members shall not receive compensation, per
diem payments, or reimbursement for expenses.
(g) Using a solicitation process that
includes a request for proposal process and multiple responses, the
commissioner shall contract for at least two independent studies at two-year
intervals to evaluate: (1) the implementation
of the requirements and (2) the availability and efficacy of resources to
support and improve student
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1657
outcomes based on student achievement
data under this subdivision. The commissioner
must submit the results of the first study to the education policy and finance
committees of the legislature by February 15, 2016. The commissioner must submit the results of
the second study to the legislature by February 15, 2018.
(h) The commissioner must not begin to develop
additional statewide end-of-course exams in geometry, chemistry, or physics
until specifically authorized in law to do so.
(i) A district or charter school must indicate on a
student's transcript the student's level of college and career readiness in
reading, writing, algebra, and biology under this subdivision after the levels
have been established through a professionally recognized methodology.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Page 49, delete section 23 and insert:
"Sec. 23. ASSESSMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE;
RECOMMENDATIONS.
(a) The Assessment Advisory Committee under Minnesota Statutes, section 120B.365, must develop recommendations for alternative methods by which students meet the reading and writing exam requirement under Minnesota Statutes, section 120B.30, subdivision 1b, paragraph (b), clause (10). The Assessment Advisory Committee, among other alternative methods and if consistent with federal educational accountability law, must consider allowing students to:
(1) achieve a college-credit score on a college-level
examination program (CLEP) for reading and writing; or
(2) achieve a college readiness score in the relevant
subject area on the American college test (ACT) or scholastic aptitude test
(SAT) exam.
(b) The Assessment Advisory Committee must develop recommendations for alternative methods by which students satisfy the high school algebra and biology requirements under Minnesota Statutes, section 120B.30, subdivision 1b, paragraph (c), clause (9), and demonstrate their college and career readiness. The Assessment Advisory Committee, among other alternative methods and if consistent with federal educational accountability law, must consider allowing students to:
(1) achieve the mathematics or science college readiness
score on the American college test (ACT) or scholastic aptitude test (SAT)
exam;
(2) achieve a college-credit score on a college-level examination
program (CLEP) for algebra or biology;
(3) achieve a score on an equivalent advanced placement
or international baccalaureate exam that would earn credit at a four-year
college or university; or
(4) pass a credit-bearing course in college algebra or
college biology or a more advanced course in either subject with a grade of C
or better under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.09, including Minnesota
Statutes, section 124D.09, subdivision 10.
(c) The Assessment Advisory Committee, in the context of
the high school assessments under Minnesota Statutes, section 120B.30,
subdivision 1b, may develop recommendations on integrating universal design
principles to improve access to learning and assessments for all students, more
accurately understand what students know and can do, provide Minnesota with
more cost-effective assessments, and provide educators with more valid
inferences about students' achievement levels.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1658
(d) The Assessment Advisory Committee, for purposes of fully implementing the high school assessment system under Minnesota Statutes, section 120B.30, subdivision 1b, also must develop recommendations for:
(1) the administrative structure, criteria, and
processes for implementing the state-level student appeals process;
(2) calculating the alignment index, including how
questions about validity and reliability are resolved; and
(3) defining "misaligned" and "highly
misaligned" and when and under what specific circumstances misalignments
occur.
(e) By February 15, 2012, the Assessment Advisory
Committee must submit its recommendations under this section to the education
commissioner and the education policy and finance committees of the
legislature.
(f) The commissioner must not implement any element of
any recommendation under paragraphs (a) to (e) related to the high school
assessment system under Minnesota Statutes, section 120B.30, subdivision 1b,
without first receiving specific legislative authority to do so.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Mariani amendment
and the roll was called. There were 52
yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Journal of the House -
33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1659
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 934, A bill for an act relating to education; providing for policy and funding for family, adult, and prekindergarten through grade 12 education including general education, academic excellence, special education, facilities and technology, nutrition and accounting, libraries, early childhood education, prevention, self-sufficiency and lifelong learning, state agencies, and forecast adjustments; requiring reports; requiring studies; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 13D.02, by adding a subdivision; 16A.152, subdivision 2; 93.22, subdivision 1; 93.2236; 120A.41; 120B.023, subdivision 2; 120B.07; 120B.30, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 120B.35, subdivision 1; 120B.36, subdivision 1; 122A.40, subdivisions 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, by adding subdivisions; 122A.41, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, by adding a subdivision; 122A.414, subdivisions 1a, 2, 2a, 2b, 4; 122A.416; 122A.60; 122A.61, subdivision 1; 123A.55; 123B.02, subdivision 15; 123B.09, subdivision 8; 123B.143, subdivision 1; 123B.54; 123B.59, subdivision 5; 123B.75, subdivision 5; 124D.10, subdivision 3; 124D.19, subdivision 3; 124D.531, subdivision 1; 124D.86, subdivision 3; 125A.07; 125A.21, subdivisions 2, 3, 5, 7; 125A.515, by adding a subdivision; 125A.69, subdivision 1; 125A.76, subdivision 1; 125A.79, subdivision 1; 126C.10, subdivisions 1, 2, 2a, 3, 7, 8, 8a, 13a, 14, by adding a subdivision; 126C.126; 126C.20; 126C.40, subdivision 1; 126C.44; 127A.33; 127A.441; 127A.45, subdivision 2; 179A.16, subdivision 1; 179A.18, subdivisions 1, 3; 298.28, subdivisions 2, 4; Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 5, section 60, as amended; Laws 2009, chapter 96, article 1, section 24, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, 4, as amended, 5, as amended, 6, as amended, 7, as amended; article 2, section 67, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, as amended, 4, as amended, 6, 9, as amended; article 3, section 21, subdivisions 3, 4, as amended; article 4, section 12, subdivision 6, as amended; article 5, section 13, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, as amended; article 6, section 11, subdivisions 3, as amended, 4, as amended, 8, as amended, 12, as amended; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 120B; 122A; 124D; 179A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 122A.61; 123B.05; 123B.59, subdivisions 6, 7; 124D.86, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 4, 5, 6; 126C.10, subdivision 5; 127A.46; 129C.10, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 3a, 4, 6, 7, 8; 129C.105; 129C.15; 129C.20; 129C.25; 129C.26; 179A.18, subdivision 2; Laws 2009, chapter 88, article 12, section 23.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 68 yeas and 59 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1660
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
CALENDAR FOR
THE DAY
Dean moved that the Calendar for the Day
be continued. The motion prevailed.
MOTIONS AND
RESOLUTIONS
Kath moved that the name of Clark be added
as an author on H. F. No. 454.
The motion prevailed.
Cornish moved that the name of Ward be
added as an author on H. F. No. 977. The motion prevailed.
Kelly moved that the name of McFarlane be added
as an author on H. F. No. 1016.
The motion prevailed.
Murphy, E., moved that her name be
stricken as an author on H. F. No. 1086. The motion prevailed.
Murphy, E., moved that her name be
stricken as an author on H. F. No. 1087. The motion prevailed.
Mullery moved that the name of Fritz be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1098. The motion prevailed.
Anderson, B., moved that the name of Clark
be added as an author on H. F. No. 1157. The motion prevailed.
Brynaert moved that the name of Clark be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1173. The motion prevailed.
Hayden moved that the names of Howes and
Gunther be added as authors on H. F. No. 1257. The motion prevailed.
Mullery moved that the name of Greene be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1307. The motion prevailed.
Hayden moved that the name of Greene be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1313. The motion prevailed.
Gruenhagen moved that the name of
Kiffmeyer be added as an author on H. F. No. 1317. The motion prevailed.
Abeler moved that the name of Morrow be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1320. The motion prevailed.
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1661
ADJOURNMENT
Dean moved that when the House adjourns
today it adjourn until 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 30, 2011. The motion prevailed.
Dean moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker declared
the House stands adjourned until 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 30, 2011.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives
Journal of the
House - 33rd Day - Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - Top of Page 1662