Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11217
Speaker pro tempore Bigham called Sertich to the Chair.
REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON
RULES AND
LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Sertich from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21, designated the following bills to be
placed on the Supplemental Calendar for the Day for Tuesday, May 4, 2010:
H. F. No. 2614; S. F. Nos. 3027
and 525; H. F. Nos. 2116 and 2037; and
S. F. Nos. 2510 and 2974.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
S. F. No. 3027 was reported to the House.
Huntley moved to amend S. F. No. 3027, the first
engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert the
following language of H. F. No. 3237, the third engrossment:
"ARTICLE 1
INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION
PLAN SERVICES
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.0625, subdivision 26, is amended to read:
Subd. 26. Special
education services. (a) Medical
assistance covers medical services identified in a recipient's individualized
education plan and covered under the medical assistance state plan. Covered services include occupational
therapy, physical therapy, speech-language therapy, clinical psychological
services, nursing services, school psychological services, school social work
services, personal care assistants serving as management aides, assistive
technology devices, transportation services, health assessments, and other
services covered under the medical assistance state plan. Mental health services eligible for medical
assistance reimbursement must be provided or coordinated through a children's
mental health collaborative where a collaborative exists if the child is
included in the collaborative operational target population. The provision or coordination of services
does not require that the individual education plan be developed by the
collaborative.
The services may be provided
by a Minnesota school district that is enrolled as a medical assistance
provider or its subcontractor, and only if the services meet all the
requirements otherwise applicable if the service had been provided by a
provider other than a school district, in the following areas: medical necessity, physician's orders,
documentation, personnel qualifications, and prior authorization requirements. The nonfederal share of costs for services
provided under this subdivision is the responsibility of the local school
district as provided in section 125A.74.
Services listed in a child's individual education plan are eligible for
medical assistance reimbursement only if those services meet criteria for federal
financial participation under the Medicaid program.
(b) Approval of
health-related services for inclusion in the individual education plan does not
require prior authorization for purposes of reimbursement under this
chapter. The commissioner may require
physician review and approval of the plan not more than once annually or upon
any modification of the individual education plan that reflects a change in
health-related services.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11218
(c) Services of a speech-language pathologist provided under
this section are covered notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 9505.0390, subpart
1, item L, if the person:
(1) holds a masters degree in speech-language pathology;
(2) is licensed by the Minnesota Board of Teaching as an
educational speech-language pathologist; and
(3) either has a certificate of clinical competence from the
American Speech and Hearing Association, has completed the equivalent
educational requirements and work experience necessary for the certificate or
has completed the academic program and is acquiring supervised work experience
to qualify for the certificate.
(d) Medical assistance coverage for medically necessary
services provided under other subdivisions in this section may not be denied
solely on the basis that the same or similar services are covered under this
subdivision.
(e) The commissioner shall develop and implement package
rates, bundled rates, or per diem rates for special education services under
which separately covered services are grouped together and billed as a unit in
order to reduce administrative complexity.
(f) The commissioner shall develop a cost-based payment
structure for payment of these services.
Only costs reported through the designated Minnesota Department of
Education data systems in distinct service categories qualify for inclusion in
the cost-based payment structure. The
commissioner shall reimburse claims submitted based on an interim rate, and
shall settle at a final rate once the department has determined it. The commissioner shall notify the school
district of the final rate. The school
district has 60 days to appeal the final rate.
To appeal the final rate, the school district shall file a written
appeal request to the commissioner within 60 days of the date the final rate
determination was mailed. The appeal
request shall specify (1) the disputed items and (2) the name and address of
the person to contact regarding the appeal.
(g) Effective July 1, 2000, medical assistance services
provided under an individual education plan or an individual family service
plan by local school districts shall not count against medical assistance
authorization thresholds for that child.
(h) Nursing services as defined in section 148.171,
subdivision 15, and provided as an individual education plan health-related
service, are eligible for medical assistance payment if they are otherwise a
covered service under the medical assistance program. Medical assistance covers the administration
of prescription medications by a licensed nurse who is employed by or under
contract with a school district when the administration of medications is
identified in the child's individualized education plan. The simple administration of medications
alone is not covered under medical assistance when administered by a provider
other than a school district or when it is not identified in the child's individualized
education plan.
ARTICLE 2
STATE HEALTH ACCESS PROGRAM
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 62Q.80, is amended to read:
62Q.80 COMMUNITY-BASED HEALTH
CARE COVERAGE PROGRAM.
Subdivision 1. Scope.
(a) A Any community-based health care initiative may
develop and operate a community-based health care coverage program
programs that offers offer to eligible individuals and their
dependents the option of purchasing through their employer health care coverage
on a fixed prepaid basis without meeting the requirements of chapter 60A, 62A,
62C, 62D, 62M, 62N, 62Q, or 62T, or 62U, or any other law
or rule that applies to entities licensed under these chapters.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11219
(b) The Each initiative
shall establish health outcomes to be achieved through the program
programs and performance measurements in order to determine whether these
outcomes have been met. The outcomes
must include, but are not limited to:
(1) a reduction in
uncompensated care provided by providers participating in the community-based
health network;
(2) an increase in the
delivery of preventive health care services; and
(3) health improvement for
enrollees with chronic health conditions through the management of these
conditions.
In establishing performance
measurements, the initiative shall use measures that are consistent with
measures published by nonprofit Minnesota or national organizations that
produce and disseminate health care quality measures.
(c) Any program established
under this section shall not constitute a financial liability for the state, in
that any financial risk involved in the operation or termination of the program
shall be borne by the community-based initiative and the participating health
care providers.
Subd. 1a. Demonstration
project. The commissioner of health and
the commissioner of human services shall award a demonstration
project grant grants to a community-based health care initiative
initiatives to develop and operate a community-based health care
coverage program to operate within Carlton, Cook, Lake, and St. Louis
Counties programs in Minnesota.
The demonstration project projects shall extend for five
years and must comply with the requirements of this section.
Subd. 2. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the
following definitions apply:
(a)
"Community-based" means located in or primarily relating to the
community of geographically contiguous political subdivisions, as
determined by the board of a community-based health initiative that is served
by the community-based health care coverage program.
(b) "Community-based
health care coverage program" or "program" means a program
administered by a community-based health initiative that provides health care
services through provider members of a community-based health network or
combination of networks to eligible individuals and their dependents who are
enrolled in the program.
(c) "Community-based
health initiative" or "initiative" means a nonprofit
corporation that is governed by a board that has at least 80 percent of its
members residing in the community and includes representatives of the
participating network providers and employers, or a county-based purchasing
organization as defined in section 256B.692.
(d) "Community-based
health network" means a contract-based network of health care providers
organized by the community-based health initiative to provide or support the
delivery of health care services to enrollees of the community-based health
care coverage program on a risk-sharing or nonrisk-sharing basis.
(e) "Dependent"
means an eligible employee's spouse or unmarried child who is under the age of
19 years.
Subd. 3. Approval. (a) Prior to the operation of a
community-based health care coverage program, a community-based health
initiative, defined in subdivision 2, paragraph (c), and receiving funds
from the Department of Health, shall submit to the commissioner of health
for approval the community-based health care coverage program developed by the
initiative. Each community-based
health initiative as defined in subdivision 2, paragraph
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11220
(c), and receiving State
Health Access Program (SHAP) grant funding shall submit to the commissioner of
human services for approval prior to its operation the community-based health
care coverage programs developed by the initiatives. The commissioner commissioners shall
ensure that the each program meets the federal grant requirements
and any requirements described in this section and is actuarially sound based
on a review of appropriate records and methods utilized by the community-based
health initiative in establishing premium rates for the community-based health
care coverage program programs.
(b) Prior to approval, the commissioner shall also ensure
that:
(1) the benefits offered comply with subdivision 8 and that
there are adequate numbers of health care providers participating in the
community-based health network to deliver the benefits offered under the
program;
(2) the activities of the program are limited to activities
that are exempt under this section or otherwise from regulation by the
commissioner of commerce;
(3) the complaint resolution process meets the requirements
of subdivision 10; and
(4) the data privacy policies and procedures comply with
state and federal law.
Subd. 4. Establishment. The initiative shall establish and
operate upon approval by the commissioner commissioners of health
a and human services community-based health care coverage program
programs. The operational structure
established by the initiative shall include, but is not limited to:
(1) establishing a process for enrolling eligible individuals
and their dependents;
(2) collecting and coordinating premiums from enrollees and
employers of enrollees;
(3) providing payment to participating providers;
(4) establishing a benefit set according to subdivision 8 and
establishing premium rates and cost-sharing requirements;
(5) creating incentives to encourage primary care and
wellness services; and
(6) initiating disease management services, as
appropriate.
Subd. 5. Qualifying employees. To be eligible for the community-based
health care coverage program, an individual must:
(1) reside in or work within the designated community-based
geographic area served by the program;
(2) be employed by a qualifying employer or, be
an employee's dependent, or be self-employed on a full‑time basis;
(3) not be enrolled in or have currently available health
coverage, except for catastrophic health care coverage; and
(4) not be eligible for or enrolled in medical
assistance, or general assistance medical care, and not be
enrolled in MinnesotaCare, or Medicare.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11221
Subd. 6. Qualifying employers. (a) To qualify for participation in the
community-based health care coverage program, an employer must:
(1) employ at least one but no more than 50 employees at the
time of initial enrollment in the program;
(2) pay its employees a median wage of $12.50 per hour
that equals 350 percent of the federal poverty guidelines or less; and
(3) not have offered employer-subsidized health coverage to
its employees for at least 12 months prior to the initial enrollment in the
program. For purposes of this section,
"employer-subsidized health coverage" means health care coverage for
which the employer pays at least 50 percent of the cost of coverage for the
employee.
(b) To participate in the program, a qualifying employer
agrees to:
(1) offer health care coverage through the program to all
eligible employees and their dependents regardless of health status;
(2) participate in the program for an initial term of at
least one year;
(3) pay a percentage of the premium established by the
initiative for the employee; and
(4) provide the initiative with any employee information
deemed necessary by the initiative to determine eligibility and premium
payments.
Subd. 7. Participating providers. Any health care provider participating in
the community-based health network must accept as payment in full the payment
rate established by the initiative initiatives and may not charge
to or collect from an enrollee any amount in access of this amount for any
service covered under the program.
Subd. 8. Coverage.
(a) The initiative initiatives shall establish the
health care benefits offered through the community-based health care coverage program
programs. The benefits established shall
include, at a minimum:
(1) child health supervision services up to age 18, as
defined under section 62A.047; and
(2) preventive services, including:
(i) health education and wellness services;
(ii) health supervision, evaluation, and follow-up;
(iii) immunizations; and
(iv) early disease detection.
(b) Coverage of health care services offered by the program
may be limited to participating health care providers or health networks. All services covered under the program
programs must be services that are offered within the scope of practice
of the participating health care providers.
(c) The initiative initiatives may establish
cost-sharing requirements. Any
co-payment or deductible provisions established may not discriminate on the
basis of age, sex, race, disability, economic status, or length of enrollment
in the program programs.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11222
(d) If any of the initiative initiatives
amends or alters the benefits offered through the program from the initial
offering, the that initiative must notify the commissioner
commissioners of health and human services and all enrollees of the
benefit change.
Subd. 9. Enrollee information. (a) The initiative initiatives
must provide an individual or family who enrolls in the program a clear and
concise written statement that includes the following information:
(1) health care services that are provided covered
under the program;
(2) any exclusions or limitations on the health care services
offered covered, including any cost-sharing arrangements or prior
authorization requirements;
(3) a list of where the health care services can be obtained
and that all health care services must be provided by or through a
participating health care provider or community-based health network;
(4) a description of the program's complaint resolution process,
including how to submit a complaint; how to file a complaint with the
commissioner of health; and how to obtain an external review of any adverse
decisions as provided under subdivision 10;
(5) the conditions under which the program or coverage under
the program may be canceled or terminated; and
(6) a precise statement specifying that this program is not
an insurance product and, as such, is exempt from state regulation of insurance
products.
(b) The commissioner commissioners of health and
human services must approve a copy of the written statement prior to the
operation of the program.
Subd. 10. Complaint resolution process. (a) The initiative initiatives
must establish a complaint resolution process.
The process must make reasonable efforts to resolve complaints and to
inform complainants in writing of the initiative's decision within 60 days of
receiving the complaint. Any decision
that is adverse to the enrollee shall include a description of the right to an
external review as provided in paragraph (c) and how to exercise this right.
(b) The initiative initiatives must report any
complaint that is not resolved within 60 days to the commissioner
of health.
(c) The initiative initiatives must include in
the complaint resolution process the ability of an enrollee to pursue the
external review process provided under section 62Q.73 with any decision
rendered under this external review process binding on the initiative
initiatives.
Subd. 11. Data privacy. The initiative initiatives
shall establish data privacy policies and procedures for the program that
comply with state and federal data privacy laws.
Subd. 12. Limitations on enrollment. (a) The initiative initiatives
may limit enrollment in the program. If
enrollment is limited, a waiting list must be established.
(b) The initiative initiatives shall not
restrict or deny enrollment in the program except for nonpayment of premiums,
fraud or misrepresentation, or as otherwise permitted under this section.
(c) The initiative initiatives may require a
certain percentage of participation from eligible employees of a qualifying
employer before coverage can be offered through the program.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11223
Subd. 13. Report. (a) The Each initiative
shall submit quarterly status reports to the commissioner of health on January
15, April 15, July 15, and October 15 of each year, with the first report due
January 15, 2008. The Each
initiative receiving funding from the Department of Human Services shall submit
status reports to the commissioner of human services as defined in the terms of
contract with the Department of Human Services.
Each status report shall include:
(1) the financial status of
the program, including the premium rates, cost per member per month, claims
paid out, premiums received, and administrative expenses;
(2) a description of the health
care benefits offered and the services utilized;
(3) the number of employers
participating, the number of employees and dependents covered under the
program, and the number of health care providers participating;
(4) a description of the
health outcomes to be achieved by the program and a status report on the
performance measurements to be used and collected; and
(5) any other information
requested by the commissioner commissioners of health, human
services, or commerce or the legislature.
(b) The initiative shall
contract with an independent entity to conduct an evaluation of the program to
be submitted to the commissioners of health and commerce and the legislature by
January 15, 2010. The evaluation shall
include:
(1) an analysis of the health
outcomes established by the initiative and the performance measurements to
determine whether the outcomes are being achieved;
(2) an analysis of the
financial status of the program, including the claims to premiums loss ratio
and utilization and cost experience;
(3) the demographics of the
enrollees, including their age, gender, family income, and the number of
dependents;
(4) the number of employers
and employees who have been denied access to the program and the basis for
the denial;
(5) specific analysis on
enrollees who have aggregate medical claims totaling over $5,000 per year,
including data on the enrollee's main diagnosis and whether all the medical
claims were covered by the program;
(6) number of enrollees
referred to state public assistance programs;
(7) a comparison of
employer-subsidized health coverage provided in a comparable geographic area to
the designated community-based geographic area served by the program,
including, to the extent available:
(i) the difference in the
number of employers with 50 or fewer employees offering employer-subsidized
health coverage;
(ii) the difference in
uncompensated care being provided in each area; and
(iii) a comparison of health
care outcomes and measurements established by the initiative; and
(8) any other information
requested by the commissioner of health or commerce.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11224
Subd. 14. Sunset. This section expires December 31, 2012
August 31, 2014.
ARTICLE 3
CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE
REAUTHORIZATION ACT (CHIPRA)
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.055,
subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Infants. Medical assistance may be paid for an
infant less than one year of age, whose mother was eligible for and receiving
medical assistance at the time of birth and who remains in the mother's
household or who is in a family with countable income that is equal to or
less than the income standard established under section 256B.057, subdivision
1.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.057,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Infants
and pregnant women. (a)(1) An infant
less than one year of age or a pregnant woman who has written verification of a
positive pregnancy test from a physician or licensed registered nurse is
eligible for medical assistance if countable family income is equal to or less
than 275 percent of the federal poverty guideline for the same family
size. For purposes of this subdivision,
"countable family income" means the amount of income considered
available using the methodology of the AFDC program under the state's AFDC plan
as of July 16, 1996, as required by the Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), Public Law 104-193, except for
the earned income disregard and employment deductions.
(2) For applications
processed within one calendar month prior to the effective date, eligibility
shall be determined by applying the income standards and methodologies in
effect prior to the effective date for any months in the six-month budget
period before that date and the income standards and methodologies in effect on
the effective date for any months in the six-month budget period on or after
that date. The income standards for each
month shall be added together and compared to the applicant's total countable
income for the six-month budget period to determine eligibility.
(b)(1) [Expired, 1Sp2003 c
14 art 12 s 19]
(2) For applications
processed within one calendar month prior to July 1, 2003, eligibility shall be
determined by applying the income standards and methodologies in effect prior
to July 1, 2003, for any months in the six-month budget period before July 1,
2003, and the income standards and methodologies in effect on the expiration
date for any months in the six-month budget period on or after July 1,
2003. The income standards for each month
shall be added together and compared to the applicant's total countable income
for the six-month budget period to determine eligibility.
(3) An amount equal to the
amount of earned income exceeding 275 percent of the federal poverty guideline,
up to a maximum of the amount by which the combined total of 185 percent of the
federal poverty guideline plus the earned income disregards and deductions
allowed under the state's AFDC plan as of July 16, 1996, as required by the
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 (PRWORA), Public Law
104-193, exceeds 275 percent of the federal poverty guideline will be deducted
for pregnant women and infants less than one year of age.
(c) Dependent care and child
support paid under court order shall be deducted from the countable income of
pregnant women.
(d) An infant born on or
after January 1, 1991, to a woman who was eligible for and receiving
medical assistance on the date of the child's birth shall continue to be
eligible for medical assistance without redetermination until the child's first
birthday, as long as the child remains in the woman's household.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11225
ARTICLE 4
LONG-TERM CARE PARTNERSHIP
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 62S.24, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Exchange for long-term care partnership
policy; addition of policy rider. (a)
If authorized by federal law or a federal waiver is granted With respect
to the long-term care partnership program referenced in section 256B.0571,
issuers of long-term care policies may voluntarily exchange a current long-term
care insurance policy for a long-term care partnership policy that meets the
requirements of Public Law 109-171, section 6021, after the effective date of
the state plan amendment implementing the partnership program in this
state. The exchange may be in the
form of: (1) an amendment or rider; or
(2) a disclosure statement indicating that the coverage is now partnership
qualified.
(b) If authorized by federal law or a federal waiver is
granted With respect to the long-term care partnership program referenced
in section 256B.0571, allowing to allow an existing long-term
care insurance policy to qualify as a partnership policy by addition of: (1) a policy rider, or amendment; or
(2) a disclosure statement, the issuer of the policy is authorized to add
the rider, amendment, or disclosure statement to the policy after the
effective date of the state plan amendment implementing the partnership program
in this state.
(c) The commissioner, in cooperation with the commissioner of
human services, shall pursue any federal law changes or waivers necessary to allow
the implementation of paragraphs (a) and (b).
Sec. 2. [62S.312]
CONSUMER PROTECTION STANDARDS FOR LONG-TERM CARE PARTNERSHIP POLICIES.
To qualify as a long-term care partnership policy under this
chapter, long-term care insurance policies must meet the requirements for being
tax qualified as defined in section 7702B(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and
meet certain consumer protection requirements in Section 6021(a)(1)(B)(5)(A) of
the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Public Law 109-171, which are taken from the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Model Act and Regulation
of 2000. Insurance carriers must certify
for each policy form to be included in the long-term care partnership that the
form complies with the requirements of the NAIC Model Act and Regulation of
2000 as implemented in sections 62S.05 to 62S.11; 62S.13 to 62S.18; 62S.19;
62S.20, subdivisions 1 to 5; 62S.21; 62S.22; 62S.24; 62S.25; 62S.266; 62S.28;
62S.29; 62S.30; and 62S.31.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 256B.0571, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Partnership policy. "Partnership policy" means a
long-term care insurance policy that meets the requirements under
subdivision 10 and criteria in sections 62S.23, subdivision 1, paragraph
(b), and 62S.312 and was issued on or after the effective date of the
state plan amendment implementing the partnership program in Minnesota. Policies that are exchanged or that have
riders or endorsements added on or after the effective date of the state plan amendment
as authorized by the commissioner of commerce qualify as a partnership policy
July 1, 2006, or exchanged on or after July 1, 2006, under the
provisions of section 62S.24, subdivision 8.
Sec. 4. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.0571, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Program established. (a) The commissioner, in cooperation with
the commissioner of commerce, shall establish the Minnesota partnership for
long-term care program to provide for the financing of long-term care through a
combination of private insurance and medical assistance.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11226
(b) An individual becomes eligible to participate in the
partnership program by meeting the requirements of either clause (1) or (2):
(1) the individual may qualify as a beneficiary of a
partnership policy that either (i) is issued on or after the effective date
of the state plan amendment implementing the partnership plan in Minnesota, or
(ii) qualifies as a partnership policy as authorized by the commissioner of
commerce meets the criteria under subdivision 6. To be eligible under this clause, the
individual must be a Minnesota resident at the time coverage first became
effective under the partnership policy; or
(2) the individual may qualify as a beneficiary of a policy
recognized under subdivision 17.
Sec. 5. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0571, subdivision 10, is
repealed.
ARTICLE 5
MODIFICATION TO PROHIBITIONS ON ASSET TRANSFERS
Section 1. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0595, subdivisions 1b,
2b, 3b, 4b, and 5, are repealed.
ARTICLE 6
COMMUNITY CLINICS
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.032, is amended to read:
256B.032 ELIGIBLE VENDORS OF
MEDICAL CARE.
(a) Effective January 1, 2011, the commissioner shall
establish performance thresholds for health care providers included in the
provider peer grouping system developed by the commissioner of health under
section 62U.04. The thresholds shall be
set at the 10th percentile of the combined cost and quality measure used for
provider peer grouping, and separate thresholds shall be set for hospital and
physician services.
(b) Beginning January 1, 2012, any health care provider with
a combined cost and quality score below the threshold set in paragraph (a)
shall be prohibited from enrolling as a vendor of medical care in the medical
assistance, general assistance medical care, or MinnesotaCare programs, and
shall not be eligible for direct payments under those programs or for payments
made by managed care plans under their contracts with the commissioner under
section 256B.69 or 256L.12. A health
care provider that is prohibited from enrolling as a vendor or receiving
payments under this paragraph may reenroll effective January 1 of any
subsequent year if the provider's most recent combined cost and quality score
exceeds the threshold established in paragraph (a).
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (b), a provider may continue to
participate as a vendor or as part of a managed care plan provider network if
the commissioner determines that a contract with the provider is necessary to
ensure adequate access to health care services.
(d) By January 15, 2013, the commissioner shall report to the
legislature on the impact of this section.
The commissioner's report shall include information on:
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11227
(1) the providers falling below the thresholds as of January
1, 2012;
(2) the volume of services and cost of care provided to
enrollees in the medical assistance, general assistance medical care, or
MinnesotaCare programs in the 12 months prior to January 1, 2012, by providers
falling below the thresholds;
(3) providers who fell below the thresholds but continued to
be eligible vendors under paragraph paragraphs (c) and
(e);
(4) the estimated cost savings achieved by not contracting
with providers who do not meet the performance thresholds; and
(5) recommendations for increasing the threshold levels of
performance over time.
(e) Federally qualified health centers and rural health
clinics are exempt from the requirements of paragraph (b).
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625, subdivision 30, is amended to read:
Subd. 30. Other clinic services. (a) Medical assistance covers rural
health clinic services, federally qualified health center services, nonprofit
community health clinic services, public health clinic services, and the
services of a clinic meeting the criteria established in rule by the
commissioner. Rural health clinic
services and federally qualified health center services mean services defined
in United States Code, title 42, section 1396d(a)(2)(B) and (C). Payment for rural health clinic and federally
qualified health center services shall be made according to applicable federal
law and regulation.
(b) A federally qualified health center that is beginning
initial operation shall submit an estimate of budgeted costs and visits for the
initial reporting period in the form and detail required by the
commissioner. A federally qualified
health center that is already in operation shall submit an initial report using
actual costs and visits for the initial reporting period. Within 90 days of the end of its reporting
period, a federally qualified health center shall submit, in the form and
detail required by the commissioner, a report of its operations, including
allowable costs actually incurred for the period and the actual number of
visits for services furnished during the period, and other information required
by the commissioner. Federally qualified
health centers that file Medicare cost reports shall provide the commissioner
with a copy of the most recent Medicare cost report filed with the Medicare
program intermediary for the reporting year which support the costs claimed on
their cost report to the state.
(c) In order to continue cost-based payment under the medical
assistance program according to paragraphs (a) and (b), a federally qualified
health center or rural health clinic must apply for designation as an essential
community provider within six months of final adoption of rules by the
Department of Health according to section 62Q.19, subdivision 7. For those federally qualified health centers
and rural health clinics that have applied for essential community provider
status within the six-month time prescribed, medical assistance payments will
continue to be made according to paragraphs (a) and (b) for the first three
years after application. For federally
qualified health centers and rural health clinics that either do not apply
within the time specified above or who have had essential community provider
status for three years, medical assistance payments for health services
provided by these entities shall be according to the same rates and conditions
applicable to the same service provided by health care providers that are not
federally qualified health centers or rural health clinics.
(d) Effective July 1, 1999, the provisions of paragraph (c)
requiring a federally qualified health center or a rural health clinic to make
application for an essential community provider designation in order to have
cost-based payments made according to paragraphs (a) and (b) no longer apply.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11228
(e) Effective January 1,
2000, payments made according to paragraphs (a) and (b) shall be limited to the
cost phase-out schedule of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.
(f) Effective January 1,
2001, each federally qualified health center and rural health clinic may elect
to be paid either under the prospective payment system established in United
States Code, title 42, section 1396a(aa), or under an alternative payment
methodology consistent with the requirements of United States Code, title 42,
section 1396a(aa), and approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services. The alternative payment
methodology shall be 100 percent of cost as determined according to Medicare
cost principles.
(g) For purposes of this
section, "nonprofit community clinic" is a clinic that:
(1) has nonprofit status as
specified in chapter 317A;
(2) has tax exempt status as
provided in Internal Revenue Code, section 501(c)(3);
(3) is established to
provide health services to low-income population groups, uninsured, high-risk
and special needs populations, underserved and other special needs populations;
(4) employs professional
staff at least one-half of which are familiar with the cultural background of
their clients;
(5) charges for services on
a sliding fee scale designed to provide assistance to low-income clients based
on current poverty income guidelines and family size; and
(6) does not restrict access
or services because of a client's financial limitations or public assistance
status and provides no-cost care as needed.
ARTICLE 7
DENTAL BENEFIT SET
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.0625, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Dental
services. (a) Medical assistance
covers dental services.
(b) Medical assistance
dental coverage for nonpregnant adults is limited to the following services:
(1) comprehensive exams,
limited to once every five years;
(2) periodic exams, limited
to one per year;
(3) limited exams;
(4) bitewing x-rays, limited
to one per year;
(5) periapical x-rays;
(6) panoramic x-rays,
limited to one every five years, and only if provided in conjunction with a
posterior extraction or scheduled outpatient facility procedure, or as
except (1) when medically necessary for the diagnosis and follow-up of oral
and maxillofacial pathology and trauma.
Panoramic x-rays may be taken or (2) once every two years for
patients who cannot cooperate for intraoral film due to a developmental
disability or medical condition that does not allow for intraoral film
placement;
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11229
(7) prophylaxis, limited to
one per year;
(8) application of fluoride
varnish, limited to one per year;
(9) posterior fillings, all
at the amalgam rate;
(10) anterior fillings;
(11) endodontics, limited to
root canals on the anterior and premolars only;
(12) removable prostheses,
each dental arch limited to one every six years;
(13) oral surgery, limited
to extractions, biopsies, and incision and drainage of abscesses;
(14) palliative treatment
and sedative fillings for relief of pain; and
(15) full-mouth debridement,
limited to one every five years.
(c) In addition to the
services specified in paragraph (b), medical assistance covers the following
services for adults, if provided in an outpatient hospital setting or
freestanding ambulatory surgical center as part of outpatient dental surgery:
(1) periodontics, limited to
periodontal scaling and root planing once every two years;
(2) general anesthesia; and
(3) full-mouth survey once
every five years.
(d) Medical assistance
covers medically necessary dental services for children that are
medically necessary and pregnant women. The following guidelines apply:
(1) posterior fillings are
paid at the amalgam rate;
(2) application of sealants are
covered once every five years per permanent molar for children only;
and
(3) application of fluoride
varnish is covered once every six months.; and
(4) orthodontia is eligible
for coverage for children only.
ARTICLE 8
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR
HEALTH SERVICES
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625,
subdivision 25, is amended to read:
Subd. 25. Prior
authorization required. The
commissioner shall publish in the State Register Minnesota health
care programs provider manual and on the department's Web site a list of
health services that require prior authorization, as well as the criteria and
standards used to select health services on the list. The list and the criteria and standards used
to formulate it are not subject to the requirements of sections 14.001 to
14.69. The commissioner's decision
whether prior authorization is required for a health service is not subject to
administrative appeal.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11230
ARTICLE 9
DRUG FORMULARY COMMITTEE
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625, subdivision 13c, is amended to read:
Subd. 13c. Formulary committee. The commissioner, after receiving recommendations
from professional medical associations and professional pharmacy associations,
and consumer groups shall designate a Formulary Committee to carry out duties
as described in subdivisions 13 to 13g.
The Formulary Committee shall be comprised of four licensed physicians
actively engaged in the practice of medicine in Minnesota one of whom must be
actively engaged in the treatment of persons with mental illness; at least
three licensed pharmacists actively engaged in the practice of pharmacy in
Minnesota; and one consumer representative; the remainder to be made up of
health care professionals who are licensed in their field and have recognized
knowledge in the clinically appropriate prescribing, dispensing, and monitoring
of covered outpatient drugs. Members of
the Formulary Committee shall not be employed by the Department of Human
Services, but the committee shall be staffed by an employee of the department
who shall serve as an ex officio, nonvoting member of the committee. The department's medical director shall also
serve as an ex officio, nonvoting member for the committee. Committee members shall serve three-year
terms and may be reappointed by the commissioner. The Formulary Committee shall meet at least quarterly
twice per year. The commissioner may
require more frequent Formulary Committee meetings as needed. An honorarium of $100 per meeting and
reimbursement for mileage shall be paid to each committee member in attendance.
ARTICLE 10
PREFERRED DRUG LIST
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes
2008, section 256B.0625, subdivision 13g, is amended to read:
Subd. 13g. Preferred drug list. (a) The commissioner shall adopt and
implement a preferred drug list by January 1, 2004. The commissioner may enter into a contract with
a vendor for the purpose of participating in a preferred drug list and
supplemental rebate program. The
commissioner shall ensure that any contract meets all federal requirements and
maximizes federal financial participation.
The commissioner shall publish the preferred drug list annually in the
State Register and shall maintain an accurate and up-to-date list on the agency
Web site.
(b) The commissioner may add to, delete from, and otherwise
modify the preferred drug list, after consulting with the Formulary Committee
and appropriate medical specialists and providing public notice and the
opportunity for public comment.
(c) The commissioner shall adopt and administer the preferred
drug list as part of the administration of the supplemental drug rebate
program. Reimbursement for prescription
drugs not on the preferred drug list may be subject to prior authorization,
unless the drug manufacturer signs a supplemental rebate contract.
(d) For purposes of this subdivision, "preferred drug
list" means a list of prescription drugs within designated therapeutic
classes selected by the commissioner, for which prior authorization based on
the identity of the drug or class is not required.
(e) The commissioner shall seek any federal waivers or approvals
necessary to implement this subdivision.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11231
ARTICLE 11
MULTISOURCE DRUGS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.0625, subdivision 13e, is amended to read:
Subd. 13e. Payment
rates. (a) The basis for determining
the amount of payment shall be the lower of the actual acquisition costs of the
drugs plus a fixed dispensing fee; the maximum allowable cost set by the
federal government or by the commissioner plus the fixed dispensing fee; or the
usual and customary price charged to the public. The amount of payment basis must be reduced
to reflect all discount amounts applied to the charge by any provider/insurer
agreement or contract for submitted charges to medical assistance programs. The net submitted charge may not be greater
than the patient liability for the service.
The pharmacy dispensing fee shall be $3.65, except that the dispensing
fee for intravenous solutions which must be compounded by the pharmacist shall
be $8 per bag, $14 per bag for cancer chemotherapy products, and $30 per bag
for total parenteral nutritional products dispensed in one liter quantities, or
$44 per bag for total parenteral nutritional products dispensed in quantities
greater than one liter. Actual
acquisition cost includes quantity and other special discounts except time and
cash discounts. Effective July 1, 2009,
the actual acquisition cost of a drug shall be estimated by the commissioner,
at average wholesale price minus 15 percent.
The actual acquisition cost of antihemophilic factor drugs shall be
estimated at the average wholesale price minus 30 percent. The maximum allowable cost of a multisource
drug may be set by the commissioner and it shall be comparable to, but no
higher than, the maximum amount paid by other third-party payors in this state
who have maximum allowable cost programs.
Establishment of the amount of payment for drugs shall not be subject to
the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.
(b) An additional dispensing
fee of $.30 may be added to the dispensing fee paid to pharmacists for legend
drug prescriptions dispensed to residents of long-term care facilities when a
unit dose blister card system, approved by the department, is used. Under this type of dispensing system, the
pharmacist must dispense a 30-day supply of drug. The National Drug Code (NDC) from the drug
container used to fill the blister card must be identified on the claim to the
department. The unit dose blister card
containing the drug must meet the packaging standards set forth in Minnesota
Rules, part 6800.2700, that govern the return of unused drugs to the pharmacy
for reuse. The pharmacy provider will be
required to credit the department for the actual acquisition cost of all unused
drugs that are eligible for reuse.
Over-the-counter medications must be dispensed in the manufacturer's
unopened package. The commissioner may
permit the drug clozapine to be dispensed in a quantity that is less than a
30-day supply.
(c) Whenever a generically
equivalent product is available maximum allowable cost has been set for
a multisource drug, payment shall be on the basis of the actual
acquisition cost of the generic drug, or on the maximum allowable cost
established by the commissioner unless prior authorization for the brand
name product has been granted according to the criteria established by the Drug
Formulary Committee as required by subdivision 13f, paragraph (a), and the
prescriber has indicated "dispense as written" on the prescription in
a manner consistent with section 151.21, subdivision 2.
(d) The basis for
determining the amount of payment for drugs administered in an outpatient
setting shall be the lower of the usual and customary cost submitted by the
provider or the amount established for Medicare by the United States Department
of Health and Human Services pursuant to title XVIII, section 1847a of the
federal Social Security Act.
(e) The commissioner may
negotiate lower reimbursement rates for specialty pharmacy products than the
rates specified in paragraph (a). The
commissioner may require individuals enrolled in the health care programs
administered by the department to obtain specialty pharmacy products from
providers with whom the commissioner has negotiated lower reimbursement
rates. Specialty pharmacy products are
defined as those used by a small number of recipients or recipients with
complex and chronic diseases that require expensive and challenging drug
regimens. Examples of these conditions
include, but are not limited to:
multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS,
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11232
transplantation, hepatitis
C, growth hormone deficiency, Crohn's Disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and
certain forms of cancer. Specialty pharmaceutical
products include injectable and infusion therapies, biotechnology drugs,
high-cost therapies, and therapies that require complex care. The commissioner shall consult with the
formulary committee to develop a list of specialty pharmacy products subject to
this paragraph. In consulting with the
formulary committee in developing this list, the commissioner shall take into
consideration the population served by specialty pharmacy products, the current
delivery system and standard of care in the state, and access to care
issues. The commissioner shall have the
discretion to adjust the reimbursement rate to prevent access to care issues.
ARTICLE 12
ADMINISTRATIVE UNIFORMITY
COMMITTEE
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625,
is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8d. Home
infusion therapy services. Home
infusion therapy services provided by home infusion therapy pharmacies must be
paid the lower of the submitted charge or the combined payment rates for
component services typically provided.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective upon federal approval.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.0625, subdivision 13e, is amended to read:
Subd. 13e. Payment
rates. (a) The basis for determining
the amount of payment shall be the lower of the actual acquisition costs of the
drugs plus a fixed dispensing fee; the maximum allowable cost set by the
federal government or by the commissioner plus the fixed dispensing fee; or the
usual and customary price charged to the public. The amount of payment basis must be reduced
to reflect all discount amounts applied to the charge by any provider/insurer
agreement or contract for submitted charges to medical assistance programs. The net submitted charge may not be greater
than the patient liability for the service.
The pharmacy dispensing fee shall be $3.65, except that the dispensing
fee for intravenous solutions which must be compounded by the pharmacist shall
be $8 per bag, $14 per bag for cancer chemotherapy products, and $30 per bag
for total parenteral nutritional products dispensed in one liter quantities, or
$44 per bag for total parenteral nutritional products dispensed in quantities
greater than one liter. Actual acquisition
cost includes quantity and other special discounts except time and cash
discounts. Effective July 1, 2009, the
actual acquisition cost of a drug shall be estimated by the commissioner, at
average wholesale price minus 15 percent.
The actual acquisition cost of antihemophilic factor drugs shall be
estimated at the average wholesale price minus 30 percent. The maximum allowable cost of a multisource
drug may be set by the commissioner and it shall be comparable to, but no
higher than, the maximum amount paid by other third-party payors in this state
who have maximum allowable cost programs.
Establishment of the amount of payment for drugs shall not be subject to
the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.
(b) An additional dispensing
fee of $.30 may be added to the dispensing fee paid to pharmacists for legend
drug prescriptions dispensed to residents of long-term care facilities when a
unit dose blister card system, approved by the department, is used. Under this type of dispensing system, the
pharmacist must dispense a 30-day supply of drug. The National Drug Code (NDC) from the drug
container used to fill the blister card must be identified on the claim to the
department. The unit dose blister card
containing the drug must meet the packaging standards set forth in Minnesota
Rules, part 6800.2700, that govern the return of unused drugs to the pharmacy
for reuse. The pharmacy provider will be
required to credit the department for the actual acquisition cost of all unused
drugs that are eligible for reuse.
Over-the-counter medications must be dispensed in the manufacturer's
unopened package. The commissioner may
permit the drug clozapine to be dispensed in a quantity that is less than a
30-day supply.
(c) Whenever a generically
equivalent product is available, payment shall be on the basis of the actual
acquisition cost of the generic drug, or on the maximum allowable cost
established by the commissioner.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11233
(d) The basis for
determining the amount of payment for drugs administered in an outpatient
setting shall be the lower of the usual and customary cost submitted by the
provider or the amount established for Medicare by the United States Department
of Health and Human Services pursuant to title XVIII, section 1847a of the
federal Social Security Act.
(e) The commissioner may
negotiate lower reimbursement rates for specialty pharmacy products than the
rates specified in paragraph (a). The
commissioner may require individuals enrolled in the health care programs
administered by the department to obtain specialty pharmacy products from
providers with whom the commissioner has negotiated lower reimbursement
rates. Specialty pharmacy products are
defined as those used by a small number of recipients or recipients with
complex and chronic diseases that require expensive and challenging drug
regimens. Examples of these conditions
include, but are not limited to:
multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS, transplantation, hepatitis C, growth
hormone deficiency, Crohn's Disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and certain forms of
cancer. Specialty pharmaceutical
products include injectable and infusion therapies, biotechnology drugs,
high-cost therapies, and therapies that require complex care. The commissioner shall consult with the
formulary committee to develop a list of specialty pharmacy products subject to
this paragraph. In consulting with the
formulary committee in developing this list, the commissioner shall take into
consideration the population served by specialty pharmacy products, the current
delivery system and standard of care in the state, and access to care
issues. The commissioner shall have the
discretion to adjust the reimbursement rate to prevent access to care issues.
(f) Home infusion therapy
services provided by home infusion therapy pharmacies must be paid at rates
according to subdivision 8d.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective upon federal approval.
ARTICLE 13
HEALTH PLANS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 62A.045, is
amended to read:
62A.045 PAYMENTS ON BEHALF OF ENROLLEES IN GOVERNMENT HEALTH
PROGRAMS.
(a) As a condition of doing
business in Minnesota or providing coverage to residents of Minnesota
covered by this section, each health insurer shall comply with the
requirements of the federal Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Public Law 109-171,
including any federal regulations adopted under that act, to the extent that it
imposes a requirement that applies in this state and that is not also required
by the laws of this state. This section
does not require compliance with any provision of the federal act prior to the
effective date provided for that provision in the federal act. The commissioner shall enforce this section.
For the purpose of this
section, "health insurer" includes self-insured plans, group health
plans (as defined in section 607(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974), service benefit plans, managed care organizations, pharmacy
benefit managers, or other parties that are by contract legally responsible to
pay a claim for a healthcare item or service for an individual receiving
benefits under paragraph (b).
(b) No health plan
offered by a health insurer issued or renewed to provide coverage to a
Minnesota resident shall contain any provision denying or reducing benefits
because services are rendered to a person who is eligible for or receiving
medical benefits pursuant to title XIX of the Social Security Act (Medicaid) in
this or any other state; chapter 256; 256B; or 256D or services pursuant to
section 252.27; 256L.01 to 256L.10; 260B.331, subdivision 2; 260C.331,
subdivision 2; or 393.07, subdivision 1 or 2.
No health carrier insurer providing benefits under plans
covered by this section shall use eligibility for medical programs named in
this section as an underwriting guideline or reason for nonacceptance of the
risk.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11234
(c) If payment for covered
expenses has been made under state medical programs for health care items or
services provided to an individual, and a third party has a legal liability to
make payments, the rights of payment and appeal of an adverse coverage decision
for the individual, or in the case of a child their responsible relative or
caretaker, will be subrogated to the state agency. The state agency may assert its rights under
this section within three years of the date the service was rendered. For purposes of this section, "state
agency" includes prepaid health plans under contract with the commissioner
according to sections 256B.69, 256D.03, subdivision 4, paragraph (c), and
256L.12; children's mental health collaboratives under section 245.493;
demonstration projects for persons with disabilities under section 256B.77;
nursing homes under the alternative payment demonstration project under section
256B.434; and county-based purchasing entities under section 256B.692.
(d) Notwithstanding any law
to the contrary, when a person covered by a health plan offered by a
health insurer receives medical benefits according to any statute listed in
this section, payment for covered services or notice of denial for services
billed by the provider must be issued directly to the provider. If a person was receiving medical benefits
through the Department of Human Services at the time a service was provided,
the provider must indicate this benefit coverage on any claim forms submitted
by the provider to the health carrier insurer for those
services. If the commissioner of human
services notifies the health carrier insurer that the
commissioner has made payments to the provider, payment for benefits or notices
of denials issued by the health carrier insurer must be issued
directly to the commissioner. Submission
by the department to the health carrier insurer of the claim on a
Department of Human Services claim form is proper notice and shall be
considered proof of payment of the claim to the provider and supersedes any
contract requirements of the health carrier insurer relating to
the form of submission. Liability to the
insured for coverage is satisfied to the extent that payments for those
benefits are made by the health carrier insurer to the provider
or the commissioner as required by this section.
(e) When a state agency has
acquired the rights of an individual eligible for medical programs named in
this section and has health benefits coverage through a health carrier
insurer, the health carrier insurer shall not impose
requirements that are different from requirements applicable to an agent or
assignee of any other individual covered.
(f) For the purpose of this
section, health plan includes coverage offered by community integrated service
networks, any plan governed under the federal Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), United States Code, title 29, sections 1001 to
1461, and coverage offered under the exclusions listed in section 62A.011,
subdivision 3, clauses (2), (6), (9), (10), and (12).
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.69, subdivision 23, is amended to read:
Subd. 23. Alternative
services; elderly and disabled persons. (a)
The commissioner may implement demonstration projects to create alternative
integrated delivery systems for acute and long-term care services to elderly
persons and persons with disabilities as defined in section 256B.77,
subdivision 7a, that provide increased coordination, improve access to quality
services, and mitigate future cost increases.
The commissioner may seek federal authority to combine Medicare and
Medicaid capitation payments for the purpose of such demonstrations and may
contract with Medicare-approved special needs plans that are offered by a
demonstration provider or by an entity that is directly or indirectly wholly
owned or controlled by a demonstration provider to provide Medicaid
services. Medicare funds and services
shall be administered according to the terms and conditions of the federal
contract and demonstration provisions.
For the purpose of administering medical assistance funds,
demonstrations under this subdivision are subject to subdivisions 1 to 22. The provisions of Minnesota Rules, parts
9500.1450 to 9500.1464, apply to these demonstrations, with the exceptions of
parts 9500.1452, subpart 2, item B; and 9500.1457, subpart 1, items B and C,
which do not apply to persons enrolling in demonstrations under this section. All enforcement and rulemaking powers
available under chapters 62D, 62M, and 62Q are hereby granted to the
commissioner of health with respect to Medicare-approved special needs plans
with which the commissioner contracts to provide Medicaid services under this
section. An initial open enrollment
period may be provided. Persons who
disenroll from demonstrations under this subdivision remain subject to
Minnesota Rules, parts 9500.1450 to 9500.1464.
When a person is enrolled in a health plan under these demonstrations
and the health
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11235
plan's participation is
subsequently terminated for any reason, the person shall be provided an opportunity
to select a new health plan and shall have the right to change health plans
within the first 60 days of enrollment in the second health plan. Persons required to participate in health
plans under this section who fail to make a choice of health plan shall not be
randomly assigned to health plans under these demonstrations. Notwithstanding section 256L.12, subdivision
5, and Minnesota Rules, part 9505.5220, subpart 1, item A, if adopted, for the
purpose of demonstrations under this subdivision, the commissioner may contract
with managed care organizations, including counties, to serve only elderly
persons eligible for medical assistance, elderly and disabled persons, or
disabled persons only. For persons with
a primary diagnosis of developmental disability, serious and persistent mental
illness, or serious emotional disturbance, the commissioner must ensure that
the county authority has approved the demonstration and contracting
design. Enrollment in these projects for
persons with disabilities shall be voluntary.
The commissioner shall not implement any demonstration project under
this subdivision for persons with a primary diagnosis of developmental
disabilities, serious and persistent mental illness, or serious emotional
disturbance, without approval of the county board of the county in which the
demonstration is being implemented.
(b) Notwithstanding chapter 245B, sections 252.40 to 252.46,
256B.092, 256B.501 to 256B.5015, and Minnesota Rules, parts 9525.0004 to
9525.0036, 9525.1200 to 9525.1330, 9525.1580, and 9525.1800 to 9525.1930, the
commissioner may implement under this section projects for persons with
developmental disabilities. The
commissioner may capitate payments for ICF/MR services, waivered services for
developmental disabilities, including case management services, day training
and habilitation and alternative active treatment services, and other services
as approved by the state and by the federal government. Case management and active treatment must be
individualized and developed in accordance with a person-centered plan. Costs under these projects may not exceed
costs that would have been incurred under fee-for-service. Beginning July 1, 2003, and until four years
after the pilot project implementation date, subcontractor participation in the
long-term care developmental disability pilot is limited to a nonprofit
long-term care system providing ICF/MR services, home and community-based
waiver services, and in-home services to no more than 120 consumers with
developmental disabilities in Carver, Hennepin, and Scott Counties. The commissioner shall report to the
legislature prior to expansion of the developmental disability pilot
project. This paragraph expires four
years after the implementation date of the pilot project.
(c) Before implementation of a demonstration project for
disabled persons, the commissioner must provide information to appropriate
committees of the house of representatives and senate and must involve
representatives of affected disability groups in the design of the
demonstration projects.
(d) A nursing facility reimbursed under the alternative
reimbursement methodology in section 256B.434 may, in collaboration with a
hospital, clinic, or other health care entity provide services under paragraph
(a). The commissioner shall amend the
state plan and seek any federal waivers necessary to implement this paragraph.
(e) The commissioner, in consultation with the commissioners
of commerce and health, may approve and implement programs for all-inclusive
care for the elderly (PACE) according to federal laws and regulations governing
that program and state laws or rules applicable to participating
providers. The process for approval of
these programs shall begin only after the commissioner receives grant money in
an amount sufficient to cover the state share of the administrative and
actuarial costs to implement the programs during state fiscal years 2006 and
2007. Grant amounts for this purpose
shall be deposited in an account in the special revenue fund and are
appropriated to the commissioner to be used solely for the purpose of PACE
administrative and actuarial costs. A
PACE provider is not required to be licensed or certified as a health plan
company as defined in section 62Q.01, subdivision 4. Persons age 55 and older who have been
screened by the county and found to be eligible for services under the elderly
waiver or community alternatives for disabled individuals or who are already
eligible for Medicaid but meet level of care criteria for receipt of waiver
services may choose to enroll in the PACE program. Medicare and Medicaid services will be
provided according to this subdivision and federal Medicare and Medicaid
requirements governing PACE providers and programs. PACE enrollees will receive Medicaid home and
community-based services through the PACE provider as an alternative to
services for which they would otherwise be eligible through home and
community-based waiver programs and Medicaid State Plan Services. The commissioner shall establish Medicaid
rates for PACE providers that do not exceed costs that would have been incurred
under fee-for-service or other relevant managed care programs operated by the
state.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11236
(f) The commissioner shall seek federal approval to expand the
Minnesota disability health options (MnDHO) program established under this
subdivision in stages, first to regional population centers outside the
seven-county metro area and then to all areas of the state. Until July 1, 2009, expansion for MnDHO
projects that include home and community-based services is limited to the two
projects and service areas in effect on March 1, 2006. Enrollment in integrated MnDHO programs that
include home and community-based services shall remain voluntary. Costs for home and community-based services
included under MnDHO must not exceed costs that would have been incurred under
the fee-for-service program.
Notwithstanding whether expansion occurs under this paragraph, in
determining MnDHO payment rates and risk adjustment methods for contract years
starting in 2012, the commissioner must consider the methods used to determine
county allocations for home and community-based program participants. If necessary to reduce MnDHO rates to comply
with the provision regarding MnDHO costs for home and community-based services,
the commissioner shall achieve the reduction by maintaining the base rate for
contract years 2010 and 2011 for services provided under the community
alternatives for disabled individuals waiver at the same level as for contract
year 2009. The commissioner may apply
other reductions to MnDHO rates to implement decreases in provider payment
rates required by state law. In
developing program specifications for expansion of integrated programs, the
commissioner shall involve and consult the state-level stakeholder group
established in subdivision 28, paragraph (d), including consultation on whether
and how to include home and community-based waiver programs. Plans for further expansion of MnDHO projects
shall be presented to the chairs of the house of representatives and senate
committees with jurisdiction over health and human services policy and finance
by February 1, 2007.
(g) Notwithstanding section 256B.0261, health plans providing
services under this section are responsible for home care targeted case
management and relocation targeted case management. Services must be provided according to the
terms of the waivers and contracts approved by the federal government.
ARTICLE 14
CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 15C.13, is amended to read:
15C.13 DISTRIBUTION TO
PRIVATE PLAINTIFF IN CERTAIN ACTIONS.
If the prosecuting attorney intervenes at the outset in an
action brought by a person under section 15C.05, the person is entitled to
receive not less than 15 percent or more than 25 percent of any recovery in proportion
to the person's contribution to the conduct of the action. If the prosecuting attorney does not
intervene in the action at any time, the person is entitled to receive not less
than 25 percent or more than 30 percent of any recovery of the civil penalty
and damages, or settlement, as the court determines is reasonable. If the prosecuting attorney does not
intervene in the action at the outset but subsequently intervenes, the person
is entitled to receive not less than 15 percent or more than 30 percent of any
recovery, as the court determines is reasonable based on the person's
participation in the action before the prosecuting attorney intervened. For recoveries whose distribution is
governed by federal code or rule, the basis for calculating the portion of the
recovery the person is entitled to receive shall not include amounts reserved for distribution to the federal government or
designated in their use by federal code or rule.
ARTICLE 15
PREPAID HEALTH PLANS
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.69, subdivision 5a, is amended to read:
Subd. 5a. Managed care contracts. (a) Managed care contracts under this
section and sections 256L.12 and 256D.03, shall be entered into or renewed on a
calendar year basis beginning January 1, 1996.
Managed care contracts which were in effect on June 30, 1995, and set to
renew on July 1, 1995, shall be renewed for the period July 1, 1995 through
December 31, 1995 at the same terms that were in effect on June 30, 1995. The commissioner may issue separate contracts
with requirements specific to services to medical assistance recipients age 65
and older.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11237
(b) A prepaid health plan providing covered health services
for eligible persons pursuant to chapters 256B, 256D, and 256L, is responsible
for complying with the terms of its contract with the commissioner. Requirements applicable to managed care
programs under chapters 256B, 256D, and 256L, established after the effective
date of a contract with the commissioner take effect when the contract is next
issued or renewed.
(c) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1,
2003, the commissioner shall withhold five percent of managed care plan
payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan's payment rate
under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance and general
assistance medical care programs pending completion of performance
targets. Each performance target must be
quantifiable, objective, measurable, and reasonably attainable, except in the
case of a performance target based on a federal or state law or rule. Criteria for assessment of each performance
target must be outlined in writing prior to the contract effective date. The managed care plan must demonstrate, to
the commissioner's satisfaction, that the data submitted regarding attainment
of the performance target is accurate.
The commissioner shall periodically change the administrative measures
used as performance targets in order to improve plan performance across a
broader range of administrative services.
The performance targets must include measurement of plan efforts to
contain spending on health care services and administrative activities. The commissioner may adopt plan-specific
performance targets that take into account factors affecting only one plan,
including characteristics of the plan's enrollee population. The withheld funds must be returned no sooner
than July of the following year if performance targets in the contract are
achieved. The commissioner may exclude
special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.
(d) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1,
2009, through December 31, 2009, the commissioner shall withhold three percent
of managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing
plan payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance and general
assistance medical care programs. The
withheld funds must be returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31
of the following year. The commissioner
may exclude special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.
The return of the withhold under this paragraph is not subject
to the requirements of paragraph (c).
(e) Effective for services provided on or after January 1,
2010, the commissioner shall require that managed care plans use the assessment
and authorization processes, forms, timelines, standards, documentation, and
data reporting requirements, protocols, billing processes, and policies
consistent with medical assistance fee-for-service or the Department of Human
Services contract requirements consistent with medical assistance fee-for-service
or the Department of Human Services contract requirements for all personal care
assistance services under section 256B.0659.
(f) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1,
2010, through December 31, 2010, the commissioner shall withhold 3.5 percent of
managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan
payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance
program. The withheld funds must be
returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following
year. The commissioner may exclude
special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.
(g) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1,
2011, through December 31, 2011, the commissioner shall withhold four percent
of managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing
plan payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance
program. The withheld funds must be
returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following year. The commissioner may exclude special
demonstration projects under subdivision 23.
(h) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1,
2012, through December 31, 2012, the commissioner shall withhold 4.5 percent of
managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan
payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance
program. The withheld funds must be
returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following
year. The commissioner may exclude
special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11238
(i) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1,
2013, through December 31, 2013, the commissioner shall withhold 4.5 percent of
managed care plan payments under this section and county-based purchasing plan
payments under section 256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance program. The withheld funds must be returned no sooner
than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following year. The commissioner may exclude special
demonstration projects under subdivision 23.
(j) Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2014,
the commissioner shall withhold three percent of managed care plan payments
under this section and county-based purchasing plan payments under section
256B.692 for the prepaid medical assistance and prepaid general assistance
medical care programs. The withheld
funds must be returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the
following year. The commissioner may
exclude special demonstration projects under subdivision 23.
(k) A managed care plan or a county-based purchasing plan
under section 256B.692 may include as admitted assets under section 62D.044 any
amount withheld under this section that is reasonably expected to be returned.
(l) Contracts between the commissioner and a prepaid health
plan are exempt from the set-aside and preference provisions of section 16C.16,
subdivisions 6, paragraph (a), and 7.
(m) The return of the withhold under paragraph (d) and
paragraphs (f) to (j) is not subject to the requirements of paragraph (c).
ARTICLE 16
INCOME STANDARDS FOR ELIGIBILITY
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256B.056, subdivision 1c, is amended to read:
Subd. 1c. Families with children income
methodology. (a)(1) [Expired,
1Sp2003 c 14 art 12 s 17]
(2) For applications processed within one calendar month prior
to July 1, 2003, eligibility shall be determined by applying the income
standards and methodologies in effect prior to July 1, 2003, for any months in
the six-month budget period before July 1, 2003, and the income standards and
methodologies in effect on July 1, 2003, for any months in the six-month budget
period on or after that date. The income
standards for each month shall be added together and compared to the
applicant's total countable income for the six-month budget period to determine
eligibility.
(3) For children ages one through 18 whose eligibility is
determined under section 256B.057, subdivision 2, the following deductions
shall be applied to income counted toward the child's eligibility as allowed
under the state's AFDC plan in effect as of July 16, 1996: $90 work expense, dependent care, and child
support paid under court order. This
clause is effective October 1, 2003.
(b) For families with children whose eligibility is
determined using the standard specified in section 256B.056, subdivision 4,
paragraph (c), 17 percent of countable earned income shall be disregarded for
up to four months and the following deductions shall be applied to each
individual's income counted toward eligibility as allowed under the state's
AFDC plan in effect as of July 16, 1996:
dependent care and child support paid under court order.
(c) If the four-month disregard in paragraph (b) has been
applied to the wage earner's income for four months, the disregard shall not be
applied again until the wage earner's income has not been considered in
determining medical assistance eligibility for 12 consecutive months.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11239
(d) The commissioner shall adjust the income standards under
this section each July 1 by the annual update of the federal poverty guidelines
following publication by the United States Department of Health and Human Services
except that the income standards shall not go below those in effect on July 1,
2009.
(e) For children age 18 or under, annual gifts of $2,000 or
less by a tax-exempt organization to or for the benefit of the child with a
life-threatening illness must be disregarded from income.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 256D.03, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. General assistance medical care;
eligibility. (a) General assistance
medical care may be paid for any person who is not eligible for medical
assistance under chapter 256B, including eligibility for medical assistance
based on a spenddown of excess income according to section 256B.056,
subdivision 5, or MinnesotaCare for applicants and recipients defined in
paragraph (c), except as provided in paragraph (d), and:
(1) who is receiving assistance under section 256D.05, except
for families with children who are eligible under Minnesota family investment
program (MFIP), or who is having a payment made on the person's behalf under
sections 256I.01 to 256I.06; or
(2) who is a resident of Minnesota; and
(i) who has gross countable income not in excess of 75
percent of the federal poverty guidelines for the family size, using a
six-month budget period and whose equity in assets is not in excess of $1,000
per assistance unit. General assistance
medical care is not available for applicants or enrollees who are otherwise
eligible for medical assistance but fail to verify their assets. Enrollees who become eligible for medical
assistance shall be terminated and transferred to medical assistance. Exempt assets, the reduction of excess
assets, and the waiver of excess assets must conform to the medical assistance
program in section 256B.056, subdivisions 3 and 3d, with the following exception: the maximum amount of undistributed funds in
a trust that could be distributed to or on behalf of the beneficiary by the
trustee, assuming the full exercise of the trustee's discretion under the terms
of the trust, must be applied toward the asset maximum; or
(ii) who has gross countable income above 75 percent of the
federal poverty guidelines but not in excess of 175 percent of the federal
poverty guidelines for the family size, using a six-month budget period, whose
equity in assets is not in excess of the limits in section 256B.056,
subdivision 3c, and who applies during an inpatient hospitalization.
(b) The commissioner shall adjust the income standards under
this section each July 1 by the annual update of the federal poverty guidelines
following publication by the United States Department of Health and Human
Services except that the income standards shall not go below those in effect
on July 1, 2009.
(c) Effective for applications and renewals processed on or
after September 1, 2006, general assistance medical care may not be paid for
applicants or recipients who are adults with dependent children under 21 whose
gross family income is equal to or less than 275 percent of the federal poverty
guidelines who are not described in paragraph (f).
(d) Effective for applications and renewals processed on or
after September 1, 2006, general assistance medical care may be paid for
applicants and recipients who meet all eligibility requirements of paragraph
(a), clause (2), item (i), for a temporary period beginning the date of
application. Immediately following
approval of general assistance medical care, enrollees shall be enrolled in
MinnesotaCare under section 256L.04, subdivision 7, with covered services as
provided in section 256L.03 for the rest of the six-month general assistance
medical care eligibility period, until their six-month renewal.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11240
(e) To be eligible for general assistance medical care
following enrollment in MinnesotaCare as required by paragraph (d), an
individual must complete a new application.
(f) Applicants and recipients eligible under paragraph (a),
clause (2), item (i), are exempt from the MinnesotaCare enrollment requirements
in this subdivision if they:
(1) have applied for and are awaiting a determination of
blindness or disability by the state medical review team or a determination of
eligibility for Supplemental Security Income or Social Security Disability
Insurance by the Social Security Administration;
(2) fail to meet the requirements of section 256L.09,
subdivision 2;
(3) are homeless as defined by United States Code, title 42,
section 11301, et seq.;
(4) are classified as end-stage renal disease beneficiaries
in the Medicare program;
(5) are enrolled in private health care coverage as defined
in section 256B.02, subdivision 9;
(6) are eligible under paragraph (k);
(7) receive treatment funded pursuant to section 254B.02; or
(8) reside in the Minnesota sex offender program defined in
chapter 246B.
(g) For applications received on or after October 1, 2003,
eligibility may begin no earlier than the date of application. For individuals eligible under paragraph (a),
clause (2), item (i), a redetermination of eligibility must occur every 12
months. Individuals are eligible under
paragraph (a), clause (2), item (ii), only during inpatient hospitalization but
may reapply if there is a subsequent period of inpatient hospitalization.
(h) Beginning September 1, 2006, Minnesota health care
program applications and renewals completed by recipients and applicants who
are persons described in paragraph (d) and submitted to the county agency shall
be determined for MinnesotaCare eligibility by the county agency. If all other eligibility requirements of this
subdivision are met, eligibility for general assistance medical care shall be
available in any month during which MinnesotaCare enrollment is pending. Upon notification of eligibility for
MinnesotaCare, notice of termination for eligibility for general assistance
medical care shall be sent to an applicant or recipient. If all other eligibility requirements of this
subdivision are met, eligibility for general assistance medical care shall be
available until enrollment in MinnesotaCare subject to the provisions of
paragraphs (d), (f), and (g).
(i) The date of an initial Minnesota health care program application
necessary to begin a determination of eligibility shall be the date the
applicant has provided a name, address, and Social Security number, signed and
dated, to the county agency or the Department of Human Services. If the applicant is unable to provide a name,
address, Social Security number, and signature when health care is delivered
due to a medical condition or disability, a health care provider may act on an
applicant's behalf to establish the date of an initial Minnesota health care program
application by providing the county agency or Department of Human Services with
provider identification and a temporary unique identifier for the
applicant. The applicant must complete
the remainder of the application and provide necessary verification before
eligibility can be determined. The
applicant must complete the application within the time periods required under
the medical assistance program as specified in Minnesota Rules, parts
9505.0015, subpart 5, and 9505.0090, subpart 2.
The county agency must assist the applicant in obtaining verification if
necessary.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11241
(j) County agencies are authorized to use all automated
databases containing information regarding recipients' or applicants' income in
order to determine eligibility for general assistance medical care or
MinnesotaCare. Such use shall be
considered sufficient in order to determine eligibility and premium payments by
the county agency.
(k) General assistance medical care is not available for a
person in a correctional facility unless the person is detained by law for less
than one year in a county correctional or detention facility as a person
accused or convicted of a crime, or admitted as an inpatient to a hospital on a
criminal hold order, and the person is a recipient of general assistance
medical care at the time the person is detained by law or admitted on a
criminal hold order and as long as the person continues to meet other
eligibility requirements of this subdivision.
(l) General assistance medical care is not available for
applicants or recipients who do not cooperate with the county agency to meet
the requirements of medical assistance.
(m) In determining the amount of assets of an individual
eligible under paragraph (a), clause (2), item (i), there shall be included any
asset or interest in an asset, including an asset excluded under paragraph (a),
that was given away, sold, or disposed of for less than fair market value
within the 60 months preceding application for general assistance medical care
or during the period of eligibility. Any
transfer described in this paragraph shall be presumed to have been for the
purpose of establishing eligibility for general assistance medical care, unless
the individual furnishes convincing evidence to establish that the transaction
was exclusively for another purpose. For
purposes of this paragraph, the value of the asset or interest shall be the
fair market value at the time it was given away, sold, or disposed of, less the
amount of compensation received. For any
uncompensated transfer, the number of months of ineligibility, including
partial months, shall be calculated by dividing the uncompensated transfer
amount by the average monthly per person payment made by the medical assistance
program to skilled nursing facilities for the previous calendar year. The individual shall remain ineligible until
this fixed period has expired. The period
of ineligibility may exceed 30 months, and a reapplication for benefits after
30 months from the date of the transfer shall not result in eligibility unless
and until the period of ineligibility has expired. The period of ineligibility begins in the month
the transfer was reported to the county agency, or if the transfer was not
reported, the month in which the county agency discovered the transfer,
whichever comes first. For applicants,
the period of ineligibility begins on the date of the first approved
application.
(n) When determining eligibility for any state benefits under
this subdivision, the income and resources of all noncitizens shall be deemed
to include their sponsor's income and resources as defined in the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, title IV,
Public Law 104-193, sections 421 and 422, and subsequently set out in federal
rules.
(o) Undocumented noncitizens and nonimmigrants are ineligible
for general assistance medical care. For
purposes of this subdivision, a nonimmigrant is an individual in one or more of
the classes listed in United States Code, title 8, section 1101, subsection
(a), paragraph (15), and an undocumented noncitizen is an individual who
resides in the United States without the approval or acquiescence of the United
States Citizenship and Immigration Services.
(p) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a noncitizen
who is ineligible for medical assistance due to the deeming of a sponsor's
income and resources, is ineligible for general assistance medical care.
(q) Effective July 1, 2003, general assistance medical care
emergency services end.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 256L.04, subdivision 7b, is amended to read:
Subd. 7b. Annual income limits adjustment. The commissioner shall adjust the income
limits under this section each July 1 by the annual update of the federal
poverty guidelines following publication by the United States Department of
Health and Human Services except that the income standards shall not go
below those in effect on July 1, 2009."
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11242
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to human services; changing
health care eligibility provisions; making changes to individualized education
plan requirements; state health access program; children's health insurance
reauthorization act; long-term care partnership; asset transfers; community
clinics; dental benefits; prior authorization for health services; drug
formulary committee; preferred drug list; multisource drugs; administrative
uniformity committee; health plans; claims against the state; income standards
for eligibility; prepaid health plans; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 62A.045; 62Q.80; 62S.24, subdivision 8; 256B.055, subdivision 10;
256B.057, subdivision 1; 256B.0571, subdivision 6; 256B.0625, subdivisions 13c,
13g, 25, 30, by adding a subdivision; 256L.04, subdivision 7b; Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 15C.13; 256B.032; 256B.056, subdivision 1c;
256B.0571, subdivision 8; 256B.0625, subdivisions 9, 13e, 26; 256B.69,
subdivisions 5a, 23; 256D.03, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62S; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
256B.0571, subdivision 10; 256B.0595, subdivisions 1b, 2b, 3b, 4b, 5."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Abeler moved to amend S. F. No. 3027, the first engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 6, line 14, after "less" insert "for an
individual"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
S. F. No. 3027, A bill for an act relating to
human services; changing health care eligibility provisions; making changes to
individualized education plan requirements; state health access program;
children's health insurance reauthorization act; long-term care partnership;
asset transfers; community clinics; dental benefits; prior authorization for
health services; drug formulary committee; preferred drug list; multisource
drugs; administrative uniformity committee; health plans; claims against the
state; income standards for eligibility; prepaid health plans; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 62A.045; 62Q.80; 62S.24, subdivision 8;
256B.055, subdivision 10; 256B.057, subdivision 1; 256B.0571, subdivision 6;
256B.0625, subdivisions 13c, 13g, 25, 30, by adding a subdivision; 256L.04,
subdivision 7b; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 15C.13; 256B.056,
subdivision 1c; 256B.0571, subdivision 8; 256B.0625, subdivisions 9, 13e, 26;
256B.69, subdivisions 5a, 23; 256D.03, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new
law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62S; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 256B.0571, subdivision 10; 256B.0595, subdivisions 1b, 2b, 3b, 4b, 5.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 123 yeas and 10
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11243
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Buesgens
Dean
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Garofalo
Hoppe
Kohls
Peppin
Scott
Severson
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2974
was reported to the House.
Abeler, Thissen and
Huntley moved to amend
S. F. No. 2974, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 18, after line 5,
insert:
"Sec. 9. NONSUBMISSION
OF HEALTH CARE CLAIM BY CLEARINGHOUSE; SIGNIFICANT DISRUPTION.
A situation shall be
considered a significant disruption to normal operations that materially
affects the provider's or facility's ability to conduct business in a normal
manner and to submit claims on a timely basis under Minnesota Statutes, section
62Q.75, if:
(1) a clearinghouse loses,
or otherwise does not submit, a health care claim as required by Minnesota
Statutes, section 62J.536; and
(2) the provider or facility
can substantiate that it submitted a complete claim to the clearinghouse within
provisions stated in contract or six months of the date of service, whichever
is less.
This section expires January
1, 2012."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11244
Dean moved to amend
S. F. No. 2974, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 13, line 24, before
"A" insert "(a)"
Page 13, after line 30,
insert:
"(b) No data
obtained from the electronic transmission of patients' medical records may be
used by any government entity to restrict access to medical treatment options
that are currently available to patients, based on age, quality of life, or
category of illness."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Peppin offered an amendment to S. F. No. 2974,
the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Huntley raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Peppin amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Sertich ruled the point
of order well taken and the Peppin amendment out of order.
Peppin appealed the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The vote
was taken on the question "Shall the decision of Speaker pro tempore
Sertich stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was called. There were 73 yeas and 60 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11245
Faust
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Olin
Otremba
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that
the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich should stand.
S. F. No. 2974, A bill for
an act relating to health; amending provisions for electronic health record
technology; providing for administrative penalties; appropriating money;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 62J.495, subdivisions 1a,
3, by adding a subdivision; 62J.497, subdivisions 4, 5; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62J.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 96 yeas and 37 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11246
H. F. No. 2614
was reported to the House.
Huntley moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 18, line 19, delete
"7.5" and insert "4.5"
Page 18, line 21, delete
everything after "January 1," and insert "2011,
through December 31, 2012,"
Page 18, after line 22,
insert:
"(j) Payment rates
for fee-for-service medical assistance admissions occurring on or after July 1,
2011, through June 30, 2013, for admissions for the following diagnosis-related
groups: 202 peds bronchitis and asthma
with major condition; 789 neonates, died or transferred to another acute care
facility; 790 extreme immaturity or respiratory distress syndrome; 791
prematurity with major problems; 793 full term neonate with major problems; 794
neonate with other significant problems; 881 depressive neuroses; 885
psychoses; and 886 behavior and developmental disorders, shall be increased for
these diagnosis-related groups at a percentage calculated to cost no more than
a total of $7,200,000 per fiscal year, including state and federal shares. For purposes of this paragraph, medical
assistance does not include general assistance medical care. The commissioner shall adjust rates to a
prepaid health plan under contract with the commissioner on a temporary basis
to reflect payments provided in this paragraph, and prepaid health plans are
required to increase rates to providers under contract on a temporary basis to
reflect payments provided in this paragraph.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2011."
Page 18, delete section 5
Page 36, line 4, delete
"1.4" and insert "1.3"
Page 41, delete lines 6 to
23 and insert:
"(f) Effective for
services rendered on or after October 1, 2010, medical assistance payment for
dental services for state-operated dental clinics shall be paid on a cost-based
payment system that is based on the cost-finding methods and allowable costs of
the Medicare program. This paragraph is
effective January 1, 2011, for enrollees in managed care receiving services at
state-operated dental clinics.
(g) Effective beginning with
fiscal year 2011, if the payments to state-operated dental clinics in paragraph
(f), including state and federal shares, are less than $1,800,000 per year, a
supplemental state payment, equal to the difference between the total payments
in paragraph (f) and $1,800,000 shall be made from the general fund to
state-operated services to operate the dental clinics.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2011."
Page 62, after line 22,
insert:
"Sec. 62. Hennepin
and Ramsey Counties Pilot Program. (a)
The commissioner, upon federal approval of a new waiver request or amendment of
an existing demonstration, may establish a pilot program in Hennepin County or
Ramsey County, or both, to test alternative and innovative integrated health
care delivery networks.
(b) Individuals eligible for
the pilot program shall be individuals who are eligible for medical assistance
under section 256B.055, subdivision 15, and who reside in Hennepin County or
Ramsey County.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11247
(c) Individuals enrolled in
the pilot shall be enrolled in an integrated health care delivery network in
their county of residence. The
integrated health care delivery network in Hennepin County shall be a network,
such as an accountable care organization or a community-based collaborative
care network, created by or including Hennepin County Medical Center. The integrated health care delivery network
in Ramsey County shall be a network, such as an accountable care organization
or community-based collaborative care network, created by or including Regions
Hospital.
(d) The commissioner shall
cap pilot program enrollment at 7,000 enrollees for Hennepin County and 3,500
enrollees for Ramsey County.
(e) In developing a payment
system for the pilot programs, the commissioner shall establish a total cost of
care for the recipients enrolled in the pilot programs that equals the cost of
care that would otherwise be spent for these enrollees in the prepaid medical
assistance program.
(f) Counties may transfer
funds necessary to support the nonfederal share of payments for integrated
health care delivery networks in their county.
Such transfers per county shall not exceed 15 percent of the expected
expenses for county enrollees.
(g) The commissioner shall
apply to the federal government for, or as appropriate, cooperate with
counties, providers, or other entities that are applying for any applicable
grant or demonstration under the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care
Act, Public Law 111-148, or the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of
2010, Public Law 111-152, that would further the purposes of or assist in the
creation of an integrated health care delivery network for the purposes of this
subdivision, including, but not limited to, a global payment demonstration or
the community-based collaborative care network grants."
Page 62, delete section 63
Page 75, line 19, delete
"beginning" and insert "for the rate period"
and after "2010" insert ", to June 30, 2011"
Page 78, line 11, delete
"beginning" and insert "for the rate period"
and delete "2009" and insert "2010, to June 30,
2011"
Page 100, after line 6,
insert:
"Sec. 22. AUTISM
PREVALENCE.
A task force of five members
of the house of representatives shall be appointed to study the prevalence of
autism in the Somali community. Four
members shall be appointed by the speaker of the house, and one member shall be
appointed by the minority leader. Members
of the task force shall be paid a per diem as provided in Minnesota Statutes,
sections 3.099 and 3.101. Frequency of
the meetings shall be determined by the members of task force, but in no case
may the task force have less than three meetings. The task force shall issue a report and
legislative proposals to the chairs of the standing committees with
jurisdiction over health and education no later than January 1, 2011."
Page 154, delete lines 14 to
20
Page 155, delete lines 1 to
7
Page 156, delete lines 30 to
34
Page 157, delete lines 1 to
7
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11248
Page 157,
line 14, delete "(4)" and insert "(1)"
Page 157,
line 19, delete "(5)" and insert "(2)"
Page 157,
line 25, delete "(6)" and insert "(3)"
Page 159,
delete lines 9 to 13
Page 159,
line 14, delete "12,854,000" and insert "9,000,000"
Page 159,
after line 14, insert:
"State-Operated Services. Of this appropriation, $8,300,000 in
fiscal year 2011 is for the commissioner to maintain dental clinics, the METO
program, and other residential adult mental health services.
Dental Clinics. $700,000 is
to continue the operation of the dental clinics in Brainerd, Cambridge,
Faribault, Fergus Falls, and Willmar.
The commissioner shall continue to bill for services provided to obtain
medical assistance critical access dental payments and cost-based payment rates
as provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.76, subdivision 2. The commissioner shall not close any of the
state-operated dental clinics without specific legislative approval. This appropriation is onetime."
Page 159,
after line 33, insert:
"(1)
Childrens Services Grants -0- (897,000)"
Page 159,
line 34, delete "(1)" and insert "(2)"
Page 160,
line 1, delete "(2)" and insert "(3)"
Page 160,
line 3, delete "(3)" and insert "(4)"
Page 160,
line 5, delete "(4)" and insert "(5)"
Page 160,
line 7, delete "(5)" and insert "(6)"
Page 163,
after line 23, insert:
"Subd. 5. Office of Minority and Multicultural
Health -0- 25,000
$25,000
from the general fund in fiscal year 2011 is for purposes of the Autism
Prevalence Task Force."
Page 176,
line 15, after "$28,000,000" insert "in fiscal year
2011" and after the period, insert "This rider is effective
the day following final enactment."
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11249
Page 194,
line 2, delete "$38,475,000" and insert "$37,860,000"
and delete "$14,758,000" and insert "$15,958,000"
Page 194,
line 3, delete "$35,058,000" and insert "$37,109,000"
Amend the
appropriations by the specified amounts and correct the totals and the
appropriations by fund accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Clark moved
to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 149,
after line 12, insert:
"This
appropriation is for food shelf programs under Minnesota Statutes, section
256E.34."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Hornstein
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 33,
after line 8, insert:
"Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.441, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 60. Nursing
facility rate reductions effective July 1, 2010. (a) Effective for the rate period
July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011, the commissioner shall increase
the operating payment rate of each nursing facility reimbursed under this
section or section 256B.434 by 2.0 percent of the operating payment rate in
effect on June 30, 2010.
(b)
Effective July 1, 2011, the commissioner shall increase the operating payment
rate of each nursing facility reimbursed under this section or section 256B.434
by 1.5 percent.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.5012,
is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 9. ICF/MR
rate reductions effective July 1, 2010.
Effective for the rate period July 1, 2010, through June 30,
2011, the commissioner shall increase the operating payment rate of each
facility reimbursed under this section by 2.0 percent of the operating payment
rates in effect on June 30, 2010.
Effective July 1, 2011, the commissioner shall increase the operating
payment rate of each facility reimbursed under this section by 1.5 percent."
Page 63,
after line 3, insert:
"Sec. 64. PROVIDER
RATE AND GRANT REDUCTIONS.
(a) The
commissioner of human services, for the rate period July 1, 2010, through June
30, 2011, shall increase grants, allocations, reimbursement rates, or rate
limits, as applicable, by 2.0 percent from the applicable amount in effect on
June 30, 2010. Effective July 1, 2011,
the commissioner of human services shall increase grants, allocations,
reimbursement rates, or rate limits, as applicable, by 1.5 percent.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11250
(b) The
rate changes described in this section must be provided to:
(1) home
and community-based waivered services for persons with developmental
disabilities or related conditions, including consumer-directed community
supports, under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.501;
(2) home
and community-based waivered services for the elderly, including
consumer-directed community supports, under Minnesota Statutes, section
256B.0915;
(3)
waivered services under community alternatives for disabled individuals,
including consumer-directed community supports, under Minnesota Statutes,
section 256B.49;
(4)
community alternative care waivered services, including consumer-directed
community supports, under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.49;
(5)
traumatic brain injury waivered services, including consumer-directed community
supports, under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.49;
(6) nursing
services and home health services under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0625,
subdivision 6a;
(7)
personal care services and qualified professional supervision of personal care
services under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0625, subdivisions 6a and 19a;
(8) private
duty nursing services under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0625, subdivision
7;
(9) day
training and habilitation services for adults with developmental disabilities
or related conditions under Minnesota Statutes, sections 252.40 to 252.46,
including the additional cost of rate adjustments on day training and
habilitation services, provided as a social service under Minnesota Statutes,
section 256M.60;
(10)
alternative care services under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0913;
(11)
semi-independent living services (SILS) under Minnesota Statutes, section
252.275, including SILS funding under county social services grants formerly
funded under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 256I;
(12)
community support services for deaf and hard-of-hearing adults with mental
illness who use or wish to use sign language as their primary means of
communication under Minnesota Statutes, section 256.01, subdivision 2; and deaf
and hard-of-hearing grants under Minnesota Statutes, sections 256C.233,
256C.25, and 256C.261; Laws 1985, First Special Session chapter 9, article 1;
Laws 1997, chapter 203, article 1, section 2, subdivision 8, as amended by Laws
1997, First Special Session chapter 5, section 20; and Laws 2007, chapter 147,
article 19, section 3, subdivision 8, as amended by Laws 2008, chapter 317,
section 3;
(13)
consumer support grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 256.476;
(14) family
support grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 252.32;
(15) aging
grants under Minnesota Statutes, sections 256.975 to 256.977, 256B.0917, and
256B.0928;
(16)
disability linkage line grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 256.01,
subdivision 24; and
(17)
housing access grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0658."
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11251
Page 98,
after line 36, insert:
"Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
289A.08, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Corporations. (a) A corporation that is subject to the
state's jurisdiction to tax under section 290.014, subdivision 5, must file a
return, except that a foreign operating corporation as defined in section
290.01, subdivision 6b, is not required to file a return.
(b) Members
of a unitary business that are required to file a combined report on one return
must designate a member of the unitary business to be responsible for tax
matters, including the filing of returns, the payment of taxes, additions to tax,
penalties, interest, or any other payment, and for the receipt of refunds of
taxes or interest paid in excess of taxes lawfully due. The designated member must be a member of the
unitary business that is filing the single combined report and either:
(1) a
corporation that is subject to the taxes imposed by chapter 290; or
(2) a
corporation that is not subject to the taxes imposed by chapter 290:
(i) Such
corporation consents by filing the return as a designated member under this
clause to remit taxes, penalties, interest, or additions to tax due from the
members of the unitary business subject to tax, and receive refunds or other
payments on behalf of other members of the unitary business. The member designated under this clause is a
"taxpayer" for the purposes of this chapter and chapter 270C, and is
liable for any liability imposed on the unitary business under this chapter and
chapter 290.
(ii) If the
state does not otherwise have the jurisdiction to tax the member designated
under this clause, consenting to be the designated member does not create the
jurisdiction to impose tax on the designated member, other than as described in
item (i).
(iii) The
member designated under this clause must apply for a business tax account
identification number.
(c) The
commissioner shall adopt rules for the filing of one return on behalf of the
members of an affiliated group of corporations that are required to file a
combined report. All members of an
affiliated group that are required to file a combined report must file one
return on behalf of the members of the group under rules adopted by the
commissioner.
(d) If a
corporation claims on a return that it has paid tax in excess of the amount of
taxes lawfully due, that corporation must include on that return information
necessary for payment of the tax in excess of the amount lawfully due by
electronic means.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 290.01,
subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Domestic
corporation. The term
"domestic" when applied to a corporation means a corporation:
(1) created
or organized in the United States, or under the laws of the United States or of
any state, the District of Columbia, or any political subdivision of any of the
foregoing but not including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any possession
of the United States;
(2) which
qualifies as a DISC, as defined in section 992(a) of the Internal Revenue Code;
or
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11252
(3) which
qualifies as a FSC, as defined in section 922 of the Internal Revenue Code.;
(4) which
is incorporated in a tax haven;
(5) which
is engaged in activity in a tax haven sufficient for the tax haven to impose a
net income tax under United States constitutional standards and section
290.015, and which reports that 20 percent or more of its income is attributable
to business in the tax haven; or
(6) which
has the average of its property, payroll, and sales factors, as defined under
section 290.191, within the 50 states of the United States and the District of
Columbia of 20 percent or more.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 290.01, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5c. Tax
haven. (a) "Tax
haven" means a foreign jurisdiction designated under this subdivision.
(b) The
commissioner may designate a foreign jurisdiction as a tax haven by
administrative rule if the jurisdiction:
(1) has no
or nominal effective tax on the relevant income; and
(2)(i) has
laws or practices that prevent effective exchange of information for tax
purposes with other governments on taxpayers benefiting from the tax regime;
(ii) has a
tax regime that lacks transparency. A
tax regime lacks transparency if the details of legislative, legal, or administrative
provisions are not open and apparent or are not consistently applied among
similarly situated taxpayers, or if the information needed by tax authorities
to determine a taxpayer's correct tax liability, such as accounting records and
underlying documentation, is not adequately available;
(iii)
facilitates the establishment of foreign-owned entities without the need for a
local substantive presence or prohibits these entities from having any
commercial impact on the local economy;
(iv) explicitly
or implicitly excludes the jurisdiction's resident taxpayers from taking
advantage of the tax regime's benefits or prohibits enterprises that benefit
from the regime from operating in the jurisdiction's domestic markets; or
(v) has
created a tax regime that is favorable for tax avoidance, based upon an overall
assessment of relevant factors, including whether the jurisdiction has a
significant untaxed offshore financial or other services sector relative to its
overall economy.
(c) The
following foreign jurisdictions are deemed to be tax havens, unless the
commissioner, by revenue notice, provides notification that the jurisdiction no
longer satisfies the requirements of paragraph (b) and removes the jurisdiction
from the list:
(1)
Anguilla;
(2) Antigua
and Barbuda;
(3) Aruba;
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11253
(4)
Bahamas;
(5)
Barbados;
(6) Belize;
(7)
Bermuda;
(8) British
Virgin Islands;
(9) Cayman
Islands;
(10) Cook
Islands;
(11)
Dominica;
(12)
Gibraltar;
(13)
Grenada;
(14)
Guernsey-Sark-Alderney;
(15) Isle of
Man;
(16)
Jersey;
(17)
Latvia;
(18) Liechtenstein;
(19) Luxembourg;
(20) Nauru;
(21) Netherlands Antilles;
(22)
Panama;
(23) Samoa;
(24)
St. Kitts and Nevis;
(25)
St. Lucia;
(26)
St. Vincent and Grenadines;
(27) Turks
and Caicos; and
(28) Vanuatu.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11254
(d) The commissioner shall
revoke a foreign jurisdiction's listing under paragraph (b) or (c), as
applicable, if the United States enters into a tax treaty or other agreement
with the foreign jurisdiction that provides for prompt, obligatory, and
automatic exchange of information with the United States government relevant to
enforcing the provisions of federal tax laws and the treaty or other agreement
was in effect for the taxable year.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2009.
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
290.01, subdivision 19c, is amended to read:
Subd. 19c. Corporations;
additions to federal taxable income. For
corporations, there shall be added to federal taxable income:
(1) the amount of any
deduction taken for federal income tax purposes for income, excise, or
franchise taxes based on net income or related minimum taxes, including but not
limited to the tax imposed under section 290.0922, paid by the corporation to
Minnesota, another state, a political subdivision of another state, the
District of Columbia, or any foreign country or possession of the United
States;
(2) interest not subject to
federal tax upon obligations of: the
United States, its possessions, its agencies, or its instrumentalities; the
state of Minnesota or any other state, any of its political or governmental
subdivisions, any of its municipalities, or any of its governmental agencies or
instrumentalities; the District of Columbia; or Indian tribal governments;
(3) exempt-interest
dividends received as defined in section 852(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue
Code;
(4) the amount of any net
operating loss deduction taken for federal income tax purposes under section
172 or 832(c)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code or operations loss deduction
under section 810 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(5) the amount of any
special deductions taken for federal income tax purposes under sections 241 to
247 and 965 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(6) losses from the business
of mining, as defined in section 290.05, subdivision 1, clause (a), that are
not subject to Minnesota income tax;
(7) the amount of any
capital losses deducted for federal income tax purposes under sections 1211 and
1212 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(8) the exempt foreign trade
income of a foreign sales corporation under sections 921(a) and 291 of the
Internal Revenue Code;
(9) the amount of percentage
depletion deducted under sections 611 through 614 and 291 of the Internal
Revenue Code;
(10) for certified pollution
control facilities placed in service in a taxable year beginning before
December 31, 1986, and for which amortization deductions were elected under
section 169 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended through December
31, 1985, the amount of the amortization deduction allowed in computing federal
taxable income for those facilities;
(11) for taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2010, the amount of any deemed dividend from a
foreign operating corporation determined pursuant to section 290.17,
subdivision 4, paragraph (g). The deemed
dividend shall be reduced by the amount of the addition to income required by
clauses (20), (21), (22), and (23);
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11255
(12) the
amount of a partner's pro rata share of net income which does not flow through
to the partner because the partnership elected to pay the tax on the income
under section 6242(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code;
(13) the
amount of net income excluded under section 114 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(14) for
taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, any increase in subpart F
income, as defined in section 952(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, for the
taxable year when subpart F income is calculated without regard to the
provisions of Division C, title III, section 303(b) of Public Law 110-343;
(15) 80
percent of the depreciation deduction allowed under section 168(k)(1)(A) and
(k)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code.
For purposes of this clause, if the taxpayer has an activity that in the
taxable year generates a deduction for depreciation under section 168(k)(1)(A)
and (k)(4)(A) and the activity generates a loss for the taxable year that the
taxpayer is not allowed to claim for the taxable year, "the depreciation
allowed under section 168(k)(1)(A) and (k)(4)(A)" for the taxable year is
limited to excess of the depreciation claimed by the activity under section
168(k)(1)(A) and (k)(4)(A) over the amount of the loss from the activity that
is not allowed in the taxable year. In
succeeding taxable years when the losses not allowed in the taxable year are
allowed, the depreciation under section 168(k)(1)(A) and (k)(4)(A) is allowed;
(16) 80
percent of the amount by which the deduction allowed by section 179 of the
Internal Revenue Code exceeds the deduction allowable by section 179 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 2003;
(17) to the
extent deducted in computing federal taxable income, the amount of the
deduction allowable under section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(18) the
exclusion allowed under section 139A of the Internal Revenue Code for federal
subsidies for prescription drug plans;
(19) the
amount of expenses disallowed under section 290.10, subdivision 2;
(20) for
taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, an amount equal to the
interest and intangible expenses, losses, and costs paid, accrued, or incurred
by any member of the taxpayer's unitary group to or for the benefit of a
corporation that is a member of the taxpayer's unitary business group that
qualifies as a foreign operating corporation.
For purposes of this clause, intangible expenses and costs include:
(i)
expenses, losses, and costs for, or related to, the direct or indirect
acquisition, use, maintenance or management, ownership, sale, exchange, or any
other disposition of intangible property;
(ii) losses
incurred, directly or indirectly, from factoring transactions or discounting
transactions;
(iii)
royalty, patent, technical, and copyright fees;
(iv)
licensing fees; and
(v) other
similar expenses and costs.
For purposes
of this clause, "intangible property" includes stocks, bonds, patents,
patent applications, trade names, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, mask
works, trade secrets, and similar types of intangible assets.
This clause
does not apply to any item of interest or intangible expenses or costs paid,
accrued, or incurred, directly or indirectly, to a foreign operating
corporation with respect to such item of income to the extent that the income
to the foreign operating corporation is income from sources without the United
States as defined in subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter N, part 1, of the
Internal Revenue Code;
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11256
(21) for
taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, except as already included
in the taxpayer's taxable income pursuant to clause (20), any interest income
and income generated from intangible property received or accrued by a foreign
operating corporation that is a member of the taxpayer's unitary group. For purposes of this clause, income generated
from intangible property includes:
(i) income
related to the direct or indirect acquisition, use, maintenance or management,
ownership, sale, exchange, or any other disposition of intangible property;
(ii) income
from factoring transactions or discounting transactions;
(iii)
royalty, patent, technical, and copyright fees;
(iv)
licensing fees; and
(v) other
similar income.
For
purposes of this clause, "intangible property" includes stocks,
bonds, patents, patent applications, trade names, trademarks, service marks,
copyrights, mask works, trade secrets, and similar types of intangible assets.
This clause
does not apply to any item of interest or intangible income received or accrued
by a foreign operating corporation with respect to such item of income to the
extent that the income is income from sources without the United States as
defined in subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter N, part 1, of the Internal Revenue
Code;
(22) for
taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, the dividends attributable
to the income of a foreign operating corporation that is a member of the
taxpayer's unitary group in an amount that is equal to the dividends paid
deduction of a real estate investment trust under section 561(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code for amounts paid or accrued by the real estate investment
trust to the foreign operating corporation;
(23) for
taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, the income of a foreign
operating corporation that is a member of the taxpayer's unitary group in an
amount that is equal to gains derived from the sale of real or personal
property located in the United States;
(24) the
additional amount allowed as a deduction for donation of computer technology
and equipment under section 170(e)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code, to the
extent deducted from taxable income; and
(25)
discharge of indebtedness income resulting from reacquisition of business
indebtedness and deferred under section 108(i) of the Internal Revenue Code.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
290.01, subdivision 19d, is amended to read:
Subd. 19d. Corporations;
modifications decreasing federal taxable income. For corporations, there shall be
subtracted from federal taxable income after the increases provided in
subdivision 19c:
(1) the
amount of foreign dividend gross-up added to gross income for federal income
tax purposes under section 78 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(2) the
amount of salary expense not allowed for federal income tax purposes due to
claiming the work opportunity credit under section 51 of the Internal Revenue
Code;
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11257
(3) any dividend (not
including any distribution in liquidation) paid within the taxable year by a
national or state bank to the United States, or to any instrumentality of the
United States exempt from federal income taxes, on the preferred stock of the
bank owned by the United States or the instrumentality;
(4) amounts disallowed for
intangible drilling costs due to differences between this chapter and the
Internal Revenue Code in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, as
follows:
(i) to the extent the
disallowed costs are represented by physical property, an amount equal to the
allowance for depreciation under Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.09,
subdivision 7, subject to the modifications contained in subdivision 19e; and
(ii) to the extent the
disallowed costs are not represented by physical property, an amount equal to
the allowance for cost depletion under Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.09,
subdivision 8;
(5) the deduction for
capital losses pursuant to sections 1211 and 1212 of the Internal Revenue Code,
except that:
(i) for capital losses
incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, capital loss
carrybacks shall not be allowed;
(ii) for capital losses
incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, a capital loss
carryover to each of the 15 taxable years succeeding the loss year shall be
allowed;
(iii) for capital losses
incurred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, a capital loss
carryback to each of the three taxable years preceding the loss year, subject
to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.16, shall be allowed;
and
(iv) for capital losses
incurred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, a capital loss
carryover to each of the five taxable years succeeding the loss year to the
extent such loss was not used in a prior taxable year and subject to the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.16, shall be allowed;
(6) an amount for interest
and expenses relating to income not taxable for federal income tax purposes, if
(i) the income is taxable under this chapter and (ii) the interest and expenses
were disallowed as deductions under the provisions of section 171(a)(2), 265 or
291 of the Internal Revenue Code in computing federal taxable income;
(7) in the case of mines,
oil and gas wells, other natural deposits, and timber for which percentage
depletion was disallowed pursuant to subdivision 19c, clause (9), a reasonable
allowance for depletion based on actual cost.
In the case of leases the deduction must be apportioned between the
lessor and lessee in accordance with rules prescribed by the commissioner. In the case of property held in trust, the
allowable deduction must be apportioned between the income beneficiaries and
the trustee in accordance with the pertinent provisions of the trust, or if
there is no provision in the instrument, on the basis of the trust's income
allocable to each;
(8) for certified pollution
control facilities placed in service in a taxable year beginning before
December 31, 1986, and for which amortization deductions were elected under section
169 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended through December 31, 1985,
an amount equal to the allowance for depreciation under Minnesota Statutes
1986, section 290.09, subdivision 7;
(9) amounts included in
federal taxable income that are due to refunds of income, excise, or franchise
taxes based on net income or related minimum taxes paid by the corporation to
Minnesota, another state, a political subdivision of another state, the
District of Columbia, or a foreign country or possession of the United States
to the extent that the taxes were added to federal taxable income under section
290.01, subdivision 19c, clause (1), in a prior taxable year;
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11258
(10) 80
percent of royalties, fees, or other like income accrued or received from a
foreign operating corporation or a foreign corporation which is part of the
same unitary business as the receiving corporation, unless the income resulting
from such payments or accruals is income from sources within the United States
as defined in subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter N, part 1, of the Internal
Revenue Code;
(11) income or
gains from the business of mining as defined in section 290.05, subdivision 1,
clause (a), that are not subject to Minnesota franchise tax;
(12) the
amount of disability access expenditures in the taxable year which are not
allowed to be deducted or capitalized under section 44(d)(7) of the Internal
Revenue Code;
(13) the
amount of qualified research expenses not allowed for federal income tax
purposes under section 280C(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, but only to the
extent that the amount exceeds the amount of the credit allowed under section
290.068;
(14) the
amount of salary expenses not allowed for federal income tax purposes due to
claiming the Indian employment credit under section 45A(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code;
(15) for
taxable years beginning before January 1, 2008, the amount of the federal small
ethanol producer credit allowed under section 40(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Code which is included in gross income under section 87 of the Internal Revenue
Code;
(16) for a
corporation whose foreign sales corporation, as defined in section 922 of the
Internal Revenue Code, constituted a foreign operating corporation during any
taxable year ending before January 1, 1995, and a return was filed by August
15, 1996, claiming the deduction under section 290.21, subdivision 4, for
income received from the foreign operating corporation, an amount equal to 1.23
multiplied by the amount of income excluded under section 114 of the Internal
Revenue Code, provided the income is not income of a foreign operating company;
(17) for
taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, any decrease in subpart F
income, as defined in section 952(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, for the
taxable year when subpart F income is calculated without regard to the provisions
of Division C, title III, section 303(b) of Public Law 110-343;
(18) in each
of the five tax years immediately following the tax year in which an addition
is required under subdivision 19c, clause (15), an amount equal to one-fifth of
the delayed depreciation. For purposes
of this clause, "delayed depreciation" means the amount of the
addition made by the taxpayer under subdivision 19c, clause (15). The resulting delayed depreciation cannot be
less than zero;
(19) in each
of the five tax years immediately following the tax year in which an addition
is required under subdivision 19c, clause (16), an amount equal to one-fifth of
the amount of the addition; and
(20) to the
extent included in federal taxable income, discharge of indebtedness income
resulting from reacquisition of business indebtedness included in federal
taxable income under section 108(i) of the Internal Revenue Code. This subtraction applies only to the extent
that the income was included in net income in a prior year as a result of the
addition under section 290.01, subdivision 19c, clause (25).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 290.17,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Unitary
business principle. (a) If a trade
or business conducted wholly within this state or partly within and partly
without this state is part of a unitary business, the entire income of the
unitary business is subject to apportionment pursuant to section 290.191. Notwithstanding subdivision 2, paragraph (c),
none of the income of
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11259
a unitary
business is considered to be derived from any particular source and none may be
allocated to a particular place except as provided by the applicable
apportionment formula. The provisions of
this subdivision do not apply to business income subject to subdivision 5,
income of an insurance company, or income of an investment company determined
under section 290.36.
(b) The
term "unitary business" means business activities or operations which
result in a flow of value between them.
The term may be applied within a single legal entity or between multiple
entities and without regard to whether each entity is a sole proprietorship, a
corporation, a partnership or a trust.
(c) Unity
is presumed whenever there is unity of ownership, operation, and use, evidenced
by centralized management or executive force, centralized purchasing,
advertising, accounting, or other controlled interaction, but the absence of
these centralized activities will not necessarily evidence a nonunitary
business. Unity is also presumed when
business activities or operations are of mutual benefit, dependent upon or
contributory to one another, either individually or as a group.
(d) Where a
business operation conducted in Minnesota is owned by a business entity that
carries on business activity outside the state different in kind from that
conducted within this state, and the other business is conducted entirely
outside the state, it is presumed that the two business operations are unitary
in nature, interrelated, connected, and interdependent unless it can be shown
to the contrary.
(e) Unity
of ownership is not deemed to exist when a corporation is involved unless that
corporation is a member of a group of two or more business entities and more
than 50 percent of the voting stock of each member of the group is directly or
indirectly owned by a common owner or by common owners, either corporate or
noncorporate, or by one or more of the member corporations of the group. For this purpose, the term "voting
stock" shall include membership interests of mutual insurance holding
companies formed under section 66A.40.
(f) The net
income and apportionment factors under section 290.191 or 290.20 of foreign
corporations and other foreign entities which are part of a unitary business
shall not be included in the net income or the apportionment factors of the
unitary business. A foreign corporation
or other foreign entity which is required to file a return under this chapter
shall file on a separate return basis. The
net income and apportionment factors under section 290.191 or 290.20 of foreign
operating corporations shall not be included in the net income or the
apportionment factors of the unitary business except as provided in paragraph
(g). The legislature intends that
the provisions of this paragraph are not severable from the provisions of
section 290.01, subdivision 5, clauses (4) to (6), and if any of those
provisions are found to be unconstitutional, the provisions of this paragraph
are void for the respective taxable years.
(g) The
adjusted net income of a foreign operating corporation shall be deemed to be
paid as a dividend on the last day of its taxable year to each shareholder
thereof, in proportion to each shareholder's ownership, with which such
corporation is engaged in a unitary business.
Such deemed dividend shall be treated as a dividend under section
290.21, subdivision 4.
Dividends
actually paid by a foreign operating corporation to a corporate shareholder
which is a member of the same unitary business as the foreign operating
corporation shall be eliminated from the net income of the unitary business in
preparing a combined report for the unitary business. The adjusted net income of a foreign
operating corporation shall be its net income adjusted as follows:
(1) any
taxes paid or accrued to a foreign country, the commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or
a United States possession or political subdivision of any of the foregoing
shall be a deduction; and
(2) the
subtraction from federal taxable income for payments received from foreign
corporations or foreign operating corporations under section 290.01,
subdivision 19d, clause (10), shall not be allowed.
Journal of the House - 96th Day
- Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11260
If a foreign operating
corporation incurs a net loss, neither income nor deduction from that
corporation shall be included in determining the net income of the unitary
business.
(h) For purposes of determining
the net income of a unitary business and the factors to be used in the
apportionment of net income pursuant to section 290.191 or 290.20, there must
be included only the income and apportionment factors of domestic corporations
or other domestic entities other than foreign operating corporations
that are determined to be part of the unitary business pursuant to this
subdivision, notwithstanding that foreign corporations or other foreign
entities might be included in the unitary business.
(i) (h) Deductions for expenses,
interest, or taxes otherwise allowable under this chapter that are connected
with or allocable against dividends, deemed dividends described in paragraph
(g), or royalties, fees, or other like income described in section 290.01,
subdivision 19d, clause (10), shall not be disallowed.
(j) (i) Each corporation or other
entity, except a sole proprietorship, that is part of a unitary business must
file combined reports as the commissioner determines. On the reports, all intercompany transactions
between entities included pursuant to paragraph (h) (g) must be
eliminated and the entire net income of the unitary business determined in
accordance with this subdivision is apportioned among the entities by using
each entity's Minnesota factors for apportionment purposes in the numerators of
the apportionment formula and the total factors for apportionment purposes of
all entities included pursuant to paragraph (h) (g) in the
denominators of the apportionment formula.
(k) (j) If a corporation has been
divested from a unitary business and is included in a combined report for a
fractional part of the common accounting period of the combined report:
(1) its income includable in
the combined report is its income incurred for that part of the year determined
by proration or separate accounting; and
(2) its sales, property, and
payroll included in the apportionment formula must be prorated or accounted for
separately.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2009."
Page 100 , delete section 22
and insert:
"Sec. 22. REPEALER.
(a) Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 254B.02, subdivisions 2, 3, and 4; and 254B.09, subdivisions 4, 5, and
7, and Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 7, section 26, subdivision 3, are repealed.
(b) Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 290.01, subdivision 6b; and 290.0921, subdivision 7, are repealed
effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009."
Page 148, delete lines 24 to
31
Page 148, delete line 32
Page 149, delete lines 1 to
7
Page 157, delete lines 14 to
18
Page 157, renumber the
clauses
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11261
Adjust
amounts accordingly
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
POINT OF ORDER
Kohls raised a point of order pursuant to rule
3.21 that the Hornstein amendment was not in order.
Speaker pro tempore Sertich submitted the
following question to the House:
"Is it the judgment of the House that the Kohls point of order is
well taken?"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
CALL OF THE HOUSE
On the motion of Kohls and on the demand
of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk.
Kelliher
Morrow moved that further proceedings of the
roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in
the absentees. The motion prevailed and
it was so ordered.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11262
The vote recurred on the question "Is
it the judgment of the House that the Kohls point of order is well taken?"
and the roll was called. There were 58
yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Obermueller
Pelowski
Peppin
Poppe
Rosenthal
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Persell
Peterson
Reinert
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
So it was the judgment of the House that the
Kohls point of order was not well taken and the Hornstein amendment was in
order.
POINT OF ORDER
Buesgens raised a point of order pursuant
to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect
on Expenditure and Revenue Bills that the Hornstein amendment was not in
order. Speaker pro tempore Sertich ruled
the point of order not well taken and the Hornstein amendment in order.
Buesgens appealed the decision of Speaker
pro tempore Sertich.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The vote was taken on the question
"Shall the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich stand as the judgment
of the House?" and the roll was called.
There were 85 yeas and 48 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11263
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Rosenthal
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that
the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich should stand.
CALL OF THE HOUSE LIFTED
Morrow moved that the call of the House be
lifted. The motion prevailed and it was
so ordered.
Dean moved
to amend the Hornstein amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 3,
after line 9, insert:
"Page
80, line 18, delete "110" and insert "100""
Page 3,
delete lines 10 to 36
Page 4,
delete lines 1 to 33
Page 5,
delete lines 1 to 36
Page 6,
delete lines 1 to 35
Page 7,
delete lines 1 to 36
Page 8,
delete lines 1 to 36
Page 9,
delete lines 1 to 34
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11264
Page 10, delete lines 1 to
36
Page 11, delete lines 1 to
36
Page 12, delete lines 1 to
35
Page 13, delete lines 1 to
35
Page 14, delete lines 1 to
36
Page 15, delete lines 1 to
19 and insert:
"Page 129, delete lines
13 and 14
Page 131, after line 26,
insert:
"Sec. 11. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Sections 1 to 10 are
effective January 1, 2014.""
Page 15, after line 24,
insert:
"Page 160, delete lines
23 to 29, and insert:
"Statewide Health Improvement Program. The funding for the statewide health
improvement program, established under Minnesota Statutes, section 145.986, is
canceled.
Family Planning Grants. The funding for family
planning grants, established under Minnesota Statutes, section 145.925, is
canceled."
Page 194, delete lines 1 to
6 and insert "$27,000,000 is transferred from the health care access
fund to the general fund.""
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The
question was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was
called. There
were 43 yeas and 90 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11265
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Brod moved to amend the Hornstein
amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended,
as follows:
Page 5, line 18, delete ", unless
the"
Page 5, delete line 19
Page 5, line 20, delete everything before
the colon
The motion prevailed and the amendment to
the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Hornstein
amendment, as amended, and the roll was called.
There were 78 yeas and 55 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11266
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Peppin
Peterson
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
The motion prevailed and the amendment, as
amended, was adopted.
Dean;
Sanders; Gottwalt; Abeler; Smith; Severson; Murdock; Shimanski; Doepke; Mack;
Buesgens; Hoppe; Emmer; Drazkowski; Scott; Anderson, B.; Zellers and Hackbarth
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 124,
after line 12, insert:
"Section
1. [62A.645]
HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE NOT REQUIRED.
No resident
of this state, regardless of whether the individual has or is eligible for
health insurance coverage under any policy or program provided by or through an
employer, or a plan sponsored by the state or the federal government, shall be
required to obtain or maintain a policy of individual insurance coverage. No provision of state law shall render a
resident of this state liable for any penalty, assessment, fee, or fine as a
result of failure to procure or obtain health insurance coverage. This section shall not apply to individuals
voluntarily applying for coverage under medical assistance, MinnesotaCare, or
general assistance medical care."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Dean et al
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 46 yeas and 86 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11267
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Huntley
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 157,
delete lines 8 to 13
Renumber
the clauses in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Gardner
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 100,
after line 6, insert:
"Sec. 22. PRESCRIPTION
DRUG WASTE REDUCTION.
The
commissioner of human services, in cooperation with the commissioners of health,
veterans affairs, and corrections, shall study prescription drug waste
reduction techniques and technologies applicable to long-term care facilities,
veterans nursing homes, and correctional facilities. In conducting the study, the commissioners shall
consult with the Minnesota Board of Pharmacy, the University of Minnesota
College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota's Minnesota Technical Assistance
Project, consumers, long-term care providers, and other interested parties. The commissioners shall evaluate the extent
to which new prescription drug waste reduction techniques and technologies can
reduce the amount of prescription drugs that enter the waste stream and reduce
state prescription drug costs. The techniques
and technologies studied must include, but are not limited to, daily, weekly,
and automated dose dispensing. The study
must provide an estimate of the cost of adopting these and other techniques and
technologies, and an estimate of waste reduction and state prescription drug
savings that would result from
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11268
adoption. The study must also evaluate methods of
encouraging the adoption of effective drug waste reduction techniques and
technologies. The commissioner shall
present recommendations on the adoption of new prescription drug waste
reduction techniques and technologies to the legislature by December 15, 2010."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
Juhnke moved
to amend the Gardner amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 8, after "with"
insert "the Minnesota Pharmacists Association,"
The motion prevailed and the amendment to
the amendment was adopted.
POINT OF ORDER
Kohls raised a point of order pursuant to
rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect on Expenditure
and Revenue Bills that the Gardner amendment, as amended, was not in
order. Speaker pro tempore Sertich ruled
the point of order not well taken and the Gardner amendment, as amended, in
order.
The question recurred on the Gardner
amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 2614, the second
engrossment, as amended. The motion
prevailed and the amendment, as amended, was adopted.
Scalze,
Dittrich, Bunn, Peterson, Abeler, Peppin and Ruud moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 87,
line 20, delete everything after "programs" and insert a
period
Page 87,
delete line 21 and insert "These programs must"
Page 87,
line 22, after the period, insert "The state employee group insurance
plan is not subject to this section until July 1, 2013, but must fully comply
with this section on and after that date."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Fritz and
Brod moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 83, after
line 31, insert:
"(e)
A health plan company is in compliance with this section if it does not include
orally administered anticancer medication in the fourth tier of its pharmacy
benefit."
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11269
Clark moved
to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 131,
after line 28, insert:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
62J.692, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Distribution
of funds. (a) Following the
distribution described under paragraph (b), the commissioner shall annually
distribute the available medical education funds to all qualifying applicants
based on a distribution formula that reflects a summation of two factors:
(1) a
public program volume factor, which is determined by the total volume of public
program revenue received by each training site as a percentage of all public
program revenue received by all training sites in the fund pool; and
(2) a supplemental
public program volume factor, which is determined by providing a supplemental
payment of 20 percent of each training site's grant to training sites whose
public program revenue accounted for at least 0.98 percent of the total public
program revenue received by all eligible training sites. Grants to training sites whose public program
revenue accounted for less than 0.98 percent of the total public program
revenue received by all eligible training sites shall be reduced by an amount
equal to the total value of the supplemental payment.
Public
program revenue for the distribution formula includes revenue from medical
assistance, prepaid medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and
prepaid general assistance medical care.
Training sites that receive no public program revenue are ineligible for
funds available under this subdivision.
For purposes of determining training-site level grants to be distributed
under paragraph (a), total statewide average costs per trainee for medical
residents is based on audited clinical training costs per trainee in primary
care clinical medical education programs for medical residents. Total statewide average costs per trainee for
dental residents is based on audited clinical training costs per trainee in
clinical medical education programs for dental students. Total statewide average costs per trainee for
pharmacy residents is based on audited clinical training costs per trainee in
clinical medical education programs for pharmacy students.
(b)
$5,350,000 of the available medical education funds shall be distributed as
follows:
(1)
$1,475,000 to the University of Minnesota Medical Center-Fairview;
(2)
$2,075,000 to the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry; and
(3)
$1,800,000 to the Academic Health Center.
$150,000 of the funds distributed to the Academic Health Center under
this paragraph shall be used for a program to assist internationally trained
physicians who are legal residents and who commit to serving underserved
Minnesota communities in a health professional shortage area to successfully
compete for family medicine residency programs at the University of Minnesota.
(c) Funds
distributed shall not be used to displace current funding appropriations from
federal or state sources.
(d) Funds
shall be distributed to the sponsoring institutions indicating the amount to be
distributed to each of the sponsor's clinical medical education programs based
on the criteria in this subdivision and in accordance with the commissioner's
approval letter. Each clinical medical
education program must distribute funds allocated under paragraph (a) to the
training sites as specified in the commissioner's approval letter. Sponsoring institutions, which are accredited
through an organization recognized by the Department of Education or the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, may contract directly with training
sites to provide clinical training. To
ensure the quality of clinical training, those accredited sponsoring
institutions must:
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11270
(1) develop contracts
specifying the terms, expectations, and outcomes of the clinical training
conducted at sites; and
(2) take necessary action if
the contract requirements are not met.
Action may include the withholding of payments under this section or the
removal of students from the site.
(e) Any funds not
distributed in accordance with the commissioner's approval letter must be
returned to the medical education and research fund within 30 days of receiving
notice from the commissioner. The
commissioner shall distribute returned funds to the appropriate training sites
in accordance with the commissioner's approval letter.
(f) A maximum of $150,000 of
the funds dedicated to the commissioner under section 297F.10, subdivision 1, clause (2), may be used by the commissioner for
administrative expenses associated with implementing this section."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Loeffler, Huntley, Norton,
Abeler and Ruud moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 130, after line 2,
insert:
"(c) The
commissioner of health shall apply for federal grants available under the
federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148, for
purposes of funding wellness and prevention, and health improvement
programs. To the extent possible under
federal law, the commissioner of health must utilize the state health
improvement program, established under Minnesota Statutes, section 145.986, to implement
grant programs related to wellness and prevention, and health improvement, for
which the state receives funding under the federal Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Loeffler et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 92 yeas and
41 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11271
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Torkelson
Westrom
Zellers
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Thao and
Juhnke moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 118,
after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 10. [144.059]
VENDOR ACCREDITATION.
A hospital
or clinic that requires a vendor accreditation report prior to a vendor
obtaining access to the facility shall accept a vendor accreditation report
acquired from any generally accepted vendor accreditation service. The hospital or clinic must not require the
vendor to obtain an additional report if the vendor has already received a
report for services provided at another hospital or clinic."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Abeler and
Huntley moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 125,
line 16, delete "five" and insert "four" and
strike "two" and insert "three"
Page 129,
line 23, before the semicolon, insert ", including a demonstration
project for the specific population of childless adults under 75 percent of
federal poverty guidelines that were to be served by the general assistance
medical care program"
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11272
Murphy, E.;
Brynaert; Jackson; Persell; Hilty; Morrow; Anzelc; Hosch; Murphy, M.; Ward;
Sailer; Huntley; Reinert; Poppe; Juhnke and Lieder moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 28,
delete section 20, and insert:
"Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0644,
as amended by Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section 6, is amended to read:
256B.0644 REIMBURSEMENT UNDER OTHER STATE HEALTH CARE
PROGRAMS.
(a) A
vendor of medical care, as defined in section 256B.02, subdivision 7, and a
health maintenance organization, as defined in chapter 62D, must participate as
a provider or contractor in the medical assistance program, general assistance
medical care program, and MinnesotaCare as a condition of participating as a
provider in health insurance plans and programs or contractor for state
employees established under section 43A.18, the public employees insurance
program under section 43A.316, for health insurance plans offered to local
statutory or home rule charter city, county, and school district employees, the
workers' compensation system under section 176.135, and insurance plans
provided through the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association under sections
62E.01 to 62E.19. The limitations on
insurance plans offered to local government employees shall not be applicable
in geographic areas where provider participation is limited by managed care
contracts with the Department of Human Services.
(b) For
providers other than health maintenance organizations, participation in the
medical assistance program means that:
(1) the
provider accepts new medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and
MinnesotaCare patients;
(2) for
providers other than dental service providers, at least 20 percent of the
provider's patients are covered by medical assistance, general assistance
medical care, and MinnesotaCare as their primary source of coverage; or
(3) for
dental service providers, at least ten percent of the provider's patients are
covered by medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and
MinnesotaCare as their primary source of coverage, or the provider accepts new
medical assistance and MinnesotaCare patients who are children with special
health care needs. For purposes of this
section, "children with special health care needs" means children up
to age 18 who: (i) require health and
related services beyond that required by children generally; and (ii) have or
are at risk for a chronic physical, developmental, behavioral, or emotional
condition, including: bleeding and
coagulation disorders; immunodeficiency disorders; cancer; endocrinopathy;
developmental disabilities; epilepsy, cerebral palsy, and other neurological
diseases; visual impairment or deafness; Down syndrome and other genetic
disorders; autism; fetal alcohol syndrome; and other conditions designated by
the commissioner after consultation with representatives of pediatric dental
providers and consumers.
(c)
Patients seen on a volunteer basis by the provider at a location other than the
provider's usual place of practice may be considered in meeting the
participation requirement in this section.
The commissioner shall establish participation requirements for health
maintenance organizations. The commissioner
shall provide lists of participating medical assistance providers on a
quarterly basis to the commissioner of management and budget, the commissioner
of labor and industry, and the commissioner of commerce. Each of the commissioners shall develop and
implement procedures to exclude as participating providers in the program or
programs under their jurisdiction those providers who do not participate in the
medical assistance program. The
commissioner of management and budget shall implement this section through
contracts with participating health and dental carriers.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11273
(d) Any
hospital or other provider that is participating in a coordinated care delivery
system under section 256D.031, subdivision 6, or receives payments from the
uncompensated care pool under section 256D.031, subdivision 8, shall not refuse
to provide services to any patient enrolled in general assistance medical care
regardless of the availability or the amount of payment.
(e) For
purposes of paragraphs (a) and (b), participation in the general assistance
medical care program applies only to pharmacy providers.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective June 1, 2010, only if the commissioner of human services
determines, on May 15, 2010, that: (1) 80
percent of general assistance medical care enrollees are not enrolled in a
coordinated care delivery system established under Minnesota Statutes, section
256D.031; or (2) the coordinated care delivery system does not provide access
to care in all geographic areas of the state.
If the commissioner does not make this determination, this section is
effective 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in this article to
Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056,
subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later."
Page 37,
delete lines 1 to 3 and insert:
"EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective June 1,
2010, only if the commissioner of human services determines, on May 15, 2010,
that: (1) 80 percent of general assistance
medical care enrollees are not enrolled in a coordinated care delivery system
established under Minnesota Statutes, section 256D.031; or (2) the coordinated
care delivery system does not provide access to care in all geographic areas of
the state. If the commissioner does not
make this determination, this section is effective 30 days after federal
approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes, sections
256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011,
whichever is later."
Page 45,
line 23, delete "May" and insert "December"
Page 54,
after line 33, insert:
"Sec. 53. Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, section
12, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Payment
rates and contract modification; April 1, 2010, to May December
31, 2010. (a) For the period April
1, 2010, to May December 31, 2010, general assistance medical
care shall be paid on a fee-for-service basis.
Fee-for-service payment rates for services other than outpatient
prescription drugs shall be set at 37 27 percent of the payment
rate in effect on March 31, 2010.
(b)
Outpatient prescription drugs covered under section 256D.03, subdivision 3,
provided on or after April 1, 2010, to May December 31,
2010, shall be paid on a fee-for-service basis according to section 256B.0625,
subdivisions 13 to 13g.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective June 1, 2010, only if the commissioner of human services
determines, on May 15, 2010, that: (1)
80 percent of general assistance medical care enrollees are not enrolled in a
coordinated care delivery system established under Minnesota Statutes, section
256D.031; or (2) the coordinated care delivery system does not provide access
to care in all geographic areas of the state.
If the commissioner does not make this determination, this section is
effective 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in this article to
Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056,
subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later."
Page 61,
line 4, strike the existing language and delete the new language and insert
"effective January 1, 2011."
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11274
Page 63, delete section 64,
and insert:
"Sec. 64. REPEALER.
(a) Laws 2010, chapter 200,
article 1, section 12, subdivisions 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, are repealed effective
June 1, 2010, only if the commissioner of human services determines, on May 15,
2010, that: (1) 80 percent of general
assistance medical care enrollees are not enrolled in a coordinated care
delivery system established under Minnesota Statutes, section 256D.031; or (2)
the coordinated care delivery system does not provide access to care in all
geographic areas of the state. If the
commissioner does not make this determination, this paragraph is effective 30
days after federal approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota
Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or
January 1, 2011, whichever is later.
(b) Laws 2010, chapter 200,
article 1, sections 12, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; 18; and 19, are
repealed 30 days after federal approval of the amendments in this article to
Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15, and 256B.056,
subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later.
(c) Minnesota Statutes 2008,
section 256D.03, subdivisions 3a, 3b, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and Minnesota Statutes
2009 Supplement, section 256D.03, subdivision 3, are repealed 30 days after
federal approval of the amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes,
sections 256B.055, subdivision 15 and 256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1,
2011, whichever is later.
(d) Upon federal approval of
the amendments to Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.055, subdivision 15 and
256B.056, subdivision 4, or January 1, 2011, whichever is later, all remaining
unspent appropriations for the program established by Laws 2010, chapter 200
are transferred to the health care access fund."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Juhnke, Falk, Thissen,
Rukavina, Morrow, Koenen, Ward, Persell, Obermueller, Lenczewski and Johnson
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 63, after line 3,
insert:
"Sec. 64. SALARY
REDUCTION; BENEFITS.
(a) The salaries of the
commissioner of human services, the assistant commissioner for chemical and
mental health services, and all managerial employees of state-operated services
who are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement must be reduced by 20
percent until all full-time state-operated services employees who
are subject to a collective bargaining agreement who have been subject to
a 20 percent reduction in hours since May 1, 2009, have been offered the
opportunity to return to full-time employment.
The Department of Human Services and affected employee groups or unions
shall certify when all affected employees have been offered the opportunity to
return to full-time employment.
(b) Cost savings resulting
from the reduction in salaries for the commissioner, assistant commissioner,
and managerial employees shall be expended to restore benefits and wages for
the affected employee groups or unions who have been adversely affected by the
reduction in hours and loss of benefits."
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11275
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Speaker pro tempore Sertich called Thissen
to the Chair.
Drazkowski
moved to amend the Juhnke et al amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the
second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1,
line 6, delete "who are not subject to a collective bargaining
agreement"
Page 1,
lines 7 to 8, delete "who are subject to a collective bargaining
agreement"
Page 1,
line 10, delete "and affected employee groups or unions"
Page 1,
line 15, delete "employee groups or unions" and insert "employees"
The motion did not prevail and the amendment
to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Juhnke et al
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 115 yeas and 18 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Eastlund
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11276
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Dean
Demmer
Drazkowski
Emmer
Gunther
Hackbarth
Lanning
Norton
Peppin
Scott
Shimanski
Torkelson
Zellers
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Fritz moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 19, after line 13,
insert:
"Sec. 6. [256B.012]
SALINE ABORTION FUNDING BAN.
Subdivision 1. Funding
restriction. None of the
funds appropriated under this chapter or chapter 256L, nor in any trust fund to
which funds are appropriated under this chapter or chapter 256L, shall be
expended for any saline abortion nor for health benefits coverage that includes
coverage of saline abortion.
"Saline amniocentesis abortion" means a procedure whereby a
saline solution is inserted into the amniotic sac for the purpose of killing
the unborn child and artificially inducing labor.
Subd. 2. Severability. If any one or more provisions,
subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words of this section
or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is found to be
unconstitutional, the same is hereby declared to be severable and the balance
of this section shall remain effective notwithstanding such
unconstitutionality. The legislature
hereby declares that it would have passed this section, and each provision,
subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, irrespective
of the fact that any one or more provision, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause, phrase, or word be declared unconstitutional.
Subd. 3. Supreme
Court jurisdiction. The
Minnesota Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over an action challenging
the constitutionality of this section and shall expedite the resolution of the
action."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Fritz amendment and the roll was
called. There were 66 yeas and 66 nays
as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11277
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Falk
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Hosch, Brod,
Fritz, Scott, Peppin, Dean, Davids, Sanders, Juhnke and Abeler moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 25,
after line 31, insert:
"Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.0625,
is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 16a. Provider
reimbursement. Provider
reimbursement for abortion services under this section or chapter 256L must not
exceed $300 per abortion."
Page 63,
after line 17, insert:
"Sec. 65. APPROPRIATION.
(a) Any fiscal
savings resulting from the cap on abortion services in section 15 are
appropriated to the Department of Human Services for fiscal year 2011 for the
purposes of the Mothers First program.
(b) Any
fiscal savings resulting from the cap on abortion services in section 15 are
appropriated to the Department of Human Services for children and economic
assistance grants for fiscal years 2012 and 2013."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11278
Hortman,
Simon, Huntley and Ruud moved to amend the Hosch et al amendment to
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line
6, delete everything after "256L" and insert "is
reduced by the amount of the reduction under section 256B.76, subdivision 1,
paragraph (d)."
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment to
the amendment was adopted.
Brod moved
to amend the Hosch et al amendment, as amended, to
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 4 of the Hortman et al amendment
to the Hosch et al amendment, after "(d)" insert "in
2011 and $300 thereafter"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Brod
amendment to the Hosch et al amendment, as amended, and the roll was called. There were 62 yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Olin
Pelowski
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Otremba
Paymar
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment
to the amendment, as amended, was not adopted.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11279
The question recurred on the Hosch et al
amendment, as amended, and the roll was called.
There were 97 yeas and 35 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Holberg
Hortman
Hosch
Jackson
Juhnke
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lillie
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Bigham
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Greiling
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Laine
Liebling
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Paymar
Reinert
Simon
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Winkler
Spk.
Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment, as
amended, was adopted.
Dean offered an amendment to
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Solberg raised a point of order pursuant
to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect
on Expenditure and Revenue Bills that the Dean amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Thissen ruled the point of
order well taken and the Dean amendment out of order.
Speaker pro tempore Thissen called Sertich
to the Chair.
Westrom
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 20,
line 18, delete everything after "effective" and insert "January
1, 2014."
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11280
Page 20,
delete line 19
Page 21,
line 6, delete everything after "effective" and insert "January
1, 2014."
Page 21,
delete line 7
Page 63,
after line 3, insert:
"Sec. 64. INSTRUCTION
TO REVISOR.
The revisor
of statutes, when engrossing this amendment, shall make all necessary changes to
section effective dates and repealers of provisions related to general
assistance medical care, to conform with the January 1, 2014, effective date
specified in this amendment for the expansion of medical assistance to include
adults without children."
Page 66,
after line 34, insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256.9657,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Nursing
home license surcharge. (a)
Effective July 1, 1993, each non-state-operated nursing home licensed under
chapter 144A shall pay to the commissioner an annual surcharge according to the
schedule in subdivision 4. The surcharge
shall be calculated as $620 per licensed bed.
If the number of licensed beds is reduced, the surcharge shall be based
on the number of remaining licensed beds the second month following the receipt
of timely notice by the commissioner of human services that beds have been
delicensed. The nursing home must notify
the commissioner of health in writing when beds are delicensed. The commissioner of health must notify the
commissioner of human services within ten working days after receiving written
notification. If the notification is
received by the commissioner of human services by the 15th of the month, the
invoice for the second following month must be reduced to recognize the
delicensing of beds. Beds on layaway
status continue to be subject to the surcharge.
The commissioner of human services must acknowledge a medical care
surcharge appeal within 30 days of receipt of the written appeal from the
provider.
(b)
Effective July 1, 1994, the surcharge in paragraph (a) shall be increased to
$625.
(c)
Effective August 15, 2002, the surcharge under paragraph (b) shall be increased
to $990.
(d)
Effective July 15, 2003, the surcharge under paragraph (c) shall be increased
to $2,815.
(e) The
commissioner may reduce, and may subsequently restore, the surcharge under
paragraph (d) based on the commissioner's determination of a permissible
surcharge.
(f) Between
April 1, 2002, and August 15, 2004, a facility governed by this subdivision may
elect to assume full participation in the medical assistance program by
agreeing to comply with all of the requirements of the medical assistance
program, including the rate equalization law in section 256B.48, subdivision 1,
paragraph (a), and all other requirements established in law or rule, and to
begin intake of new medical assistance recipients. Rates will be determined under Minnesota
Rules, parts 9549.0010 to 9549.0080.
Notwithstanding section 256B.431, subdivision 27, paragraph (i), rate
calculations will be subject to limits as prescribed in rule and law. Other than the adjustments in sections
256B.431, subdivisions 30 and 32; 256B.437, subdivision 3, paragraph (b),
Minnesota Rules, part 9549.0057, and any other applicable legislation enacted
prior to the finalization of rates, facilities assuming full participation in
medical assistance under this paragraph are not eligible for any rate
adjustments until the July 1 following their settle-up period.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11281
(g) Effective July 1, 2010,
the commissioner shall adjust the surcharge calculation under this subdivision
by multiplying the per bed surcharge amount by the average occupancy for the
nursing home for the most recent month for which occupancy information is
available."
Page 193, delete section 17
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Westrom amendment and the roll
was called. There were 49 yeas and 83
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Davids, Demmer, Cornish,
Brod, Torkelson, Gunther, Urdahl, Lanning and Anderson, P., moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 10 of the
Horenstein amendment, adopted earlier today, delete "1.5" and
insert "3.25"
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11282
Page 80,
line 18, delete "110" and insert "100"
Page 151,
after line 2, insert:
"Transfer. The commissioner of management and
budget shall transfer from the health care access fund to the general fund the
amounts necessary to implement the increase in nursing facility payment rates
under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.441, subdivision 60."
Page 160,
delete lines 23 to 29, and insert:
"Statewide Health Improvement Program. The funding for the statewide health
improvement program, established under Minnesota Statutes, section 145.986, is
canceled.
Family Planning Grants. The funding
for family planning grants, established under Minnesota Statutes, section
145.925, is canceled."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Correct the
subdivision and section totals and the appropriations by fund accordingly
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Davids et al
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 47 yeas and 84 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Fritz
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Olin
Pelowski
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11283
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Otremba
Paymar
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Thissen
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 75,
after line 6, insert:
"Sec. 9. Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 8, section 81,
is amended to read:
Sec. 81. ESTABLISHING
A SINGLE SET OF STANDARDS.
(a) The
commissioner of human services shall consult with disability service providers,
advocates, counties, and consumer families to develop a single set of standards,
to be referred to as "quality outcome standards," governing
services for people with disabilities receiving services under the home and
community-based waiver services program to replace all or portions of existing
laws and rules including, but not limited to, data practices, licensure of
facilities and providers, background studies, reporting of maltreatment of
minors, reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults, and the psychotropic
medication checklist. The standards
must:
(1) enable
optimum consumer choice;
(2) be
consumer driven;
(3) link
services to individual needs and life goals;
(4) be
based on quality assurance and individual outcomes;
(5) utilize
the people closest to the recipient, who may include family, friends, and
health and service providers, in conjunction with the recipient's risk
management plan to assist the recipient or the recipient's guardian in making
decisions that meet the recipient's needs in a cost-effective manner and assure
the recipient's health and safety;
(6) utilize
person-centered planning; and
(7)
maximize federal financial participation.
(b) The commissioner
may consult with existing stakeholder groups convened under the commissioner's
authority, including the home and community-based expert services panel
established by the commissioner in 2008, to meet all or some of the
requirements of this section.
(c) The
commissioner shall provide the reports and plans required by this section to
the legislative committees and budget divisions with jurisdiction over health
and human services policy and finance by January 15, 2012."
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11284
Page 78,
after line 7, insert:
"Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256D.44, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Special
needs. In addition to the state
standards of assistance established in subdivisions 1 to 4, payments are
allowed for the following special needs of recipients of Minnesota supplemental
aid who are not residents of a nursing home, a regional treatment center, or a
group residential housing facility.
(a) The
county agency shall pay a monthly allowance for medically prescribed diets if
the cost of those additional dietary needs cannot be met through some other
maintenance benefit. The need for
special diets or dietary items must be prescribed by a licensed physician. Costs for special diets shall be determined
as percentages of the allotment for a one-person household under the thrifty
food plan as defined by the United States Department of Agriculture. The types of diets and the percentages of the
thrifty food plan that are covered are as follows:
(1) high
protein diet, at least 80 grams daily, 25 percent of thrifty food plan;
(2)
controlled protein diet, 40 to 60 grams and requires special products, 100
percent of thrifty food plan;
(3)
controlled protein diet, less than 40 grams and requires special products, 125
percent of thrifty food plan;
(4) low
cholesterol diet, 25 percent of thrifty food plan;
(5) high
residue diet, 20 percent of thrifty food plan;
(6) pregnancy
and lactation diet, 35 percent of thrifty food plan;
(7)
gluten-free diet, 25 percent of thrifty food plan;
(8)
lactose-free diet, 25 percent of thrifty food plan;
(9)
antidumping diet, 15 percent of thrifty food plan;
(10)
hypoglycemic diet, 15 percent of thrifty food plan; or
(11)
ketogenic diet, 25 percent of thrifty food plan.
(b) Payment
for nonrecurring special needs must be allowed for necessary home repairs or
necessary repairs or replacement of household furniture and appliances using
the payment standard of the AFDC program in effect on July 16, 1996, for these
expenses, as long as other funding sources are not available.
(c) A fee
for guardian or conservator service is allowed at a reasonable rate negotiated
by the county or approved by the court.
This rate shall not exceed five percent of the assistance unit's gross
monthly income up to a maximum of $100 per month. If the guardian or conservator is a member of
the county agency staff, no fee is allowed.
(d) The
county agency shall continue to pay a monthly allowance of $68 for restaurant
meals for a person who was receiving a restaurant meal allowance on June 1,
1990, and who eats two or more meals in a restaurant daily. The allowance must continue until the person
has not received Minnesota supplemental aid for one full calendar month or
until the person's living arrangement changes and the person no longer meets
the criteria for the restaurant meal allowance, whichever occurs first.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11285
(e) A fee of
ten percent of the recipient's gross income or $25, whichever is less, is
allowed for representative payee services provided by an agency that meets the
requirements under SSI regulations to charge a fee for representative payee
services. This special need is available
to all recipients of Minnesota supplemental aid regardless of their living
arrangement.
(f)(1)
Notwithstanding the language in this subdivision, an amount equal to the
maximum allotment authorized by the federal Food Stamp Program for a single
individual which is in effect on the first day of July of each year will be
added to the standards of assistance established in subdivisions 1 to 4 for
adults under the age of 65 who qualify as shelter needy and are: (i) relocating from an institution, or an
adult mental health residential treatment program under section 256B.0622; (ii)
eligible for the self-directed supports option as defined under section
256B.0657, subdivision 2; or (iii) home and community-based waiver recipients living
in their own home or rented or leased apartment which is not owned, operated,
or controlled by a provider of service not related by blood or marriage.
(2)
Notwithstanding subdivision 3, paragraph (c), an individual eligible for the
shelter needy benefit under this paragraph is considered a household of
one. An eligible individual who receives
this benefit prior to age 65 may continue to receive the benefit after the age
of 65.
(3)
"Shelter needy" means that the assistance unit incurs monthly shelter
costs that exceed 40 percent of the assistance unit's gross income before the
application of this special needs standard.
"Gross income" for the purposes of this section is the
applicant's or recipient's income as defined in section 256D.35, subdivision
10, or the standard specified in subdivision 3, paragraph (a) or (b), whichever
is greater. A recipient of a federal or
state housing subsidy, that limits shelter costs to a percentage of gross
income, shall not be considered shelter needy for purposes of this paragraph.
(g)
Notwithstanding this subdivision, to access housing and services as provided in
paragraph (f), the recipient may choose housing that may or may not be owned,
operated, or controlled by the recipient's service provider if the housing
is located in a multifamily building of six or more units. In a multiunit building of six or more units,
the maximum number of units that may be used by recipients of this program
shall be 50 percent of the units in a building.
The department shall develop an exception process to the 50 percent
maximum. This paragraph expires on
June 30, 2011 2012."
Page 92,
after line 30, insert:
"Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
245A.11, subdivision 7b, is amended to read:
Subd. 7b. Adult
foster care data privacy and security. (a)
An adult foster care license holder who creates, collects, records, maintains,
stores, or discloses any individually identifiable recipient data, whether in
an electronic or any other format, must comply with the privacy and security
provisions of applicable privacy laws and regulations, including:
(1) the
federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA),
Public Law 104-1; and the HIPAA Privacy Rule, Code of Federal Regulations,
title 45, part 160, and subparts A and E of part 164; and
(2) the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act as codified in chapter 13.
(b) For
purposes of licensure, the license holder shall be monitored for compliance
with the following data privacy and security provisions:
(1) the
license holder must control access to data on foster care recipients according
to the definitions of public and private data on individuals under section
13.02; classification of the data on individuals as private under section
13.46, subdivision 2; and control over the collection, storage, use, access,
protection, and contracting related to data according to section 13.05, in
which the license holder is assigned the duties of a government entity;
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11286
(2) the
license holder must provide each foster care recipient with a notice that meets
the requirements under section 13.04, in which the license holder is assigned
the duties of the government entity, and that meets the requirements of Code of
Federal Regulations, title 45, part 164.52.
The notice shall describe the purpose for collection of the data, and to
whom and why it may be disclosed pursuant to law. The notice must inform the recipient that the
license holder uses electronic monitoring and, if applicable, that recording
technology is used;
(3) the
license holder must not install monitoring cameras in bathrooms;
(4)
electronic monitoring cameras must not be concealed from the foster care
recipients; and
(5) electronic
video and audio recordings of foster care recipients shall not be stored by the
license holder for more than five days unless the recording is pertinent to
an investigation of a reported incident of abuse or neglect under section
626.556 or 626.557, or if requested by a recipient or the recipient's legal
representative for a specific reported incident of abuse or neglect.
(c) The
commissioner shall develop, and make available to license holders and county
licensing workers, a checklist of the data privacy provisions to be monitored
for purposes of licensure."
Page 98,
after line 36, insert:
"Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 326B.43,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Agreement
with municipality. The commissioner
may enter into an agreement with a municipality, in which the municipality
agrees to perform plan and specification reviews required to be performed by
the commissioner under Minnesota Rules, part 4715.3130, if:
(a) the
municipality has adopted:
(1) the
plumbing code;
(2) an
ordinance that requires plumbing plans and specifications to be submitted to,
reviewed, and approved by the municipality, except as provided in paragraph
(n);
(3) an
ordinance that authorizes the municipality to perform inspections required by
the plumbing code; and
(4) an
ordinance that authorizes the municipality to enforce the plumbing code in its
entirety, except as provided in paragraph (p);
(b) the
municipality agrees to review plumbing plans and specifications for all
construction for which the plumbing code requires the review of plumbing plans
and specifications, except as provided in paragraph (n);
(c) the
municipality agrees that, when it reviews plumbing plans and specifications
under paragraph (b), the review will:
(1) reflect
the degree to which the plans and specifications affect the public health and
conform to the provisions of the plumbing code;
(2) ensure
that there is no physical connection between water supply systems that are safe
for domestic use and those that are unsafe for domestic use; and
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11287
(3) ensure that there is no
apparatus through which unsafe water may be discharged or drawn into a safe
water supply system;
(d) the municipality agrees
to perform all inspections required by the plumbing code in connection with
projects for which the municipality reviews plumbing plans and specifications
under paragraph (b);
(e) the commissioner
determines that the individuals who will conduct the inspections and the
plumbing plan and specification reviews for the municipality do not have any
conflict of interest in conducting the inspections and the plan and specification
reviews;
(f) individuals who will
conduct the plumbing plan and specification reviews for the municipality
are:
(1) licensed master
plumbers;
(2) licensed professional
engineers; or
(3) individuals who are
working under the supervision of a licensed professional engineer or licensed
master plumber and who are licensed master or journeyman plumbers or hold a
postsecondary degree in engineering;
(g) individuals who will
conduct the plumbing plan and specification reviews for the municipality have
passed a competency assessment required by the commissioner to assess the
individual's competency at reviewing plumbing plans and specifications;
(h) individuals who will
conduct the plumbing inspections for the municipality are licensed master or
journeyman plumbers, or inspectors meeting the competency requirements
established in rules adopted under section 326B.135;
(i) the municipality agrees
to enforce in its entirety the plumbing code on all projects, except as
provided in paragraph (p);
(j) the municipality agrees
to keep official records of all documents received, including plans,
specifications, surveys, and plot plans, and of all plan reviews, permits and
certificates issued, reports of inspections, and notices issued in connection with
plumbing inspections and the review of plumbing plans and specifications;
(k) the municipality agrees
to maintain the records described in paragraph (j) in the official records of
the municipality for the period required for the retention of public records
under section 138.17, and shall make these records readily available for review
at the request of the commissioner;
(l) the municipality and the
commissioner agree that if at any time during the agreement the municipality
does not have in effect the plumbing code or any of ordinances described in
paragraph (a), or if the commissioner determines that the municipality is not
properly administering and enforcing the plumbing code or is otherwise not
complying with the agreement:
(1) the commissioner may,
effective 14 days after the municipality's receipt of written notice, terminate
the agreement;
(2) the municipality may
challenge the termination in a contested case before the commissioner pursuant
to the Administrative Procedure Act; and
(3) while any challenge is
pending under clause (2), the commissioner shall perform plan and specification
reviews within the municipality under Minnesota Rules, part 4715.3130;
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11288
(m) the municipality and the
commissioner agree that the municipality may terminate the agreement with or
without cause on 90 days' written notice to the commissioner;
(n) the municipality and the
commissioner agree that the municipality shall forward to the state for review
all plumbing plans and specifications for the following types of projects
within the municipality:
(1) hospitals, nursing
homes, supervised living facilities licensed for eight or more individuals,
and similar health-care-related facilities regulated by the Minnesota
Department of Health;
(2) buildings owned by the
federal or state government; and
(3) projects of a special
nature for which department review is requested by either the municipality or
the state;
(o) where the municipality
forwards to the state for review plumbing plans and specifications, as provided
in paragraph (n), the municipality shall not collect any fee for plan review,
and the commissioner shall collect all applicable fees for plan review; and
(p) no municipality shall
revoke, suspend, or place restrictions on any plumbing license issued by the
state."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Loon moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 90, after line 22,
insert:
"Sec. 7. [62V.01]
CITATION AND PURPOSE.
This chapter may be cited as
the "Interstate Health Insurance Competition Act."
Sec. 8. [62V.02]
DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1. Application. The definitions in this section apply to this
chapter.
Subd. 2. Commissioner. "Commissioner" means the
commissioner of commerce.
Subd. 3. Covered
person. "Covered
person" means an individual, whether a policyholder, subscriber, enrollee,
or member of a health plan who is entitled to health care services provided,
arranged for, paid for, or reimbursed pursuant to a health plan.
Subd. 4. Domestic
health insurer. "Domestic
health insurer" means an insurer licensed to sell, offer, or provide
health plans in Minnesota.
Subd. 5. Hazardous
financial condition. "Hazardous
financial condition" means that, based on its present or reasonably
anticipated financial condition, an out-of-state health insurer is unlikely to
be able to meet obligations to policyholders with respect to known claims or to
any other obligations in the normal course of business.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11289
Subd. 6. Health
care provider or provider. "Health
care provider" or "provider" means any hospital, physician, or
other person authorized by statute, licensed, or certified to furnish health
care services.
Subd. 7. Health
care services. "Health
care services" means the furnishing of services to any individual for the
purpose of preventing, alleviating, curing, or healing human illness, injury,
or physical disability.
Subd. 8. Health
plan. "Health plan"
means an arrangement for the delivery of health care, on an individual basis,
in which an insurer undertakes to provide, arrange for, pay for, or reimburse
any of the costs of health care services for a covered person that is in
accordance with the laws of any state.
Health plan does not include short-term health coverage, accident only,
limited or specified disease, long-term care or individual conversion policies
or contracts, or policies or contracts designed for issuance to persons
eligible for coverage under title XVIII of the federal Social Security Act,
known as Medicare, or any other similar coverage under state or federal
governmental plans.
Subd. 9. Insurer. "Insurer" means any entity
that is authorized to sell, offer, or provide a health plan, including an
entity providing a plan of health insurance, health benefits, or health
services, an accident and sickness insurance company, a health maintenance
organization, a corporation offering a health plan, a fraternal benefit
society, a community integrated service network, or any other entity that
provides health plans subject to state insurance regulation, or a health carrier
described in section 62A.011, subdivision 2.
Subd. 10. Out-of-state
health plan. "Out-of-state
health plan" means a health plan that was filed for use in any other
state.
Subd. 11. Resident. "Resident" means an
individual whose primary residence is in Minnesota and who is present in
Minnesota for at least six months of the calendar year.
Sec. 9. [62V.03]
OUT-OF-STATE HEALTH PLANS TO MINNESOTA RESIDENTS.
Subdivision
1. Eligibility. (a)
Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, a health insurer may sell,
offer, or issue an out-of-state health plan to residents in Minnesota, if the
following requirements are met:
(1) the
out-of-state health plan must be in compliance with all applicable Minnesota
laws that apply to the type of health plan offered;
(2) the
out-of-state health plan must not be issued, nor any application, rider, or
endorsement be used in connection with the plan, until the form has received
prior approval in Minnesota;
(3) the offering
insurer must have a certificate of authority to do business in Minnesota
pursuant to section 60A.07; and
(4) the
out-of-state health plan shall participate, on a nondiscriminatory basis, in
the Minnesota Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association created under
chapter 61B.
(b) The
provisions of section 62A.02, subdivision 2, shall not apply to plans issued
under this section.
Subd. 2. Minnesota
laws applicable. An
out-of-state health plan sold, offered, or provided by a health insurer in Minnesota
in accordance with this chapter is subject to laws applicable to the sale,
offering, or provision of accident and sickness insurance or health plans
including, but not limited to, requirements imposed by chapters 62A, 62E, and
62Q.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11290
Subd. 3. Nature
of out-of-state health insurer. The
out-of-state health insurer may be a for-profit or nonprofit company.
Sec. 10. [62V.04]
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY TO OFFER OUT-OF-STATE HEALTH PLANS.
Subdivision
1. Issuance of certificate. A
health insurer may apply for a certificate that authorizes the health insurer
to offer out-of-state health insurance plans in Minnesota, using a form
prescribed by the commissioner. Upon
application, the commissioner shall issue a certificate to the health insurer
unless the commissioner determines that the out-of-state health insurer:
(1) will not
provide a health plan in compliance with this chapter;
(2) is in a
hazardous financial condition, as determined by an examination by the
commissioner conducted in accordance with the Financial Analysis Handbook of
the National Association of Insurance Commissioners; or
(3) has not adopted
procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable laws governing the
confidentiality of its records with respect to providers and covered persons.
Subd. 2. Validity. A certificate of authority issued pursuant
to this section is valid for three years from the date of issuance by the
commissioner.
Subd. 3. Rulemaking
authority. The commissioner
shall adopt rules that include:
(1)
procedures for an out-of-state health insurer to renew a certificate of
authority, consistent with this chapter; and
(2) a
certificate of authority application and renewal fees, the amount of which must
be no greater than is reasonably necessary to enable the commissioner of
commerce to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
Subd. 4. Applicability
of certain statutory requirements. A
health insurer offering health plans pursuant to this chapter shall comply
with:
(1)
protections for covered persons from unfair trade practices applicable to accident
and sickness insurance or health plans pursuant to chapter 72A;
(2) the
capital and surplus requirements for licensure specified in chapter 60A, as
determined applicable to out-of-state health insurers by the commissioner;
(3)
applicable requirements of this chapter and sections 297I.05, subdivision 12,
and 62E.11, pertaining to taxes and assessments imposed on health insurers
selling individual health insurance policies in Minnesota; and
(4)
applicable requirements of chapter 60A regarding the obtaining of authority to
transact business in Minnesota.
Sec. 11. [62V.06]
REVOCATION OF CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY; MARKETING MATERIALS.
Subdivision
1. Revocation. The
commissioner may deny, revoke, or suspend, after notice and opportunity to be
heard, a certificate of authority issued to a health insurer pursuant to this
chapter for a violation of this chapter, including any finding by the
commissioner that a health insurer is no longer in compliance with any of the
conditions for issuance of a certificate of authority set forth in section
60A.07, or the administrative rules adopted pursuant to this chapter. The commissioner shall provide for an
appropriate and timely right of appeal for the out-of-state health insurer
whose certificate is denied, revoked, or suspended.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11291
Subd. 2. Fair
marketing standards. The commissioner
shall establish fair marketing standards for marketing materials used by
out-of-state health insurers to market health plans to residents in Minnesota,
which standards must be consistent with those applicable to health plans
offered by a domestic health insurer pursuant to chapter 72A.
Subd. 3. Nondiscrimination. The procedures and standards
established under subdivision 2 must be applied on a nondiscriminatory basis so
as not to place greater responsibilities on out-of-state health insurers than
the responsibilities placed on domestic health insurers doing business in
Minnesota.
Sec. 12. [62V.07]
RULES.
The
commissioner shall adopt rules to effectuate the purposes of this chapter. The rules must not:
(1)
directly or indirectly require an insurer offering out-of-state health plans
to, directly or indirectly, modify coverage or benefit requirements or restrict
underwriting requirements or premium ratings in any way that conflicts with the
insurer's domiciliary state's laws or regulations, except as necessary to
comply with Minnesota law;
(2) provide
for regulatory requirements that are more stringent than those applicable to
carriers providing Minnesota health plans; or
(3) require
any out-of-state health plan issued by the health insurer to be countersigned
by an insurance agent or broker residing in Minnesota."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Loon
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 94 yeas and 39 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lillie
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Murdock
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11292
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Dill
Greiling
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Loeffler
Mariani
Masin
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Paymar
Persell
Rukavina
Sertich
Slawik
Slocum
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Emmer offered an amendment to H. F. No. 2614,
the second engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Huntley raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Emmer amendment was not in order.
Speaker pro tempore Sertich ruled the point of order well taken and the
Emmer amendment out of order.
Emmer appealed the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The vote
was taken on the question "Shall the decision of Speaker pro tempore
Sertich stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was called. There were 80 yeas and 52 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Doty
Falk
Faust
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kelly
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Benson
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11293
Eken
Emmer
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kath
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Rosenthal
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that
the decision of Speaker pro tempore Sertich should stand.
Gunther
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 122,
line 21, after the comma, insert "one representative of the residential
construction industry,"
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Holberg
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 118,
after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 144.05, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. Firearms
data. Notwithstanding any law
to the contrary, the commissioner of health is prohibited from collecting data
on individuals regarding lawful firearm ownership in the state or data related
to an individual's right to carry a weapon under section 624.714."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Scott moved
to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 129, after
line 14, insert:
"Sec. 7. INSURANCE
AGENTS AND FEDERAL HEALTH REFORM.
No
insurance agent or an employee of the agent shall suffer a job loss, reduction
in profit, or loss of business as a result of state implementation of the
provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law
No. 111-148), and the health care reform provisions in the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law No. 111-152)."
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11294
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Sanders moved to amend the Scott amendment
to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 1, line 4, delete ",
reduction"
Page 1, line 5, delete "in profit,"
The motion prevailed and the amendment to
the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Scott
amendment, as amended, and the roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Davids and Sterner
were excused from voting on the Scott amendment, as amended, to
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended.
There were 44 yeas and 86 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment, as amended, was not adopted.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11295
Dill was excused between the hours of 6:55 p.m. and 7:40 p.m.
Dean moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 194, after line 12,
insert:
"ARTICLE 12
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 1. [62V.01]
HEALTH PLAN REQUIREMENTS.
In order to keep Minnesotans
healthy and provide the best quality of health care, the Minnesota Health
Plan must:
(1) ensure all Minnesotans
receive quality health care, regardless of their income;
(2) not restrict, delay, or
deny care or reduce the quality of care to hold down costs, but instead reduce
costs through prevention, efficiency, and reduction of bureaucracy;
(3) cover all necessary
care, including all coverage currently required by law, complete mental health
services, chemical dependency treatment, prescription drugs, medical equipment
and supplies, dental care, long-term care, and home care services;
(4) allow patients to choose
their own providers;
(5) be funded through
premiums based on ability to pay and other revenue sources;
(6) focus on preventive care
and early intervention to improve the health of all Minnesota residents and
reduce costs from untreated illnesses and diseases;
(7) ensure an adequate
number of qualified health care professionals and facilities to guarantee
availability of, and timely access to quality care throughout the state;
(8) continue Minnesota's
leadership in medical education, training, research, and technology; and
(9) provide adequate and
timely payments to providers.
Sec. 2. [62V.02]
MINNESOTA HEALTH PLAN GENERAL PROVISIONS.
Subdivision 1. Short
title. This chapter may be
cited as the "Minnesota Health Act."
Subd. 2. Purpose. The Minnesota Health Plan shall
provide all medically necessary health care services for all Minnesota
residents in a manner that meets the requirements in section 62V.01.
Subd. 3. Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following
terms have the meanings provided:
(a) "Board" means
the Minnesota Health Board.
(b) "Plan" means
the Minnesota Health Plan.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11296
(c) "Fund" means
the Minnesota Health Fund.
(d) "Medically
necessary" means a health service that is consistent with the recipient's
diagnosis or condition, is recognized as the prevailing standard or current
practice by the provider's peer group, and is rendered to:
(1) treat an injury,
illness, infection, or pain;
(2) treat a condition that
could result in physical or mental disability;
(3) care for a mother and
child through a maternity period;
(4) achieve a level of
physical or mental function consistent with prevailing community standards for
the diagnosis or condition; or
(5) provide a preventive
health service.
(e) "Institutional
provider" means an inpatient hospital, nursing facility, rehabilitation
facility, and other health care facilities that provide overnight care.
(f) "Noninstitutional
provider" means group practices, clinics, outpatient surgical centers,
imaging centers, other health facilities that do not provide overnight care,
and individual providers.
Subd. 4. Ethics
and conflict of interest. (a)
All provisions of section 43A.38 apply to employees and the executive officer
of the Minnesota Health Plan, the members and directors of the Minnesota Health
Board, the regional health boards, the director of the Office of Health Quality
and Planning, the director of the Minnesota Health Fund, and the
ombudsman. Failure to comply with
section 43A.38 shall be grounds for disciplinary action including termination
of employment or removal from the board.
(b) In order to avoid the
appearance of political bias or impropriety, the Minnesota Health Plan
executive officer shall not:
(1) engage in leadership of,
or employment by, a political party or a political organization;
(2) publicly endorse a
political candidate;
(3) contribute to any
political candidates or political parties and political organizations; or
(4) attempt to avoid
compliance with this subdivision by making contributions through a spouse or
other family member.
(c) In order to avoid a
conflict of interest, individuals specified in paragraph (a) shall not be
currently employed by a medical provider or a pharmaceutical, medical
insurance, or medical supply company.
This paragraph does not apply to the five provider members of the board.
Subd. 5. Data
practice. Notwithstanding
chapter 13, other state agencies shall cooperate with data sharing and provide
all requested information to the board or board designee, the Ombudsman for
Patient Advocacy, the director of the Office of Health Quality and Planning,
and the Inspector General.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 14.03,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Rulemaking
procedures. (a) The definition of a
rule in section 14.02, subdivision 4, does not include:
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11297
(1) rules
concerning only the internal management of the agency or other agencies that do
not directly affect the rights of or procedures available to the public;
(2) an
application deadline on a form; and the remainder of a form and instructions
for use of the form to the extent that they do not impose substantive
requirements other than requirements contained in statute or rule;
(3) the
curriculum adopted by an agency to implement a statute or rule permitting or mandating
minimum educational requirements for persons regulated by an agency, provided
the topic areas to be covered by the minimum educational requirements are
specified in statute or rule;
(4)
procedures for sharing data among government agencies, provided these
procedures are consistent with chapter 13 and other law governing data
practices.
(b) The
definition of a rule in section 14.02, subdivision 4, does not include:
(1) rules
of the commissioner of corrections relating to the release, placement, term,
and supervision of inmates serving a supervised release or conditional release
term, the internal management of institutions under the commissioner's control,
and rules adopted under section 609.105 governing the inmates of those
institutions;
(2) rules
relating to weight limitations on the use of highways when the substance of the
rules is indicated to the public by means of signs;
(3)
opinions of the attorney general;
(4) the
data element dictionary and the annual data acquisition calendar of the
Department of Education to the extent provided by section 125B.07;
(5) the
occupational safety and health standards provided in section 182.655;
(6) revenue
notices and tax information bulletins of the commissioner of revenue;
(7) uniform
conveyancing forms adopted by the commissioner of commerce under section
507.09;
(8) standards adopted by the Electronic Real Estate Recording Commission
established under section 507.0945; or
(9) the
interpretive guidelines developed by the commissioner of human services to the
extent provided in chapter 245A.; or
(10) any
schedules or provisions for payment under section 62V.05.
ARTICLE 13
ELIGIBILITY
Section
1. [62V.03]
ELIGIBILITY.
Subdivision
1. Residency. All
Minnesota residents are eligible for the Minnesota Health Plan. The board shall establish standards to
prevent people from moving to the state for the purpose of obtaining medical
care.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11298
Subd. 2. Enrollment;
identification. The Minnesota
Health Board shall establish a procedure to enroll residents and provide each
with identification that may be used by health care providers to confirm
eligibility for services. The
application for enrollment shall be no more than two pages.
Subd. 3. Residents
temporarily out of state. (a)
The Minnesota Health Plan shall provide health care coverage to Minnesota residents
who are temporarily out of the state who intend to return and reside in
Minnesota.
(b) Coverage
for emergency care obtained out of state shall be at prevailing local
rates. Coverage for nonemergency care
obtained out of state shall be according to rates and conditions established by
the board. The board may require that a
resident be transported back to Minnesota when prolonged treatment of an
emergency condition is necessary and when that transport will not adversely
affect a patient's care or condition.
Subd. 4. Visitors. Nonresidents visiting Minnesota shall
be billed for all services received under the Minnesota Health Plan. The board may enter into intergovernmental
arrangements or contracts with other states and countries to provide reciprocal
coverage for temporary visitors.
Subd. 5. Nonresident
employed in Minnesota. The
board may extend eligibility to nonresidents employed in Minnesota using a
sliding premium scale.
Subd. 6. Retiree
benefits. (a) All persons who
are eligible for retiree medical benefits under an employer-employee contract
shall remain eligible for those benefits provided the contractually mandated
payments for those benefits are made to the Minnesota Health Fund, which shall
assume financial responsibility for care provided under the terms of the
contract along with additional health benefits covered by the Minnesota Health
Plan. Retirees who elect to reside
outside of Minnesota shall be eligible for benefits under the terms and
conditions of the retiree's employer-employee contract.
(b) The
board may establish financial arrangements with states and foreign countries in
order to facilitate meeting the terms of the contracts described in paragraph
(a). Payments for care provided by
non-Minnesota providers to Minnesota retirees shall be reimbursed at rates
established by the Minnesota Health Board.
Subd. 7. Presumptive
eligibility. (a) An
individual is presumed eligible for coverage under the Minnesota Health Plan if
the individual arrives at a health facility unconscious, comatose, or otherwise
unable, because of the individual's physical or mental condition, to document
eligibility or to act on the individual's own behalf. If the patient is a minor, the patient is presumed
eligible, and the health facility shall provide care as if the patient were
eligible.
(b) Any
individual is presumed eligible when brought to a health facility according to
any provision of section 253B.05.
(c) Any
individual involuntarily committed to an acute psychiatric facility or to a
hospital with psychiatric beds according to any provision of section 253B.05,
providing for involuntary commitment, is presumed eligible.
(d) All
health facilities subject to state and federal provisions governing emergency
medical treatment must comply with those provisions.
ARTICLE 14
BENEFITS
Section
1. [62V.04]
BENEFITS.
Subdivision
1. General provisions. Any
eligible individual may choose to receive services under the Minnesota Health Plan
from any licensed participating provider.
A provider may not refuse to care for a patient on the basis that is
specified in the definition of unfair employment practice in section 363A.08.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11299
Subd. 2. Covered
benefits. Covered benefits in
this chapter include all medically necessary care subject to the limitations
specified in subdivision 4. Covered benefits
include:
(1)
inpatient and outpatient health facility services;
(2)
inpatient and outpatient professional health care provider services by licensed
health care professionals;
(3)
diagnostic imaging, laboratory services, and other diagnostic and evaluative
services;
(4) medical
equipment, appliances, and assistive technology, including prosthetics,
eyeglasses, and hearing aids and their repair;
(5)
inpatient and outpatient rehabilitative care;
(6)
emergency transportation;
(7)
necessary transportation for health care services for disabled and indigent
persons;
(8)
language interpretation and translation for health care services, including
sign language and Braille or other services needed for individuals with
communication disabilities;
(9) child
and adult immunizations and preventive care;
(10) health
education;
(11)
hospice care;
(12) home
health care;
(13) all
prescription drugs on the Minnesota Health Plan formulary and additional drugs
as specified by the board;
(14) all prescription
drugs as determined by the board if the Minnesota Health Plan does not have a
prescription drug formulary;
(15) mental
health services;
(16) dental
care;
(17)
podiatric care;
(18)
chiropractic care;
(19)
acupuncture;
(20) blood
and blood products;
(21)
emergency care services;
(22) vision
care;
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11300
(23) adult
day care;
(24) case
management and coordination to ensure services necessary to enable a person to
remain safely in the least restrictive setting;
(25)
substance abuse treatment;
(26) care in
a skilled nursing facility; and
(27)
dialysis.
Subd. 3. Benefit
expansion. The Minnesota
Health Board may expand benefits beyond the minimum benefits described in this
section when expansion meets the intent of this chapter and when there are
sufficient funds to cover the expansion.
Subd. 4. Exclusions. The following health care services
shall be excluded from coverage by the Minnesota Health Plan:
(1) health
care services determined to have no medical benefit by the board;
(2) surgery,
dermatology, orthodontia, prescription drugs, and other procedures primarily
for cosmetic purposes, unless required to correct a congenital defect, restore
or correct a part of the body that has been altered as a result of injury,
disease, or surgery, or determined to be medically necessary by a qualified,
licensed health care provider in the Minnesota Health Plan;
(3) private
rooms in inpatient health facilities where appropriate nonprivate rooms are
available, unless determined to be medically necessary by a qualified, licensed
provider in the Minnesota Health Plan; and
(4) services
of a health care provider or facility that is not licensed or accredited by the
state, except for approved services provided to a Minnesota resident who is
temporarily out of the state.
Subd. 5. Prohibition. The Minnesota Health Plan shall not
pay for prescription drugs from pharmaceutical companies that directly market
the drugs to consumers.
Sec. 2. [62V.041]
CARE COORDINATION.
(a) All patients
shall have a primary care provider that may include registered nurses,
physician assistants, or other providers who shall coordinate the care a
patient receives. A specialist may serve
as the care coordinator if the patient and the specialist agree to this
arrangement, and if the specialist agrees to coordinate the patient's care.
(b)
Referrals are not required for a patient to see a health care specialist. If a patient sees a specialist and does not
have a care coordinator, the patient must choose a care coordinator. The Minnesota Health Plan may assist with
choosing a primary care provider to coordinate care.
(c) The
board may establish or ensure the establishment of a computerized referral
registry to facilitate referrals.
ARTICLE 15
FUNDING
Section
1. [62V.19]
MINNESOTA HEALTH FUND.
Subdivision
1. General provisions. (a)
The board shall establish a Minnesota Health Fund to implement the Minnesota
Health Plan and to receive premiums and other sources of revenue. The fund shall be administered by a director
appointed by the Minnesota Health Board.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11301
(b) All
money collected, received, and transferred according to this chapter shall be
deposited in the Minnesota Health Fund for the purpose of financing the
Minnesota Health Plan.
(c) Money
deposited in the Minnesota Health Fund shall be used exclusively to implement
the purpose of this chapter.
(d) All
claims for health care services rendered shall be made to the Minnesota Health
Fund.
(e) All
payments made for health care services shall be disbursed from the Minnesota
Health Fund.
(f) Premiums
and other revenues collected each year must be sufficient to cover that year's
projected costs.
Subd. 2. Accounts. The Minnesota Health Fund shall have
operating, capital, and reserve accounts to provide for all state expenditures
for health care.
Subd. 3. Budgets
within the operating account. The
operating account in the Minnesota Health Fund shall be comprised of the
accounts and budgets specified in paragraphs (a) to (e).
(a) Medical services budget and account. The medical services budget and account
must be used to provide for all medical services and benefits covered under the
Minnesota Health Plan.
(b) Prevention budget and account. The prevention budget and account must
be used solely to establish and maintain primary community prevention programs,
including preventive screening tests.
(c) Program administration, evaluation,
planning, and assessment budget and account. The program administration,
evaluation, planning, and assessment budget and account must be used to monitor
and improve the plan's effectiveness and operations. The board may establish grant programs
including demonstration projects for this purpose.
(d) Training, development, and continuing
education budget and account. The
training, development, and continuing education budget and account must be used
to support the training, development, and continuing education of health care
providers and the health care workforce needed to meet the health care needs of
the population.
(e) Medical research budget and account. The medical research budget and
account must be used to support research and innovation as determined by the
Minnesota Health Board, and recommended by the Office of Health Quality and
Planning and the Ombudsman for Patient Advocacy.
Subd. 4. Capital
account. The capital account
must be used solely to pay for capital expenditures for institutional providers
and all capital expenditures requiring approval from the Minnesota Health Board
as specified in section 62V.05, subdivision 4.
Subd. 5. Reserve
account. (a) The Minnesota
Health Plan must at all times hold in reserve an amount estimated in the
aggregate to provide for the payment of all losses and claims for which the
Minnesota Health Plan may be liable and to provide for the expense of
adjustment or settlement of losses and claims.
(b) Money
currently held in reserve by state, city, and county health programs must be
transferred to the Minnesota Health Fund when the Minnesota Health Plan
replaces those programs.
(c) The
board shall have provisions in place to insure the Minnesota Health Plan
against unforeseen expenditures or revenue shortfalls not covered by the
reserve account and the board may borrow money to cover temporary shortfalls.
Journal of the House - 96th Day -
Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11302
Sec. 2. [62V.20] REVENUE SOURCES.
Subdivision 1. Minnesota
Health Plan premium. (a) The Minnesota Health Board
shall:
(1)
determine the aggregate costs of providing health care according to this
chapter;
(2) develop
an equitable and affordable premium structure, including unearned income as part
of the premium determination for Minnesota residents, that is progressive and
based on the ability to pay and a business health tax for businesses that
together will generate adequate revenue for the Minnesota Health Fund;
(3) develop
a premium structure for individuals that has an appropriate range based on an
individual's ability to pay and includes a cap on the maximum premium any
individual pays;
(4) in
consultation with the Department of Revenue, develop an efficient means of
collecting premiums and the business health tax; and
(5)
coordinate with existing, ongoing funding sources from federal and state
programs.
(b) On or
before January 15, 2012, the board shall submit to the governor and the
legislature a report on the premium and business health tax structure
established to finance the Minnesota Health Plan.
Subd. 2. Funds
from outside sources. Institutional
providers operating under Minnesota Health Plan operating budgets may raise and
expend funds from sources other than the Minnesota Health Plan including
private or foundation donors.
Contributions to providers in excess of $500,000 must be reported to the
board.
Subd. 3. Governmental
payments. The executive
officer and, if required under federal law, the commissioners of health and human
services shall seek all necessary waivers, exemptions, agreements, or
legislation so that all current federal payments to the state for health care
are paid directly to the Minnesota Health Plan, which shall then assume
responsibility for all benefits and services previously paid for by the federal
government with those funds. In
obtaining the waivers, exemptions, agreements, or legislation, the executive
officer and, if required, commissioners shall seek from the federal government
a contribution for health care services in Minnesota that reflects: medical inflation, the state gross domestic
product, the size and age of the population, the number of residents living
below the poverty level, and the number of Medicare and VA eligible
individuals, and does not decrease in relation to the federal contribution to
other states as a result of the waivers, exemptions, agreements, or savings
from implementation of the Minnesota Health Plan.
Subd. 4. Federal
preemption. (a) The board
shall pursue all reasonable means to secure a repeal or a waiver of any
provision of federal law that preempts any provision of this chapter. The commissioners of health and human
services shall provide all necessary assistance.
(b) In the event
that a repeal or a waiver of law or regulations cannot be secured, the board
shall adopt rules, or seek conforming state legislation, consistent with
federal law, in an effort to best fulfill the purposes of this chapter.
(c) The
Minnesota Health Plan's responsibility for providing care shall be secondary to
existing federal government programs for health care services to the extent
that funding for these programs is not transferred to the Minnesota Health Fund
or that the transfer is delayed beyond the date on which initial benefits are
provided under the Minnesota Health Plan.
Subd. 5. No-cost
sharing. No deductible,
co-payment, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing shall be imposed with respect to
covered benefits.
Journal of the House - 96th Day -
Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11303
Sec. 3. [62V.21] SUBROGATION.
Subdivision 1. Collateral
source. (a) When
other payers for health care have been terminated, health care costs shall be
collected from collateral sources whenever medical services provided to an
individual are, or may be, covered services under a policy of insurance, or
other collateral source available to that individual, or when the individual
has a right of action for compensation permitted under law.
(b) As used
in this section, collateral source includes:
(1) health
insurance policies and the medical components of automobile, homeowners, and
other forms of insurance;
(2) medical
components of worker's compensation;
(3) pension
plans;
(4)
employer plans;
(5)
employee benefit contracts;
(6)
government benefit programs;
(7) a
judgment for damages for personal injury; and
(8) any third
party who is or may be liable to an individual for health care services or
costs.
(c)
Collateral source does not include:
(1) a
contract or plan that is subject to federal preemption; or
(2) any
governmental unit, agency, or service, to the extent that subrogation is
prohibited by law. An entity described
in paragraph (b) is not excluded from the obligations imposed by this section
by virtue of a contract or relationship with a government unit, agency, or service.
(d) The
board shall negotiate waivers, seek federal legislation, or make other
arrangements to incorporate collateral sources into the Minnesota Health Plan.
Subd. 2. Collateral
source; negotiation. When an
individual who receives health care services under the Minnesota Health Plan is
entitled to coverage, reimbursement, indemnity, or other compensation from a
collateral source, the individual shall notify the health care provider and
provide information identifying the collateral source, the nature and extent of
coverage or entitlement, and other relevant information. The health care provider shall forward this
information to the board. The individual
entitled to coverage, reimbursement, indemnity, or other compensation from a
collateral source shall provide additional information as requested by the
board.
Subd. 3. Reimbursement. (a) The Minnesota Health Plan shall
seek reimbursement from the collateral source for services provided to the
individual and may institute appropriate action, including legal proceedings,
to recover the reimbursement. Upon
demand, the collateral source shall pay to the Minnesota Health Fund the sums
it would have paid or expended on behalf of the individual for the health care
services provided by the Minnesota Health Plan.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11304
(b) In
addition to any other right to recovery provided in this section, the board
shall have the same right to recover the reasonable value of benefits from a
collateral source as provided to the commissioner of human services under
section 256B.37.
(c) If a
collateral source is exempt from subrogation or the obligation to reimburse the
Minnesota Health Plan, the board may require that an individual who is entitled
to medical services from the source first seek those services from that source
before seeking those services from the Minnesota Health Plan.
(d) To the
extent permitted by federal law, the board shall have the same right of subrogation
over contractual retiree health benefits provided by employers as other
contracts, allowing the Minnesota Health Plan to recover the cost of services
provided to individuals covered by the retiree benefits, unless arrangements
are made to transfer the revenues of the benefits directly to the Minnesota
Health Plan.
Subd. 4. Defaults,
underpayments, and late payments. (a)
Default, underpayment, or late payment of any tax or other obligation imposed
by this chapter shall result in the remedies and penalties provided by law,
except as provided in this section.
(b)
Eligibility for benefits under section 62V.04 shall not be impaired by any
default, underpayment, or late payment of any premium or other obligation
imposed by this chapter.
ARTICLE 16
PAYMENTS
Section
1. [62V.05]
PROVIDER PAYMENTS.
Subdivision
1. General provisions. (a)
All health care providers licensed to practice in Minnesota may participate in
the Minnesota Health Plan.
(b) A
participating health care provider shall comply with all federal laws and
regulations governing referral fees and fee splitting including, but not
limited to, United States Code, title 42, sections 1320a-7b and 1395nn, whether
reimbursed by federal funds or not.
(c) A fee
schedule or financial incentive may not adversely affect the care a patient
receives or the care a health provider recommends.
Subd. 2. Payments
to noninstitutional providers. (a)
The Minnesota Health Board shall establish and oversee a uniform fee schedule
for noninstitutional providers.
(b) The
board shall pay noninstitutional providers based on rates negotiated with
providers. Rates may factor in
geographic differences to address provider shortages.
(c) The
board shall examine the need for and methods of paying providers for care
coordination for all patients especially those with chronic illness and complex
medical needs.
(d)
Providers may request reimbursement of ancillary health care or social services
that were previously funded by money now received and disbursed by the Minnesota
Health Fund.
(e)
Providers who accept any payment from the Minnesota Health Plan for a covered
service shall not bill the patient for the covered service.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11305
(f) Providers shall be paid
within 30 business days for claims filed following procedures established by
the board.
Subd. 3. Payments
to institutional providers. (a)
The board shall establish annual budgets for institutional providers. These budgets shall consist of an operating
and a capital budget. An institution's
annual budget shall be negotiated to cover its anticipated services for the
next year based on past performance and projected changes in prices and service
levels.
(b) Providers who accept any
payment from the Minnesota Health Plan for a covered service shall not bill the
patient for the covered service.
Subd. 4. Capital
management plan. (a) The
board shall periodically develop a capital investment plan that will serve as a
guide in determining the annual budgets of institutional providers and in
deciding whether to approve applications for approval of capital expenditures
by noninstitutional providers.
(b) Providers who propose to
make capital purchases in excess of $500,000 must obtain board approval. The board may alter the threshold expenditure
level that triggers the requirement to submit information on capital
expenditures. Institutional providers
shall propose these expenditures and submit the required information as part of
the annual budget they submit to the board.
Noninstitutional providers shall submit applications for approval of
these expenditures to the board.
ARTICLE 17
GOVERNANCE
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 14.03,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Contested
case procedures. The contested case
procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act provided in sections 14.57 to
14.69 do not apply to (a) proceedings under chapter 414, except as specified in
that chapter, (b) the commissioner of corrections, (c) the unemployment
insurance program and the Social Security disability determination program in
the Department of Employment and Economic Development, (d) the commissioner of
mediation services, (e) the Workers' Compensation Division in the Department of
Labor and Industry, (f) the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals, or
(g) the Board of Pardons, or (h) the Minnesota Health Plan.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
15A.0815, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Group
I salary limits. The salaries for positions
in this subdivision may not exceed 95 percent of the salary of the
governor:
Commissioner of
administration;
Commissioner of agriculture;
Commissioner of education;
Commissioner of commerce;
Commissioner of corrections;
Commissioner of health;
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11306
Executive
officer of the Minnesota Health Plan;
Executive
director, Minnesota Office of Higher Education;
Commissioner,
Housing Finance Agency;
Commissioner
of human rights;
Commissioner
of human services;
Commissioner
of labor and industry;
Commissioner
of management and budget;
Commissioner
of natural resources;
Director of
Office of Strategic and Long-Range Planning;
Commissioner,
Pollution Control Agency;
Executive
director, Public Employees Retirement Association;
Commissioner
of public safety;
Commissioner
of revenue;
Executive
director, State Retirement System;
Executive
director, Teachers Retirement Association;
Commissioner
of employment and economic development;
Commissioner
of transportation; and
Commissioner
of veterans affairs.
Sec. 3. [62V.06]
MINNESOTA HEALTH BOARD.
Subdivision
1. Establishment. The
Minnesota Health Board is established to promote the delivery of high quality,
coordinated health care services that enhance health; prevent illness, disease,
and disability; slow the progression of chronic diseases; and improve personal
health management. The board shall
administer the Minnesota Health Plan.
The board shall oversee:
(1) the
Office of Health Quality and Planning under section 62V.09; and
(2) the
Minnesota Health Fund under section 62V.19.
Subd. 2. Board
composition. The board shall
consist of 15 members, including a representative selected by each of the five
rural regional health planning boards under section 62V.08 and three
representatives selected by the metropolitan regional health planning board
under section 62V.08. These members
shall select the following:
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11307
(1) one
consumer member and one employer member appointed by the board members; and
(2) five
providers appointed by the board members that include one primary care
physician, one registered nurse, one mental health provider, one dentist, and
one facility director.
Subd. 3. Term
and compensation; selection of chair.
Board members shall serve four years. Board members shall set the board's
compensation not to exceed the compensation of Public Utilities Commission
members. The board shall select the
chair from its membership.
Subd. 4. General
duties. The board shall:
(1) ensure
that all of the requirements of section 62V.01 are met;
(2) hire an
executive officer for the Minnesota Health Plan to administer all aspects of
the plan as directed by the board;
(3) hire a director
for the Office of Health Quality and Planning;
(4) hire a
director of the Minnesota Health Fund;
(5) provide
technical assistance to the regional boards established under section 62V.08;
(6) conduct
necessary investigations and inquiries and require the submission of
information, documents, and records the board considers necessary to carry out
the purposes of this chapter;
(7)
establish a process for the board to receive the concerns, opinions, ideas, and
recommendations of the public regarding all aspects of the Minnesota Health
Plan and the means of addressing those concerns;
(8) conduct
other activities the board considers necessary to carry out the purposes of
this chapter;
(9)
collaborate with the agencies that license health facilities to ensure that
facility performance is monitored and that deficient practices are recognized
and corrected in a timely manner;
(10) adopt
rules as necessary to carry out the duties assigned under this chapter;
(11)
establish conflict of interest standards prohibiting providers from any
financial benefit from their medical decisions outside of board reimbursement;
(12)
establish conflict of interest standards related to pharmaceutical marketing to
providers; and
(13) create
a program to provide support and retraining for workers dislocated by the
creation of the Minnesota Health Plan.
The board
shall ensure that workers who may be displaced because of the administrative
efficiencies of the Minnesota Health Plan receive financial help and assistance
in retraining and job placement. Because
there is currently a serious shortage of providers in many health care
professions, from medical technologists to registered nurses, and because many
potentially displaced health administrative workers already have training in
some medical field, the dislocated worker support program should emphasize
retraining and placement into health care related positions. As Minnesota residents, all displaced workers
shall be covered under the Minnesota Health Plan.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11308
Subd. 5. Conflict
of interest committee. (a) The
board shall establish a conflict of interest committee to develop standards of
practice for individuals or entities doing business with the Minnesota Health
Plan, including but not limited to, board members, providers, and medical
suppliers. The committee shall establish
guidelines on the duty to disclose the existence of a financial interest and
all material facts related to that financial interest to the committee.
(b) In
considering the transaction or arrangement, if the committee determines a conflict
of interest exists, the committee shall investigate alternatives to the
proposed transaction or arrangement.
After exercising due diligence, the committee shall determine whether
the Minnesota Health Plan can obtain with reasonable efforts a more advantageous
transaction or arrangement with a person or entity that would not give rise to
a conflict of interest. If this is not
reasonably possible under the circumstances, the committee shall make a
recommendation to the board on whether the transaction or arrangement is in the
best interest to the operation of the Minnesota Health Plan for the benefit of
the plan, and whether the transaction is fair and reasonable. The committee shall provide the board with
all material information used to make the recommendation. After reviewing all relevant information, the
board shall decide whether to approve the transaction or arrangement.
Subd. 6. Financial
duties. The board shall:
(1)
establish and collect premiums and the business health tax according to section
62V.20, subdivision 1;
(2) approve
statewide and regional budgets that include budgets for the accounts in section
62V.19;
(3)
establish payment rates for providers which may reflect regional differences to
address provider shortages;
(4) monitor
compliance with all budgets and payment rates and take action to achieve
compliance to the extent authorized by law;
(5) pay
claims for medical products or services as negotiated, and may issue requests
for proposals for a contract to process claims submitted by individual
nonprofit providers;
(6)
negotiate fees, prices, and budgets;
(7)
administer the Minnesota Health Fund created under section 62V.19;
(8)
annually determine the appropriate level for the Minnesota Health Plan reserve
account and implement policies needed to establish the appropriate reserve;
(9)
implement fraud prevention measures necessary to protect the operation of the
Minnesota Health Plan; and
(10) work
to ensure appropriate cost control by:
(i) instituting
aggressive public health measures, early intervention and preventive care, and
promotion of personal health improvement;
(ii) making
changes in the delivery of health care services and administration that improve
efficiency and care quality;
(iii)
minimizing administrative costs;
(iv)
ensuring that the delivery system does not contain excess capacity; and
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11309
(v) negotiating the lowest
possible prices for prescription drugs, medical equipment, and medical
services.
If the board determines that
there will be a revenue shortfall despite the cost control measures mentioned
in clause (10), the board shall implement measures to correct the shortfall,
including an increase in premiums. The
board shall report to the legislature on the causes of the shortfall, reasons
for the failure of cost controls, and measures taken to correct the shortfall.
Subd. 7. Minnesota
Health Board management duties. The
board shall:
(1) develop and implement
enrollment procedures for providers and persons eligible for the program and
disseminate, to providers of services and to the public, information concerning
the program and the persons eligible to receive benefits under the program;
(2) implement eligibility
standards for the Minnesota Health Plan, including standards to prevent people
moving to the state for the purpose of obtaining medical care;
(3) make recommendations,
when needed, to the legislature about changes in the geographic boundaries of
the health planning regions;
(4) establish an electronic
claims and payments system for the Minnesota Health Plan;
(5) monitor the operation of
the Minnesota Health Plan through consumer surveys and regular data collection
and evaluation activities, including evaluations of the adequacy and quality of
services furnished under the program, the need for changes in the benefit
package, the cost of each type of service, and the effectiveness of cost
control measures under the program;
(6) establish a health care
Web site that provides information to the public about the Minnesota Health
Plan including access information on providers and facilities, and that informs
the public about state and regional health planning board meetings and activities;
(7) collaborate with public
health agencies, schools, and community clinics;
(8) ensure that Minnesota
Health Plan policies and providers, including public health providers, support
all Minnesota residents in achieving and maintaining maximum physical and
mental health functionality; and
(9) annually report to the
legislature on the performance of the Minnesota Health Plan, fiscal condition
and need for payment adjustments, any needed changes in geographic boundaries
of the health planning regions, recommendations for statutory changes, receipt
of revenue from all sources, whether current year goals and priorities are met,
future goals and priorities, major new technology or prescription drugs, and
other circumstances that may affect the cost of health care.
Subd. 8. Policy
duties. The board shall:
(1) develop and implement
cost control and quality assurance procedures, including a professional peer
review system;
(2) ensure strong public
health services including education and community prevention and clinical
services;
(3) ensure a continuum of
coordinated high-quality primary to tertiary care to all Minnesota residents;
and
(4) implement policies to
ensure that all Minnesotans receive culturally and linguistically competent
care.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11310
Sec. 4. [62V.07]
HEALTH PLANNING REGIONS.
A metropolitan health
planning region consisting of the seven-county metropolitan area is
established. By October 1, 2011, the
commissioner of health shall designate five rural health planning regions from
the greater Minnesota area composed of geographically contiguous counties
grouped on the basis of the following considerations:
(1) patterns of utilization
of health care services;
(2) health care resources,
including workforce resources;
(3) health needs of the
population, including public health needs;
(4) geography;
(5) population and
demographic characteristics; and
(6) other considerations as
appropriate.
The commissioner of health
shall designate the health planning regions.
Sec. 5. [62V.08]
REGIONAL HEALTH PLANNING BOARD.
Subdivision 1. Regional
planning board composition. (a)
Initially, each regional board shall consist of one county commissioner per
county selected by the county board and two county commissioners per county
selected by the county board in the seven-county metropolitan area. A county commissioner may designate a
representative to act as a member of the board in the member's absence. Each board shall select the chair from among
its membership.
(b) Board members shall
serve for four-year terms and may receive per diems for meetings as provided in
section 15.059, subdivision 3.
Subd. 2. Regional
health board duties. Regional
health planning boards shall:
(1) recommend health
standards, goals, priorities, and guidelines for the region;
(2) prepare an operating and
capital budget for the region to recommend to the Minnesota Health Board;
(3) collaborate with local
public health care agencies to educate consumers and providers on public health
programs, goals, and the means of reaching those goals;
(4) hire a regional health
planning director;
(5) collaborate with public
health care agencies to implement public health and wellness initiatives; and
(6) ensure that all parts of
the region have access to a 24-hour nurse hotline and 24-hour urgent care
clinics.
Sec. 6. [62V.09]
OFFICE OF HEALTH QUALITY AND PLANNING.
Subdivision 1. Establishment. The Minnesota Health Board shall
establish an Office of Health Quality and Planning to assess the quality,
access, and funding adequacy of the Minnesota Health Plan.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11311
Subd. 2. General
duties. (a) The Office of
Health Quality and Planning shall make annual recommendations to the board on
the overall direction on subjects including:
(1) the
overall effectiveness of the Minnesota Health Plan in addressing public health
and wellness;
(2) access
to care;
(3) quality
improvement;
(4)
efficiency of administration;
(5)
adequacy of budget and funding;
(6)
appropriateness of payments for providers;
(7) capital
expenditure needs;
(8)
long-term care;
(9) mental
health and substance abuse services;
(10)
staffing levels and working conditions in health care facilities;
(11) identification
of number and mix of health care facilities and providers required to best meet
the needs of the Minnesota Health Plan;
(12) care
for chronically ill patients;
(13)
research needs; and
(14)
integration of disease management programs into care delivery.
(b) Analyze
shortages in health care workforce required to meet the needs of the population
and develop plans to meet those needs in collaboration with regional planners
and educational institutions.
(c) Assist
in coordination of the Minnesota Health Plan and public health programs.
Subd. 3. Assessment
and evaluation of benefits. The
Office of Health Quality and Planning shall:
(1)
consider benefit additions to the Minnesota Health Plan and evaluate them based
on evidence of clinical efficacy;
(2)
establish a process and criteria by which providers may request authorization
to provide services and treatments that are not included in the Minnesota
Health Plan benefit set, including experimental treatments;
(3) evaluate
proposals to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the health care
delivery system, and make recommendations to the board based on the
cost-effectiveness of the proposals; and
(4) identify
complementary and alternative modalities that have been shown to be safe and
effective.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11312
Sec. 7. [62V.10]
OMBUDSMAN OFFICE FOR PATIENT ADVOCACY.
Subdivision 1. Creation
of office; generally. (a) The
Ombudsman Office for Patient Advocacy is created to represent the interests of
the consumers of health care. The
ombudsman shall help residents of the state secure the health care services and
benefits they are entitled to under the laws administered by the Minnesota
Health Board and advocate on behalf of and represent the interests of enrollees
in entities created by this chapter and in other forums.
(b) The ombudsman shall be a
patient advocate appointed by the governor, who serves in the unclassified
service and may be removed only for just cause.
The ombudsman must be selected without regard to political affiliation
and must be knowledgable about and have experience in health care services and
administration.
(c) The ombudsman may gather
information about decisions, acts, and other matters of the Minnesota Health
Board, health care organization, or a health care program. A person may not serve as ombudsman while
holding another public office.
(d) The budget for the
ombudsman's office shall be determined by the legislature and is independent
from the Minnesota Health Board which has no oversight or authority over the
ombudsman for patient advocacy. The
ombudsman shall establish offices to provide convenient access to
residents.
Subd. 2. Ombudsman's
duties. (a) The ombudsman for
patient advocacy shall:
(1) ensure that patient
advocacy services are available to all Minnesota residents;
(2) establish and maintain
the grievance process according to section 62V.11;
(3) receive, evaluate, and
respond to consumer complaints about the Minnesota Health Plan;
(4) establish a process to
receive recommendations from the public about ways to improve the Minnesota
Health Plan;
(5) develop educational and
informational guides according to communication services under section 15.441,
describing consumer rights and responsibilities;
(6) ensure the guides in
clause (5) are widely available to consumers and specifically available in
provider offices and health care facilities; and
(7) report annually to the
public, the board, and the legislature about the consumer perspective on the
performance of the Minnesota Health Plan, including recommendations for needed
improvements.
(b) The patient advocate, in
carrying out assigned duties, shall have unlimited access to all
nonconfidential and all nonprivileged documents in the custody and control of
the Minnesota Health Board.
Sec. 8. [62V.11]
GRIEVANCE SYSTEM.
Subdivision 1. Grievance
system established. The
ombudsman for patient advocacy shall establish a grievance system for all
complaints. The system shall provide
reasonable procedures that shall ensure adequate consideration of Minnesota
Health Plan enrollee grievances and appropriate remedies.
Subd. 2. Referral
of grievances. The ombudsman
for patient advocacy may refer any grievance that does not pertain to
compliance with this chapter to the federal Center for Medicaid or any other
appropriate local, state, and federal government entity for investigation and
resolution.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11313
Subd. 3. Submittal
by designated agents and providers. A
provider may join with, or otherwise assist, a complainant to submit the
grievance to the ombudsman without fear of retribution.
Subd. 4. Review
of documents. The ombudsman
may require additional information from health care providers or the board.
Subd. 5. Written
notice of disposition. The
ombudsman shall send a written notice of the final disposition of the
grievance, and the reasons for the decision, to the complainant, to any
provider who is assisting the complainant, and to the board, within 30 calendar
days of receipt of the request for review unless the ombudsman determines that
additional time is reasonably necessary to fully and fairly evaluate the
relevant grievance. The ombudsman's
order of corrective action shall be binding on the Minnesota Health Plan. Decisions of the ombudsman may be appealed in
district court.
Sec. 9. [62V.12]
INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR THE MINNESOTA HEALTH PLAN.
Subdivision 1. Establishment. There is within the Office of the
Attorney General an inspector general for the Minnesota Health Plan who is
appointed by the attorney general.
Subd. 2. Duties. The inspector general shall:
(1) investigate, audit, and
review the financial and business records of individuals, public and private
agencies and institutions, and private corporations that provide services or
products to the Minnesota Health Plan, the costs of which are reimbursed by the
Minnesota Health Plan;
(2) investigate allegations
of misconduct on the part of an employee or appointee of the Minnesota Health
Board and on the part of any provider of health care services that is
reimbursed by the Minnesota Health Plan, and report any findings of misconduct
to the attorney general;
(3) investigate patterns of
medical practice that may indicate fraud and abuse related to over or under
utilization or other inappropriate utilization of medical products and
services;
(4) arrange for the
collection and analysis of data needed to investigate the inappropriate
utilization of these products and services; and
(5) annually report
recommendations for improvements to the Minnesota Health Plan to the board.
Sec. 10. [62V.13]
EXAMINATION BY LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR.
The books and all operating
policies and procedures of the Minnesota Health Board shall be subject to
examination by the legislative auditor.
ARTICLE 18
IMPLEMENTATION
Sec. 1. EFFECTIVE
DATE AND TRANSITION.
Subdivision 1. Notice
and effective date. This act
is effective on July 1, 2012. The
commissioner of management and budget shall notify the chairs of the house of
representatives and senate committees with jurisdiction over health care when
the Minnesota Health Fund has sufficient revenues to fund the costs of
implementing this act.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11314
Subd. 2. Timing
to implement. The Minnesota
Health Plan must be operational within two years from the date of final
enactment of this act.
Subd. 3. Prohibition. On and after the day the Minnesota
Health Plan becomes operational, a health plan, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes, section 62Q.01, subdivision 3, may not be sold in Minnesota for
services provided by the Minnesota Health Plan.
Subd. 4. Transition. (a) The commissioners of health and
human services shall prepare an analysis of the state's capital expenditure needs
for the purpose of assisting the board in adopting the statewide capital budget
for the year following implementation.
The commissioners shall submit this analysis to the board.
(b) The
following timelines shall be implemented:
(1) the
commissioner of health shall designate the health planning regions utilizing
the criteria specified in Minnesota Statutes, section 62V.07, three months
after the date of enactment of this act;
(2) the
regional boards shall be established six months after the date of enactment of
this act; and
(3) the
Minnesota Health Board shall be established nine months on or after July 1,
2011; and
(4) the
commissioner of health, or the commissioner's designee, shall convene the first
meeting of each of the regional boards and the Minnesota Health Board within 30
days after each of the boards has been established."
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
CALL OF THE HOUSE
On the motion of Kohls and on the demand of
10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11315
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Morrow moved that further proceedings of
the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring
in the absentees. The motion prevailed
and it was so ordered.
The question recurred on the Dean
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 16 yeas and 116 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Champion
Clark
Greiling
Hausman
Hayden
Hilty
Hornstein
Johnson
Kahn
Laine
Mariani
Murphy, M.
Paymar
Rukavina
Thao
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Juhnke
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
CALL OF THE HOUSE LIFTED
Morrow moved that the call of the House be
lifted. The motion prevailed and it was
so ordered.
Torkelson; Cornish;
Dettmer; Howes; Shimanski; Nornes; Demmer; Kiffmeyer; Davids; Gottwalt; Urdahl;
Seifert; Severson; Murdock; Peppin; Gunther; Hamilton; Lanning; Kelly;
McNamara; Anderson, P., and Eastlund moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 20,
line 18, delete everything after "effective" and insert "January
1, 2014."
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11316
Page 20,
delete line 19
Page 21,
line 6, delete everything after "effective" and insert "January
1, 2014."
Page 21,
delete line 7
Page 63,
after line 3, insert:
"Sec. 64. INSTRUCTION
TO REVISOR.
The revisor of
statutes, when engrossing this amendment, shall make all necessary changes to
section effective dates and repealers of provisions related to general
assistance medical care, to conform with the January 1, 2014, effective date
specified in this amendment for the expansion of medical assistance to include
adults without children."
Page 71,
after line 9, insert:
"Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.441, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 60. Adjustment
for low-payment rate facilities. (a)
For the rate year beginning October 1, 2011, the commissioner shall adjust
operating payment rates for low-payment rate nursing facilities reimbursed
under this section or section 256B.434 and licensed under chapter 144A, in
accordance with this subdivision.
(b) The
commissioner shall determine a value for an operating payment rate with a RUGS
index of 1.00, such that the cost to increase the operating payment rate for
all nursing facilities with operating payment rates less than that value by an
amount equal to 50 percent of the difference between their operating payment
rate with a RUGS index equal to 1.00 and the value determined under this
paragraph not to exceed an increase of six percent of a facility's operating
payment rate with a RUGS index equal to 1.00, does not exceed the amount
appropriated for this purpose.
(c)
Effective September 30, 2011, the commissioner shall identify all nursing
facilities with operating payment rates with a RUGS index equal to 1.00, that
are less than the value determined in paragraph (b).
(d)
Effective September 30, 2011, the commissioner shall provide each nursing
facility identified in paragraph (c) with an increase in their operating
payment rate with a RUGS index of 1.00 that is equal to 50 percent of the
difference between their operating payment rate with a RUGS index equal to
1.00, and the value determined in paragraph (b), but not to exceed an
increase of six percent of the operating payment rate with a RUGS index
equal to 1.00.
(e) The
commissioner shall apportion the amount of the RUGS index equal to 1.00
computed in paragraph (d) between case mix and noncase mix per diems in
proportion to the amounts in effect on September 30, 2011. The commissioner shall multiply the case mix
portion by the RUGS indices and add the noncase mix portion to that product to
determine the other RUGS operating rates.
(f) The rate
adjustment provided in paragraph (d) shall be added after any nursing facility
rate adjustments provided under this section or section 256B.434."
Page 155,
after line 7, insert:
"Adjustment for Low-Rate Facilities. Of this appropriation, $37,860,000 in
fiscal year 2011 and $56,567,000 in the 2012-2013 biennium is to implement
Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.441, subdivision 60."
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11317
Page 193, delete section 17
Amend the appropriations by
the specified amounts and correct the totals and the appropriations by fund
accordingly
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Torkelson et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 57 yeas and
75 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Bly
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jackson
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Morrow
Murdock
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Holberg moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 119, after line 3,
insert:
"Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 144.293, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11318
Subd. 11. Prohibited
release by state agencies. No
state agency may provide to the federal Internal Revenue Service any
patient-specific health insurance information."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Holberg
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 110 yeas and 22 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Juhnke
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lillie
Loon
Mack
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Hausman
Hayden
Hornstein
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Lesch
Liebling
Loeffler
Mahoney
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Paymar
Thao
Thissen
Winkler
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Brod moved
to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 46,
delete section 39
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11319
The question was taken on the Brod
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 46 yeas and 86 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Seifert
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 81,
after line 24, insert:
"Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256J.39, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1b. EBT
cards; photo identification required.
Cashiers at points-of-sale shall request photo identification
when an MFIP electronic benefits transfer card is presented."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Seifert
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 91 yeas and 41 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11320
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lillie
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Murdock
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Sterner
Swails
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Spk.
Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Falk
Fritz
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Paymar
Pelowski
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Sertich
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Speaker pro tempore Sertich called Hortman
to the Chair.
Gottwalt, Brod,
Kiffmeyer, Seifert, Dean and Bunn moved to amend H. F. No. 2614,
the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 49,
after line 26, insert:
"Sec. 43. [256L.031]
HEALTH COVERAGE CONTRIBUTION PROGRAM.
Subdivision
1. Coverage contributions to enrollees. (a) Beginning January 1, 2011, or upon
federal approval, whichever is later, the commissioner shall provide each
MinnesotaCare enrollee eligible under section 256L.04, subdivision 7, with gross
family income that exceeds 133 percent of the federal poverty guidelines with a
monthly coverage contribution to purchase health coverage under a health plan
as defined in section 62A.011, subdivision 3.
(b)
Enrollees eligible under paragraph (a) shall not be charged premiums under
section 256L.15, and are exempt from the managed care enrollment requirement of
section 256L.12.
(c)
Sections 256L.03 and 256L.05, subdivision 3, do not apply to enrollees eligible
under paragraph (a). Covered services, cost-sharing,
and the effective date of coverage for enrollees eligible under paragraph (a)
shall be as provided under the terms of the health plan purchased by the
enrollee.
Subd. 2. Use
of coverage contribution. An
enrollee may use up to the monthly coverage contribution only to pay premiums
for coverage under a health plan as defined in section 62A.011, subdivision 3.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11321
Subd. 3. Determination
of coverage contribution amount. (a)
The commissioner shall determine the coverage contribution sliding scale using
the base contribution specified in paragraph (b) for the specified age
ranges. The commissioner shall use a
sliding scale for coverage contributions that provides:
(1) persons
with household incomes greater than 133 percent but not exceeding 134 percent
of the federal poverty guidelines with a coverage contribution of 150 percent
of the base contribution;
(2) persons
with household incomes at 175 percent of the federal poverty guidelines with a
coverage contribution of 100 percent of the base contribution;
(3) persons
with household incomes at 250 percent of the federal poverty guidelines with a
coverage contribution of 80 percent of the base contribution; and
(4) persons
with household incomes in evenly spaced increments between the percentages of
the federal poverty guideline specified in clauses (1) to (3) with a base
contribution that is a percentage interpolated from the coverage contribution
percentages specified in clauses (1) to (3).
Age Monthly
Per-Person Base Contribution
21-29 122.79
30-31 129.19
32-33 132.38
34-35 134.31
36-37 136.06
38-39 141.02
40-41 151.25
42-43 159.89
44-45 175.08
46-47 191.71
48-49 213.13
50-51 239.51
52-53 266.69
54-55 293.88
56-57 323.77
58-59 341.20
60+ 357.19
(b) The commissioner shall multiply the coverage contribution
amounts developed under paragraph (a) by 1.20 for enrollees who are denied
coverage under an individual health plan by a health plan company, who do not
have access to an employer-sponsored group plan, and who purchase coverage
through the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association.
Subd. 4.
Administration by
commissioner. The
commissioner shall administer the coverage contributions. The commissioner shall:
(1) calculate and process coverage contributions for
enrollees; and
(2) pay the coverage contribution amount to health
plan companies or the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association, as
applicable, for enrollee health plan coverage.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11322
Subd. 5. Assistance
to enrollees. The
commissioner of human services, in consultation with the commissioner of
commerce, shall develop an efficient and cost-effective method of referring
eligible applicants to professional insurance agent associations.
Subd. 6. MCHA. Beginning January 1, 2011, or upon
federal approval, whichever is later, MinnesotaCare enrollees who are denied
coverage under an individual health plan by a health plan company, and who do not
have access to an employer-sponsored group plan, are eligible for coverage
through a health plan offered by the Minnesota Comprehensive Health
Association. Any difference between the
revenue and covered losses to the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association
related to implementation of this act shall be paid to the Minnesota
Comprehensive Health Association from the health care access fund."
Page 63, after line 3,
insert:
"Sec. 64. REDUCTION
BY COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE.
The commissioner of revenue
must reduce the lowest income tax bracket to reflect savings in fiscal year
2012 of $48,724,000 and in fiscal year 2013 of $61,813,000."
Page 153, line 23, delete
"1,234,000" and insert "1,449,000"
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Gottwalt et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 55 yeas and
79 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Obermueller
Peppin
Rosenthal
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11323
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Speaker pro tempore Hortman called Sertich
to the Chair.
Dean moved
to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 20, after
line 19, insert:
"Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.056,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Asset
limitations for individuals and families.
To be eligible for medical assistance, a person must not individually
own more than $3,000 in assets, or if a member of a household with two family
members, husband and wife, or parent and child, the household must not own more
than $6,000 in assets, plus $200 for each additional legal dependent. In addition to these maximum amounts, an
eligible individual or family may accrue interest on these amounts, but they
must be reduced to the maximum at the time of an eligibility
redetermination. The accumulation of the
clothing and personal needs allowance according to section 256B.35 must also be
reduced to the maximum at the time of the eligibility redetermination. The value of assets that are not considered
in determining eligibility for medical assistance is the value of those assets
excluded under the supplemental security income program for aged, blind, and
disabled persons, with the following exceptions:
(1)
household goods and personal effects are not considered;
(2) capital
and operating assets of a trade or business that the local agency determines are
necessary to the person's ability to earn an income are not considered;
(3) motor
vehicles are excluded to the same extent excluded by the supplemental security
income program, except that the entire value of a motor vehicle valued at
more than $50,000 shall be treated as a nonexempt asset, regardless of the use
of the motor vehicle, to the extent allowable under federal law and regulations;
(4) assets
designated as burial expenses are excluded to the same extent excluded by the
supplemental security income program.
Burial expenses funded by annuity contracts or life insurance policies
must irrevocably designate the individual's estate as contingent beneficiary to
the extent proceeds are not used for payment of selected burial expenses; and
(5) effective
upon federal approval, for a person who no longer qualifies as an employed
person with a disability due to loss of earnings, assets allowed while eligible
for medical assistance under section 256B.057, subdivision 9, are not
considered for 12 months, beginning with the first month of ineligibility as an
employed person with a disability, to the extent that the person's total assets
remain within the allowed limits of section 256B.057, subdivision 9, paragraph
(c).
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11324
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
256B.056, subdivision 3c, is amended to read:
Subd. 3c. Asset
limitations for families and children. A
household of two or more persons must not own more than $20,000 in total net
assets, and a household of one person must not own more than $10,000 in total
net assets. In addition to these maximum
amounts, an eligible individual or family may accrue interest on these amounts,
but they must be reduced to the maximum at the time of an eligibility
redetermination. The value of assets
that are not considered in determining eligibility for medical assistance for
families and children is the value of those assets excluded under the AFDC
state plan as of July 16, 1996, as required by the Personal Responsibility and
Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), Public Law 104-193, with
the following exceptions:
(1)
household goods and personal effects are not considered;
(2) capital
and operating assets of a trade or business up to $200,000 are not considered,
except that a bank account that contains personal income or assets, or is used
to pay personal expenses, is not considered a capital or operating asset of a
trade or business;
(3) one
motor vehicle is excluded for each person of legal driving age who is employed
or seeking employment, except that the entire value of a motor vehicle
valued at more than $50,000 shall be treated as a nonexempt asset, regardless
of the use of the motor vehicle, to the extent allowable under federal law and
reguations;
(4) assets
designated as burial expenses are excluded to the same extent they are excluded
by the Supplemental Security Income program;
(5) court-ordered
settlements up to $10,000 are not considered;
(6)
individual retirement accounts and funds are not considered; and
(7) assets
owned by children are not considered.
The assets specified
in clause (2) must be disclosed to the local agency at the time of application
and at the time of an eligibility redetermination, and must be verified upon
request of the local agency."
Page 78,
line 2, reinstate the stricken colon
Page 78,
line 3, reinstate the stricken "(1)"
Page 78,
line 5, delete the period and insert a semicolon
Page 78,
line 6, reinstate the stricken "(2)" and after the stricken period,
insert "to the extent allowable under federal law and regulations, they
have a vehicle valued at less than $50,000, regardless of the use of the
vehicle."
Page 78,
after line 7, insert:
"Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256D.425,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Resource
standards. The resource standards
and restrictions for supplemental aid under this section shall be those used to
determine eligibility for disabled individuals in the supplemental security
income program, except that to the extent allowable under federal law and
regulations, vehicles must be valued at less than $50,000, regardless of the
use of the vehicle."
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11325
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Scott moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 92, after line 13,
insert:
"Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 246B.04,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Ban on
obscene material or, pornographic work, or certain drugs. The commissioner shall prohibit persons
civilly committed as sexual psychopathic personalities or sexually dangerous
persons under section 253B.185 from having or receiving material that is
obscene as defined under section 617.241, subdivision 1, material that depicts
sexual conduct as defined under section 617.241, subdivision 1, or
pornographic work as defined under section 617.246, subdivision 1, or drug
used for the treatment of impotence or erectile dysfunction while receiving
services in any secure treatment facilities operated by the Minnesota sex
offender program or any other facilities operated by the commissioner.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
246B.06, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Wages. (a) Notwithstanding section 177.24
or any other law to the contrary, the commissioner of human services has the
discretion to set the pay rate for clients participating in the vocational work
program. The commissioner has the
authority to retain up to 50 percent of any payments made to a client
participating in the vocational work program for the purpose of reducing state costs
associated with operating the Minnesota sex offender program.
(b) A client who receives
payments is prohibited from spending any of the funds received on drugs used
for the treatment of impotence or erectile dysfunction while receiving services
in any treatment facilities operated by the Minnesota sex offender program or
any other facilities operated by the commissioner."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The
question was taken on the Scott amendment and the roll was called. There were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11326
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Davids
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 36,
after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.69, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5m. Limits
on net income and administrative costs; enabling expansion of prepaid medical
assistance. (a)
Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the total monthly net income
received by a managed care plan for providing covered services under the public
programs must not exceed six percent of the total monthly revenues the managed
care plan receives from the program. For
purposes of this paragraph, "net income" means total revenues
received by the managed care plan under the program minus expenses and other
adjustments, all as required to be defined for purposes of the managed care
plan's annual Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Net Income, prepared using
the appropriate National Association of Insurance Commissioners Blank and
related instructions for health maintenance organizations, as required and
amended by Minnesota Rules, part 4685.1940.
The managed care plan shall refund any amounts of net monthly income in
excess of six percent to the commissioner, no later than 30 days after the end
of each month.
(b) For
services rendered under paragraph (a), allowable administrative costs for a
managed care plan are the per-enrollee dollar amount allowed in 2009.
(c) The
commissioner shall use 60 percent of savings in costs to the state achieved
under this subdivision to provide equal percentage increases in operating
payment rates for nursing facilities under section 256B.441 and 40 percent
savings in costs to the state achieved under this subdivision to compensate
victims of violations of the provisions of article 7, section 7, of this act. Insurance agency owners who suffer a total
loss of health insurance business shall be compensated by a payment of 1.25
times the agency owner's commissions in the preceding 12 months. No members of the legislature shall be
eligible for a payment.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11327
Page 129,
after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 7. INSURANCE
AGENTS AND FEDERAL HEALTH REFORM.
No insurance
agent or an employee of the agent shall suffer a job loss, reduction in profit,
or loss of business as a result of state implementation of the provisions in
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law No. 111-148),
and the health care reform provisions in the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law No. 111-152)."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
Liebling
moved to amend the Davids amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the
second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, delete lines 2 to 8
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to
the amendment and the roll was called.
There were 87 yeas and 47 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The motion prevailed and the amendment to
the amendment was adopted.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11328
Thissen moved to amend the
Davids amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 2614, the second
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 20, delete "60" and insert "100"
Page 1, line 22, delete everything after "256B.441"
and insert a period
Page 1, delete lines 23 to 27
The motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment, as
amended, was adopted.
The question recurred on the Davids amendment, as amended, to
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended. The motion prevailed and the amendment, as
amended, was adopted.
Seifert, Gottwalt and
Otremba moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 123, after line 1,
insert:
"Sec. 17. [145.9251]
USE OF FAMILY PLANNING GRANT FUNDS.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. For purposes of this section,
"abortion" means the use or prescription of any instrument, medicine,
drug, or any other substance or device to intentionally terminate the pregnancy
of a female known to be pregnant, with an intention other than to prevent the
death of the female, increase the probability of a live birth, preserve the
life or health of the child after live birth, or remove a dead fetus.
Subd. 2. Uses
of family planning grant funds. No
family planning grant funds received under this chapter may be:
(1) expended to directly or
indirectly subsidize abortion services or administrative expenses;
(2) paid or granted to an
organization or an affiliate of an organization that provides abortion services;
or
(3) paid or granted to an
organization that has adopted or maintains a policy in writing or through oral
public statements that abortion is considered part of a continuum of family
planning services, or both.
Subd. 3. Organizations
receiving family planning grant funds.
An organization that receives family planning grant funds:
(1) may provide nondirective
counseling relating to pregnancy but may not directly refer patients who seek
abortion services to any organization that provides abortion services,
including an independent affiliate of the organization receiving family
planning grant funds;
(2) may not display or
distribute marketing materials about abortion services to patients;
(3) may not engage in public
advocacy promoting the legality or accessibility of abortion; and
(4) must be separately
incorporated from any affiliated organization that provides abortion services."
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11329
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Seifert et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 62 yeas and
72 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
McNamara
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Falk
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
McFarlane
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Paymar
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Gottwalt, Severson,
Kiffmeyer and Mack moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 77, after line 10,
insert:
"Section 1. [62A.0412]
ABORTION COVERAGE LIMITED; HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGES.
(a) No abortion coverage may
be provided by a qualified health plan offered through a health insurance
exchange created under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act within
the state of Minnesota.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11330
(b) This
limitation shall not apply to an abortion performed when the life of the mother
is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury,
including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the
pregnancy itself, or when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Gottwalt et
al amendment and the roll was called. There
were 65 yeas and 68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Falk
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Paymar
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Brod and
Buesgens moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 123,
after line 1, insert:
"Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 145.416, is
amended to read:
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11331
145.416 LICENSING AND REGULATION OF FACILITIES.
The state
commissioner of health shall license and promulgate rules for facilities as
defined in section 145.411, subdivision 4, which are organized for purposes of
delivering abortion services which provide 100 or more abortions
annually."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Brod and
Buesgens amendment and the roll was called.
There were 64 yeas and 68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Falk
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Dean moved
to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 89,
after line 15, insert:
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11332
"Sec. 4. [62Q.521]
ABORTION COVERAGE; OPT-OUT PERMITTED.
For each health
plan that a health plan company offers in this state, the health plan company
must permit each female enrollee to choose not to have coverage for abortion
procedures. The health plan company
shall inform each female enrollee of this option at the time of initial
enrollment and at each renewal. The
health plan company must provide a premium reduction for female enrollees who
choose not to have abortion coverage, based upon the expected cost of coverage
of abortion procedures. For enrollees
under the age of 18, the option must be provided to the enrollee's parent or
guardian."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Dean
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 66 yeas and 68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Falk
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11333
Gottwalt
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 19,
after line 13, insert:
"Sec. 6. [256B.012]
SEX-SELECTION ABORTION FUNDING BAN.
Subdivision
1. Funding restriction. None
of the funds appropriated under this chapter or chapter 256L, nor in any trust
fund to which funds are appropriated under this chapter or chapter 256L, shall
be expended for any sex-selection abortion nor for health benefits coverage
that includes coverage of sex-selection abortion.
Subd. 2. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section,
"sex-selection abortion" means an abortion performed when the
provider has knowledge that the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion based
solely on the sex of the unborn child.
(b) For the
purposes of this section, "health benefits coverage" means the
package of services covered by a managed care provider or organization pursuant
to a contract or other arrangement.
Subd. 3. Severability. If any one or more provisions,
subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words of this section
or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is found to be
unconstitutional, the same is hereby declared to be severable and the balance
of this section shall remain effective notwithstanding such
unconstitutionality. The legislature
hereby declares that it would have passed this section, and each provision,
subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, irrespective
of the fact that any one or more provision, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause, phrase, or word be declared unconstitutional.
Subd. 4. Supreme
Court jurisdiction. The
Minnesota Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over an action challenging
the constitutionality of this section and shall expedite the resolution of the
action."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Gottwalt
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 79 yeas and 54 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Beard
Bly
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lillie
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mariani
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Rosenthal
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11334
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Benson
Bigham
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Loeffler
Mahoney
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Ruud
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Seifert moved to amend
H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended.
Fritz requested a division
of the Seifert amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second
engrossment, as amended.
The first portion of the
Seifert amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended,
reads as follows:
Page 81, after line 24,
insert:
"Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256J.39, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1a. EBT
cards; prohibited activities. (a)
MFIP recipients are prohibited from using MFIP monthly cash assistance payments
issued in the form of an electronic benefits transfer to purchase tobacco
products, alcoholic beverages, as defined in section 340A.101, subdivision 2,
or lottery tickets."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the first portion of the Seifert
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 105 yeas and 27 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Hilstrom
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11335
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Murdock
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Greiling
Hausman
Hayden
Hilty
Hornstein
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Lesch
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Rukavina
Sertich
Slocum
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Winkler
The motion prevailed and the first portion
of the Seifert amendment was adopted.
CALL OF THE HOUSE
On the motion of Seifert and on the demand
of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Morow moved that further proceedings of the
roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in
the absentees. The motion prevailed and
it was so ordered.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11336
The second portion of the Seifert
amendment to H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as amended,
reads as follows:
Page 81, after line 24, insert:
"Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256J.39, is amended
by adding a subdivision to read:
(b) MFIP
recipients are prohibited from using MFIP monthly cash assistance payments
issued in the form of an electronic benefits transfer at vendors located
outside of Minnesota."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the second
portion of the Seifert amendment and the roll was called. There were 85 yeas and 49 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Bigham
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lillie
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Murdock
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Torkelson
Urdahl
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Reinert
Rukavina
Sertich
Slocum
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the second portion
of the Seifert amendment was adopted.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11337
Westrom
moved to amend H. F. No. 2614, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 163,
delete lines 16 to 20
Correct the
section totals and the appropriation summary
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Westrom
amendment and the roll was called.
Morrow moved that those not voting be
excused from voting. The motion
prevailed.
There were 31 yeas and 102 nays as
follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Mack
Masin
Murdock
Obermueller
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Sterner
Westrom
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davids
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Zellers
Spk.
Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11338
H. F. No. 2614, A bill for
an act relating to state government; licensing; state health care programs; continuing
care; children and family services; health reform; Department of Health; public
health; health plans; assessing administrative penalties; modifying foreign
operating corporation taxes; requiring reports; making supplemental and
contingent appropriations and reductions for the Departments of Health and
Human Services and other health-related boards and councils; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2008, sections 62D.08, by adding a subdivision; 62J.07, subdivision 2,
by adding a subdivision; 62J.38; 62J.692, subdivision 4; 62Q.19, subdivision 1;
62Q.76, subdivision 1; 62U.05; 119B.025, subdivision 1; 119B.09, subdivision 4;
119B.11, subdivision 1; 144.05, by adding a subdivision; 144.226, subdivision
3; 144.291, subdivision 2; 144.293, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision;
144.651, subdivision 2; 144.9504, by adding a subdivision; 144A.51, subdivision
5; 144E.37; 214.40, subdivision 7; 245C.27, subdivision 2; 245C.28, subdivision
3; 246B.04, subdivision 2; 254B.01, subdivision 2; 254B.02, subdivisions 1, 5; 254B.03,
subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 254B.05, subdivision 4; 254B.06,
subdivision 2; 254B.09, subdivision 8; 256.01, by adding a subdivision;
256.9657, subdivision 3; 256B.04, subdivision 14; 256B.055, by adding a
subdivision; 256B.056, subdivisions 3, 4; 256B.057, subdivision 9; 256B.0625,
subdivisions 8, 8a, 8b, 18a, 22, 31, by adding subdivisions; 256B.0631,
subdivisions 1, 3; 256B.0644, as amended; 256B.0754, by adding a subdivision;
256B.0915, subdivision 3b; 256B.19, subdivision 1c; 256B.441, by adding a
subdivision; 256B.5012, by adding a subdivision; 256B.69, subdivisions 20, as
amended, 27, by adding subdivisions; 256B.692, subdivision 1; 256B.75; 256B.76,
subdivisions 2, 4, by adding a subdivision; 256D.03, subdivision 3b; 256D.0515;
256D.425, subdivision 2; 256I.05, by adding a subdivision; 256J.20, subdivision
3; 256J.24, subdivision 10; 256J.37, subdivision 3a; 256J.39, by adding
subdivisions; 256L.02, subdivision 3; 256L.03, subdivision 3, by adding a
subdivision; 256L.04, subdivision 7; 256L.05, by adding a subdivision; 256L.07,
subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 256L.12, subdivisions 5, 6, 9; 256L.15,
subdivision 1; 290.01, subdivision 5, by adding a subdivision; 290.17,
subdivision 4; 326B.43, subdivision 2; 626.556, subdivision 10i; 626.557,
subdivision 9d; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 62J.495,
subdivisions 1a, 3, by adding a subdivision; 157.16, subdivision 3; 245A.11,
subdivision 7b; 245C.27, subdivision 1; 246B.06, subdivision 6; 252.025,
subdivision 7; 252.27, subdivision 2a; 256.045, subdivision 3; 256.969,
subdivision 3a; 256B.056, subdivision 3c; 256B.0625, subdivisions 9, 13e;
256B.0653, subdivision 5; 256B.0911, subdivision 1a; 256B.0915, subdivision 3a;
256B.69, subdivisions 5a, 23; 256B.76, subdivision 1; 256B.766; 256D.03,
subdivision 3, as amended; 256D.44, subdivision 5; 256J.425, subdivision 3;
256L.03, subdivision 5; 256L.11, subdivision 1; 289A.08, subdivision 3; 290.01,
subdivisions 19c, 19d; 327.15, subdivision 3; Laws 2005, First Special Session
chapter 4, article 8, section 66, as amended; Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 3,
section 18; article 5, sections 17; 18; 22; 75, subdivision 1; 78, subdivision
5; article 8, sections 2; 51; 81; article 13, sections 3, subdivisions 1, as
amended, 3, as amended, 4, as amended, 8, as amended; 5, subdivision 8, as
amended; Laws 2009, chapter 173, article 1, section 17; Laws 2010, chapter 200,
article 1, sections 12, subdivisions 5, 6, 7, 8; 13, subdivision 1b; 16; 21;
article 2, section 2, subdivisions 1, 8; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapters 62A; 62D; 62E; 62J; 62Q; 144; 245; 254B; 256;
256B; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62V;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 254B.02, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 254B.09,
subdivisions 4, 5, 7; 256D.03, subdivisions 3a, 3b, 5, 6, 7, 8; 290.01,
subdivision 6b; 290.0921, subdivision 7; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement,
section 256D.03, subdivision 3; Laws 2009, chapter 79, article 7, section 26,
subdivision 3; Laws 2010, chapter 200, article 1, sections 12, subdivisions 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; 18; 19.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called.
Morrow moved that those not voting be
excused from voting. The motion
prevailed.
There were 79 yeas and 54 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Journal of the House - 96th Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top
of Page 11339
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Falk
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Paymar
Peppin
Peterson
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
Hortman moved that the remaining bills on
the Calendar for the Day be continued.
The motion prevailed.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Davids moved that his name be stricken as
an author on H. F. No. 3702.
The motion prevailed.
Eken moved that the name of Kelliher be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3795. The motion prevailed.
ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
S. F. No. 184:
Rukavina, Brynaert and McFarlane.
FISCAL
CALENDAR ANNOUNCEMENT
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Solberg announced
his intention to place S. F. Nos. 2540, 3325, 1761, 2505 and
3055; H. F. Nos. 3571 and 3660; and
S. F. No. 345 on the Fiscal Calendar for Wednesday, May 5, 2010.
Journal of the House - 96th
Day - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - Top of Page 11340
ADJOURNMENT
Hortman moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 12:00 noon, Wednesday, May 5, 2010.
The motion prevailed.
Hortman moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and Speaker pro tempore
Sertich declared the House stands adjourned until 12:00 noon, Wednesday, May 5,
2010.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz, Chief
Clerk, House of Representatives